Participation and environmental policy in Canada and the United States: Trends over time

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 267-287

  VanNijnatten, Debora L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; POLICY MAKING;

CANADA;

EID: 0032746901     PISSN: 00190292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01968.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amy, D. (1990). Decision techniques in environmental policy. In R. Paehlke & D. Torgerson (Eds.), Managing leviathan (pp. 59-79). Peterborough: Broadview.
2. Brickman, R., Jasinoff, S., & Ilgen, T. (1985). Controlling chemicals: The politics of regulation in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3. Dorcey, A, & Riek, C. L. (1987). Negotiation-based approaches to the settlement of environmental disputes in Canada. The place of negotiation in environmental assessment. Hull: Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council.
4. Environmental Commissioner of Ontario. (1996). Keep the doors open to better environmental decision-making. Annual Report. Toronto: Environmental Commissioner of Ontario.
5. Fiorino, D. (1995). Regulatory negotiation as a form of public participation. In O. Renn, T. Webler, & P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environment discourse (pp. 223-238). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
6. Gallon, G. (1996, November 20). Ontario government backsliding on environment. Canadian Environmental Business Letter: The Gallon Report II, 46. On-line: [Available: cibe@web.NET].
7. Graham, K. A., & Phillips, S. D. (1997). Citizen engagement: Beyond the customer revolution. Canadian Public Administration, 40(2), 255-273.
8. Gunton, T., & Flynn, S. (1992). Resolving environmental conflict: The role of mediation and negotiation. Environments, 27(3), 12-16.
9. Harrison, K. (1996a). Passing the buck: Federalism and Canadian environmental policy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
10. Harrison, K. (1996b, September). The regulator's dilemma: Regulation of pulp mill effluents in the Canadian federal state. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 29(3), 469-491.
11. Haussmann, F. C. (1982). Environmental mediation: A Canadian perspective. Report prepared for Environment Canada. Ottawa: Environment Canada.
12. Hessing, M., & Howlett, M. (1997). Canadian natural resource and environmental policy: Political economy and public policy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
13. Hoberg, G. (1993). Comparing Canadian performance in environmental policy. In D. Thomas (Ed.), Canada and the United States: Differences that count (pp. 101-124). Peterborough: Broadview.
14. Hoberg, G. (1997). Governing the environment: Comparing Canada and the United States. In K. Banting, G. Hobert, & R. Simeon (Eds.), Degrees of freedom: Canada and the United States in a changing world (pp. 341-385). Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
15. Hoberg, G., & Harrison, K. (1994). It's not easy being green: The politics of Canada's green plan. Canadian Public Policy, 20(2), 119-137.
16. Jackson, J. (1994). The spread of "regulatory voluntarism": Abandonment of the goal of zero discharge. Bulletin of Pollution Prevention (Insert to Great Lakes United Newsletter), 9(2), p. 16.
17. Landes, R. G. (1998). The Canadian polity: A comparative introduction. Scarborough: Prentice Hall and Bacon Canada.
18. Malvem, R. J. (1985, December). A reference guide to environmental legislation in Canada: 1985 update. [Report #85438]. Toronto: Environmental Studies and Assessments Department, Design and Development Generation Division, Ontario Hydro.
19. McIlroy, A. (1997, October 4). Ottawa's environmental joy ride. The Globe and Mail, p. D2.
20. Merelman, R. M. (1984). Making something of ourselves: On culture and politics in the United States. Berekley, CA: University of California Press.
21. Nemetz Centre for Dispute Resolution. (1991, March). Compendium of information on the use of mediation on environmental disputes. Hull: Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office.
22. Nevitte, N. (1996). The decline of deference: Canadian value change in cross-national perspective. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
23. Paehlke, R. (1990). Democracy and environmentalism: Opening a door to the administrative state. In R. Paehlke & D. Torgerson (Eds.), Managing leviathan: Environmental politics and the administrative state (pp. 35-55). Peterborough: Broadview.
24. Perlin, G. (1997). The constraints of public opinion: Diverging or converging paths. In K. Banting, G. Hoberg, & R. Simeon (Eds.), Degrees of freedom: Canada and the United States in a changing world (pp. 71-149). Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
25. Peterson, L. (1992). Evaluating the mediation potential of a Superfund enforcement case: The EPA region V experience. Resolve, 24, pp. 1, 8-14.
26. Sadler, B. (1986). Environmental conflict resolution in Canada. Resolve, 18, pp. 1, 4-8.
27. Schrecker, T. (1984). Political economy of environmental hazards. Toronto: Law Reform Commission of Canada.
28. Schrecker, T. (1990). Resisting environmental regulation. In R. Paehlke & D. Torgerson (Eds.), Managing leviathan, (pp. 165-199). Peterborough: Broadview.
29. Sewell, W. R. D., & O'Riordan, T. (1976, January). Environmental decisionmaking. Natural Resources Journal, 16, 1-21.
30. Vanderzwaag, D., & Duncan, L. (1992). Canada and environmental protection: Confident political faces, uncertain legal hands. In R. Boardman (Ed.), Canadian environmental policy: Ecosystems, politics, and process. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
31. VanNijnatten, D. (1996, January). Institutions, participation and the nature of public policy: Packaging waste reduction policy in Germany, the United States and Canada. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Queen's University at Kingston.
32. VanNijnatten, D. (1997, November). Intergovernmentalization, multistakeholder consultation and environmental policy-making in Canada: Challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the Association for Canadian Studies in the United States Biennial Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
33. VanNijnatten, D. (1998). Voluntary pollution prevention initiatives: Some reflections on government's role in ensuring public involvement. Alternatives Journal, 24(2), 10-15.
34. VanNijnatten, D., & Leiss, W., with Hodson, P. (1997). Environment's X-file: Pulp mill effluent regulation in Canada. Working Paper Series 97-1. Queen's University: Environmental Policy Unit.
35. Versteeg, H. (1992, March). A case study in multi-stakeholder consultation: The corporate history of the federal pesticide registration review or how we got therefrom here. Volume 1: General principles for practitioners. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development.
36. Waldo, D. (Ed.). (1971). Public administration in a time of turbulence. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
37. Webler, T., & Renn, O. (1995). A brief primer on participation: Philosophy and practice. In O. Renn, T. Webler, & P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse (pp. 17-34). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
38. Wenner, L. M. (1989). The courts and environmental policy. In J. P. Lester (Ed.), Environmental politics and policy: Theories and evidence (pp. 238-260). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39. Winfield, M. S. (1997, February). Breaking the contract: The defeat of the environmental components of the "contract with America" and its implications for Ontario. Toronto: Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy.