A multitude of syntheses: A comparison of five approaches from diverse policy fields

Evidence and Policy

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 479-502

  Boaz, Annette ^a   Ashby, Deborah ^b   Denyer, David ^c   Egan, Matt ^d   Harden, Angela ^e   Jones, David R ^f   Pawson, Ray ^g   Tranfield, David ^c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Methods; Synthesis; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250361861     PISSN: 17442648     EISSN: 17442656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1332/174426406778881755     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M. and Donovan, J. (2003) 'Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care', Social Science and Medicine, vol 56, no 4, pp 671-84.
2. Chalmers, I. (2005) 'If evidence-informed policy works in practice, does it matter if it doesn't work in theory?', Evidence & Policy, vol 1, no 2, pp 227-42.
3. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (formerly the Reviewers' Handbook), Version 4.2.5, available online: www.cochrane.org/ resources/handbook/ (last accessed 11 August 2006).
4. CRD (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination) (2001) Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for those commissioning or carrying out reviews (2nd edition), CRD Report 4, York: University of York, available online: www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/ report4.htm (last accessed 11 August 2006).
5. Davies, H.T.O., Nutley, S. and Smith, P.C. (2000) Mat works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public service, Bristol: The Policy Press.
6. Davies, P. (2000) 'The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice', Oxford Review of Education, vol 26, nos 3 and 4, pp 365-78.
7. Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Young, B., Jones, D.R. and Sutton, A.J. (2004) Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence, London: Health Development Agency, available online: www.nice.org.uk/ page.aspx?o=508055 (last accessed 11 August 2006).
8. Egan, M., Petticrew, M., Ogilvie, D. and Hamilton,V. (2003) New roads and human health: a systematic review, American Journal of Public Health, vol 93, no 9, pp 1463-71.
9. Egger, M., Davey-Smith, G. and Altman, B.G. (eds) (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context, London: BMJ Books.
10. Greenhalgh, T. (1997) 'Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses)', British Medical Journal, vol 315, no 7109, pp 672-5.
11. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O. and Peacock, R. (2005) 'Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review', Social Science and Medicine, vol 61, no 2, pp 417-30.
12. Hammersley, M. (2005) 'Is the evidence-based practice movement doing more good than harm? Reflections on Iain Chalmers' case for research-based policy making and practice', Evidence & Policy, vol 1, no 1, pp 85-100.
13. Harden, A., Garcia, J., Oliver, S., Rees, R., Shepherd, J., Brunton, G. and Oakley, A. (2004) 'Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: in example from public health', Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol 58, no 9, pp 794-800.
14. Lilford, R. (2001) 'Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners', Health Technology Assessment, vol 5, no 8, 62 pp, www.ncchta.org/ (last accessed 11 August 2006).
15. Macdonald, G. (2003) Using systematic reviews to improve social care, Report 04, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence, available online: www.scie.org.uk/publications/knowledge.asp (last accessed 11 August 2006).
16. Oakley,A., Gough, D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J. (2005) 'The politics of evidence and methodology: lessons from the EPPI-Centre', Evidence & Policy, vol 1, no 1, pp 5-32.
17. Ogilvie, D., Egan, M., Hamilton, V. and Petticrew, M. (2005a) 'Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go?', Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol 59, no 10, pp 886-92.
18. Ogilvie, D., Hamilton, V., Egan, M. and Petticrew, M. (2005b) 'Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go?', Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol 59, no 9, pp 804-8.
19. Oliver, S., Harden, A., Rees, R., Shepherd, J., Brunton, G., Garcia, J. and Oakley, A. (2005) 'An emerging framework for integrating different types of evidence in systematic reviews for public policy', Evaluation, vol 11, no 4, pp 428-46.
20. Pawson, R. (2004) Mentoring relationships: An explanatory review, Working Paper 21, London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, available online: http://evidencenetwork.org/Documents/ wp21.pdf (last accessed 11 August 2006).
21. Pawson, R. (2006) Evidence-based policy:A realist perspective, London: Sage Publications.
22. Petticrew, M. (2001) 'Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions', British Medical Journal, vol 322, no 7278, pp98-101, available online: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/ 322/7278/98 (last accessed 11 August 2006).
23. Roberts, K.A., Dixon-Woods, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Abrams, K.R. and Jones, D.R. (2002) 'Factors affecting uptake of childhood immunisation: a Bayesian synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence', Lancet, vol 360, no 9345, pp 1596-9.
24. Sheldon, T. (2005) 'Making evidence synthesis more useful for management and policy-making', Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, vol 10, no 3 (supplement 1), pp S1-S5.
25. Shepherd, J., Garcia, J., Oliver, S., Harden, A., Rees, R., Brunton, G. and Oakley, A. (2002) Barriers to, and facilitators of the health of young people:A systematic review of evidence on young people's views and on interventions in mental health, physical activity and healthy eating, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, available online: http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/ cms/?tabid=262 (last accessed 11 August 2006).
26. Social Research Association (2002) Commissioning social research:A good practice guide (2nd edition), London: Social Research Association, available online: www.thesra.org.uk/documents/pdfs/commissioning.pdf (last accessed 11 August 2006).
27. Solesbury, W. (2001) Evidence based policy: Whence it came and where it's going, Working Paper 1, London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, available online: http://evidencenetwork.org/ Documents/wp1.pdf (last accessed 11 August 2006).
28. Sutton, A.J.,Abrams, K.R., Jones, D.R., Sheldon, T.A. and Song, F. (2000) Methods for meta-analysis in medical research, Chichester: Wiley.
29. Thomas, J., Harden,A., Oakley, A., Oliver, S., Sutcliffe, K., Rees, R., Brunton, G. and Kavanagh, J. (2004) 'Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews: an example from public health', British Medical Journal, vol 328, no 7446, pp 1010-12.
30. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003) 'Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review, British Journal of Management, vol 14, no 3, pp 207-22.
31. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Marcos, J. and Burr, M. (2004) 'Co-producing management knowledge', Management Decision, vol. 42, no 3-4, pp 375-86.
32. van Aken, J. (2004) 'Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field tested and grounded technological rules', Journal of Management Studies, vol 41, no 2, pp 219-46.