EXPLAINING THE UTILIZATION OF RELATIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT: A MULTI-THEORETICAL STUDY USING DATA FROM SWEDEN

Financial Accountability and Management

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 197-224

  Johansson, Tobias ^a   Siverbo, Sven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

adoption; benchmarking; local government; management accounting; relative performance evaluation; use

Indexed keywords

EID: 81255206794     PISSN: 02674424     EISSN: 14680408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00474.x     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Abrahamson, E. (1991), ‘Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 586–612.
2. Ask, U. and C. Ax (1997), Produktkalkylering i litteratur och praktik. En beskrivande och förklarande studie av svensk verkstadsindustri (Göteborg: BAS).
3. Askim, J., Å. Johnsen, and K.A. Christophersen (2008), ‘Factors Behind Organisational Learning from Benchmarking: Experiences from Norwegian Municipal Benchmarking Networks’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 297–320.
4. Ax, C. and T. Bjørnenak (2005), ‘Bundling and Diffusion of Management Accounting Innovations – The Case of the Balanced Scorecard in Sweden’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 16, pp. 1–20.
5. Ax, C. and T. Bjørnenak (2007), ‘Management Accounting Innovations: Origins and Diffusion’, in T. Hopper, D. Northcott and R.W. Scapens (eds.), Issues in Management Accounting (Hertfordshire, UK: Prentice-Hall).
6. Bjørnenak, T. (1997), ‘Diffusion and Accounting: The Case of ABC in Norway’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, pp. 3–17.
7. Bohrnstedt, G.W. and D. Knoke (1994), Statistics for Social Data Analysis (F.E. Peacock Publishers Inc.: Itasca, IL).
8. Bowerman, M., G. Francis, A. Ball and J. Fry (2002), ‘The Evolution of Benchmarking in UK Local Authorities’, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 429–49.
9. Bruijn, H. de and G.J. Van Helden (2005), ‘A Plea for Dialogue Driven Performance-based Management Systems; Evidence from the Dutch Public Sector’, Paper presented at the 18th Scandinavian Academy of Management (NFF) meeting at Aarhus School of Business in Denmark (18–20 August).
10. Brunsson, N. (1989), The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations. (Chichester: Wiley).
11. Bujaki, M.L. and A.J. Richarson (1997), ‘A Citation Trail Review of the Uses of Firm Size in Accounting Research’, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 16, pp. 1–25.
12. Burns, J. (2000), ‘The Dynamics of Accounting Change. Inter-play Between New Practises, Routines, Institutions, Power and Politics’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 566–96.
13. Burns, J. and R.W. Scapens (2000), ‘Conceptualizing Management Accounting Change: An Institutional Framework’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp. 3–25.
14. Cavalluzzo, K.S. and C.D. Ittner (2004), ‘Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from Government’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 29, pp. 243–67.
15. Chenhall, R.H. (2003), ‘Management Control Systems Design Within its Organizational Context: Findings from Contingency-based Research and Directions for the Future’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28, pp. 127–68.
16. Chenhall, R.H. and K. Langfield-Smith (1998), ‘The Relationship Between Strategic Priorities, Management Techniques and Management Accounting: An Empirical Investigation Using a Systems Approach’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23, pp. 243–64.
17. Chenhall, R.H. and K. Langfield-Smith (1998b), ‘Adoption and Benefits of Management Accounting Practices: An Australian Study’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9, pp. 1–19.
18. Chenhall, R.H. and F. Moers (2007), ‘The Issue of Endogeneity within Theory-Based, Quantitative Management Accounting Research’, European Accounting Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 173–95.
19. Chia, Y.M. and H.C. Koh (2007), ‘Organizational Culture and the Adoption of Management Accounting Practices in the Public Sector: A Singapore Study’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 189–213.
20. Coad, A.F. and J. Cullen (2006), ‘Inter-organisational Cost Management: Towards an Evolutionary Perspective’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 17, pp. 342–69.
21. Collier, P.M. (2001), ‘The Power of Accounting: A Field Study of Local Financial Management in a Police Force’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, pp. 465–86.
22. Cooper, R. and R. Slagmulder (2004), ‘Interorganizational Cost Management and Relational Context’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 29, pp. 221–44.
23. Cox, J.W., L. Mann and D. Samson (1997), ‘Benchmarking as a Mixed Metaphor: Disentangling Assumptions of Competition and Collaboration’, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 285–314.
24. De Lancer Julnes, P. and M. Holzer (2001), ‘Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 693–708.
25. Dequech, D. (2005), ‘Cognition and Valuation: Some Similarities and Contrasts between Institutional Economics and the Economics of Conventions’, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 39, pp. 465–73.
