Ownership of Corporations: A Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda

Journal of Management

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1282-1314

  Boyd, Brian K ^a   Solarino, Angelo M ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

agency theory; emerging economies; firm performance; investors; ownership; review; shareholders

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977142298     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: 15571211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0149206316633746     Document Type: Review

References (186)

1. H.E.AldrichC.M.Fiol1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19: 645-670.
2. T.M.AlessandriA.Seth2014. The effects of managerial ownership on international and business diversification: Balancing incentives and risks. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 2064-2075.
3. J.W.AllenG.M.Phillips2000. Corporate equity ownership, strategic alliances, and product market relationships. Journal of Finance, 55: 2791-2815.
4. R.C.AndersonD.M.Reeb2003. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58: 1301-1327.
5. W.A.AndrewsM.J.Dowling1998, Explaining performance changes in newly privatized firms. Journal of Management Studies, 35: 601-617.
6. J.S.AngR.A.ColeJ.W.Lin2000. Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance, 55: 81-106.
7. H.AslanP.Kumar2012. Strategic ownership structure and the cost of debt. Review of Financial Studies, 7: 2257-2299.
8. J.AzarM.C.SchmalzI.Tecu2014. Anti-competitive effects of common ownership (Ross School of Business Paper, 1235). Ann Arbor, MI: Ross School of Business.
9. K.H.BaeJ.K.KangJ.M.Kim2002. Tunneling or value added? Evidence from mergers by Korean business groups. Journal of Finance, 57: 2695-2740.
10. E.R.BanalievaK.A.Eddleston2011. Home-region focus and performance of family firms: The role of family vs non-family leaders. Journal of International Business Studies, 42: 1060-1072.
11. J.Barney1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
12. J.BattilanaB.LecaE.Boxenbaum2009. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3: 65-107.
13. A.A.BearleJr.G.C.Means1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.
14. D.D.Bergh1993. Don’t “waste” your time! The effects of time series errors in management research: The case of ownership concentration and research and development spending. Journal of Management, 19: 897-914.
15. D.D.BerghH.AguinisC.HeaveyD.J.KetchenB.K.BoydP.SuC.L.L.LauH.Joo2016. Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 477-497.
16. S.BettonB.E.EckboK.S.Thorburn2009. Merger negotiations and the toehold puzzle. Journal of Financial Economics, 91: 158-178.
17. S.K.BhaumikN.DriffieldS.Pal2010. Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors. Journal of International Business Studies, 41: 437-450.
18. Bloomberg. 2014. Amazon loss widens as CEO alarms investors with spending. Available from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-07-25/amazon-loss-widens-as-ceo-alarms-investors-with-spending
19. M.BorensteinL.HedgesJ.HigginsH.Rothstein2005. Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat, 104.
20. G.BorisovaW.L.Megginson2011. Does government ownership affect the cost of debt? Evidence from privatization. Review of Financial Studies, 24: 2693-2737.
21. B.BortolottiV.FotakW.MegginsonW.Miracky2009. Sovereign wealth fund investment patterns and performance (Nota di lavoro No. 22.2009). Milan, Italy: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Institutions and Markets.
22. B.Boyd1990. Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 419-430.
23. B.K.Boyd1995. CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 301-312.
24. B.K.BoydD.D.BerghD.Ketchen2010. Reconsidering the reputation – performance relationship: A resource-based view. Journal of Management, 36: 588-609.
25. B.K.BoydS.GoveM.A.Hitt2005. Construct measurement in strategic management research: Illusion or reality?Strategic Management Journal, 26: 239-257.
26. B.K.BoydK.T.HaynesM.A.HittD.D.BerghD.J.Ketchen2012. Contingency models in strategic management: Use, disuse, or misuse?Journal of Management, 38: 278-313.
27. B.K.BoydK.T.HaynesF.Zona2011. Dimensions of CEO – board relations. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 1892-1923.
28. M.F.BrauerM.F.Wiersema2012. Industry divestiture waves: How a firm’s position influences investor returns. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1472-1492.
29. J.A.BrickleyR.C.LeaseC.W.Smith1988. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 267-291.
30. P.BunkanwanichaJ.P.FanY.Wiwattanakantang2013. The value of marriage to family firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48: 611-636.
31. B.J.BusheeM.E.CarterJ.Gerakos2013. Institutional investor preferences for corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26: 123-149.
