State Performance-Based Budgeting in Boom and Bust Years: An Analytical Framework and Survey of the States

Public Administration Review

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 370-388

  Hou, Yilin ^a   Lunsford, Robin S ^a   Sides, Katy C ^a   Jones, Kelsey A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955775126     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02357.x     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Bourdeaux, Carolyn. 2006. Legislative Influences on Performance-Based Budgeting Reform. Fiscal Research Center Report no. 128, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies. [accessed February 9, 2009].
2. Boyle, Brenda. 2008. Utah Elevates Its Performance: Performance Elevated Is a Management Tool for Improving Performance and Efficiency in State Agencies. Government Finance Review 24(4).
3. California Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO). 1996 1996-1997 Budget Analysis: Statewide Administration Crosscutting Issues. [accessed February 20, 2009].
4. Christie, Chris. 2010. Executive Order No. 8 [accessed March 18, 2010].
5. Colorado Governor's Office of State Planning and Budget Office. 2007 Fact Sheet: Colorado Department of Public Safety. Denver, CO: Governor's Office of State Planning and Budget.
6. Colorado Governor's Office of State Planning and Budget Office. 2010 Colorado Department of Public Safety FY 2010-11 Budget Cycle Schedule 2. [accessed February 18, 2010].
7. Colorado Department of Human Services. 2008 Schedule 2-FY 2009-2010 Budget Cycle. Denver: Colorado Department of Human Services.
8. Colorado Department of Human Services, Executive Directors Office. 2009. Division Highlights. [accessed February 19, 2009].
9. Colorado Department of Transportation. 2007 Fiscal Year 2007 Annual Performance Report. Denver: Colorado Department of Transportation.
10. Colorado Department of Transportation. 2009 2008-2009 Fact Book. Denver: Colorado Department of Transportation.
11. Colorado Governor's Office of State Planning and Budget Office. 2007 Fact Sheet: Colorado Department of Public Safety. Denver: Governor's Office of State Planning and Budget.
12. Colorado Governor's Office of State Planning and Budget Office. 2010 Colorado Department of Public Safety FY 2010-11 Budget Cycle Schedule 2. Denver: Governor's Office of State Planning and Budget.
13. Commonwealth Fund. 2009 Maryland: Increasing Adult Eligibility While Cutting the Budget. States in Action, August-September. [accessed February 21, 2011].
14. Florida Governor's Office. 2009 Senate Bill 2600-General Appropriations Act for FY 2010. [accessed February 20, 2010].
15. Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. 1997a Performance-Based Program Budgeting in Context: History and Comparison. [accessed September 13, 2009].
16. Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. 1997b A Report on Performance-Based Budgeting in Context: History and Comparison. Tallahassee: Florida Legislature.
17. Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. 2010 Performance-Based Program Budgeting. [accessed February 20, 2010].
18. Florida Performs. 2010a. About Florida Performs. [accessed February 20, 2010].
19. Florida Performs. 2010b Agency Unit Cost Summaries. [accessed February 20, 2010].
20. Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts State Government Division. 2010 2009 Prioritized Program Based Budgeting Special Report. E-mail from anonymous official, January 14.
21. Georgia Office of Planning and Budget. 2009a Program Measures and Prioritized Program Budgeting. [accessed February 9, 2009].
22. Georgia Office of Planning and Budget. 2009b Program Measures User Manual. [accessed February 20, 2010].
23. Georgia Office of Planning and Budget. 2010 Governor's Budget Report Fiscal Year 2011. [accessed February 20, 2010].
24. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). 2009 Performance Reporting for Government-Reporting Initiatives. [accessed February 17, 2009].
25. Holmstrom, Bengt, and Paul Milgrom 1987. Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Inter-Temporal Incentives. Econometrica 5(2): 303-28.
26. Hoover Commission (Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government). 1949 On Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Hou, Yilin. 2006. Budgeting for Fiscal Stability over the Business Cycle. Public Administration Review 66(5): 730-41.
28. Hou, Yilin. 2007 Transition: The Significance of Carter Years in American Fiscal and Budgetary Policy. [accessed February 18, 2011].
29. Joyce, Philip G. 1993. Using Performance Measures for Federal Budgeting: Proposals and Prospects. Public Budgeting and Finance 13(4): 3-17.