26. Dillard, J.F., J.T. Rigsby and C. Goodman (2004), ‘The Making and Remaking of Organization Context. Duality and the Institutionalization Process’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 506–42.
27. DiMaggio, P.J. and W.W. Powell (19831991), ‘The Iron Cage Revisited. Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality’, in W.W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press).
28. Domberger, S. and P. Jensen (1997), ‘Contracting Out by the Public Sector: Theory, Evidence and Prospects’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 67–78.
29. Dooren, W. van (2005), ‘What Makes Organisations Measure? Hypotheses on the Causes and Conditions for Performance Measurement’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 363–83.
30. Elnathan, D., T.W. Lin and S.M. Young (1996), ‘Benchmarking and Management Accounting: A Framework for Research’, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, pp. 37–54.
31. Geiger, D.R. and C.D. Ittner (1996), ‘The Influence of Funding Source and Legislative Requirements on Government Cost Accounting Practices’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 243–64.
32. Granlund, M. (2001), ‘Towards Explaining Stability in and Around Management Accounting Systems’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, pp. 141–66.
33. Helden, G.J. van (2000), ‘Is Financial Stress an Incentive for the Adoption of Businesslike Planning and Control in Local Government?: A Comparative Study of Eight Dutch Municipalities’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 83–100.
34. Helden, G.J. van (2005), ‘Researching Public Sector Transformation: The Role of Management Accounting’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 99–133.
35. Helden, G.J. van and S. Tillema (2005), ‘In Search of a Benchmarking Theory for the Public Sector’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 337–61.
36. Holmblad Brunsson, K. (2002), ‘Management or Politics – or Both? How Management by Objectives May be Managed: A Swedish Example’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 189–209.
37. Hood, C. (1995), ‘The New Public Management in the 1980:s. Variations on a Theme’, Accounting, Organisation and Society, Vol. 20, No. 2/3, pp. 93–109.
38. Ittner, C.D., D. Larker and T. Randall (2003), ‘Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28, pp. 715–41.
39. Jackson, A. and I. Lapsley (2003), ‘The Diffusion of Accounting Practices in the New “Managerial” Public Sector’, The International Journal of Public Management Sector Management, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 359–72.
40. Johansson, T. (2006), Förvaltningens gräns mot marknaden: Om mekanismer bakom och effekter av kommunernas marknadsutnyttjande. Förvaltningshögskolan. Göteborg. (Doctoral thesis: Göteborg: School of Public Administration) [Eng translation: The Boundaries of the Public Bureau.
41. Johansson, T. (2008), ‘Municipal Contracting Out: Governance Choices, Misalignment and Performance in Swedish Local Government’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 243–64.
42. Johnsen, Å. (1999), Performance Measurement in Local Government: Organizational Control in Political Institutions, Doctoral Thesis, Bergen: Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.
43. Johnsen, Å. (2001), ‘Balanced Scorecard: Theoretical Perspectives and Public Management Implications’, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 319–30.
44. Johnsen, Å. (2005), ‘What Does 25 Years of Experience Tell Us About the State of Performance Measurement in Public Management Policy? Public Money & Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 9–17.
45. Kennedy, T. and J. Affleck-Graves (2001), ‘The Impact of Activity-based Costing Techniques on Firm Performance’, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 13, pp. 19–45.
46. Kraus, K. and J. Lind (2007), ‘Management Control in Inter-organisational Relationships’, in T. Hopper, D. Northcott and R. Scapens (eds.), Issues in Management Accounting (Harlow: Prentice Hall).
47. Laakso, M. and R. Taagepera (1979), ‘Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West-Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 3–27.
48. Langfield-Smith, K. and D. Smith (2003), ‘Management Control Systems and Trust in Outsourcing Relationships’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 281–307.
49. Lapsley, I. and J. Pallot (2000), ‘Accounting, Management and Organizational Change: A Comparative Study of Local Government’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp. 355–74.
50. Libby, T. and J.H. Waterhouse (1996), ‘Predicting Change in Management Accounting Systems’, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, pp. 137–50.
51. Llewellyn, S. and D. Northcott (2005), ‘The Average Hospital’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 30, pp. 555–83.
52. Malmi, T. (1997), ‘Towards Explaining Activity-based Costing Failure: Accounting and Control in a Decentralized Organization’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, pp. 459–80.
53. Malmi, T. (1999), ‘Activity-based Costing Diffusion Across Organizations: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis of Finnish Firms’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 24, pp. 649–72.