32. D.CaiJ.LuoD.Wan2012. Family CEOs: Do they benefit firm performance in China?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 923-947.
33. M.Carney2005. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29: 249-265.
34. S.J.Chang2003. Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 238-253.
35. S.J.ChangJ.Hong2000. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 429-448.
36. V.ChenJ.LiD.Shapiro2011. Are OECD-prescribed “good corporate governance practices” really good in an emerging economy?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28: 115-138.
37. Y.Y.ChenM.N.Young2010. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal–principal perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27: 523-539.
38. A.ChizemaJ.Kim2010. Outside directors on Korean boards: Governance and institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 471: 109-129.
39. A.ChizemaY.Shinozawa2012. The “company with committees”: Change or continuity in Japanese corporate governance?Journal of Management Studies, 49: 77-101.
40. J.J.ChrismanP.C.Patel2012. Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 976-997.
41. W.Chu2011. Family ownership and firm performance: Influence of family management, family control, and firm size. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28: 833-851.
42. H.M.Chung2013. The role of family management and family ownership in diversification: The case of family business groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30: 871-891.
43. S.ClaessensS.DjankovJ.P.FanL.H.Lang2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57: 2741-2771.
44. J.G.CombsT.R.CrookC.L.Shook2005. The dimensionality of organizational performance and its implications for strategic management research. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 2: 259-286.
45. H.CronqvistR.Fahlenbrach2009. Large shareholders and corporate policies. Review of Financial Studies, 22: 3941-3976.
46. R.M.CyertJ.G.March1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
47. P.DavidM.A.HittJ.Gimeno2001. The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 144-157.
48. P.DavidR.KochharE.Levitas1998. The effect of institutional investors on the level and mix of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 200-208.
49. P.DavidJ.P.O’BrienT.YoshikawaA.Delios2010. Do shareholders or stakeholders appropriate the rents from corporate diversification? The influence of ownership structure. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 636-654.
50. G.F.Davis1991. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 583-613.
51. G.F.DavisS.K.Stout1992. Organization theory and the market for corporate control: A dynamic analysis of the characteristics of large takeover targets, 1980-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 605-633.
52. Z.DengP.S.HofmanA.Newman2013. Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese private SMEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30: 717-734.
53. P.DiMaggio1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In (Ed.), Institutional patterns and culture: 3-22. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
54. P.J.DiMaggioW.W.Powell1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.
55. C.Ding2013. Corporate governance, enforcement and financial development: The Chinese experience. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
56. P.DomadenikJ.PrašnikarJ.Svejnar2008. Restructuring of firms in transition: Ownership, institutions and openness to trade. Journal of International Business Studies, 39: 725-746.
57. S.DoumaR.GeorgeR.Kabir2006. Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: Evidence from a large emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 637-657.
58. A.A.DrakosF.V.Bekiris2010. Corporate performance, managerial ownership and endogeneity: A simultaneous equation analysis for the Athens stock exchange. Research in International Business and Finance, 24: 24-38.
59. W.G.DyerD.A.Whetten2006. Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30: 785-802.
60. A.Edmans2009. Blockholder trading, market efficiency, and managerial myopia. Journal of Finance, 64: 2481-2513.
61. K.M.Eisenhardt1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14: 57-74.
62. L.EnriquesP.Volpin2007. Corporate governance reforms in continental Europe. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21: 117-140.
63. S.EstrinS.PoukliakovaD.Shapiro2009. The performance effects of business groups in Russia. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 393-420.
64. M.FaccioM.T.MarchicaR.Mura2011. Large shareholder diversification and corporate risk-taking. Review of Financial Studies, 24: 3601-3641.
65. E.F.Fama1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88: 288-307.
66. E.F.FamaM.C.Jensen1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 91: 301-325.
67. Z.FernándezM.J.Nieto2006. Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 340-351.
68. M.K.Fiegener2010. Locus of ownership and family involvement in small private firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 296-321.
69. I.FilatotchevY.C.LienJ.Piesse2005. Corporate governance and performance in publicly listed, family-controlled firms: Evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 257-283.
70. I.FilatotchevX.ZhangJ.Piesse2011. Multiple agency perspective, family control, and private information abuse in an emerging economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28: 69-93.
71. N.Fligstein1997. Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 404, 397-405.
72. S.A.FrankforterS.L.BermanT.M.Jones2000. Boards of directors and shark repellents: Assessing the value of an agency theory perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 37: 321-348.
