Does evidence-based policy work? Learning from the UK experience

Evidence and Policy

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 233-253

  Boaz, Annette ^a   Grayson, Lesley ^a   Levitt, Ruth ^a   Solesbury, William ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evidence informed policy; Evidence based policy; Policy research; Research utilisation

Indexed keywords

EID: 45449090983     PISSN: 17442648     EISSN: 17442656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1332/174426408784614680     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Attree, P. and Milton, B. (2006) 'Critically appraising qualitative research for systematic reviews: defusing the methodological cluster bombs', Evidence & Policy, vol 2, no 1, pp 109-26.
2. Becker, S., Bryman,A. and Sempik, J. (2006) Defining quality in social policy research: Views, perceptions and a framework for discussion, Lavenham: Social Policy Association.
3. Blewett, J. (2007) 'Towards evidence-based care: the challenge of Making Research Count', Evidence & Policy, vol 3, no 2, pp 287-300.
4. Boaz, A. (2006) 'Systematic reviews as a source of evidence for policy: an in-depth exploration of a review on mentoring', PhD thesis, Queen Mary, University of London.
5. Boaz, A., Solesbury, W and Sullivan, F. (2004) The practice of research reviewing 1: An assessment of 28 review reports, Working Paper 22, London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, http://evidencenetwork.org/Documents/wp22.pdf
6. Boaz, A., Solesbury, W. and Sullivan, F. (2007) The practice of research reviewing 2: Ten case studies of reviews, Working Paper 25, London: UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, http:// evidencenetwork.org/Documents/wp25.pdf
7. Burton, P. (2006) 'Modernising the policy process: making policy research more significant?', Policy Studies, vol 27, no 3, pp 173-95.
8. Cabinet Office (1999) Modernising government, Cm 4310, London: The Stationery Office, www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm43/ 4310/4310.htm
9. Cabinet Office PIU (Performance and Innovation Unit) (2000) Adding it up: Improving analysis and modelling for central government, London: The Stationery Office, www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/strategy/publications/
10. Cabinet Office Strategic Policy Making Team (1999) Professional policy making for the 21st century, London: Cabinet Office, www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm43/4310/4310.htm
11. Campbell, S., Benita, S., Coates, E., Davies, P. and Penn, G. (2007) Analysis for policy: Evidence-based policy in practice, London: Government Social Research Unit, www.gsr.gov.uk/downloads/resources/ pu256_160407.pdf
12. Chalmers, I. (2005) 'If evidence-informed policy works in practice, does it matter if it doesn't work in theory?', Evidence & Policy, vol 1, no 1, pp 227-42.
13. Chief Scientific Adviser (2005) Guidelines on scientific analysis in policy making, London: Office of Science and Technology, www.berr.gov.uk/files/file9767.pdf
14. CHSRF (Canadian Health Services Research Foundation) (2003) The theory and practice of knowledge brokering in Canada's health system: A report based on a CHSRF national consultation and a literature review, Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, www.chsrf.ca/brokering/pdf/Theory_and_Practice_e.pdf
15. Clark, G. and Kelly, L. (2005) New directions for knowledge transfer and knowledge brokerage in Scotland, Office of Chief Researcher Knowledge Transfer Team Briefing Paper, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research, www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2005/09/2782919/29199
16. Davies, H., Nutley, S. and Smith, P. (eds) (2000) What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services, Bristol: The Policy Press.
17. Davies, H., Nutley, S. and Walter, I. (2005) Approaches to assessing the non academic impact of social science research, Swindon: ESRC, www.odi.org.uk/rapid/Meetings/ESRC/Index.html
18. Davies, P (2000) 'The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice', Oxford Review of Education, vol 26, no 3, pp 365-78.
19. European Commission (2002) On the collection and use of expertise by the Commission: Principles and guideline. Improving the knowledge base for better policies, COM(2002) 713 final, Brussels: European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/governance/docs/comm_expertise_en.pdf
20. Gray, A. and Pollitt, C. (2007) 'Academic advice to practitioners: editorial', Public Money and Management, vol 27, no 4, pp 231-2.
21. Grayson, L. (2002) Evidence based policy and the quality of evidence: Rethinking peer review, Working Paper 7, London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, http://evidencenetwork.org/Documents/ wp7.pdf
22. Hammersley, M. (2005) 'Is the evidence-based practice movement doing more good than harm? Reflections on lain Chalmers' case for research-based policy making and practice', Evidence & Policy, vol 1, no 1, pp 85-100.
23. HM Treasury, Department for Education and Skills, Office of Science and Technology and Department of Trade and Industry (2002) Cross-cutting review of science and research: Final report, London: HM Treasury et al, www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/E/7/science©osscutter.pdf
24. HM Treasury, Department of Trade and Industry and Department for Education and Skills (2004) Science and innovation investment framework 2004-2014, London: HM Treasury, www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/ spending_review/spendℰ04/associated_documents/ spendingℰ04ℬience.cfm [especially Chapter 8].
25. Home Office (2005) A generous society: Next steps on charitable giving in England, London: Home Office, www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/ third↘ctor/giving/generous_society.aspx
26. House of Commons Science andTechnology Committee (2001) The scientfic advisory system: Fourth report, session 2000-01, HC 257, London: The Stationery Office, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmsctech.htm
27. House of Commons Select Committee on Public Administration (2007) Governing thefuture: Second report of session 2006-07. Volume II, oral and written evidence, HC 123-II, London:The Stationery Office, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmpubadm.htm
