Rethinking the science-policy nexus: From knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements

Poiesis und Praxis

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 199-215

  Hoppe, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844432029     PISSN: 16156609     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10202-005-0074-0     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. R Bal 1999 Grenzenwerk, Over het organiseren van normstelling voor de arbeidsplek Twente University Press Enschede
2. A Barker BG Peters 1993 The politics of expert advice: Creating, using and manipulating scientific knowledge for public policy Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh
3. A Boogaard van den 2001 De verwevenheid tussen toekomstdenken en beleid. Het ontstaan van een vertoogcoalitie WRR. SDU Den Haag
4. JS Coleman 1972 Policy research in the social sciences General Learning Morristown
5. SE Cozzens EJ Woodhouse 1995 Science, government, and the politics of knowledge In: S Jasanoff et al (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies SAGE Thousand Oaks
6. A Downs 1967 Inside bureaucracy Little, Brown and Company Boston
7. Y Dror 1971 Design for policy sciences Elsevier New York
8. WN Dunn 1994 Public policy analysis. An introduction 2nd Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs
9. Dunn WN, Holzner B (1988) Knowledge in society: Anatomy of an emergent field. Knowledge in society. Int J Knowl Transfer Util 1/1(1-2):9
10. Eeten M van, Heuvelhof EJ ten (1998) 'Serviceable truth': De procescontingente inzet van wetenschappelijke expertise. In: Hoppe R, Peterse A (eds) Bouwstenen voor argumentatieve beleidsanalyse, pp 161-174
11. Y Ezrahi 1990 The descent of Icarus. Science and the transformation of contemporary democracy Harvard University Press Cambridge
12. MS Feldman 1989 Order without design. Information production and policy making Stanford University Press Stanford
13. F Fischer 1990 Technocracy and the politics of expertise SAGE Newbury Park
14. JH Fujimura 1992 Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and 'translation' In: A Pickering (ed) Science as culture and practice Chicago University Press Chicago 168-211
15. SO Funtowicz JR Ravetz 1992 Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science In: S Krimsky D Golding (eds)Social theories of risk Preager Westport 211-232
16. TF Gieryn 1995 Boundaries of science In: S Jasanoff et al (ed) Handbook of science and technology studies SAGE Thousand Oaks 393-443
17. E Guba Y Lincoln 1989 Fourth generation evaluation SAGE Newbury Park
18. Guston D (1996) Principal-agent theory and the structure of science policy. Sci Public Policy 23/4:229-240
19. Guston DH (2001) Toward a "best practice" of constructing "serviceable truths". In: Hisschemöller M et al (eds) Knowledge, power, and participation in environmental policy analysis. Transaction, New Brunswick, pp 97-120
20. M Hajer 1995 The politics of environmental discourse, ecological modernizations, and the policy process Clarendon Press Oxford
21. Halffman W (2003) Boundaries of regulatory science. Eco-toxicology and aquatic hazards of chemicals in the US, England and the Netherlands, 1970-1995. Thesis, University of Amsterdam
22. M Hisschemöller R Hoppe WN Dunn JR Ravetz 2001a Knowledge, power, and participation in environmental policy analysis. Policy studies review annual 12 Transaction Publishers New Brunswick
23. Hisschemöller M, Hoppe R, Groenewegen P, Midden CHJ (2001b) Knowledge use and political choice in Dutch environmental policy: A problem-structuring perspective on real-life experiments in extended peer review. In: Hisschemöller et al (eds) Knowledge, power, and participation in environmental policy analysis. Transaction, New Brunswick, pp 437-470
24. B Holzner J Marx 1979 Knowledge application: The knowledge system in society Allyn and Bacon Boston
25. Chr Hood 1998 The art of the state. Culture rhetoric, and public management Clarendon Press Oxford
26. Hoppe R (1999) Policy analysis, science, and politics: From "speaking truth to power" to "making sense together". Sci Public Policy 26(3):201-210
27. R Hoppe 2002a Van flipperkast naar grensverkeer. Veranderende visies op de relatie tussen wetenschap en beleid AWT-Achtergrondstudie 25 Rotterdam
28. Hoppe R (2002b) Rethinking the puzzles of the science-policy nexus: boundary traffic, boundary work and the mutual transgression between STS and policy studies. Paper prepared for the EASST 2002 Conference, York, 31 July-3 August (downloadable from http://bbt-webserver.bbt.utwente.nl/)
29. Hoppe R, Huijs S (2003) Werk op de grens tussen wetenschap en beleid: paradoxen en dilemma's. Raad voor Ruimtelijk, Milieu-en Natuuronderzoek(RMNO), Den Haag
30. R Hoppe A Peterse (red) 1998 Bouwstenen voor argumentatieve beleidsanalyse Elsevier Den Haag