73. R.GarudS.JainA.Kumaraswamy2002. Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 196-214.
74. E.GedajlovicM.Carney2010. Markets, hierarchies, and families: Toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34: 1145-1172.
75. E.R.GedajlovicD.M.Shapiro1998. Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 533-553.
76. E.GedajlovicD.Shapiro2002. Ownership structure and firm profitability in Japan. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 565-575.
77. G.GeorgeJ.WiklundS.A.Zahra2005. Ownership and the internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management, 31: 210-233.
78. R.J.GilsonC.J.Milhaupt2008. Sovereign wealth funds and corporate governance: A minimalist response to the new mercantilism. Stanford Law Review, 60: 1345-1358.
79. E.GoldengL.A.GrünfeldG.R.Benito2008. The performance differential between private and state owned enterprises: The roles of ownership, management and market structure. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 1244-1273.
80. L.R.Gómez-MejíaK.T.HaynesM.Núñez-NickelK.J.JacobsonJ.Moyano-Fuentes2007. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 106-137.
81. L.R.Gomez-MejiaM.MakriM.L.Kintana2010. Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 223-252.
82. L.R.Gomez-MejiaM.Nunez-NickelI.Gutierrez2001. The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 81-95.
83. E.GonnardE.J.KimI.Ynesta2008. Recent trends in institutional investors statistics. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, 2008: 1-22.
84. M.GoranovaT.M.AlessandriP.BrandesR.Dharwadkar2007. Managerial ownership and corporate diversification: A longitudinal view. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 211-225.
85. M.GoranovaR.DharwadkarP.Brandes2010. Owners on both sides of the deal: Mergers and acquisitions and overlapping institutional ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 1114-1135.
86. R.H.Gordon1990. Do publicly traded corporations act in the public interest? (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 3303). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
87. R.GreenwoodR.Suddaby2006. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management journal, 49: 27-48.
88. R.GreenwoodR.SuddabyC.R.Hinings2002. Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 58-80.
89. K.GuglerJ.Weigand2003. Is ownership really endogenous?Applied Economic Letters, 10: 483-486.
90. M.F.Guillen2000. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 362-380.
91. D.C.HambrickS.Finkelstein1987. Managerial discretion—A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 369-406.
92. B.H.HamiltonJ.A.Nickerson2003. Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1: 51-78.
93. R.G.HansenJ.R.Lott1996. Externalities and corporate objectives in a world with diversified shareholder/consumers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31: 43-68.
94. C.HardyS.Maguire2008. Institutional entrepreneurship. In (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 198-217. London: Sage.
95. H.A.Haveman1993. Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 593-627.
96. C.W.HillS.A.Snell1988. External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 577-590.
97. C.W.L.HillS.A.Snell1989. Effects of ownership structure and control on corporate productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 25-46.
98. A.J.HillmanT.Dalziel2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28: 383-396.
99. A.J.HillmanM.C.WithersB.J.Collins2009. Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35: 1404-1427.
100. C.G.HoldernessR.S.KrosznerD.P.Sheenan2000. The rise in managerial stock ownership. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 13: 105-115.
101. R.E.HoskissonR.A.JohnsonD.D.Moesel1994. Corporate divestiture intensity in restructuring firms: Effects of governance, strategy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1207-1251.
102. R.HoskissonM.HittR.A.JohnsonW.Grossman2002. Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 697-716.
103. E.S.HotchkissD.Strickland2003. Does shareholder composition matter? Evidence from the market reaction to corporate earnings announcements. Journal of Finance, 58: 1469-1498.
104. H.W.HuO.K.TamM.G.S.Tan2010. Internal governance mechanisms and firm performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27: 727-749.
105. J.HunterF.Schmidt1990. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
106. C.F.K.V.InoueS.G.LazzariniA.Musacchio2013. Leviathan as a minority shareholder: Firm-level implications of state equity purchases. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 1775-1801.
107. M.C.JensenW.H.Meckling1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.
108. W.JiangK.LiP.Shao2010. When shareholders are creditors: Effects of the simultaneous holding of equity and debt by non-commercial banking institutions. Review of Financial Studies, 23: 3595-3637.
109. Y.JiangM.W.Peng2011a. Are family ownership and control in large firms good, bad, or irrelevant?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28: 15-39.
110. Y.JiangM.W.Peng2011b. Principal-principal conflicts during crisis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28: 683-695.
