Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 550-557

  Ostrom, Elinor ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Collective action; Multiple scales; Polycentricity

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GLOBAL CLIMATE; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; GREENHOUSE GAS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;

EID: 78650169968     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Adler J.H. Jurisdictional mismatch in environmental federalism. New York University Environmental Law Journal 2005, 14:130-135.
2. Agrawal A. Common resources and institutional sustainability. The Drama of the Commons. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change 2002, 41-85. National Research Council. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. E. Ostrom (Ed.).
3. Bala G., et al. Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104:6550-6555. 10.1073/pnas.0608998104.
4. Baland J.-M., Platteau J.-P. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? 2000, Oxford University Press, New York.
5. Betsill M.M. Mitigating climate change in US cities: opportunities and obstacles. Local Environment 2001, 6. 392-306.
6. 2 emissions: shifting international responsibilities for climate debt. Climate Policy 2008, 8:569-576.
7. Brennan G. Climate change: a rational choice politics view. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2009, 53:309-326.
8. Bulkeley H., Kern K. Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UK. Urban Studies 2006, 43:2237-2259.
9. Camerer C.F. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction 2003, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
10. Carraro C. Governing the Global Environment 2003, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
11. Chomitz K.M. Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: how do forestry and energy projects compare?. Climate Policy 2002, 2:35-49.
12. Cole D.H. Climate change and collective action. Current Legal Problems 2008, 61:229-264.
13. Cox J.C., et al. A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness. Games and Economic Behavior 2007, 59:17-45.
14. Dellink R., et al. Sharing the burden of financing adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change 2009, 19:411-421.
15. Dietz T., et al. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 2003, 302(5652):1907-1912.
16. Dietz T., et al. Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:18452-18456.
17. Ebeling J. Risks and criticisms of forestry-based climate change mitigation and carbon trading. Climate Change and Forests: Emerging Policy and Market Opportunities 2008, 43-58. Chatham House, London. C. Streck (Ed.).
18. EEA (European Environmental Agency), 2006. Greenhouse Gas Emission Trends and Projections in Europe 2006. EEA Report No. 9/2006. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. URL: (accessed July 8, 2010). http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_9/eea_report_9_2006.pdf.
19. Engel, K.H., 2006. State and Local Climate Change Initiatives: What is Motivating State and Local Governments to Address a Global Problem and What Does this Say about Federalism and Environmental Law? Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 06-36. University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law, Tucson. URL: (accessed July 8, 2010). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm%3Fabstract_id=933712%23%23.
20. Fehr E., Gächter S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 2002, 415:137-140.
21. Fehr, E., Leibbrandt, A., 2008. Cooperativeness and Impatience in the Tragedy of the Commons. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3625. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany. URL: (accessed July 8, 2010). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm%3Fabstract_id=1214914.
22. Friesema H.P. The metropolis and the maze of local government. Urban Affairs Review 1966, 2:68-90.
23. Frohlich N., Oppenheimer J.A. Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory 1992, University of California Press, Berkeley.
24. Fuller M.C., et al. Toward a low-carbon economy: municipal financing for energy efficiency and solar power. Environment 2009, 51:22-32.
25. Gardner G.T., Stern P. The short list: the most effective actions U.S. households can take to curb climate change. Environment 2008, 50:13-24.
26. Gershenfeld N., et al. Intelligent infrastructure for energy efficiency. Science 2010, 327:1086-1087.
27. Goulder, L.H., 2007. California's bold new climate policy. The Economists' Voice 4 (3), article 5. URL: (accessed July 7, 2010). http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol4/iss3/art5/.
28. Gulick L. Metropolitan organization. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1957, 314:57-65. 10.1177/000271625731400107.
29. Hillman T., Ramaswami A. Greenhouse gas emission footprints and energy use benchmarks for eight U.S. cities. Environmental Science and Technology 2010, 44:1902-1910.
30. Kates R.W., Wilbanks T.J. Making the global local: responding to climate change concerns from the ground up. Environment 2003, 45(3):12-23.
31. Kaufman, L., 2009. A desire to keep up with neighbors is spurring conservation. The New York Times, Environment, January 30. URL: (accessed July 8, 2010). http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/31/science/earth/31compete.html.
