Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges

Policy and Society

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 77-94

  Head, Brian W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950954614     PISSN: 14494035     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (158)

1. Aaron H.J. Politics and the professors: The great society in perspective (1978), Brookings, Washington
2. Abrams P. The origins of British sociology 1834-1914 (1968), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
3. Adams D. Usable knowledge in public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration 63 1 (2004) 29-42
4. Amara N., Ouimet M., and Landry R. New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies. Science Communication 26 1 (2004) 75-106
5. APSC [Australian Public Service Commission]. Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective (2007), APSC, Canberra
6. APSC. Smarter policy: Choosing policy instruments and working with others to influence behaviour (2009), APSC, Canberra
7. APSC. Policy development through devolved government (2009), APSC, Canberra
8. Argyris C. Flawed advice and the management trap (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford
9. In: Argyrous G. (Ed). Evidence for policy and decision-making (2009), UNSW Press, Sydney
10. Bakvis H. Rebuilding policy capacity in the era of the fiscal dividend: A report from Canada. Governance 13 1 (2000) 71-103
11. Banks, G. (2009). Evidence-based policy-making: What is it? How do we get it? ANZSOG Public Lecture, 4 February, http://www.pc.gov.au/speeches/cs20090204.
12. Bardach E. Getting government agencies to work together (1998), Brookings, Washington
13. Barnardo's. What works? Making connections: Linking research and practice (2000), Barnardo's, Ilford
14. Barnardo's. The evidence guide 5 Vols. (2006), Barnardo's, Ilford
15. In: Belsky J., Barnes J., and Melhuish E. (Eds). The National evaluation of sure start (2007), Policy Press, Bristol
16. Boaz A., Grayson L., Levitt R., and Solebury W. Does evidence-based policy work? Learning from the UK experience. Evidence & Policy 4 2 (2008) 233-253
17. Boaz A., Fitzpatrick S., and Shaw B. Assessing the impact of research on policy: A review of the literature (2008), King's College & Policy Studies Institute, London
18. In: Bochel H., and Duncan S. (Eds). Making policy in theory and practice (2007), Policy Press, Bristol
19. In: Bogdanor V. (Ed). Joined-up government (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
20. Boruch R., and Rui N. From randomized controlled trials to evidence grading schemes: Current state of evidence-based practice in social sciences. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 1 1 (2008) 41-49
21. Bowen S., and Zwi A.B. Pathways to "evidence-informed" policy and practice: A framework for action. PLoS Medicine 2 7 (2005) 100-105 e166
22. British Academy. Punching our weight: The humanities and social sciences in public policy making (2008), British Academy, London. http://www.britac.ac.uk/reports/wilson/
23. Brooks-Gunn J. Do you believe in magic? What we can expect from early childhood intervention programs. Social Policy Report 17 1 (2003) 1-14
24. Bruner, C., Kunesh, L. G., & Knuth, R.A. (1992). What does research say about interagency collaboration? http://www.ncrel.org.
25. Campbell D.T. Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist 24 4 (1969) 409-429
26. Campbell Collaboration. (2010). About the Campbell Collaboration. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/.
27. Cannon J.S., and Kilburn M.R. Meeting decision makers' needs for evidence-based information on child and family policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22 4 (2003) 665-668
28. Clarence E. Technocracy reinvented: The new evidence-based policy movement. Public Policy and Administration 17 3 (2002) 1-11
29. Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2006). What works and what doesn't work in social policy? Findings from well-designed randomized controlled trials. http://www.evidencebasedprograms.org/.
30. Cochrane Collaboration. (2010). The Cochrane Collaboration: The reliable source of evidence in health care. http://www.cochrane.org/.