31. S Jasanoff 1990 The fifth branch: Science-advisors as policymakers Harvard University Press Cambridge
32. K Knorr-Cetina 1995 Laboratory studies: The cultural approach In: S Jasanoff et al (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies. SAGE Thousand Oaks 140-166
33. HD Lasswell 1971 A pre-view of policy sciences Elsevier New York
34. HD Lasswell D Lerner 1951 The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method Stanford University Press Stanford
35. B Latour 1987 Science in action Harvard University Press Cambridge
36. ChE Lindblom 1968 The policy-making process Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs
37. ChE Lindblom 1990 Inquiry and change: The troubled attempt to understand and shape society Yale University Press New Haven
38. ChE Lindblom D Braybrooke 1963 A strategy of decision Free Press, New York
39. ChE Lindblom D Cohen 1979 Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving Yale University Press New Haven
40. G Majone 1989 Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the political process Yale University Press New Haven
41. RK Merton 1973 The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations University of Chicago Press Chicago
42. II Mitroff 1974 The subjective side of science: An inquiry into the psychology of the Apollo moon scientists Elsevier Amsterdam
43. MJ Mulkay 1979 Science and the sociology of knowledge Allen and Unwin London
44. D Nelkin 1995 Science controversies: The dynamics of public disputes in the United States In: S Jasanoff et al (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies SAGE Thousand Oaks 444-456
45. MQ Patton 1997 Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text 3rd edn. SAGE Thousand Oaks
46. S Restivo 1995 The theory landscape in science studies: Sociological traditions In: S Jasanoff et al (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies. SAGE Thousand Oaks 95-110
47. Rip A (1997) A cognitive approach to relevance of science. Soc Sci Inf 36/4:615-640
48. Rip A (2001) Aggregation machines: A political science of science approach to the future of the peer review system. In: Hisschemoller M et al (eds) Knowledge, power, and participation in environmental policy analysis. Transaction, New Brunswick, pp 391-416
49. MEA Schmutzer 1994 Ingenium und Individuum. Eine sozialwissenschaftliche Theorie von Wissenschaft und Technik Springer Wien
50. Shackley S, Wynne B (1996) Representing uncertainty in global climate change science policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority. Sci Technol Hum Values 21(3):275-302
51. Shapin S (1992) Discipline and bounding: The history and sociology of science as seen through the externalism-internalism debate. Hist Sci 30:333-369
52. J Sluys van der 1997 Anchoring amid uncertainty. On the management of uncertainties in risk assessment of anthropogenic climate change Mosterd en van Onderen Leiden
53. Star SL, Griesemer J (1989) Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-1939. Soc Stud Sci 19:387-420
54. RJ Veld in 't 2000 Willens en Wetens Lemma Utrecht
55. Weingart P (1999) Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Sci Public Policy 26(3):151-161
56. Weiss CH (1980) Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Knowledge 1(3):381-404
57. CH Weiss 1991 Policy research: Data, ideas, or arguments? In: PEA Wagner (eds) Social sciences and modern states: National experiments and theoretical crossroads Cambridge University Press Cambridge 307-332
58. Weiss C (1999) Factors that improve the use of research in social policy: Case studies. Research design for a UNESCO/MOST programme project. http://www.unesco.org/most/weiss.htm
59. A Wildavsky 1979 Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis Little Brown and Company Boston
60. JQ Wilson 1989 Bureaucracy Basic Books New York
61. L Winner 1997 Autonomous technology MIT Cambridge
62. B Wittrock 1991 Social knowledge and public policy: Eight models of interaction In: PEA Wagner (ed) Social sciences and modern states, national experiences and theoretical crossroads Cambridge University Press Cambridge 4-20
63. Woodhouse EJ, Nieusma D (1997) When expert advice works, and when it does not. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, pp 23-29
64. Woodhouse EJ, Nieusma D (2001) Democratic expertise: Integrating knowledge, power, and expertise. In: Hisschemöller M et al (eds) Knowledge, power, and participation in environmental policy analysis. Transaction, New Brunswick, pp 73-96
65. S Yearly 1988 Science, technology and social change Unwin Hyman London
66. JM Ziman 1990 What is happening to science? In: SE Cozzens et al (eds) The research system in transition Kluwer Dordrecht 23-33
67. W Zonneveld 1990 Conceptvorming in ruimtelijke planning. Patronen en processen Planologisch en Demografisch Instituut van de UvA Amsterdam