The politics of evidence-based policy making

The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 1-137

  Cairney, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979530065     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-51781-4     Document Type: Book

References (413)

1. Bastow, S., Dunleavy, P., & Tinkler, J. (2014a). Measuring the impact of social science research in UK central government policy making. Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Manchester. http://bit.ly/1iSMw4P
2. Bastow, S., Dunleavy, P., & Tinkler, J. (2014b). The impact of the social sciences. London: Sage.
3. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993; 2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (1st and 2nd eds.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
4. Bédard, P., & Ouimet, M. (2012). Cognizance and consultation of randomized controlled trials among ministerial policy analysts. Review of Policy Research, 29 (5), 625-644.
5. Béland, D. (2005). Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 39 (1), 1-18.
6. Berry, F., & Berry, W. (2014). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Chicago: Westview Press.
7. Birkland, T. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8. Cairney, P. (2012a). Understanding public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
9. Cairney, P. (2012b). Complexity theory in political science and public policy. Political Studies Review, 10 (3), 346-358.
10. Cairney, P. (2013). Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies? Policy Studies Journal, 41 (1), 1-21.
11. Cairney, P., & Heikkila, T. (2014). A comparison of theories of the policy process. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Chicago: Westview Press.
12. Cairney, P., & Studlar, D. (2014). Public health policy in the United Kingdom: After the war on Tobacco, is a war on alcohol brewing? World Medical and Health Policy, 6 (3), 308-323.
13. Cairney, P., Studlar, D., & Mamudu, H. (2012). Global tobacco control: Power, policy, governance and transfer. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
14. Embrett, M., & Randall, G. (2014). Social determinants of health and health equity policy research: Exploring the use, misuse, and nonuse of policy analysis theory. Social Science and Medicine, 108, 147-155.
15. Jenkins-Smith, H., Nohrstedt, D., & Weible, C. (2014). The advocacy coalition frame work: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research' process. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Chicago: Westview Press.
16. John, P. (2012). Analysing public policy (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
17. Kingdon, J. (1984; 1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (1st & 2nd eds.). New York: Harper Collins.
18. Kok, M., Rodrigues, A., Paulo Silva, A., & de Haan, S. (2012). The emergence and current performance of a health research system: Lessons from Guinea Bissau. Health Research Policy and Systems, 10 (5), 1-12. http://www.health-policysystems. com/content/10/1/5.
19. Lavis, J. N., Lomas, J., Hamid, M., & Sewankambo, N. K. (2006). Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84 (8), 620-628.
20. Lindblom, C. (1964). Contexts for change and strategy: A reply. Public Administration Review, 24 (3), 157-158.
21. Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
22. Marston, G., & Watts, R. (2003). Tampering with the evidence: A critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3 (3), 143-163.
23. Monaghan, M. (2011). Evidence versus politics: Exploiting research in UK drug policy making? Bristol: The Policy Press.
24. Nilsen, P., Ståhl, C., Roback, K., & Cairney, P. (2013). Never the twain shall meet? A comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implementation Science, 8 (1), 63.
25. Nutley, S., Powell, A., & Davies, H. (2013). What counts as good evidence. London: Alliance for Useful Evidence. http://www.alliance4usefulevidence.org/assets/What-Counts-as-Good-Evidence-WEB.pdf.
26. Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14 (1), 2. http://www.biomedcentral. com/1472-6963/14/2.
27. Oliver, K., Lorenc, T., & Innvær, S. (2014). New directions in evidence-based policy research: A critical analysis of the literature. Health Research Policy and Systems, 12, 34. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1478-4505-12-34.pdf.
28. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
29. Sabatier, P., & Weible, C. (Eds.). (2014). Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Chicago: Westview Press.
30. Sanderson, I. (2009). Intelligent policy making for a complex world: Pragmatism, evidence and learning. Political Studies, 57, 699-719.
31. Weiss, C. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39 (5), 426-431.
32. Zahariadis, N. (2007). The multiple streams framework. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Cambridge, MA: Westview.
33. Alter, A., & Oppenheimer, D. (2008). Easy on the mind, easy on the wallet: The roles of familiarity and processing fluency in valuation judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15 (5), 985-990.
34. Alter, A., & Oppenheimer, D. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13 (3), 219-235.
35. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2010). What is evidence based decision making? Canberra: ABS. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/1500.0ch apter32010.
36. Avey, P., & Desch, M. (2014). What do policymakers want from us? International Studies Quarterly, 58 (4), 227-246.
37. Axford, N., & Pawson, R. (2014). Are randomised control trials essential in policy making? SRA: Research Matters. June http://the-sra.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/SRA-Research-Matters-June-2014.pdf
38. Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004a). Multi-level governance and the study of the British state. Public Policy and Administration, 19 (1), 31-51.
39. Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (Eds.). (2004b). Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Baggott, R. (2010). A modern approach to an old problem? Alcohol policy and new labour. Policy and Politics, 38 (1), 135-152.
41. Bambra, C. (2013). The primacy of politics: The rise and fall of evidence-based public health policy? Journal of Public Health, 35 (4), 486-487.
42. Barrett, S. (2004). Implementation studies: Time for a revival? Public Administration, 82 (2), 249-262.
43. Barrett, S., & Fudge, C. (Eds.). (1981). Policy and action. London: Methuen.
44. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993; 2009). Agendas and Instability in American Politics (1st and 2nd eds.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
45. Baumgartner, F., Jones, B., & Mortensen, P. (2014). Punctuated-equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Chicago: Westview Press.
46. BBC News (2014) "Paul Nurse accuses politicians of 'cowardice' over scientific evidence", 14 January, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30744203
47. Bédard, P., & Ouimet, M. (2012). Cognizance and consultation of randomized controlled trials among ministerial policy analysts. Review of Policy Research, 29 (5), 625-644.
48. Berry, F., & Berry, W. (2014). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Chicago: Westview Press.
49. Birkland, T. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
50. Blackman, T. (2001). Complexity theory and the new public management. Social Issues, 2.
51. Boaz, A., Ashby, D., Denyer, D., Egan, M., Harden, A., Jones, D. R., & Tranfield, D. (2006). A multitude of syntheses: A comparison of five approaches from diverse policy fields. Evidence & Policy, 2 (4), 479-502.
52. Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Levitt, R., & Solesbury, W. (2008). Does evidence-based policy work? Learning from the UK experience. Evidence & Policy, 4 (2), 233-253.
53. Boswell, C. (2009). The political uses of expert knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Botterill, L., & Hindmoor, A. (2012). Turtles all the way down: Bounded rationality in an evidence-based age. Policy Studies, 33 (5), 367-379.
55. Brown, C. (2014) 'Phronetic expertise in evidence use: a new perspective on how research can aid educational policy development', Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation (early access http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08109028. 2013.850186)
56. Cairney, P. (2007). A 'multiple lenses' approach to policy change: The case of tobacco policy in the UK. British Politics, 2 (1), 45-68.
57. Cairney, P. (2009). Implementation and the governance problem: A pressure participant perspective. Public Policy and Administration, 24 (4), 355-377.
58. Cairney, P. (2012a). Understanding public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
59. Cairney, P. (2012b). Complexity theory in political science and public policy. Political Studies Review, 10 (3), 346-358.