54. Mayston, D.J. (1985), ‘Non-profit Performance Indicators in the Public Sector’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 51–74.
55. McCloskey, D.N. (1985), ‘The Loss Function Has Been Mislaid: The Rhetoric of Significance Tests’, American Economic Review, Vol. 75 (May), pp. 201–5.
56. McCloskey, D.N. and S.T. Ziliak (1996), ‘The Standard Error of Regressions’, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 34 (March), pp. 97–114.
57. Meyer, J.W. and B. Rowan (19771991), ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, in W.W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press).
58. Modell, S. (2001), ‘Performance Measurement and Institutional Processes: A Study of Managerial Responses to Public Sector Reform’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, pp. 437–64.
59. Modell, S. (2003), ‘Goals versus Institutions: The Development of Performance Measures in the Swedish University Sector’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 14, pp. 333–59.
60. Modell, S. (2007), ‘Managing Accounting Change’, in T. Hopper, D. Northcott and R.W. Scapens (eds.), Issues in Management Accounting (Hertfordshire, UK: Prentice-Hall).
61. Modell, S. (2009), ‘Bundling Management Control Innovations: A Field Study of Organisational Experimenting with Total Quality Management and the Balanced Scorecard’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal (forthcoming).
62. Mouritsen, J. et al. (2001), ‘Inter-organizational Controls and Organizational Competencies: Episodes Around Target Cost Management/Functional Analysis and Open Book Accounting’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, pp. 221–26.
63. th conference on performance measurement and management control in Nice (26–28 September).
64. Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).
65. Nørreklit, H. (2000), ‘The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard – A Critical Analysis of Some of its Assumptions’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp. 65–88.
66. Nørreklit, H. (2003), ‘The Balanced Scorecard: What is the Score? A Rhetorical Analysis of the Balanced Scorecard’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28, pp. 591–619.
67. Northcott, D. and S. Llewellyn (2003), ‘The “Ladder of Success” in Healthcare: The UK National Reference Costing Index’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 14, pp. 51–66.
68. Peng, C.-Y.J. and T.-S.H. So (2002), ‘Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting: A Primer’, Understanding Statistics, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 31–70.
69. Power, M. (1997), The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
70. Ribeiro, J.A. and R.W. Scapens (2006), ‘Institutional Theories in Management Accounting Change. Contributions, Issues and Paths for Development’, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 94–111.
71. Scapens, R.W. (1994), ‘Never Mind the Gap: Towards an Institutional Perspective on Management Accounting Practice’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 5, pp. 301–21.
72. Scapens, R.W. (2006), ‘Understanding Management Accounting Practices: A Personal Journey’, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 38, pp. 1–30.
73. Siti-Nabiha, A.K. and R.W. Scapens (2005), ‘Stability and Change: An Institutionalist Study of Management Accounting Change’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 44–73.
74. Siverbo, S. and T. Johansson (2006), ‘Relative Performance Evaluation in Swedish Local Government’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 271–90.
75. Soin, K., W. Seal and J. Cullen (2002), ‘ABC and Organizational Change: An Institutional Perspective’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 13, pp. 249–71.
76. SOU 2001:75 http://www.kommundatabas.NU!: Hur man med nyckeltal bättre kan analysera och jämföra kommunal verksamhet (Stockholm: Fritzes public publikationer).
77. SOU 2005:110 Jämförelsevis. Styrning och uppföljning med nyckeltal i kommuner och landsting (Stockholm: Fritzes public publikationer).
78. Statistics Sweden (2008) (http://www.scb.se).
79. Tyler, M.C. (2005), ‘Benchmarking in the Non-profit Sector in Australia’, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 219–35.
80. Vaivio, J. (2007), ‘Qualitative Research on Management Accounting: Achievements and Potential’, in T. Hopper, D. Northcott and R. Scapens (eds.), Issues in Management Accounting (Harlow: Prentice Hall).
81. Van der Stede, W.A., S.M. Young and C.X. Chen (2005), ‘Assessing the Quality of Evidence in Empirical Management Accounting Research: The Case of Survey Studies’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 30, pp. 655–84.
82. Wang, X. and E. Berman (2001), ‘Hypotheses About Performance Measurement in Counties: Findings from a Survey’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 403–28.
83. Williams, D.W. (2003), ‘Measuring Government in the Early Twentieth Century’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 643–59.
84. Yazdifar, H., M. Zaman, M. Tsamenyi and D. Askarany (2006), ‘Management Accounting Change in a Subsidiary Organisation’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting (doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2006.08.004).