30. Joyce, Philip G. 2008 Does More (or Even Better) Information Lead to Better Budgeting?, A New Perspective. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27(4): 945-75.
31. Kamensky, John M. 2009. Maryland's Fact-Driven, Strategy-Based Governing Approach. PA Times, August.
32. Key, V. O. 1940. The Lack of a Budgetary Theory (in Public Administration). American Political Science Review 34(6): 1137-44.
33. Louisiana Department of Administration. 2010 Governor's Executive Budget Fiscal Year 2010-2011. [accessed February 20, 2010].
34. Louisiana House of Representatives, Fiscal Division. 2010a. Incentive Fund Reward. [accessed February 23, 2009].
35. Louisiana House of Representatives, Fiscal Division. 2010b Peformance Based Budgeting. [accessed February 20, 2010].
36. Louisiana Office of Planning and Budget. 2010 Peformance Based Budgeting. [accessed February 6, 2010].
37. Louisiana State Legislature. 2010 House Bill No. 1. [accessed February 20, 2010].
38. Lu, Yi, Katherine Willoughby, and Sarah Arnett 2009. Legislating Results: Examining the Legal Foundations of PBB Systems in the States. Public Performance and Management Review 33(2): 266-87.
39. Maryland Department of Budget and Management. 2009 Managing for Results: Annual Performance Review. Prepared for the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee and House Appropriations Committee.
40. Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. 2008 Reduction Summary-FY 2008 Budget. Annapolis: Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
41. Maryland Department of Legislative Services. 2007 Fiscal Policy Note. Senate Bill 102, Maryland General Assembly.
42. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services. 2010 End of FY 2009 Report. Annapolis: Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services.
43. Maryland Department of Transportation. 2009 MDOT Overview FY 2010 Budget Allowance. Annapolis: Maryland Department of Transportation.
44. Maryland Department of Transportation. 2010 Consolidated Transportation Program. 2010 State Report on Transportation FY 2010-2015. Annapolis: Maryland Department of Transportation.
45. Maryland General Assembly. 2009 Police and Correctional Training Commission. Q00G00. Analysis of the FY 2010 Maryland Executive Budget. Annapolis, MD: Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services.
46. Maryland Office of the Governor. 2007 Maryland StateStat. [accessed January 5, 2010].
47. McGuire, Therese J., and Kim S. Rueben 2006. The Colorado Revenue Limits: The Economic Effects of TABOR. Briefing Paper, Economic Policy Institute. [accessed February 18, 2011].
48. Megna, Robert L. 2009. 2010-2011 Executive Budget Briefing Book, Governor David A. Paterson (NY 2010-2011 Budget). [accessed February 22, 2010].
49. Melkers, Julia, and Katherine Willoughby 1998. The State of the States: Performance-Based Budgeting Requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review 58(1): 66-73.
50. National Governors Association, and National Association of State Budget Officers (NGA/NASBO). 2008. Fiscal Survey of the States. [accessed September 6, 2009].
51. New Jersey Department of Transportation. 2009 FY 2010-2019 Statewide Capital Investment Strategy. [accessed March 18, 2010].
52. New Jersey Office of Management and Budget. 2009 The State of New Jersey Budget Fiscal Year 2009-2010. [accessed February 25, 2009].
53. New Jersey Office of Management and Budget. 2010 The State Budget Process. [accessed February 20, 2010].
54. Oregon Progress Board. 2009 Oregon Benchmarks. [accessed February 18, 2009].
55. Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
56. Pattison, Scott D. 2008. Budget Processes in the State. [accessed February 21, 2010].
57. People's Budget (Florida). 2009 Governor's Proposed Budget for FY2010. [accessed February 20, 2010].
58. Performance Utah. 2010 Agency Performance: Department of Public Safety. [accessed February 16, 2010].
59. Pew Center on the States. 2009 Trade-Off Time: How Four States Continue to Deliver. Washington DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.
60. Schick, Allen. 1971. Budget Innovation in the States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
61. Schick, Allen. 1990 The Capacity to Budget. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
62. Sharfstein, Steven S., and Ronald P. Peterson 2007. Report to the New Secretary, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Annapolis: O'Malley/Brown Transition, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
63. Smith, Richard Bon. 2004. California Performance Review. [accessed February 25, 2009].
64. Stein, Herbert. 1996. The Fiscal Revolution in America. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
65. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2005 Performance Budgeting: State's Experiences Can Inform Federal Efforts. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. GAO-05-215.