60. Cairney, P. (2014). How can policy theory have an impact on policy making? The role of theory-led academic-practitioner discussions. Teaching Public Administration. doi: 10.1177/0144739414532284.
61. Cairney, P. (2015a). What is 'complex government' and what can we do about it? Public Money and Management, January, 3-6.
62. Cairney, P. (2015b). Can you separate the facts from your beliefs when making policy? 23 January. https://paulcairney.wordpress.com/2015/01/23/canyou-separate-the-facts-from-your-beliefs-when-making-policy/
63. Cairney, P., & Geyer, R. (2015). Introduction. In R. Geyer & P. Cairney (Eds.), Handbook of complexity and public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
64. Cairney, P., & Heikkila, T. (2014). A comparison of theories of the policy process. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Chicago: Westview Press.
65. Cairney, P., & Denny, E. (2014). A framework to decide 'what works' in prevention policy. Paper to Scottish Government, February 2014. http://www.futureukandscotland.ac.uk/sites/default/files/papers/Cairney%20St%20 Denny%20Prevention%20Paper%2021.2.14.pdf
66. Cairney, P., Studlar, D., & Mamudu, H. (2012). Global tobacco control: Power, policy, governance and transfer. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
67. Cairney, P., & Weible, C. (2015) 'Comparing and Contrasting Peter Hall's Paradigms and Ideas with the Advocacy Coalition Framework' in (eds) M. Howlett and J. Hogan Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
68. Cameron, A., Salisbury, C., Lart, R., Stewart, K., Peckham, S., Calnan, M., Purdy, S., & Thorp, H. (2011). Policy makers' perceptions on the use of evidence from evaluations. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 7 (4), 429-447.
69. Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (1), 1-25.
71. Colebatch, H. (1998). Policy. Buckingham: Open University Press.
72. Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda setting. London: Sage.
73. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, XLIV, 343-357.
74. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13 (1), 5-24.
75. Downe, J., Martin, S., & Bovaird, T. (2012). Learning from complex policy evaluations. Policy & Politics, 40 (4), 505-523.
76. Ettelt, S., Mays, N., & Nolte, E. (2012). Policy learning from abroad: Why it is more difficult than it seems. Policy & Politics, 40 (4), 491-504.
77. Geyer, R. (2012). Can complexity move UK policy beyond 'evidence-based policy making' and the 'audit culture'? Applying a 'complexity cascade' to education and health policy. Political Studies, 60 (1), 20-43.
78. Geyer, R., & Rihani, S. (2010). Complexity and public policy. London: Routledge.
79. Ginsburg, M. B., & Gorostiaga, J. M. (2001). Relationships between theorists/researchers and policy makers/practitioners. Comparative Education Review, 45 (2), 173-196.
80. Greenaway, J. (2008). Agendas, venues and alliances: New opportunities for the alcohol control movement in England. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 15 (5), 487-501.
81. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46 (1), 1-35.
82. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108 (4), 814-834.
83. Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998-1000.
84. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.
85. Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25 (2), 275-296.
86. Haynes, L., Service, O., Goldacre, B., & Torgerson, D. (2012). Test, learn, adapt: Developing public policy with randomised controlled trials. London: Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/62529/TLA-1906126.pdf.
87. Head, B. (2008). Three lenses of evidence-based policy. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67 (1), 1-11.
88. Head, B. (2010a). Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges. Policy and Society, 29, 77-94.
89. Head, B. (2010b). Water policy-Evidence, learning and the governance of uncertainty. Policy and Society, 29, 171-180.
90. Head, B. (2013). Evidence-based policymaking-Speaking truth to power? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72 (4), 397-403.
91. Head, B., Ferguson, M., Cherney, A., & Boreham, P. (2014). Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia. Policy and Society, 33 (2), 89-101.
92. Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The New American political system. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
93. Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2009). Implementing public policy (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
94. Hjern, B. (1982). Implementation research-The link gone missing. Journal of Public Policy, 2 (3), 301-308.
95. Hjern, B., & Porter, D. (1981). Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis. Organizational Studies, 2, 211-227.
96. HM Government. (2014). The futures toolkit: Tools for strategic futures for policymakers and analysts, 8 July. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/futures-toolkit-for-policy-makers-and-analysts
97. Jenkins-Smith, H., Nohrstedt, D., & Weible, C. (2014). The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research' process. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Chicago: Westview Press.
98. Jordan, G. (1981). Iron triangles, woolly corporatism and elastic nets: Images of the policy process. Journal of Public Policy, 1 (1), 95-123.
99. Jordan, G., Halpin, D., & Maloney, W. (2004). Defining interests: Disambiguation and the need for new distinctions? The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 6 (2), 195-212.
100. Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast and slow (UK ed.). London: Penguin.
101. Kernick, D. (2006). Wanted-New methodologies for health service research. Is complexity theory the answer? Family Practice, 23, 385-390.
102. Kingdon, J. (1984; 1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (1st & 2nd eds.). New York: Harper Collins.
103. Lewis, P. (2013). Policy thinking, fast and slow: A social intuitionist perspective on public policy processes. American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting. Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=2300479
104. Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 79-88.
105. Lindblom, C. (1964). Contexts for change and strategy: A reply. Public Administration Review, 24 (3), 157-158.
106. Lindblom, C. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39, 517-525.
107. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
108. Lomas, J., & Brown, A. (2009). Research and advice giving: A functional view of evidence-informed policy advice in a Canadian ministry of health. Milbank Quarterly, 87 (4), 903-926.
109. Marsh, D., & McConnell, A. (2010). Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration, 88 (2), 564-583.
110. Marston, G., & Watts, R. (2003). Tampering with the evidence: A critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3 (3), 143-163.
111. McBeth, M., Jones, M., & Shanahan, E. (2014). The narrative policy framework. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Chicago: Westview Press.
112. McCaughey, D., & Bruning, N. S. (2010). Rationality versus reality: The challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers. Implementation Science, 5, 39. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-39. http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/39.
113. McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
114. Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
115. Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Ten principles of complexity and enabling infrastructures. In E. Mitleton-Kelly (Ed.), Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives of organisations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
116. Monaghan, M. (2011). Evidence versus politics: Exploiting research in UK drug policy making? Bristol: The Policy Press.
117. Naughton, K. (2005). Evidence based policy and the government of the criminal justice system-Only if the evidence fits! Critical Social Policy, 25 (1), 47-69.
118. Neylan, J. (2008). Social policy and the authority of evidence. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67 (1), 12-19.
119. Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.
120. Nutley, S., Powell, A., & Davies, H. (2013). What counts as good evidence. London: Alliance for Useful Evidence. http://www.alliance4usefulevidence.org/assets/What-Counts-as-Good-Evidence-WEB.pdf.
121. O'Brien, D. (2013). Drowning the deadweight in the rhetoric of economism: What sport policy, free swimming, and EMA tell us about public services after the crash. Public Administration, 91 (1), 69-82.
122. Ostrom, E., Cox, M., & Schlager, E. (2014). Institutional rational choice. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
123. Paley, J. (2010). The appropriation of complexity theory in health care. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 15 (1), 59-61.
124. Parsons, W. (2002). From muddling through to muddling up-Evidence based policy making and the modernisation of British government. Public Policy and Administration, 17 (3), 43.
125. Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage.
126. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.
127. Pierce, J., Siddiki, S., Jones, M., Schumacher, K., Pattison, A., & Peterson, H. (2014). Social construction and policy design: A review of past applications. Policy Studies Journal, 42 (1), 1-29.
128. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94 (2), 251-267.
129. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
130. Rhodes, R. (2013). Political anthropology and civil service reform: Prospects and limits. Policy and Politics, 41 (4), 481-496.
131. Rich, R. F. (1997). Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outcomes. Knowledge and Policy, 10 (3), 11-24.
132. Room, G. (2011). Complexity, institutions and public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
133. Rose, R. (1990). Inheritance before choice in public policy. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2 (3), 263-291.
134. Rose, R. (1993). Lesson-drawing in public policy. New York: Chatham House.
135. Rose, R. (2005). Learning from comparative public policy: A practical guide. London: Routledge.
136. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
137. Sabatier, P. (1988). An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences 21(2-3): 129-126.
138. Sabatier, P., & Weible, C. (Eds.). (2014). Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Chicago: Westview Press.
139. Sabatier, P., Hunter, S., & McLaughlin, S. (1987). The devil shift: Perceptions and misperceptions of opponents. The Western Political Quarterly, 40 (3), 449-476.
140. Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80 (1), 1-22.
141. Sanderson, I. (2006). Complexity, 'practical rationality' and evidence-based policy making. Policy and Politics, 34 (1), 115-132.
142. Sanderson, I. (2009). Intelligent policy making for a complex world: Pragmatism, evidence and learning. Political Studies, 57, 699-719.
143. Sanderson, I. (2011). Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence? Reflections on Scottish experience. Evidence and Policy, 7 (1), 59-76.
144. Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
145. Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (2005). A response to Peter deLeon. Public Administration Review, 65 (5), 638-640.
146. Schneider, A., Ingram, H., & de Leon, P. (2014). Democratic policy design: Social construction of target populations. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
147. Schneider, A., Ingram, H. and deLeon, P. (2014) 'Democratic Policy Design: Social Construction of Target Populations' in Sabatier, P. and Weible, C. (eds.) Theories of the Policy Process 3rd edition
148. Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332-348.
149. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
150. Scottish Government. (2009). Review of policymaking. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
151. Simon, H. (1957; 1976). Administrative behavior (2nd & 3rd eds.). London: Macmillan.
152. Smith, K. (2013). Beyond evidence based policy in public health: The interplay of ideas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
153. Solesbury, W. (2001). Evidence based policy: Whence it came and where it's going. London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice. http:// www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/politicaleconomy/research/cep/pubs/papers/assets/wp1.pdf.
154. Stevens, A. (2007a). Survival of the ideas that fit: An evolutionary analogy for the use of evidence in policy. Social Policy & Society, 6 (1), 25-35.
155. Stevens, A. (2007b). Telling policy stories: An ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policymaking in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 40 (2), 237-255.
156. Stoker, G. (2010). Translating experiments into policy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 628 (1), 47-58.
157. Stone, D. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104, 281-300.
158. Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (revised ed.). London: Norton.
159. Sutherland, W., Spiegelhalter, D., & Burgman, M. (2013). Twenty tips for interpreting scientific claims. Nature, 503, 335-336.
160. Talbot, C., & Talbot, C. (2014). Sir Humphrey and the professors: What does Whitehall want from academics? Manchester: University of Manchester. http:// www.policy.manchester.ac.uk/media/projects/policymanchester/1008_ Policy@Manchester_Senior_Civil_Servants_Survey_v4(1).pdf.
161. Taylor, B. (2013). Evidence-based policy and systemic change: Conflicting trends? (Springfield Working Paper Series no. 1). Durham: The Springfield Centre.
162. Teisman, G., & Klijn, E. (2008). Complexity theory and public management. Public Management Review, 10 (3), 287-297.
163. Thom, B. (1999). Dealing with drink. London: Free Association Books.
164. Thom, B. (2005). Who makes alcohol policy: Science and policy networks. In V. Berridge (Ed.), Making health policy: Networks in research and policy after 1945. New York: Rodopi.
165. True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2007). Punctuated equilibrium theory. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
166. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
167. Weible, C. (2007). An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17 (1), 95-117.
168. Weible, C. (2014). Introduction. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
169. Weible, C., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P., & Sabatier, P. (2012). Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sciences, 45 (1), 1-21.
170. Weiss, C. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39 (5), 426-431.
171. Williams, I., & Glasby, J. (2010). Making 'what works' work: The use of knowledge in UK health and social care decision-making. Policy and Society, 29, 95-102.
172. Wood, M. (2015). Depoliticisation, Resilience and the Herceptin Post-code Lottery Crisis: Holding Back the Tide. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 17(4), 644-664.
173. Yeomans, H. (2013). Blurred visions: Experts, evidence and the promotion of moderate drinking. The Sociological Review, 61 (S2), 58-78.
174. Zahariadis, N. (2014). Ambiguity and multiple streams. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
175. Avery, G. (2004). Bioterrorism, fear, and public health reform: Matching a policy solution to the wrong window. Public Administration Review, 64, 274-288.
176. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993; 2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (1st and 2nd eds.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
177. Bédard, P., & Ouimet, M. (2012). Cognizance and consultation of randomized controlled trials among ministerial policy analysts. Review of Policy Research, 29 (5), 625-644.
178. Birkland, T. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
179. Blackman, T., Harrington, B., Elliott, E., Greene, A., Hunter, D. J., Marks, L., McKee, L., & Williams, G. (2012). Framing health inequalities for local intervention: Comparative case studies. Sociology of Health & Illness, 34 (1), 49-63.
180. Cairney, P. (2012). Understanding public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
181. Cairney, P. (2014a). How can policy theory have an impact on policy making? The role of theory-led academic-practitioner discussions. Teaching Public Administration. doi: 10.1177/0144739414532284.
182. Cairney, P., & Jones, M. (2015) 'Kingdon's Multiple Streams Approach: What Is the Empirical Impact of this Universal Theory?' Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 37-58.
183. Cairney, P. (2015a). What is 'complex government' and what can we do about it? Public Money and Management, January, 3-6.
184. Cairney, P. (2015b). Can you separate the facts from your beliefs when making policy? 23 January. https://paulcairney.wordpress.com/2015/01/23/canyou-separate-the-facts-from-your-beliefs-when-making-policy/
185. Cairney, P. (2015c). Evidence-based best practice is more political than it looks: A case study of the 'Scottish approach'. Paper to ESRC academic practitioner workshop, Centre on Constitutional Change, Edinburgh, 10 June.
186. Cairney, P. (2015d). These complaints about ignoring science seem biased and naïve-And too easy to dismiss. https://paulcairney.wordpress.com/2015/08/19/these-complaints-about-ignoring-science-seem-biased-and-naive-andtoo-easy-to-dismiss/
187. Cairney, P., & Mamudu, H. (2014). The global tobacco control 'endgame': Change the policy environment to implement the FCTC. Journal of Public Health Policy. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2014.18.
188. Cairney, P., & Studlar, D. (2014). Public health policy in the United Kingdom: After the war on Tobacco, is a war on alcohol brewing? World Medical and Health Policy, 6(3), 308-323.