31. In: Colebatch H.K. (Ed). Beyond the policy cycle (2006), Allen & Unwin, Sydney
32. In: Colebatch H.K. (Ed). The work of policy: An international survey (2006), Rowman and Littlefield, New York
33. Commission on the Social Sciences. Great expectations: The social sciences in Britain (2003), Academy of Learned Societies for the Social Sciences, London
34. Coote A., Allen J., and Woodhead D. Finding out what works: Building knowledge about complex community-based initiatives (2004), King's Fund, London
35. Council on Health Research for Development. Lessons in research to action and policy: Case studies from seven countries (2000), CHRD, Geneva
36. Davies, P. (2004). Is Evidence-based Policy Possible? The Jerry Lee Lecture, Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Washington, 18 February.
37. In: Davies H.T., Nutley S., and Smith P.C. (Eds). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services (2000), Policy Press, Bristol
38. Davies H.T., Nutley S., and Walter I. Why 'knowledge transfer' is misconceived for applied social research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 13 3 (2008) 188-190
39. Deaton, A. S. (2009). Instruments of development: Randomization in the tropics and the search for the elusive keys to economic development. Working Paper 14690. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14690.
40. In: Dobuzinskis L., Howlett M., and Laycock D. (Eds). Policy analysis in Canada: The state of the art (2007), University of Toronto Press, Toronto
41. In: Dopson S., and Fitzgerald L. (Eds). Knowledge to action? Evidence-based health care in context (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
42. Durlak J.A., and DuPre E.P. Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology 41 3-4 (2008) 327-350
43. Edelenbos J., and Van Buuren A. The learning evaluation: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Evaluation Review 29 6 (2005) 591-612
44. Edwards M. Social policy, public policy: From problem to practice (2001), Allen & Unwin, Sydney
45. Edwards M. Social science research and public policy: Narrowing the divide. Policy Paper 2 (2004), Academy of Social Sciences in Australia, Canberra
46. Ferlie E. Conclusion: From evidence to actionable knowledge?. In: Dopson S., and Fitzgerald L. (Eds). Knowledge to action? Evidence-based health care in context (2005), Oxford, Oxford University Press 182-197
47. Fischer F. Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford
48. In: France A., and Homel R. (Eds). Pathways and Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy and Practice (2007), Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon
49. Glasby J., and Beresford P. Who knows best? Evidence-based practice and the service user contribution. Critical Social Policy 26 1 (2006) 268-284
50. In: Hajer M.A., and Wagenaar H. (Eds). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
51. Haskins R. Testimony on the welfare reform law, 19 July 2006. Committee on ways and means (2006), US House of Representatives, Washington
52. Head B.W. The origins of 'la science sociale' in France 1770-1800. Australian Journal of French Studies 19 2 (1982) 115-132
53. Head B.W. Three lenses of evidence based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration 67 1 (2008) 1-11
54. Head B.W. Assessing network-based collaborations: Effectiveness for whom?. Public Management Review 10 6 (2008) 733-749
55. Head B.W. Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy 3 2 (2008) 101-118
56. In: Heilbron J., Magnusson L., and Wittrock B. (Eds). The rise of the social sciences and the formation of modernity (1998), Kluwer, Dordrecht
57. Hemmati M. Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability (2002), Earthscan, London
58. Hill M., and Hupe P. Implementing public policy (2002), Sage, London
59. Hoppe R., and Jeliazkova M. How policy workers define their job: A netherlands case study. In: Colebatch H.K. (Ed). The work of policy: An international survey (2006), Rowan and Littlefield, New York 35-60
60. Horowitz I.L. Conflict and consensus between social scientists and policy-makers. In: Horowitz I.L. (Ed). The use and abuse of social science. 2nd ed. (1975), Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ 110-135
61. Huberman M. Research utilization: The state of the art. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 7 4 (1994) 13-33
62. Innes J.E. Improving policy making with information. Planning Theory & Practice 3 1 (2002) 102-104
