Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform

Public Administration Review

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 77-89

  Moynihan, Donald P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645051471     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00557.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aucoin, Peter. 1990. Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums. Governance 3(2): 115-37.
2. Barzelay, Michael. 1999. How to Argue about the New Public Management. International Public Management Journal 2(2): 183-217.
3. _. 2001. The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Boston, Jonathan. 1991. The Theoretical Underpinnings of Public-Sector Restructuring in New Zealand. In Reshaping the States, edited by Jonathan Boston, John Martin, June Pallot, and Pat Walsh, 1-26. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
5. Brudney, Jeffrey L, F.. Ted Hebert, and Deil S. Wright. 1999. Reinventing Government in the American States: Measuring and Explaining Administrative Reform. Public Administration Review 59(1): 19-30.
6. Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. 1962. The Calcula of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Bullock, R. J., and M. E. Tubbs. 1987. The Case Meta-Analysis for OD. Research in Organizational Change and Development 1: 171-228.
8. Cothran, Dan A. 1993. Entrepreneurial Budgeting: An Emerging Reform? Public Administration Review 53(5): 445-54.
9. Denhardt, Robert B. 1985. Strategic Planning in State and Local Government. State and Local Government Review 17(1): 174-79.
10. Downs, George W., and Patrick D. Larkey. 1986. The Search for Government Efficiency. New York: Random House.
11. Durant, Robert. 1999. The Political Economy of Results-Oriented Management in the "Neoadministrative State." American Review of Public Administration 29(4): 307-31.
12. Forrester, John P., and Guy B. Adams. 1997. Budgetary Reform through Organizational Learning: Toward an Organizational Theory of Budgeting. Administration & Society 28(4): 466-88.
13. Franklin, Aimee L. 2000. An Examination of Bureaucratic Reactions to Institutional Controls. Public Performance and Management Review 24(1): 8-21.
14. Hammer, Michael A., and James Champy. 1994. Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: Harper Business.
15. Hood, Christopher, and Michael Jackson. 1991. Administrative Argument.: Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
16. _. 1994. Key for Locks in Administrative Argument. Administration & Society 25(4): 467-88.
17. Ingraham, Patricia W (ed). Forthcoming. In Pursuit of Performance: Management Systems in State and Local Government. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Ingraham Patricia W., and Donald P. Moynihan. 2001. Beyond Measurement: Managing for Results in State Government. In Quicker, Better, Cheaper? Managing Performance in American Government, edited by Dall Forsythe, 309-34. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.
19. Keating, Michael, and Malcolm Holmes. 1990. Australia's Budgetary and Financial Management Reforms. Governance 3(2): 168-85.
20. Larsson, Rikard. 1993. Case Survey Methodology: Quantitative Analysis of Patterns across Case Studies. Academy of Management Journal 36(6): 1515-47.
21. Lauth, Thomas P. 1987. Budgeting and Productivity in State Government: Not Integrated but Friendly. Public Productivity and Management Review 41(2): 21-32.
22. Melkers, Julia E., and Katherine Willoughby. 1998. The State of the States: Performance-Based Budgeting Requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review 58(1): 66-73.
23. _. 2001. Budgeters' Views of State Performance-Budgeting Systems: Distinctions across Branches. Public Administration Review 61(1): 54-64.
24. Moe, Ronald. 1994. The "Reinventing Government" Exercise: Misinterpreting the Problem, Misjudging the Consequences. Public Administration Review 55(2): 135-46.
25. Moe, Terry. 1984. The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science 28(4): 739-77.
26. Moynihan, Donald P. 2001. The State of the States in Managing for Results, Working Paper, Alan K. Campbell Public Affairs Institute, www.maxwell.syr.edu/gpp/pdfs/The_State_of_the_States_In_MFR.pdf [accessed September 27, 2005].
27. Niskanen, William A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atheron.
28. Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA). 1997. A Report on Performance-Based Program Budgeting in Context: History and Comparison. Tallahassee, FL: OPPAGA Report Production.
29. Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Government is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. Peters, Thomas J., and Richard H. Waterman. 1982. In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best Run Companies. New York: HarperCollins.
31. Radin, Beryl. 2000. The Government Performance and Results Act and the Tradition of Federal Management Reform: Square Pegs in Round Holes. Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory 10(1): 111-35.
32. Schick, Allen. 1999. Opportunity, Strategy, and Tactics in Reforming Public Management. Paper presented at the OECD Symposium, Government of the Future: Getting from Here to There, September 14-15, Paris.
33. _. 2001. Getting Performance Measures to Measure Up. In Quicker, Better, Cheaper? Managing Performance in American Government, edited by Dall Forsythe, 39-60. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.
34. Scott, Graham, Peter Bushnell, and Nikitin Sallee. 1990. Reform of the Core Public Sector: New Zealand Experience. Governance 3(2): 138-67.
35. Seiden, Sally C., Patricia W. Ingraham, and Willow Jacobson. 2001. Human Resources Practices in State Government: Findings from a National Survey. Public Administration Review 61 (5): 598-607.
36. Simon, Herbert. 1997. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organisions. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan.
37. Snell, Ronald K., and Jennifer Grooters. 2000. Append\ix A: Governing for Results: Legislation in the States. In Making Results-Based Government Work, by Blaine Liner, Harry P. Hatry, Elisa Vinson, Ryan Allen, Pat Dusenbury, Scoot Bryant, and Ron Snell. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. www.urban.org/ UploadedPDF/results-based-stategovt.pdf [accessed September 28, 2005].
38. Terry, Larry. 1998. Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the New Public Management Movement. Public Administration Review 58(3): 194-201.
39. Thompson, Fred. 1994. Mission-Driven, Results-Oriented Budgeting: Fiscal Administration and the New Public Management. Public Budgeting and Finance 14(3): 90-105.
40. Tullock, Gordon. 1965. The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
41. Williamson, Oliver. 1981. Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology 87(3): 548-77.