189. Cairney, P. (2007a) 'A 'Multiple Lenses' Approach to Policy Change: The Case of Tobacco Policy in the UK', British Politics, 2 (1), 45-68.
190. Cairney, P., Studlar, D., & Mamudu, H. (2012). Global tobacco control: Power, policy, governance and transfer. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
191. Cameron, A., Salisbury, C., Lart, R., Stewart, K., Peckham, S., Calnan, M., Purdy, S., & Thorp, H. (2011). Policy makers' perceptions on the use of evidence from evaluations. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 7 (4), 429-447.
192. Chalkidou, K., Tunis, S., Lopert, R., Rochaix, L., Sawicki, P. T., Nasser, M., & Xerri, B. (2009). Comparative effectiveness research and evidence-based health policy: Experience from four countries. Milbank Quarterly, 87 (2), 339-367.
193. Chambers, D., Grant, R., Warren, E., Pearson, S. A., & Wilson, P. (2012). Use of evidence from systematic reviews to inform commissioning decisions: A case study. Evidence & Policy, 8 (2), 141-148.
194. Currie, L. M., & Clancy, L. (2010). The road to smoke-free legislation in Ireland. Addiction, 106 (1), 15-24.
195. de Goede, J., Putters, K., van der Grinten, T., & van Oers, H. (2010). Knowledge in process? Exploring barriers between epidemiological research and local health policy development. Health Research Policy and Systems, 8 (26), 1-11. http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/8/1/26.
196. Dobbins, M., Robeson, P., Ciliska, D., Hanna, S., Cameron, R., O'Mara, L., et al. (2009). A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies. Implementation Science, 4 (23), 1-16.
197. Dobrow, M. J., Goel, V., Lemieux-Charles, L., & Black, N. A. (2006). The impact of context on evidence utilization: A framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations. Social Science & Medicine, 63 (7), 1811-1824.
198. Doll, R. (1998). The first reports on smoking and health. In S. Lock, L. Reynolds, & E. M. Tansey (Eds.), Ashes to ashes: The history of smoking and health (pp. 130-142). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
199. Donley T. Studlar (2015). Punching Above Their Weight Through Policy Learning: Tobacco Control Policies in Ireland, Irish Political Studies, 30 (1), 41-78.
200. El-Jardali, F., Lavis, J., Ataya, N., & Jamal, D. (2012). Use of health systems and policy research evidence in the health policymaking in eastern Mediterranean countries: Views and practices of researchers. Implementation Science, 7 (2), 1-16.
201. Elliott, H., & Popay, J. (2000). How are policy makers using evidence? Models of research utilisation and local NHS policy making. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54 (6), 461-468.
202. Embrett, M., & Randall, G. (2014). Social determinants of health and health equity policy research: Exploring the use, misuse, and nonuse of policy analysis theory. Social Science and Medicine, 108, 147-155.
203. Ettelt, S., & Mays, N. (2011). Health services research in Europe and its use for informing policy. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 16 (Suppl 2), 48-60. Exworthy, M., 2008. Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: using conceptual models to understand the policy process. Health Policy and Planning, 23 (5), 318-327.
204. Ferlie, E., Crilly, T., Jashapara, A., & Peckham, A. (2012). Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: A critical review of health sector and generic management literature. Social Science & Medicine, 74 (8), 1297-1304.
205. Flitcroft, K., Gillespie, J., Salkeld, G., Carter, S., & Trevena, L. (2011) 'Getting evidence into policy: The need for deliberative strategies?' Social Science & Medicine, 72 (7), 1039-1046.
206. Geyer, R. (2012). Can complexity move UK policy beyond 'evidence-based policy making' and the 'audit culture'? Applying a 'complexity cascade' to education and health policy. Political Studies, 60 (1), 20-43.
207. Geyer, R., & Rihani, S. (2010). Complexity and public policy. London: Routledge.
208. Gkeredakis, E., Swan, J., Powell, J., Nicolini, D., Scarbrough, H., Roginski, C., Taylor-Phillips, S., & Clarke, A. (2011). Mind the gap: Understanding utilisation of evidence and policy in health care management practice. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 25 (3), 298-314.
209. Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2003). The underprovision of experiments in political science. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589 (1), 94-112.
210. Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., and Maskrey, N. (2014) 'Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?' British Medical Journal, 348, g3725.
211. Hanney, S., Gonzalez-Block, M., Buxton, M., & Kogan, M. (2003). The utilisation of health research in policy-making: Concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Research Policy and Systems, 1 (2), 1-28. http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/1/1/2.
212. Haynes, P. (2008) 'Complexity Theory and Evaluation in Public Management', Public Management Review, 10 (3), 401-19.
213. Haynes, A., Gillespie, J., Derrick, G., Hall, W., Redman, S., Chapman, S., & Sturk, H. (2011). Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: The many ways that policymakers use public health researchers. The Milbank Quarterly, 89 (4), 564-598.
214. Haynes, L., Service, O., Goldacre, B., & Torgerson, D. (2012). Test, learn, adapt: Developing public policy with randomised controlled trials. London: Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/62529/TLA-1906126.pdf.
215. Hinchcliff, R., Poulos, R., Ivers, R. Q., & Senserrick, T. (2011). Understanding novice driver policy agenda setting. Public Health, 125, 217-221.
216. HM Treasury and Department of Health. (2002). Tackling health inequalities summary of the 2002 cross-cutting review. London: HM Treasury.
217. Hobin, E., Hayward, S., Riley, B., Di Ruggiero, E., & Birdsell, J. (2012). Maximising the use of evidence: Exploring the intersection between population health intervention research and knowledge translation from a Canadian perspective. Evidence & Policy, 8 (1), 97-115.
218. Howie, W. O. (2009). Mandatory reporting of medical errors: Crafting policy and integrating it into practice. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 5 (9), 649-654.
219. Hunsmann, M. (2012). Limits to evidence-based health policymaking: Policy hurdles to structural HIV prevention in Tanzania. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1477-1485.
220. Hunter, D. (2009) 'Relationship between evidence and policy: A case of evidencebased policy or policy-based evidence?' Public health, 123 (9), 583-586.
221. Innvær, S. (2009). The use of evidence in public governmental reports on health policy: An analysis of 17 Norwegian official reports (NOU). BMC Health Services Research, 9 (177), 1-10.
222. Jack, S., Brooks, S., Furgal, C., & Dobbins, M. (2010). Knowledge transfer and exchange processes for environmental health issues in Canadian Aboriginal communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7 (2), 651-674.
223. John, P., Cotterill, S., Richardson, L., Moseley, A., Stoker, G., Wales, C., & Smith, G. (2013). Nudge, nudge, think, think: Experimenting with ways to change civic behaviour. London: Bloomsbury.
224. Jönsson, K., Tomson, G., Jönsson, C., Kounnavong, S., & Wahlström, R. (2007). Health Research Policy and. Health Research Policy and Systems, 5 (11), 1-10.
225. Jordan, G., & Cairney, P. (2013). What is the 'dominant model' of British policy making? Comparing majoritarian and policy community ideas. British Politics, 8 (3), 233-259.