63. Jackson P.M. Making sense of policy advice. Public Money and Management 27 4 (2007) 257-264
64. Jones A., and Seelig T. Enhancing research-policy linkages in Australian housing, final report 79 (2005), Australian Housing & Urban Research Institute. http://www.ahuri.edu.au/publications
65. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Linking research and practice (2000), Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York. http://www.jrf.org.uk
66. Landry R., Amara N., and Lamari M. Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy 30 2 (2001) 333-349
67. Landry R., Lamari M., and Amara N. The extent and determinants of the utilization of university research in government agencies. Public Administration Review 63 2 (2003) 192-205
68. Lavis J.N., Ross S., Hurley J., Hohenadel J., Stoddart G., Woodward C., et al. Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. Milbank Quarterly 80 1 (2002) 125-154
69. Lavis J.N., Robertson D., Woodside J., McLeod C., and Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?. Milbank Quarterly 81 2 (2003) 221-248
70. Leigh A. What evidence should social policymakers use?. Economic Roundup 2009 1 (2009) 27-43
71. In: Lemieux-Charles L., and Champagne F. (Eds). Using knowledge and evidence in health care (2004), University of Toronto Press, Toronto
72. In: Lerner D., and Lasswell H.D. (Eds). The policy sciences (1951), Stanford University Press, Stanford
73. In: Lewicki R.J., Gray B., and Elliott M. (Eds). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts (2003), Island Press, Washington
74. Lewig K., Arney F., and Scott D. Closing the research-policy and research-practice gaps: Ideas for child and family services. Family Matters 74 (2006) 12-19
75. In: Lin V., and Gibson B. (Eds). Evidence-based health policy: Problems and possibilities (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford
76. Lindblom C.E. The policy-making process. 2nd ed. (1980), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
77. Lipsky M. Street level bureaucracy (1980), Russell Sage Foundation, New York
78. Lomas J. Finding audiences, changing beliefs: The structure of research use in Canadian health policy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 15 3 (1990) 525-542
79. Lomas J. Using "linkage and exchange" to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation: Encouraging partnerships between researchers and policymakers is the goal of a promising new Canadian initiative. Health Affairs 19 (2000) 236-240
80. Majone G. Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process (1989), Yale University Press, New Haven
81. Marston G., and Watts R. Tampering with the evidence: A critical appraisal of evidence-based policy. Australian Review of Public Affairs 3 3 (2003) 143-163
82. Martinson R. What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest 10 (1974) 22-54
83. Mashaw J.L. Bureaucratic justice (1983), Yale University Press, New Haven
84. Maynard R.A. Presidential address: Evidence-based decision making: What will it take for decision makers to decide. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 25 1 (2006) 249-266
85. McDonald L. The early origins of the social sciences (1993), McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal & Kingston
86. In: Mead L.M. (Ed). The new paternalism (1997), Brookings Institution, Washington
87. Meagher L., Lyall C., and Nutley S. Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: A method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research. Research Evaluation 17 3 (2008) 163-173
88. Melhuish E., Belsky J., and Barnes J. Evaluation and value in sure start. Archives of Disease in Childhood (2009) 10.1136/adc.2009.161018
89. Meltsner A.J. Political feasibility and policy analysis. Public Administration Review 32 6 (1972) 859-867
90. Meltsner A.J. Policy analysts in the bureaucracy (1976), University of California Press, Berkeley
91. Mills C.W. The sociological imagination (1959), Oxford University Press, New York
92. Mintrom M., and Bollard R. Governing controversial science: Lessons from stem cell research. Policy and Society 28 4 (2009) 301-314
93. In: Mosteller F., and Boruch R. (Eds). Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (2002), Brookings, Washington
94. Mulgan, G. (2005). The academic and the policy-maker', presentation to public policy unit. Oxford University, 18 November.
