The Riskiness of Public Sector Performance Measurement: A Review and Research Agenda

Financial Accountability and Management

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 279-302

  Cuganesan, Suresh ^a   Guthrie, James ^a   Vranic, Vedran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

performance measurement; public sector; risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979950231     PISSN: 02674424     EISSN: 14680408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/faam.12037     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Adler, P. and B. Borys (1996), ‘Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 61–90.
2. Ahrens, T. and C. Chapman (2004), ‘Accounting for Flexibility and Efficiency: A Field Study of Management Control Systems in a Restaurant Chain’, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 271–301.
3. Amirkhanyan, A.A. (2008), ‘Collaborative Performance Measurement: Examining and Explaining the Prevalence of Collaboration in State and Local Government Contracts’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 523–54.
4. Amirkhanyan, A.A. (2010), ‘Monitoring across Sectors: Examining the Effect of Nonprofit and For-Profit Contractor Ownership on Performance Monitoring in State and Local Contracts’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 70, No. 5, pp. 742–55.
5. Ammons, D.N. and W.C. Rivenbark (2008), ‘Factors Influencing the Use of Performance Data to Improve Municipal Services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benchmarking Project’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 304–18.
6. Arnaboldi, M. and T. Palermo (2011), Translating Ambiguous Reforms: Doing Better Next Time?’ Management Accounting Research, Vol. 22, pp. 6–15.
7. Barnow, B.S. and C.J. Heinrich (2010), ‘One Standard Fits All? The Pros and Cons of Performance Standard Adjustments’, Public Administration Review (Jan/Feb), pp. 60–71.
8. Bevan, G. and C. Hood (2006), ‘What's Measured is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System’, Public Administration, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 517–38.
9. Blumer, H. (1954), ‘What is Wrong with Social Theory?’ American Sociological Review, Vol. 18, pp. 3–10.
10. Bogt, H.J. ter and R.W. Scapens (2012), ‘Performance Management in Universities: Effects of the Transition to More Quantitative Measurement Systems’, European Accounting Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 451–97.
11. Bouckaert, G. and W. Balk (1991),Public Productivity Measurement: Diseases and Cures', Public Productivity & Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 229–35.
12. Bracci, E. (2009), ‘Autonomy, Responsibility and Accountability in the Italian School System’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 293–312.
13. Catasus, B. and A. Grönlund (2005), ‘More Peace For Less Money: Measurement and Accountability in the Swedish Armed Forces’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 467–84.
14. Chang, L-C. (2009), ‘The Impact of Political Interests upon the Formulation of Performance Measurements: The NHS Star Rating System’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 145–65.
15. Chenhall, R. (2003), 'Management Control Systems Design within its Organizational Context: Findings from Contingency-Based Research and Directions for the Future', Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol. 28, pp. 127–68.
16. Collier, P.M. (2006), ‘Costing Police Services: The Politicization of Accounting’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 17, pp. 57–86.
17. Conrad, L. and P.G. Uslu (2011), ‘Investigation of the Impact of "Payment by Results" on Performance Measurement and Management in NHS Trusts’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 22, pp. 46–55.
18. Courty, P. and G. Marschke (2007), ‘Making Government Accountable: Lessons from a Federal Job Training Program’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 67, No. 5, pp. 904–16.
19. Crotty, S.N., N.A. Theobald and J. Nicholson-Crotty (2006), ‘Disparate Measures: Public Managers and Performance-Measurement Strategies’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 101–13.
20. Cuganesan, S. and D. Lacey (2011), ‘Developments in Public Sector Performance Measurement: A Project on Producing Return on Investment Metrics for Law Enforcement’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.458–79.
21. de Bruijn, H. (2002), Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Strategies to Cope with the Risks of Performance Measurement’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol 15, No. 7, pp. 578–94.
22. Dubnick, M.J. and H.G. Frederickson (2010), ‘Accountable Agents: Federal Performance Measurement and Third-Party Government’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 20, Suppl. 1, pp. i143-59.
23. Eisenkopf, G. (2009), ‘Negative Weights for Performance Measures’, International Public Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 332–44.
24. Goddard, A. (2010), ‘Contemporary Public Sector Accounting Research – An International Comparison of Journal Papers’, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 42, pp. 75–87.