226. King's Improvement Science. (2015). What is improvement science? http:// www.kingsimprovementscience.org/what-is-improvement-science
227. Kok, M. O., Vaandrager, L., Bal, R., & Schuit, J. (2012). Practitioner opinions on health promotion interventions that work: Opening the 'black box' of a linear evidence-based approach. Social Science & Medicine, 74 (5), 715-723.
228. Kotharia, A., Birch, S., & Charles, C. (2005). "Interaction" and research utilisation in health policies and programs: Does it work? Health Policy, 71, 117-125.
229. Lavis, J., Ross, S., McLeod, C., & Gildiner, A. (2003). Measuring the impact of health research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 8, 165-170.
230. Learmonth, A. M. (2000). Utilizing research in practice and generating evidence from practice. Health Education Research, 15 (6), 743-756.
231. Lewig, K., Scott, D., Holzer, P., Arney, F., Humphreys, C., & Bromfield, L. (2010). The role of research in child protection policy reform: A case study of South Australia. Evidence & Policy, 6 (4), 461-482.
232. Little, A. (2012) 'Political Action, Error and Failure: The Epistemological Limits of Complexity', Political Studies, 60 (1), 3-19.
233. Lomas, J., & Brown, A. (2009). Research and advice giving: A functional view of evidence-informed policy advice in a Canadian ministry of health. Milbank Quarterly, 87 (4), 903-926.
234. Mamudu, H., Cairney, P., & Studlar, D. (2015). Global public policy: Does the new venue for transnational tobacco control challenge the old way of doing things? Public Administration, Early view doi: 10.1111/padm.12143.
235. Marston, G., & Watts, R. (2003). Tampering with the evidence: A critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3 (3), 143-163.
236. McBeth, M., Jones, M., & Shanahan, E. (2014). The narrative policy framework. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Chicago: Westview Press.
237. McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
238. Mitton, C., Adair, C. E., McKenzie, E., Patten, S. B., & Perry, B. W. (2007). Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Quarterly, 85 (4), 729-768.
239. Morris, Z. S., Wooding, S., & Grant, J. (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104 (12), 510-520.
240. Nilsen, P., Ståhl, C., Roback, K., & Cairney, P. (2013). Never the twain shall meet? A comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implementation Science, 8 (1), 63.
241. Nilsen, P., Ståhl, C., Roback, K., and Cairney, P. (2013) 'Never the twain shall meet? A comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research', Implementation Science, 8 (1), 63.
242. Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14 (1), 2. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/14/2.
243. Oliver, K., Lorenc, T., & Innvær, S. (2014). New directions in evidence-based policy research: A critical analysis of the literature. Health Research Policy and Systems, 12, 34. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1478-4505-12-34.pdf.
244. Petticrew, M., Whitehead, M., Macintyre, S. J., Graham, H., & Egan, M. (2004). Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1: The reality according to policymakers. Journal of Epidemiological Community Health, 58, 811-816.
245. Pralle, S. B. (2009). Agenda-setting and climate change. Environmental Politics, 18 (5), 781-799.
246. Paul Cairney (2007b) 'Using Devolution to Set the Agenda? Venue shift and the smoking ban in Scotland', British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9 (1), 73-89. Quirk, B., 2007. The four things you need to know. Public Policy and Administration, 22 (3), 367-373.
247. Ritter, A. (2009). How do drug policymakers access research evidence? The International Journal of Drug Policy, 20, 70-75.
248. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
249. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312 (7023), 71-72.
250. Sanderson, I. (2009). Intelligent policy making for a complex world: Pragmatism, evidence and learning. Political Studies, 57, 699-719.
251. Schneider, A., Ingram, H., & de Leon, P. (2014). Democratic policy design: Social construction of target populations. In P. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
252. Smith, K. (2013). Beyond evidence based policy in public health: The interplay of ideas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
253. Smith, K., & Joyce, K. (2012). Capturing complex realities: Understanding efforts to achieve evidence-based policy and practice in public health. Evidence & Policy, 8 (1), 57-78.
254. Smith, G. C., & Pell, J. P. (2003). Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 327, 7429, 1459.
255. Stoker, G. (2010). Translating experiments into policy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 628 (1), 47-58.
256. Studlar, D., & Cairney, P. (2014). Conceptualizing punctuated and nonpunctuated policy change: Tobacco control in comparative perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80 (3), 513-531.
257. True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2007). Punctuated equilibrium theory. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
258. Van Egmond, S., Bekker, M., Bal, R., & van der Grinten, T. (2011). Connecting evidence and policy: Bringing researchers and policy makers together for effective evidence-based health policy in the Netherlands: A case study. Evidence & Policy, 7 (1), 25-39.
259. Aoki-Suzuki, C., Bengtsson, M., & Hotta, Y. (2012). Policy application of economy-wide material flow accounting. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16 (4), 467-480.
260. Backstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3 (4), 24-41.
261. Barrett, J., Birch, R., Cherrett, N., & Wiedmann, T. (2005). Exploring the application of the ecological footprint to sustainable consumption policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7 (4), 303-316.
262. Biesbroek, R., Dupuis, J., Jordan, A., Wellstead, A., Howlett, M., Cairney, P., Rayner, J., & Davidson, D. (2015). Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making. Nature Climate Change, 5 (6), 493-494.
263. Boissière, M., Locatelli, B., Sheil, D., Padmanaba, M., & Sadjudin, E. (2013). Local perceptions of climate variability and change in tropical forests of Papua, Indonesia. Ecology and Society, 18 (4), 13.
264. Briggs, S. V. (2006). Integrating policy and science in natural resources: Why so difficult? Ecological Management and Restoration, 7 (1), 37-39.
265. Brunner, S. (2008). Understanding policy change: Multiple streams and emissions trading in Germany. Global Environmental Change, 18 (3), 501-507.
266. Burbidge, A. H., Maron, M., Clarke, M. F., Baker, J., Oliver, D. L., & Ford, G. (2011). Linking science and practice in ecological research and management: How can we do it better? Ecological Management and Restoration, 12 (1), 54-60.
267. Cairney, P., & Mamudu, H. (2014). The global tobacco control 'endgame': Change the policy environment to implement the FCTC. Journal of Public Health Policy. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2014.18.
268. Cairney, P., Studlar, D., & Mamudu, H. (2012). Global tobacco control: Power, policy, governance and transfer. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
269. Cairney, P., Fischer, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Hydraulic fracturing policy in the UK. In C. Weible, T. Heikkila, K. Ingold, & M. Fischer (Eds.), Comparing coalition politics: Policy debates on hydraulic fracturing in North America and Western Europe. London: Palgrave.
270. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. (2004). The third community: Knowledge brokers, research, and policy. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation.
271. Carneiro, M., & Danton, T. (2011). Agriculture and biodiversity in the Brazilian social sciences: A possible state-of-the-art scenario. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 24 (3), 225-246.
272. Carneiro, M., & da-Silva-Rosa, T. (2011). The use of scientific knowledge in the decision making process of environmental public policies in Brazil. Journal of Science Communication, 10, 1, A03, 1-10.
273. Cash, D. W., & Moser, S. (2000). Linking global and local scales: Designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change, 10 (2), 109-120.
274. Cash, D., Clark, W., Alcock, F., Dickson, N., Eckley, N., Guston, D., Jager, J., & Mitchell, R. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100 (14), 8086-8091.