95. Nathan R.P. Social science in government (1988), Basic Books, New York
96. Nelson C.E., Roberts J., Maederer C., Wertheimer B., and Johnson B. The utilization of social science information by policymakers. American Behavioral Scientist 30 6 (1987) 569-577
97. Nutley S., Walter I., and Davies H. Using evidence: How research can inform public services (2007), Policy Press, Bristol
98. Nutley S., Walter I., and Davies H. Past, present and possible futures for evidence-based policy. In: Argyrous G. (Ed). Evidence for policy and decision-making (2009), UNSW Press, Sydney 1-23
99. Nutley S., and Homel P. Delivering evidence-based policy and practice: Lessons from the implementation of the UK crime reduction program. Evidence and Policy 2 1 (2006) 5-26
100. Ouimet M., Landry R., Ziam S., and Bedard P.O. The absorption of research knowledge by public civil servants. Evidence & Policy 5 4 (2009) 331-350
101. Page E.C., and Jenkins B. Policy bureaucracy: Governing with a cast of thousands (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
102. In: Painter M., and Pierre J. (Eds). Challenges to state policy capacity: Global trends and comparative perspectives (2005), Palgrave Macmillan, London
103. Parsons W. From muddling through to muddling up-evidence based policy making and the modernisation of British government. Public Policy & Administration 17 3 (2002) 43-60
104. Parsons W. Not just steering but weaving: Relevant knowledge and the craft of building policy capacity and coherence. Australian Journal of Public Administration 63 1 (2004) 43-57
105. Pawson R., Boaz A., Grayson L., Long A., and Barnes C. Types and quality of knowledge in social care knowledge review #3 (2003), Social Care Institute for Excellence, London
106. Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective (2006), Sage, London
107. Percy-Smith J. What works in strategic partnerships for children? (2005), Barnardo's, Ilford
108. Peters B.G. The policy capacity of government (1996), Canadian Centre for Management Development, Ottawa
109. Petrosino, A., Petrosino, C. T., & Buehler, J. (2003). 'Scared straight' and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency. (Updated C2 Review). Campbell Collaboration website.
110. Petticrew, M. (2007). Making high quality research relevant and accessible to policy makers and social care practitioners. Presentation to Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, 16 May.
111. Petticrew M., and Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences (2005), Blackwells, Oxford
112. Pfeffer J., and Sutton R. Hard facts, dangerous half-truths and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management (2006), Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston
113. Pollitt C. Academic advice to practitioners-what is its nature, place and value within academia?. Public Money & Management 26 4 (2006) 257-264
114. Pressman J.L., and Wildavsky A. Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland (1973), University of California Press, Berkeley
115. Radaelli C. The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy 2 2 (1995) 159-183
116. Radin B.A. Beyond machiavelli: Policy analysis comes of age (2000), Georgetown University Press, Washington
117. Rayner J., and Howlett M. Conclusions: Governance arrangements and policy capacity for policy integration. Politics and Society 28 2 (2009) 165-172
118. Rich R.F., and Oh C.H. Rationality and the use of information in policy decisions. Science Communication 22 2 (2000) 173-211
119. In: Roberts A.R., and Yeager K.R. (Eds). Foundations of evidence-based social work practice (2006), Oxford University Press, New York
120. Roberts H. What works?. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 24 (2005) 34-54
121. Rousseau D. Is there such a thing as "evidence-based management"?. Academy of Management Review 31 2 (2006) 256-269
122. Rudd, K. (2008). Prime Minister: Address to Heads of Agencies and Members of Senior Executive Service, 30 April. http://www.pm.gov.au/node/5817.