111. M.JuH.Zhao2009. Behind organizational slack and firm performance in China: The moderating roles of ownership and competitive intensity. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26: 701-717.
112. R.KabirD.CantrijnA.Jeunink1997. Takeover defenses, ownership structure and stock returns in the Netherlands: An empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 97-109.
113. R.KatilaJ.D.RosenbergerK.M.Eisenhardt2008. Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 295-332.
114. T.KhannaK.Palepu1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75: 3-10.
115. T.KhannaY.Yafeh2005. Business groups and risk sharing around the world. Journal of Business, 78: 301-340.
116. O.KiniW.KracawS.Mian2004. The nature of discipline by corporate takeovers. Journal of Finance, 59: 1511-1552.
117. A.KleinE.Zur2009. Entrepreneurial shareholder activism: Hedge funds and other private investors. Journal of Finance, 64: 187-229.
118. R.KochharP.David1996. Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 73-84.
119. A.KumarC.Lee2006. Retail investor sentiment and return co-movements. Journal of Finance, 61: 2451-2486.
120. R.La PortaF.Lopez-De-SilanesA.Shleifer1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54: 471-517.
121. S.F.LathamM.Braun2009. Managerial risk, innovation, and organizational decline. Journal of Management, 35: 258-281.
122. T.B.LawrenceM.K.MauwsB.DyckR.F.Kleysen2005. The politics of organizational learning: Integrating power into the 4I framework. Academy of Management Review, 30: 180-191.
123. T.B.LawrenceR.Suddaby2006. Institutions and institutional work. In (Eds.), Sage handbook of organization studies, 2nd ed.: 215-254. London: Sage.
124. T.V.LeJ.P.O’Brien2010. Can two wrongs make a right? State ownership and debt in a transition economy. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 1297-1316.
125. H.LeblebiciG.R.SalancikA.CopayT.King1991. Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 333-363.
126. W.LiA.HeH.LanD.Yiu2012. Political connections and corporate diversification in emerging economies: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 799-818.
127. A.I.LopesI.Lourenço2014. Determinants of engaging in business combinations through partial acquisitions. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 43: 149-176.
128. Y.LuJ.Yao2006. Impact of state ownership and control mechanisms on the performance of group affiliated companies in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 485-503.
129. J.LuoD.WanD.Cai2012. The private benefits of control in Chinese listed firms: Do cash flow rights always reduce controlling shareholders’ tunneling?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 499-518.
130. X.MaX.YaoY.Xi2006. Business group affiliation and firm performance in a transition economy: A focus on ownership voids. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 467-483.
131. S.MaguireC.HardyT.B.Lawrence2004. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 657-679.
132. M.V.Makhija2004. The value of restructuring in emerging economies: The case of the Czech Republic. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 243-267.
133. R.W.MasulisC.WangF.Xie2009. Agency problems at dual-class companies. Journal of Finance, 64: 1697-1727.
134. D.MillerI.Le Breton-MillerR.H.Lester2010. Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly-traded companies. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 201-223.
135. D.MillerA.MinichilliG.Corbetta2013. Is family leadership always beneficial?Strategic Management Journal, 34: 553-571.
136. R.MorckD.WolfenzonB.Yeung2005. Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43: 655-720.
137. T.Mullaney2015. Making sense of a wild ride for the Chinese economy. CNBC, August1. Retrieved from http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/01/making-sense-of-a-wild-ride-for-the-chinese-economy.html.
138. D.P.O’BrienS.C.Salop2000. Competitive effects of partial ownership: Financial interest and corporate control. Antitrust Law Journal, 67: 559-614.
139. C.Oliver1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16: 145-179.
140. H.M.O’NeillD.A.RondinelliT.Wattanakul2004. Ownership and its impact on coping with financial crisis: Differences in state-, mixed-, and privately-owned enterprises in Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 49-74.
141. P.P.Ouimet2013. What motivates minority acquisitions? The trade-offs between a partial equity stake and complete integration. Review of Financial Studies, 26: 1021-1047.
142. C.PattnaikJ.J.ChangH.H.Shin2013. Business groups and corporate transparency in emerging markets: Empirical evidence from India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30: 987-1004.
143. M.W.PengY.Jiang2010. Institutions behind family ownership and control in large firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 253-273.