275. Ceccarelli, D. M., Richards, Z. T., Pratchett, M. S., & Cvitanovic, C. (2011). Rapid increase in coral cover on an isolated coral reef. Marine and Freshwater Research, 62 (10), 1214-1220.
276. Cerveny, L., Blalma, D., Mortimer, M., Predmore, S., & Freeman, J. (2011). The use of recreation planning tools in U.S. forest service NEPA assessments. Environmental Management, 48 (3), 644-657.
277. Clare, S., & Creed, I. (2014). Tracking wetland loss to improve evidence-based wetland policy learning and decision making. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 22 (3), 235-245.
278. Conrad, E., Cassar, L., Christie, M., & Fazey, I. (2011). Hearing but not listening? A participatory assessment of public participation in planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29 (5), 761-782.
279. Cook, C. N., Hockings, M., & Carter, R. W. (2010). Conservation in the dark? The information used to support management decisions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8 (4), 181-186.
280. Cook, B., Kesby, M., Fazey, I., & Spray, C. (2013a). The persistence of 'normal' catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference. Social Studies of Science, 43 (5), 754-779.
281. Cook, C. N., Possingham, H. P., & Fuller, R. A. (2013b). Contribution of systematic reviews to management decisions. Conservation Biology, 27 (5), 902-915.
282. Cortner, H. J. (2000). Making science relevant to environmental policy. Environmental Science and Policy, 3 (1), 21-30.
283. Crona, B. I., & Parker, J. N. (2012). Learning in support of governance: Theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society, 17 (1), 32. http://dx.doi. org/10.5751/ES-04534-170132.
284. Curry, R., & Maguire, C. (2011). The use of ecological and carbon footprint analysis in regional policy making: Application and insights using the REAP model. Local Environment, 16 (9), 917-936.
285. Cvitanovic, C., et al. (2013). Critical research needs for managing coral reef marine protected areas: Perspectives of academics and managers. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 84-91.
286. Cvitanovic, C., Marshall, N., Wilson, S., Dobbs, K., & Hobday, A. (2014a). Perceptions of Australian marine protected area managers regarding the role, importance, and achievability of adaptation for managing the risks of climate change. Ecology and Society, 19 (4), 33-42.
287. Cvitanovic, C., Fulton, C. J., Wilson, S. K., van Kerkhoff, L., Cripps, I. L., & Muthiga, N. (2014b). Utility of primary scientific literature to environmental managers: An international case study on coral-dominated marine protected areas. Ocean and Coastal Management, 102 (A), 72-78.
288. Cvitanovic, C., Hobday, A. J., van Kerkhoff, L., Wilson, S. K., Dobbs, K., & Marshall, N. A. (2015). Improving knowledge exchange among scientists and decisionmakers to facilitate the adaptive governance of marine resources: A review of knowledge and research needs. Ocean & Coastal Management, 112, 25-35.
289. D'Aquino, P., & Bah, A. (2014). Multi-level participatory design of land use policies in African drylands: A method to embed adaptability skills of drylands societies in a policy framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 132, 207-219.
290. Dhanda, K., & Murphy, P. (2011). The new wild west is green: Carbon offset markets, transactions, and providers. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25 (4), 37-49.
291. Dicks, L., Hodge, I., Randall, N., Scharlemann, J., Siriwardena, G., Smith, H. G., Smith, R., & Sutherland, W. (2014). A transparent process for "evidenceinformed" policy making. Conservation Letters, 7 (2), 119-125.
292. Eisenack, K., Moser, S. C., Hoffmann, E., Klein, R. J., Oberlack, C., Pechan, A., Rotter, M., & Termeer, C. J. (2014). Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 4 (10), 867-872.
293. Eisenack, K., Moser, S. C., Hoffmann, E., Klein, R. J., Oberlack, C., Pechan, A., Rotter, M., & Termeer, C. J. (2015). Reply to 'opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making'. Nature Climate Change, 5 (6), 494-495.
294. Fazey, I., Salisbury, J. G., Lindenmayer, D. B., Maindonald, J., & Douglas, R. (2004). Can methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research? Environmental Conservation, 31 (3), 190-198.
295. Fox, H. E., Christian, C., Nordby, J. C., Pergams, O. R., Peterson, G. D., & Pyke, C. R. (2006). Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation. Conservation Biology, 20 (6), 1817-1820.
296. Gan, W., Koehoorn, M., Davies, H., Demers, P., Tamburic, L., & Brauer, M. (2011). Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and the risk of coronary heart disease hospitalization and mortality. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119 (4), 501-508.
297. Gaudreau, M., & Saner, M. (2014). Researchers are from Mars: Policymakers are from Venus. Ottawa: Institute for Science, Society and Policy. http://issp. uottawa.ca/sites/issp.uottawa.ca/files/issp2014-spibrief1-collaboration.pdf.
298. Gibbons, P., Zammit, C., Youngentob, K., Possingham, H. P., Lindenmayer, D. B., Bekessy, S., et al. (2008). Some practical suggestions for improving engagement between researchers and policymakers in natural resource management. Ecological Management & Restoration, 9 (3), 182-186.
299. Grorud-Colvert, K., Lester, S. E., Airame, S., Neeley, E., & Gaines, S. D. (2010). Communicating marine reserve science to diverse audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107 (43), 18306-18311.
300. Hamilton, R., & Penny, D. (2015). Ecological history of Lachlan Nature Reserve, Centennial Park, Sydney, Australia: A palaeoecological approach to conservation. Environmental Conservation, 42 (01), 84-94.
301. Hamm, J. A., Pytlik Zillig, L. M., Herian, M. N., Tomkins, A. J., Dietrich, H., & Michaels, S. (2013). Trust and intention to comply with a water allocation decision: The moderating roles of knowledge and consistency. Ecology and Society, 18 (4), 49.
302. Haug, C., et al. (2010). Navigating the dilemmas of climate policy in Europe: Evidence from policy evaluation studies. Climatic Change, 101 (3-4), 427-444.
303. Heikkila, T., & Weible, C. (2016). Contours of coalition politics on hydraulic fracturing within the United States. In C. Weible, T. Heikkila, K. Ingold, & M. Fischer (Eds.), Comparing coalition politics: Policy debates on hydraulic fracturing in North America and Western Europe. London: Palgrave.
304. Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008). Rethinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37 (4), 740-760.
305. Hickey, G., Forest, P., Sandall, J., Lalor, B., & Keenan, R. (2013). Managing the environmental science-Policy nexus in government: Perspectives from public servants in Canada and Australia. Science and Public Policy, 40 (4), 529-543.
306. Hoey, A. S., Pratchett, M. S., & Cvitanovic, C. (2011). High macroalgal cover and low coral recruitment undermines the potential resilience of the world's southernmost coral reef assemblages. PLoS One, 6 (10) e25824, 1-9.
307. Hoppe, R. (2005). Rethinking the science-policy nexus: From knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis & Praxis, 3 (3), 199-215.
308. Howard, T. (2015). Olive branches and idiot's guides: Frameworks for community engagement in Australian wind farm development. Energy Policy, 78, 137-147.