123. In: Sabatier P.A. (Ed). Theories of the policy process. 2nd ed. (2007), Westview Press, Boulder, CO
124. In: Saunders P., and Walter J. (Eds). Ideas and influence: Social science and public policy in Australia (2005), UNSW Press, Sydney
125. Shaxson L. Is your evidence robust enough? Questions for policy makers and practitioners. Evidence and Policy 1 1 (2005) 101-111
126. Schon D.A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (1983), Basic Books, New York
127. Schon D.A., and Rein M. Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies (1994), Basic Books, New York
128. Schorr L.B. Determining 'what works' in social programs and social policies: Towards a more inclusive knowledge base (2003), Harvard University
129. Schorr L.B., and Auspos P. Usable information about what works: Building a broader and deeper knowledge base. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22 4 (2003) 669-676
130. Scott R.A., and Shore A.R. Why sociology does not apply (1979), Elsevier, New York
131. In: Sherman L.W., Farrington D.P., Welsh B.C., and MacKenzie D.L. (Eds). Evidence-based crime prevention (2006), Routledge, New York
132. Shonkoff J.P. Science, policy and practice: Three cultures in search of a shared mission. Child Development 71 1 (2000) 181-187
133. Shulock N. The paradox of policy analysis: If it is not used, why do we produce so much of it?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18 2 (1999) 226-244
134. Simons H. Utilizing evaluation evidence to enhance professional practice. Evaluation 10 4 (2004) 410-429
135. Smith C. Review of british academy report 'punching our weight'. Economic Affairs 29 1 (2009) 95-97
136. Solesbury W. The ascendancy of evidence. Planning Theory & Practice 3 1 (2002) 90-96
137. In: Stone D., and Denham A. (Eds). Think tank traditions: Policy research and the politics of ideas (2004), Manchester University Press, Manchester
138. Thaler R., and Sunstein C. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness (2008), Yale University Press, New Haven
139. Tsui L. A handbook for knowledge sharing (2006), Community-University Partnership for Study of Children Youth and Families, Alberta
140. UK Cabinet Office. Modernising government (1999), Cabinet Office, London
141. UK Cabinet Office. Professional policy making for the twenty first century (1999), Cabinet Office, London
142. UK Cabinet Office. Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence (2003), Cabinet Office, London
143. UK Cabinet Office. Think research: Using research evidence to inform service development for vulnerable groups (2008), Social Exclusion Taskforce, Cabinet Office, London
144. UK Treasury. Analysis for policy: Evidence-based policy in practice (2007), Government Social Research Unit, Treasury, London
145. In: Verweij M., and Thompson M. (Eds). Clumsy solutions for a complex world (2006), Palgrave Macmillan, London
146. In: Wagner P., Weiss C.H., Wittrock B., and Wollmann H. (Eds). Social sciences and modern states: National experiences and theoretical crossroads (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
147. Walker R. Great expectations: Can social science evaluate New Labour's policies?. Evaluation 7 3 (2001) 305-330
148. Walshe K., and Rundall T. Evidence-based management: From theory to practice in health care. Milbank Quarterly 79 3 (2001) 429-457
149. Walter I., Nutley S., and Davies H. Research impact, a cross sector review, literature review (2003), Research Unit for Research Utilisation, University of St. Andrews
150. Walter I., Nutley S., and Davies H. What works to promote evidence-based practice? A cross-sector review. Evidence and Policy 1 3 (2005) 335-364
151. Weber E.P., and Khademian A.M. Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review 68 2 (2008) 334-349
152. Weiss C.H. Improving the linkage between social science and public policy. In: Lynn L.E. (Ed). Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection (1978), National Academy of Sciences, Washington 23-81
153. Weiss C.H. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review 39 5 (1979) 426-431
154. Weiss, C. H. (with M.J. Bucuvalas). (1980). Social science research and decision-making. New York: Columbia University Press.
155. In: Welsh B., Farrington D., and Sherman L. (Eds). Costs and benefits of preventing crime (2001), Westview Press, Boulder
156. Wilson J.Q. Policy intellectuals and public policy. The Public Interest 64 (1981) 31-46
157. Woolcock M. Toward a plurality of methods in project evaluation. Journal of Development Effectiveness 1 1 (2009) 1-14
158. In: Zigler E., and Styfco S. (Eds). The head start debates (2004), Brookes Publishing, Baltimore