28. House of Commons Select Committee on Science andTechnology (1999a) Scientfic advisory system: Genetically modified foods: First report, session 1998-99, HC 286, London:The Stationery Office, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmsctech/286/ 28602.htm
29. House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology (1999b) Scientific advisory system: Mobile phones and health: Third report, session 1998-99, HC 489, London:The Stationery office, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmsctech/489/ 48902.htm
30. House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology (2001) Scientific advisory system: Scientific advice on climate change: Third report, session 2000-01, HC 14, London: The Stationery office, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200001/cmselect/cmsctech/14/1402.htm
31. House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology (2006) Scientific advice, risk and evidence based policy making: Seventh report of session 2005-2006. Volume 1, report together with formal minutes, HC 900-1, London: The Stationery Office, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmsctech/ cmsctech.htm
32. Hulme, R. (2006) 'The role of policy transfer in assessing the impact of American ideas on British social policy', Global Social Policy, vol 6, no 2, pp 173-95.
33. Jackson, P. (2007) 'Making sense of policy advice', Public Money and Management, vol 27, no 4, pp 257-64.
34. Jowell, R. (2003) Trying it out: The role of 'pilots' in policy making: Report of a review of government pilots, London: Government Chief Social Researcher's Office, www.policyhub.gov.uk/docs/rop.pdf
35. Levitt, R. (2003) GM crops andfoods: Evidence, policy andpractice in the UK: A case study, Working Paper 20, London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and practice, http://evidencenetwork.org/Documents/ wp20.pdf
36. Levitt, R. and Solesbury, W. (2005) Evidence-informed policy: What difference do outsiders in Whitehall make?, Working Paper 23, London: ESRC Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, http:// evidencenetwork.org/Documents/wp23.pdf
37. Lindblom, C. (1959) 'The science of "muddling through"', Public Administration Review, vol. 19, no 2, pp 79-88.
38. Lovbrand, E. (2007) 'Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science', Environmental Science and Policy, vol 10, no 1, pp 39-47.
39. Macdonald, G. (2003) Using systematic reviews to improve social care, Report 4, Bristol and London: The Policy Press and Social Care Institute for Excellence, www.scie.org.uk/publications/knowledge.asp
40. Martin, S. and Bovaird, T. (2005) Meta-evaluation of the Local Government Modernisation Agenda: Progress report on service improvement in local government, London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/146058
41. Mawson, J. (2007) 'Research councils, universities and local government: building bridges', Public Money and Management, vol 27, no 4, pp 265-72.
42. Ministry of Reconstruction (1918) Report of the Machinery of Government Committee under the chairmanship of Viscount Haldane of Cloan, Cmd 9230, London: HMSO.
43. Morris, S., Greenberg, D., Riccio, J., Mittra, B., Green, H., Lissenburgh, S. and Blundell, R. (2004) Designing a demonstration project: An Employment Retention and Advancement Demonstration for Great Britain (2nd edition), London: Government Chief Social Researcher's Office, www.gsr.gov.uk/downloads/evaluating∝licy/ designing_demonstration∥oject.pdf
44. National Audit Office (2003) Getting the evidence: Using research in policy making, HC 586-I/II, Session 2002-03, London: The Stationery Office, www.nao.org.uk/publications/nao_reports/02-03/0203586-i.pdf
45. Nutley, S.,Walter, I. and Davies, H. (2007) Using evidence: How research can inform public services, Bristol: The Policy Press.
46. Oancea, A. and Furlong, J. (2005) Assessing quality in applied and practice-based educational research: A framework for discussion, Oxford: Oxford University Department of Educational Studies, www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/index.aspx
47. ODPM. (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) (2006) Evidence to action: Evidence-based delivery of sustainable communities, London: ODPM, www.communities.gov.uk/documents/corporate/pdf/143774
48. OST (Office of Science and Technology) (2001) Code of practice for scientific advisory committees, London: OST, www.berr.gov.uk/files/ file9769.pdf
49. Parsons, W. (2001) 'Modernising policy-making for the 21st century: the professional model', Public Policy and Administration, vol 16, no 3, pp 93-110.
50. Pawson, R. (2006) Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective, London: Sage Publications.
51. Pawson, R., Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Long, A. and Barnes, C. (2003) Types and quality of knowledge in social care, Knowledge Review 3, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence, www.scie.org.uk/ publications/knowledgereviews/index.asp
52. Pullin,A.S. and Stewart, G.B. (2006) 'Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management', Conservation Biology, vol 20, no 6, pp 1647-56.
53. Sanderson, I. (2002) 'Making sense of"what works": evidence-based policy making as instrumental rationality?', Public Policy and Administration, vol 17, no 3, pp 61-75.
54. Solesbury, W. (2001) Evidence based policy? Whence it came and where it's going?, Working Paper 1, London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, www.evidencenetwork.org/Documents/wp1.pdf
55. Sorrell, S. (2005) The role of evidence in energy policy: What can be learnt from evidence based policy and practice, Brighton: SPRU (Science & Technology Policy Research), www.ukerc.ac.uk/ ImportedResources/PDF/E/Energy_Policy_EBPP.pdf
56. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003) 'Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review', British Journal of Management, vol 14, no 3, pp 207-22.
57. Wallace,A., Croucher, K., Quilgars, D. and Baldwin, S. (2005) 'Meeting the challenge: developing systematic reviewing in social policy', Policy & Politics, vol 32, no 4, pp 455-70.
58. Weiss, C. (1995) 'The four' I's of school reform: how interests, ideology, information, and institution affect teachers and principles', Harvard Educational Review, vol 65, no 4, pp 571-92.
59. Young, K. and Boaz, A. (2005) 'Editorial', Evidence & Policy, vol 1, no 1, pp 3-4.