309. Huntjens, P., Pahl-Wostl, C., Rihoux, B., Schlüter, M., Flachner, Z., Neto, S., Koskova, R., Dickens, C., & Nabide Kiti, I. (2011). Adaptive water management and policy learning in a changing climate: A formal comparative analysis of eight water management regimes in Europe, Africa and Asia. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21 (3), 145-163.
310. Janse, G., & Konijnendijk, C. C. (2007). Communication between science, policy and citizens in public participation in urban forestry: Experiences from the neighbourwoods project. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 6 (1), 23-40.
311. Jasanoff, S. (2005). In the democracies of DNA: Ontological uncertainty and political order in three states. New Genetics and Society, 24 (2), 139-155.
312. Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., & Popp, D. (2010). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts (NBER Working Paper 13670). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
313. Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2 (10), 732-735.
314. Keene, M., & Pullin, A. (2011). Realizing an effectiveness revolution in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2130-2135.
315. Keskitalo, E. C. H., Westerhoff, L., & Juhola, S. (2012). Agenda-setting on the environment: The development of climate change adaptation as an issue in European states. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22 (6), 381-394.
316. Klein, R. J., Schipper, E. L. F., & Dessai, S. (2005). Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: Three research questions. Environmental Science & Policy, 8 (6), 579-588.
317. Klenk, N. L., & Hickey, G. M. (2011). Government science in forestry: Characteristics and policy utilization. Forest Policy and Economics, 13 (1), 37-45.
318. Lake, S. P., Likens, G. E., & Ryder, D. S. (2010). Integrating science, policy and management of rivers: Peters Cullen's legacy. Marine and Freshwater Research, 61 (7), 733-735.
319. Lalor, B., & Hickey, G. (2014). Strengthening the role of science in the environmental decision-making processes of executive government. Organization & Environment, Early view, 1-20.
320. Landry, R., Lamari, M., & Amara, N. (2003). The extent and determinants of the utilization of university research in government agencies. Public Administration Review, 63 (2), 192-205.
321. Lawton, J. H. (2007). Ecology, politics and policy. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44 (3), 465-474.
322. Leviston, Z., & Walker, I. (2012). Beliefs and denials about climate change: An Australian perspective. Ecopsychology, 4 (4), 277-285.
323. Likens, G. E. (2010). The role of science in decision making: Does evidence based science drive environmental policy? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8 (6), 1-9.
324. Litfin, K. (2000). Advocacy coalitions along the domestic-foreign frontier: Globalization and Canadian climate change policy. The Policy Studies Journal, 28 (1), 236-252.
325. Longstaff, P. H., & Yang, S.-U. (2008). Communication management and trust: Their role in building resilience to "surprises" such as natural disasters, pandemic flu, and terrorism. Ecology and Society, 13 (1), 3. http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol13/iss1/art3/.
326. Louwagie, G., Northey, G., Finn, J., & Purvis, G. (2012). Development of indicators for assessment of the environmental impact of livestock farming in Ireland using the agri-environmental footprint index. Ecological Indicators, 18, 149-162.
327. Malcomb, D., Weaver, E., & Krakowka, A. (2014). Vulnerability modeling for sub-Saharan Africa: An operationalized approach in Malawi. Applied Geography, 48, 17-30.
328. Mamudu, H., Cairney, P., & Studlar, D. (2015). Global public policy: Does the new venue for transnational tobacco control challenge the old way of doing things? Public Administration, Early view doi: 10.1111/padm.12143.
329. McNie, E. C. (2007). Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: An analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 10 (1), 17-38.
330. Meyer, M. (2010). The rise of the knowledge broker. Science Communication, 32 (1), 118-127.
331. Michaels, D. (2008). Doubt is their product: How industry's assault on science threatens your health. New York: Oxford University Press.
332. Michaels, S. (2009). Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings. Environmental Science and Policy, 12 (7), 994-1011.
333. Molnár, Z. (2014). Perception and management of spatio-temporal pasture heterogeneity by Hungarian herders. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 67 (2), 107-118.
334. Naughton, O., & Hynds, P. (2014). Public awareness, behaviours and attitudes towards domestic wastewater treatment systems in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Hydrology, 518, 108-119.
335. Nilsson, M., Jordan, A., Turnpenny, J., Hertin, J., Nykvist, B., & Russel, D. (2008). The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: An analysis of three European countries and the European Union. Policy Sciences, 41 (4), 335-355.
336. O'Neill, K., Weinthal, E., Suiseeya, K., Bernstein, S., Cohn, A., Stone, M., & Cashore, B. (2013). Methods and global environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 441-471.
337. Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14 (1), 2. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/14/2.
338. Oreskes, N. (2004). Science and public policy: What's proof got to do with it? Environmental Science and Policy, 7 (5), 369-383.
339. Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
340. Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20 (4), 550-557.
341. Owens, S. (2005). Making a difference? Some perspective on environmental research and policy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30 (3), 287-292.
342. Pohl, C. (2008). From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science and Policy, 11 (1), 46-53.
343. Policansky, D. (1998). Science and decision making for water resources. Ecological Applications, 8 (3), 610-618.
344. Poteete, A., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Fifteen years of empirical research on collective action in natural resource management: Struggling to build large-N databases based on qualitative research. World Development, 36 (1), 176-195.
345. Poteete, A., Janssen, M., & Ostrom, O. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons and multiple methods in practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
346. Pralle, S. B. (2009). Agenda-setting and climate change. Environmental Politics, 18 (5), 781-799.
347. Pullin, A. S., & Stewart, G. B. (2006). Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 20 (6), 1647-1656.
348. Pullin, A. S., Knight, T. M., Stone, D. A., & Charman, K. (2004). Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biological Conservation, 119 (2), 245-252.
349. Radaelli, C. (2004). The diffusion of regulatory impact analysis: Best practice or lesson-drawing? European Journal of Political Research, 43, 723-747.
350. Rametsteiner, E., Pülzl, H., Alkan-Olsson, J., & Frederiksen, P. (2011). Sustainability indicator development-Science or political negotiation? Ecological Indicators, 11 (1), 61-70.
351. Rayner, S. (2006). What drives environmental policy? Global Environmental Change, 16 (1), 4-6.
352. Rickards, L., Wiseman, J., Edwards, T., & Biggs, C. (2014). The problem of fit: Scenario planning and climate change adaptation in the public sector. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32 (4), 641-662.
353. Rissman, A., & Smail, R. (2015). Accounting for results: How conservation organizations report performance information. Environmental Management, 55 (4), 916-929.
354. Rittell, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.
355. Robertson, D. P., & Hull, R. B. (2003). Public ecology: An environmental science and policy for global society. Environmental Science and Policy, 6 (5), 399-410.
356. Roux, D. J., Rogers, K. H., Biggs, H. C., Ashton, P. J., & Sergeant, A. (2006). Bridging the science management divide: Moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecology and Society, 11 (1), 4, 1-20.
357. Rowe, E. (2013). A sylvan superpower? Russian forests in international climate negotiations. Geoforum, 48, 216-224.
358. Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science and Policy, 7 (5), 385-403.
359. Sarewitz, D., & Pielke, R. A. (2007). The neglected heart of science policy: Reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environmental Science and Policy, 10 (1), 5-16.