25. Greener, I. (2005), ‘Health Management as Strategic Behaviour: Managing Medics and Performance in the NHS’, Public Management Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 95–110.
26. Gregory, R. and Z. Lonti (2008), ‘Chasing Shadows? Performance Measurement of Policy Advice in New Zealand Government Departments’, Public Administration, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 837–56.
27. Guven-Uslu, P. and L. Conrad (2011), ‘A Longitudinal Study of Change in the English National Health Service’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 385–408.
28. Heinrich, C.J. and G. Marschke (2010), ‘Incentives and their Dynamics in Public Sector Performance Management Systems’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 183–208.
29. Helden G.J. van and D. Northcott (2010), ‘Examining the Practical Relevance of Public Sector Management Accounting Research’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 213–40.
30. Helden, G.J. van, H. Aardema, H. J. ter Bogt and T.L.C.M. Groot (2010), ‘Knowledge Creation for Practice in Public Sector Management Accounting by Consultants and Academics: Preliminary Findings and Directions for Future Research’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 83–94.
31. Ho, A.T.-K. (2006), ‘Accounting for the Value of Performance Measurement from the Perspective of Midwestern Mayors’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 217–37.
32. Ho, A.T.-K. (2011), ‘PBB in American Local Governments: It's More than a Management Tool’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 391–401.
33. Hood, C. and P. Miller (2009), ‘Public Service Risks: What is Distinctive and What is New?’ Risk and Public Services (ESRC Public Services Programme, Oxford).
34. Hou, Y., R.S. Lunsford, K.C. Sides and K.A. Jones (2011), ‘State Performance-Based Budgeting in Boom and Bust Years: An Analytical Framework and Survey of the States’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 370–88.
35. International Integrated Reporting Council (2012), ‘Integrated Reporting – Prototype of the International Framework' (available at http://www.theiirc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/23.11.12-Prototype-Final.pdf) (accessed 6 March, 2013).
36. Jackson, P. (2011), ‘Governance by Numbers: What Have We Learned Over the Past 30 Years’, Public Money and Management (January), pp.13–26.
37. Johansson, T. and S. Siverbo (2009), ‘Explaining the Utilization of Relative Performance Evaluation in Local Government: A Multi-Theoretical Study using Data from Sweden’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 197–224.
38. Kelman, S. and J.N. Friedman (2009), ‘Performance Improvement and Performance Dysfunction: An Empirical Examination of Distortionary Impacts of the Emergency Room Wait-Time Target in the English National Health Service’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 19, pp. 917–46.
39. Lacey, D., S. Cuganesan, S. Goode and K. Jacobs (2012), ‘Celebrating Adversity: Inter-organizational Dependence and Public Sector Performance Reporting in the Australian Federal Police’, Public Administration, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 393–411.
40. Lapsley, I. (2008), ‘The NPM Agenda: Back to the Future’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 77–96.
41. Lapsley, I. (2009), ‘New Public Management: The Cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit?’, Abacus, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 1–21.
42. Li, P. and G. Tang (2009), ‘Performance Measurement Design within its Organisational Context—Evidence from China', Management Accounting Research, Vol. 20, pp. 193–207.
43. Marvel, M.K. and P.H. Marvel (2007), ‘Outsourcing Oversight: A Comparison of Monitoring for In-House and Contracted Services’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 521–30.
44. Melkers, J. and K. Willoughby (2005), ‘Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects’, Public Administration Review, Vol, 65, No, 2, pp. 180–90.
45. Micheli, P. and A. Neely (2010), ‘Performance Measurement in the Public Sector in England: Searching for the Golden Thread’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 591–600.
46. Milakovich, M.E. (2006), ‘Comparing Bush-Cheney and Clinton-Gore Performance Management Strategies: Are they more Alike than Different?’ Public Administration, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 461–78.
47. Modell, S. (2009a), ‘Bundling Management Control Innovations: A Field Study of Organisational Experimenting with Total Quality Management and the Balanced Scorecard’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 59–90.
48. Modell, S. (2009b), ‘Institutional Research on Performance Measurement and Management in the Public Sector Accounting Literature: A Review and Assesssment’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 277–303.