66. Utah Department of Transportation. 2009 2009 Strategic Direction and Performance Measures. Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Transportation.
67. Utah Governor's Office. 1998 A Brief History of Utah Tomorrow. Salt Lake City: Governor's Office.
68. Utah Governor's Office of Planning and Budget. 2009 Budget Summary Fiscal Year 2010 and Fiscal Year 2009 Supplementals. Salt Lake City: Governor Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.
69. Utah Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst. 1999 Performance Based Budgeting. Salt Lake City: Department of Human Services.
70. Washington State Office of Financial Management. 2008 Washington State Budget Process. [accessed February 25, 2009].
71. Washington State Office of Financial Management. 2009 Priorities of Government Home Page. [accessed February 24, 2009].
72. Willoughby, William F. 1918. The Problem of a National Budget. New York: D. Appleton and Co.
73. Anonymous Interview A. 2009 Official, Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. Interviewed by Robin Lunsford on February 19, 2009, by phone.
74. Anonymous Interview B. 2010 Official, Georgia House of Representatives Budget Office. Interviewed by Robin Lunsford on January 14, 2010, by e-mail.
75. Anonymous Interview C. 2010 Official, Louisiana Office of Planning and Budget. Interviewed by Robin Lunsford on January 28, 2010, by phone.
76. Anonymous Interview D. 2010 Official, New Jersey Office of Management and Budget. Interviewed by Robin Lunsford on March 18, 2010, by phone.
77. Anonymous Interview E. 2010 Official, New York State Department of Transportation, Transportation Budgeting Bureau. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones on February 16, 2010.
78. Anonymous Interview F. 2010 Official, New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Budget Management. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones on January 20, 2010.
79. Anonymous Interview G. 2010 Official, Maryland Department of Budget and Management, Office of Legislative Services. Interviewed by Katy Sides on March 9, 2010.
80. Anonymous Interview H. 2009 Official, Utah Office of Planning and Budget. Interviewed by Katy Sides on September 10, 2009.
81. Anonymous Interview I. 2009 Official, Utah Department of Transportation. Interviewed by Katy Sides on September 14, 2009.
82. Anonymous Interview J. 2009 Official, Colorado Office of State Planning and Budget. Interviewed by Katy Sides on September 17, 2009.
83. Anonymous Interview K. 2010 Official, Maryland Department of Transportation. Interviewed by Katy Sides on February 24, 2010.
84. Anonymous Interview L. 2010 Official, Maryland Department of Budget Analysis. Interviewed by Katy Sides on February 24, 2010.
85. Bingham, Carol. 2009. Official, California Department of Education. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones on December 11, 2009.
86. Britton, John. 2010. Principal Legislative Analyst, Oregon Legislative Fiscal Office. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones on February 3, 2010.
87. Hansen, Mike. 2009. Management Director, Utah Governor's Office, Office of Planning and Budget. Interviewed by Katy Sides on September 10, 2009, by phone.
88. Iles, Cathy. 2010. Performance Management Coordinator, Oregon Department of Human Services. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones on January 15, 2010.
89. Martín, Diego C. 2010. Fiscal and Policy Analyst, State Administration Section, California Legislative Analyst's Office. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones on February 20, 2010.
90. McCarthy, Clinton J. 2010. Transportation Budget Assistant to the Governor, Washington Office of Financial Management. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones on January 22, 2010.
91. Richrath, Scott. 2009. Performance Measure and Policy Analysis Manager, Colorado Department of Transportation. Interviewed by Katy Sides on September 10, 2009, by e-mail.
92. Showman, Jeffrey. 2010. Budget Assistant to the Governor, Washington Office of Financial Management. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones on February 3, 2010.
93. Speelman, Lois. 2010. Assistant Secretary of Financial Services, Washington Department of Health. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones on February 3, 2010.
94. Swanson, John. 2010. Administrator, Budget, Planning and Analysis, Oregon Department of Human Services. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones on January 15, 2010.
95. Vaughn, Doug. 2010. Budget Director, Washington State Department of Transportation. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones on January 26, 2010.
96. Winegar, Steve. 2009. Public Safety Training Research and Development, Oregon Department of Public Safety Standards and Training. Interviewed by Kelsey Jones, December 27.