360. Schenkel, R. (2010). The challenge of feeding scientific advice into policy-making. Science, 330 (6012), 1749-1751.
361. Sharman, A., & Holmes, J. (2010). Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence gathering? Biofuels, the EU and the 10% target. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20 (5), 309-321.
362. Steel, B., List, P., Lach, D., & Shindlet, B. (2004). The role of scientists in the environmental policy process: A case study from the American west. Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 1, 1-13.
363. Stephens, J., Hansson, A., Liu, Y., de Coninck, H., & Vajjhala, S. (2011). Characterizing the international carbon capture and storage community. Global Environmental Change, 21 (2), 379-390.
364. Stringer, L., & Dougill, A. (2013). Channelling science into policy: Enabling best practices from research on land degradation and sustainable land management in dryland Africa. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 328-335.
365. Studlar, D., & Cairney, P. (2014). Conceptualizing punctuated and nonpunctuated policy change: Tobacco control in comparative perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80 (3), 513-531.
366. Taylor, C., Pollard, S., Angus, A., & Rocks, S. (2013). Better by design: Rethinking interventions for better environmental regulation. Science of the Total Environment, 512-513, 287-295.
367. Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2016). The politics of hydraulic fracturing in Germany. In C. Weible, T. Heikkila, K. Ingold, & M. Fischer (Eds.), Comparing coalition politics: Policy debates on hydraulic fracturing in North America and Western Europe. London: Palgrave.
368. Underwood, J. N., Wilson, S. K., Ludgerus, L., & Evans, R. D. (2013). Integrating connectivity science and spatial conservation management of coral reefs in north-west Australia. Journal for Nature Conservation, 21 (3), 163-172.
369. Van Nijnatten, D. L. (1999). Participation and environmental policy in Canada and the United States: Trends over time. Policy Studies Journal, 27, 267-287.
370. Webb, J. A., Nichols, S. J., Norris, R. H., Stewardson, M. J., Wealands, S. R., & Lea, P. (2012). Ecological responses to flow alteration: Assessing causal relationships with eco evidence. Wetlands, 32 (2), 203-213.
371. Weber, J. R., & Word, C. S. (2001). The communication process as evaluative context: What do non-scientists hear when scientists speak? BioScience, 51 (6), 487-495.
372. Wellstead, A., & Stedman, R. (2014). Addressing the challenges of adaptation to climate change policy: Integrating public administration and public policy studies. International Journal of Public Administration, 37 (14), 999-1010.
373. Wellstead, A., Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2015). How useful is complexity theory to policy studies? Lessons from the climate change adaptation literature. In R. Geyer & P. Cairney (Eds.), Handbook of complexity and public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
374. Weible, C., Heikkila, T., Ingold, K., & Fischer, M. (eds.) Comparing Coalition Politics: Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing in North America and Western Europe. Palgrave.
375. Yuen, E., Jovicich, S., & Preston, B. (2013). Climate change vulnerability assessments as catalysts for social learning: Four case studies in south-eastern Australia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18 (5), 567-590.
376. Alter, A., & Oppenheimer, D. (2008). Easy on the mind, easy on the wallet: The roles of familiarity and processing fluency in valuation judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15 (5), 985-990.
377. Alter, A., & Oppenheimer, D. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13 (3), 219-235.
378. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993; 2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (1st and 2nd eds.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
379. Cairney, P. (2012). Understanding public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
380. Cairney, P. (2013). What is evolutionary theory and how does it inform policy studies? Policy and Politics, 41 (2), 279-298.
381. Cairney, P. (2015a). Evidence-based best practice is more political than it looks: A case study of the 'Scottish approach'. Paper to ESRC academic practitioner workshop, Centre on Constitutional Change, Edinburgh, 10 June.
382. Cairney, P. (2015b). These complaints about ignoring science seem biased and naïve-And too easy to dismiss. https://paulcairney.wordpress.com/2015/08/19/these-complaints-about-ignoring-science-seem-biased-and-naive-and-too-easyto-dismiss/
383. Cairney, P., & Denny, E. (2015). What happens when a 'policy window' opens to produce a vague solution to an ill-defined policy problem? Paper to International Conference on Public Policy, Milan, July.
384. Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
385. Constantinescu, D. (2012). The role of emotion in judicial decision-making. Available at SSRN 2000857.
386. Elster, J. (2000). Ulysses unbound: Studies in rationality, precommitment, and constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
387. Frank, R. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: Norton.
388. Greenaway, J. (2008). Agendas, venues and alliances: New opportunities for the alcohol control movement in England. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 15 (5), 487-501.
389. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108 (4), 814-834.
390. Jasanoff, S. (1986). Risk management and political culture: A comparative analysis of science in a policy context. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
391. Kingdon, J. (1984; 1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (1st & 2nd eds.). New York: Harper Collins.
392. Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 79-88.
393. Lindblom, C. (1964). Contexts for change and strategy: A reply. Public Administration Review, 24 (3), 157-158.
394. Lindblom, C. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39, 517-525.
395. Lustick, I. (2011). Taking evolution seriously. Polity, 43 (2), 179-209.
396. McCaughey, D., & Bruning, N. S. (2010). Rationality versus reality: The challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers. Implementation Science, 5, 39. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-39. http://www.implementationscience. com/content/5/1/39.
397. Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37 (4), 649-667.
398. Nutley, S., Powell, A., & Davies, H. (2013). What counts as good evidence. London: Alliance for Useful Evidence. http://www.alliance4usefulevidence.org/assets/What-Counts-as-Good-Evidence-WEB.pdf.
399. Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage.
400. Sanderson, I. (2009). Intelligent policy making for a complex world: Pragmatism, evidence and learning. Political Studies, 57, 699-719.
401. Schneider, A., Ingram, H. and deLeon, P. (2014) 'Democratic Policy Design: Social Construction of Target Populations' in Sabatier, P. and Weible, C. (Eds.) Theories of the Policy Process 3rd edition Boulder: Westview Press.
402. Smith, K. (2013). Beyond evidence based policy in public health: The interplay of ideas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
403. Slovic, P. (2010) 'Introduction' in (ed.) Slovic, P. The Feeling of Risk (Oxford: Earthscan)
404. Stoker, G. (2010). Translating experiments into policy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 628 (1), 47-58.
405. Stoker, G. (2013). Why policymakers ignore evidence. Southampton: University of Southampton. http://publicpolicy.southampton.ac.uk/why-policymakersignore-evidence/.
406. Sunstein, C. (2002). Risk and reason: Safety, law, and the environment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
407. Taylor, B. (2013). Evidence-based policy and systemic change: Conflicting trends? (Springfield Working Paper Series no. 1). Durham: The Springfield Centre.
408. True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2007). Punctuated equilibrium theory. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
409. Van Kleef, G., De Dreu, C., & Manstead, A. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 45-96.
410. Weale, A. (2001). Deliberative democracy: Science advice, democratic responsiveness and public policy. Science and Public Policy, 28 (6), 413-421.
411. Weible, C., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P., & Sabatier, P. (2012). Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sciences, 45 (1), 1-21.
412. Weinberger, N. (2014). (Review) Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better. Economics and Philosophy, 30 (1), 113-120.
413. Williams, I., & Glasby, J. (2010). Making 'what works' work: The use of knowledge in UK health and social care decision-making. Policy and Society, 29, 95-102.