PBB in American Local Governments: It's More than a Management Tool

Public Administration Review

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 391-401

  Ho, Alfred Tat Kei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955842995     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02359.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ammons, David N. 1995. Overcoming the Inadequacies of Performance Measurement in Local Government: The Case of Libraries and Leisure Services. Public Administration Review 55(1): 37-47.
2. Ashbaugh, Sam. 2001. The Government Performance and Results Act: Lessons for State and Local Governments. Government Finance Review, April, 19-23.
3. Behn, Robert D. 2007. What All Mayors Would Like to Know About Baltimore's CitiStat Performance Strategy. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
4. Berman, Evan, and XiaoHu Wang 2000. Performance Measurement in U.S. Counties: Capacity for Reform. Public Administration Review 65(5): 409-20.
5. Broom, Cheryl, and Edward T. Jennings, Jr. 2008. Advancing Performance Measurement and Management for Accountability: King's County Collaborative, Incremental Approach. In International Handbook of Practice-Based Performance Management, edited by Patria de Lancer Julnes, Frances Stokes Berry, Maria P. Aristigueta, and Kaifeng Yang, 123-44. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6. Caiden, Naomi. 1998. Public Service Professionalism for Performance Measurement and Evaluation. Public Budgeting and Finance 18(2): 35-52.
7. Charlotte, North Carolina. 2009. Strategic Planning Handbook: Charlotte's Model for Integrating Budget and Performance Management. [accessed February 20, 2011].
8. Cope, Glen H. 1987. Local Government Budgeting and Productivity: Friends or Foes?, Public Productivity Review 10(3): 45-57.
9. De Lancer Julnes, Patria, and Marc Holzer 2001. Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation. Public Administration Review 61(6): 693-708.
10. Fernandez, Sergio, and Hal G. Rainey 2006. Managing Successful Organizational Change in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review 66(2): 168-76.
11. Fischer, Richard J. 1994. An Overview of Performance Measurement. Public Management 76(9): 2-8.
12. Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). 2007 Recommended Practice: Budgeting for Results and Outcomes. [accessed February 20, 2011].
13. Grizzle, Gloria A. 1986. Does Budget Format Really Govern the Actions of Budgetmakers?, Public Budgeting and Finance 6(1): 60-70.
14. Grizzle, Gloria A. 1987. Linking Performance to Funding Decisions: What Is the Budgeter's Roles?, Public Productivity Review 10(3): 33-44.
15. Grizzle, Gloria A., and Carole D. Pettijohn 2002. Implementing Performance-Based Budgeting: A System-Dynamics Perspective. Public Administration Review 62(1): 51-62.
16. Hatry, Harry P. 2006. Performance Measurement: Getting Results. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
17. Hatry, Harry P.., Louis H. Blair, Donald M. Fish, John H. Greiner, John R. Hall, Jr., and Philip S. Schaenman 1977. How Effective Are Your Community Services?, Procedures for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Municipal Services. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
18. Hatry, Harry P.., Sumner N. Claren, Therese van Houten, Jane P. Woodward, and Pasqual A. Donvito 1979. Efficiency Measurement for Local Government Services: Some Initial Suggestions. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
19. Ho, Alfred T. 2003. Perceptions of Performance Measurement and the Practice of Performance Budgeting in Small Cities. State and Local Government Review 35(3): 161-73.
20. Ho, Alfred T. 2006. Accounting for the Value of Performance Measurement from the Perspective of Midwestern Mayors. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(2): 217-37.
21. Ingraham, Patricia W. 2005. Performance: Promises to Keep and Miles to Go. Public Administration Review 65(4): 390-95.
22. International City/County Management Association (ICMA), Center for Performance Measurement. 2008. Performance Measurement in Practice. Washington, DC: ICMA.
23. Joyce, Philip G. 2003. Linking Performance and Budgeting: Opportunities in the Federal Budget Process. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
24. Joyce, Philip G. 2008. Does More (or Even Better) Information Lead to Better Budgeting?, A New Perspective. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27(4): 945-75.
25. Kinney, Anne S., and John Ruggini 2008. Measuring for Purpose: Trends in Public-Sector Performance Measurement and Management Practices. Government Finance Review, August, 14-23.