144. M.W.PengS.L.SunB.PinkhamH.Chen2009. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23: 63-81.
145. M.W.PengD.WangY.Jiang2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39: 920-936.
146. M.PeterafR.Reed2007. Managerial discretion and internal alignment under regulatory constraints and change. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1089-1112.
147. J.Pfeffer1981. Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
148. J.PfefferG.R.Salancik1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
149. P.H.PhanT.Yoshikawa2000. Agency theory and Japanese corporate governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17: 1-27.
150. W.T.ProffittA.Spicer2006. Shaping the shareholder activism agenda: Institutional investors and global social issues. Strategic Organization, 4: 165-190.
151. S.D.Prowse1992. The structure of corporate ownership in Japan. Journal of Finance, 47: 1121-1140.
152. K.Ramaswamy2001. Organizational ownership, competitive intensity, and firm performance: An empirical study of the Indian manufacturing sector. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 989-998.
153. K.RamaswamyM.LiB.S.P.Petitt2004. Who drives unrelated diversification? A study of Indian manufacturing firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 403-423.
154. K.RamaswamyM.LiR.Veliyath2002. Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversify: A study of the Indian corporate context. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 345-358.
155. K.J.RedikerA.Seth1995. Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 85-99.
156. K.SchnatterlyS.G.Johnson2014. Independent boards and the institutional investors that prefer them: Drivers of institutional investor heterogeneity in governance preferences. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1552-1563.
157. W.S.SchulzeM.H.LubatkinR.N.Dino2003. Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 179-194.
158. M.G.SeoW.D.Creed2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27: 222-247.
159. A.ShleiferR.W.Vishny1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94: 461-488.
160. A.ShleiferR.W.Vishny1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52: 737-783.
161. J.Siegel2007. Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 621-666.
162. H.A.Simon1957. Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.
163. M.P.Smith1996. Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERS. Journal of Finance, 51: 227-252.
164. S.SoM.Smith2009. Value relevance of IAS 27 2003 revision on presentation of noncontrolling interest: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 20: 166-198.
165. W.SuC.-Y.Lee2013. Effects of corporate governance on risk taking in Taiwanese family firms during institutional reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30: 809-828.
166. The Economist. 2013. The rise of BlackRock. December7. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21591174-25-years-blackrock-has-become-worlds-biggest-investor-its-dominance-problem. Accessed July 10, 2015.
167. S.ThomsenT.Pedersen2000. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 689.
168. L.TihanyiR.A.JohnsonR.E.HoskissonM.A.Hitt2003. Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: The effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 195-211.
169. M.TonelloS.R.Rabimov2010. The institutional investment report: Trends in asset allocation and portfolio composition (The Conference Board Research Report, No. R-1468-10-RR, 2010). Available from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1707512
170. S.-M.TsaoG.-Z.Chen2012. The impact of internationalization on performance and innovation: The moderating effects of ownership concentration. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 617-642.
171. C.S.TuggleD.G.SirmonC.R.ReutzelL.Bierman2010. Commanding board of director attention: Investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 946-968.
172. N.Venkatraman1989. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14: 423-444.
173. A.VerbekeL.Kano2010. Transaction cost economics TCE and the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34: 1173-1182.
174. B.VillalongaR.Amit2006. How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?Journal of Financial Economics, 80: 385-417.
175. J.WestphalE.J.Zajac1994. Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 367-390.
176. O.E.Williamson1975. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
177. O.E.Williamson1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Simon & Schuster.
178. R.M.WisemanL.R.Gomez-Mejia1998. A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23: 133-153.
179. E.XuH.Zhang2008. The impact of state shares on corporate innovation strategy and performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 473-487.
180. D.W.YiuY.LuG.D.BrutonR.E.Hoskisson2007. Business groups: An integrated model to focus future research. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 1551-1579.
181. T.YoshikawaE.R.Gedajlovic2002. The impact of global capital market exposure and stable ownership on investor relations practices and performance of Japanese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 525-540.
182. T.YoshikawaA.A.Rasheed2010. Family control and ownership monitoring in family-controlled firms in Japan. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 274-295.
183. M.N.YoungM.W.PengD.AhlstromG.D.BrutonY.Jiang2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 196-220.
184. S.A.ZahraD.O.NeubaumM.Huse2000. Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management, 26: 947-976.
185. N.ZhouA.Delios2012. Diversification and diffusion: A social networks and institutional perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29: 773-798.
186. E.W.Zuckerman2000. Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 591-619.