49. Modell, S., K. Jacobs and F. Wiesel (2007), ‘A Process Return? Path Dependencies, Institutions and Performance Management in Swedish Central Government’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 453–75.
50. Moynihan, D.P. (2006), ‘Managing for Results in State Government: Evaluating a Decade of Reform’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 77–89.
51. Moynihan, D.P. and S. Pandey (2010), ‘The Big Question for Performance Management: Why Do Managers Use Performance Information?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (March), pp. 1–18.
52. Moynihan, D.P., S. Fernandez, S. Kim, K.M. LeRoux, S. J. Piotrowski, B. E. Wright and K. Yang (2011), ‘Performance Regimes Amidst Governance Complexity’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 21 (suppl 1), pp. i141–55.
53. Nõmm, K. and T. Randma-Liiv (2012), ‘Performance Measurement and Performance Information in New Democracies’, Public Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 859–79.
54. Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler (1993), Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector (New York: Penguin).
55. Poister, T.H. (2010), ‘The Future of Strategic Planning in the Public Sector: Linking Strategic Management and Performance’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 70, pp. s246–54.
56. Power, M.K. (2004a), The Risk Management of Everything (Demos, London).
57. Power, M.K. (2004b), ‘Counting, Control and Calculation: Reflections on Measuring and Management’, Human Relations, Vol. 57, pp. 765–82.
58. Rautiainen, A. and M. Jarvenpää (2012), ‘Institutional Logics and Responses to Performance Measurement Systems’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 164–88.
59. Sanger, M.B. (2008), ‘From Measurement to Management: Breaking through the Barriers to State and Local Performance – Special Issue’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 68, pp. 70–85.
60. Simons, R. (1995), Levers of Control (Harvard University Press, Boston).
61. Schochet, P.Z. and J.A. Burghardt (2008), ‘Do Job Corps Performance Measures Track Program Impacts?’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 556–76.
62. Shingler, J., M.E. Van Loon, T.R. Alter and J.C. Bridger (2008), ‘The Importance of Subjective Data for Public Agency Performance Evaluation' Public Administration Review, Vol. 68, No. 6, pp. 1101–11.
63. Smith, P. (1995), ‘On the Unintended Consequences of Publishing Performance Data in the Public Sector', International Journal of Public Administration, Vol, 18, pp. 277–310.
64. Taylor, J. (2009), ‘Strengthening the Link Between Performance Measurement and Decision Making’, Public Administration, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 853–71.
65. Taylor, J. (2011), ‘Factors Influencing the Use of Performance Information for Decision Making in Australian State Agencies', Public Administration, Vol. 89, No. 4, pp. 1316–34.
66. Tooley, S., J. Hooks and N. Basnan (2010), ‘Performance Reporting by Malaysian Local Authorities: Identifying Stakeholder Needs’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 103–33.
67. Torres, L., V. Pina and A. Yetano (2011), ‘Performance Measurement in Spanish Local Governments: A Cross-Case Comparison Study’, Public Administration, Vol. 89, No. 1, pp. 1–29.
68. Van de Walle, S. (2009), ‘International Comparisons of Public Sector Performance: How to Move Ahead?’, Public Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 39–56.
69. Wall, A. (2005), ‘The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital in the Public Sector: Taking the Lead or Waiting for Direction?’, Public Management Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 289–303.
70. Watkins, A.L. and C.E. Arrington (2007), ‘Accounting, New Public Management and American Politics: Theoretical Insights into the National Performance Review’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 18, pp. 33–58.
71. Wichowsky, A. and D.P. Moynihan (2008), ‘Measuring How Administration Shapes Citizenship: A Policy Feedback Perspective on Performance Management’, Public Administration Review, Vol.68, No. 5, pp. 908–20.
72. Wouters, M. and C. Wilderom (2008), ‘Developing Performance Measurement Systems as Enabling Formalization: A Longitudinal Field Study of a Logistics Department’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 33, pp. 488–516.
73. Yang, K. and M. Holzer (2006), ‘The Performance–Trust Link: Implications for Performance Measurement’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 114–26.
74. Yang, K. and J.Y. Hsieh (2007), ‘Managerial Effectiveness of Government Performance Measurement: Testing a Middle-Range Model’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 67, No. 5, pp. 861–79.