26. Kluvers, Ron. 2001. An Analysis of Introducing Program Budgeting in Local Government. Public Budgeting and Finance 21(2): 29-45.
27. Larkey, Patrick D., and Erik A. Devereux 1999. Good Budgetary Decision Processes. In Public Management Reform and Innovation: Research, Theory, and Applications, edited by H. George Frederickson and Jocelyn M. Johnston, 168-88.Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
28. Lauth, Thomas P. 1987. Budgeting and Productivity in State Government: Not Integrated but Friendly. Public Productivity Review 10(3): 21-32.
29. MacManus, Susan A. 1984. Coping with Retrenchment: Why Local Governments Need to Restructure Their Budget Documents. Public Budgeting and Finance 4(3): 58-66.
30. Melkers, Julia, and Katherine Willoughby 2005. Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects. Public Administration Review 65(2): 180-90.
31. Moynihan, Donald P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
32. Moynihan, Donald P., and Sanjay K. Pandey 2005. Testing How Management Matters in an Era of Government by Performance Management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3): 421-39.
33. National Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting (NACSLB). 1998 Recommended Budget Practices: A Framework for Improved State and Local Government Budgeting. Chicago: Government Finance Officers Association.
34. O'Toole, Daniel E., and James Marshall 1987. Budgeting Practices in Local Government: The State of the Art. Government Finance Review 3(5): 11-16.
35. O'Toole, Daniel E., and Brian Stipak 1988. Budgeting and Productivity Revisited: The Local Government Picture. Public Productivity Review 12(1): 1-12.
36. Poister, Theodore H., and Robert P. McGowan 1984. The Use of Management Tools in Municipal Government: A National Survey. Public Administration Review 44(3): 215-23.
37. Poister, Theodore H., and Gregory Streib 1989. Management Tools in Municipal Government: Trends over the Past Decade. Public Administration Review 49(3): 240-48.
38. Poister, Theodore H., and Gregory Streib 1999. Performance Measurement in Municipal Government: Assessing the State of the Practice. Public Administration Review 59(4): 325-35.
39. Poister, Theodore H., and Gregory Streib 2005. Elements of Strategic Planning and Management in Municipal Government: Status after Two Decades. Public Administration Review 65(1): 45-56.
40. Radin, Beryl A. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
41. Ridley, Clarence E., and Herbert A. Simon 1938. Measuring Municipal Activities: A Survey of Suggested Criteria and Reporting Forms for Appraising Administration. Chicago: International City Managers' Association.
42. Robinson, Marc. 2002. Best Practice in Performance Budgeting. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Budgeting and Financial Management, Kansas City, MO, October.
43. Rubin, Irene S. 2010. The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and Balancing. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
44. San Jose, California. 2010. City of San Jose FY 2010-2011 Proposed Operating Budget. [accessed February 20, 2011].
45. Schick, Allen. 1966. The Road to PPB: The Stages of Budget Reform. Public Administration Review 26(4): 243-58.
46. Schick, Allen. 1990. Budgeting for Results: Recent Developments in Five Industrialized Countries. Public Administration Review 50(1): 26-34.
47. Smith, Dennis C. 2009. Making Management Count: A Case for Theory- and Evidence-Based Public Management. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 28(3): 497-505.
48. Thurmaier, Kurt M., and Katherine G. Willoughby 2001. Policy and Politics in State Budgeting. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
49. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1997 Performance Budgeting: Past Initiatives Offer Insights for GPRA Implementation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. GAO/AIMD-97-46.
50. Usher, Charles L., and Gary C. Cornia 1981. Goal Setting and Performance Assessment in Municipal Budgeting. Public Administration Review 41(2): 229-35.
51. Wellman, Martha, and Gary VanLandingham 2008. Performance-Based Budgeting in Florida: Great Expectations, More Limited Reality. In International Handbook of Practice-Based Performance Management, edited by Patria de Lancer Julnes, Frances Stokes Berry, Maria P. Aristigueta, and Kaifeng Yang, 321-40. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
52. Williams, Daniel W. 2004. Evolution of Performance Measurement until 1930. Administration & Society 36(2): 131-65.