32. Laitner, J.A., et al., 2009. Examining the Scale of the Behaviour Energy Efficiency Conundrum. Panel 1 Paper for the 2009 ECEEE Summer Study, La Colle sur Loup, France, June 1-6. URL: (accessed July 8, 2010). http://www.eceee.org/conference_proceedings/eceee/2009/Panel_1/1.367/.
33. Lichbach M.I. The Cooperator's Dilemma 1996, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
34. Matrak, J., 2009. Promoting Sustainability by Identifying the Appropriate Scale of Governance: A Polycentric Perspective on Localization in England. Master's Thesis. University of Oxford, UK.
35. McKean M.A. Common property: what is it, what is it good for, and what makes it work?. People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance 2000, 27-55. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C. Gibson, M.A. McKean, E. Ostrom (Eds.).
36. Milinski M., et al. Reputation helps solve the 'tragedy of the commons'. Nature 2002, 415:424-426.
37. Miller C.A Climate science and the making of a global political order. States of Knowledge: The Coproduction of Science and Social Order 2004, 46-66. Routledge, New York. S. Jasanoff (Ed.).
38. Morgan M.G. Managing carbon from the bottom up. Science 2000, 289:2285.
39. Najam A., et al. Climate negotiations beyond Kyoto: developing countries concerns and interests. Climate Policy 2003, 3:221-231.
40. Nordhaus W.D. Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change 1994, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. NRC (National Research Council) The Drama of the Commons. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change 2002, National Academies Press, Washington, DC. E. Ostrom (Ed.).
42. Ostrom E., Parks R.B. Neither gargantua nor the land of lilliputs: conjectures on mixed systems of metropolitan organization. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis 1999, 284-305. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. M. McGinnis (Ed.).
43. Ostrom E., et al. Patterns of Metropolitan Policing 1978, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
44. Ostrom E., et al. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources 1994, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
45. Ostrom V. The political economy of water development. American Economic Review 1962, 52:450-458.
46. Ostrom V. Polycentricity (Parts 1 and 2). Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis 1999, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 52-74, 119-138. M. McGinnis (Ed.).
47. Ostrom V., et al. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review 1961, 55:831-842.
48. Petersen J.E., et al. Dormitory residents reduce electricity consumption when exposed to real-time visual feedback and incentives. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 2007, 8:16-33. 10.1108/14676370710717562.
49. Posner, E.A., Sunstein, C., 2008. Justice and Climate Change. Discussion Paper 08-04. Harvard University Project on International Climate Agreements. Cambridge, MA.
50. Poteete A., et al. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice 2010, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
51. Rabe B.G. Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy 2004, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
52. Rabe B.G. Beyond Kyoto: climate change policy in multilevel governance systems. Governance 2007, 20:423-444.
53. Ramaswami A., et al. A demand-centered, hybrid life-cycle methodology for city-scale greenhouse gas inventories. Environmental Science & Technology 2008, 42:6455-6461.
54. Rothstein B. Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State 1998, Cambridge University Press, UK.
55. Rothstein B. Social Traps and the Problem of Trust 2005, Cambridge University Press, UK.
56. Sandler T. Global Collective Action 2004, Cambridge University Press, UK.
57. Schelling T.C. Micromotives and Macrobehavior 1978, Norton, New York.
58. Schlager E., et al. Mobile flows, storage and self-organized institutions for governing common-pool resources. Land Economics 1994, 70:294-317.
59. Sen A. Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1977, 6:317-344.
60. Simon H.A. A behavioural model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1955, 69:99-188.
61. Sovacool B.K., Brown M.A. Scaling the policy response to climate change. Policy and Society 2009, 27:317-328.
62. Stavins R. Policy instruments for climate change: how can national governments address a global problem?. The University of Chicago Legal Forum 1997, 1997:293-329.
63. Toonen T. Resilience in public administration: the work of Elinor and Vincent Ostrom from a public administration perspective. Public Administration Review 2010, 70:193-202.
64. U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, 2010. (accessed May 1, 2010). http://www.usmayors.org/climateprotection/documents/mcpAgreement.pdf.
65. Vandenberg M.P., Steinemann A.C. The carbon-neutral individual. New York University Law Review 2007, 82:1673-1745.
66. Vatn A. Institutions and the Environment 2005, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
67. Victor D.G., et al. A Madisonian approach to climate policy. Science 2005, 309:1820-1821.
68. Wara M. Is the global carbon market working?. Nature 2007, 445:595-596.
69. Weschler, L.F., 1968. Water Resources Management: The Orange County Experience. California Government Series, No. 14. University of California, Institute of Governmental Affairs, Davis.
70. Wiener J.B. Think globally, act globally: the limits of local climate policies. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2007, 155:1961-1979.