Organizational ownership, competitive intensity, and firm performance: An empirical study of the Indian manufacturing sector

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 989-998

  Ramaswamy, Kannan ^a  

^a The American Grad Sch of Intnl   (United States)

Author keywords

Competitive intensity; India; Ownership; Privatization; Public sector firms

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012025876     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.204     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aharoni Y. 1986. The Evolution and Management of State Owned Enterprises. Ballinger Publishing. Cambridge, MA.
2. Boardman AE, Vining AR. 1989. Ownership and performance in competitive environments. Journal of Law and Economics 32: 1-33.
3. Foster CD. 1992. Privatization, Public Ownership and the Regulation of Natural Monopoly. Blackwell: Oxford, U.K.
4. Grant RM. 1987. Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies 18: 79-89.
5. Grosse R, Yanes J. 1998. Carrying out a successful privatization: the YPF case. Academy of Management Executive 12: 64-73.
6. Hjalmarsson L, Veiderpass A. 1992. Productivity in Swedish electricity retail distribution. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Special Issue: 193-206.
7. Kay JA, Thompson DJ. 1986. Privatisation: a policy in search of a rationale. Economic Journal 96: 18-32.
8. Li M, Simerly RL. 1998. The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the ownership and performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal 19(2): 169-179.
9. Martin S, Parker D. 1997. The Impact of Privatisation. Routledge: London.
10. Megginson WL, Nash RC, Van Randenborgh M. 1994. The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms An international empirical analysis. Journal of Finance 69: 403-452.
11. Papadakis VM, Lioukas S, Chambers D. 1998. Strategic decision-making processes: the role of management and context. Strategic Management Journal 19(1): 115-148.
12. Parker D, Hartley K. 1991. Do changes in organizational status affect financial performance? Strategic Management Journal 12(8): 631-641.
13. Pollitt MG. 1995. Ownership and Performance in Electric Utilities: International Evidence on Privatization and Efficiency. Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K.
14. Ring PS, Perry JL. 1985. Strategic management in public and private organizations: implications of distinctive contexts and constraints. Academy of Management Review 10: 276-286.
15. Shirley M, Nellis J. 1991. Public Enterprise Reform: The Lessons of Experience. The World Bank: Washington, D.C.
16. Smith KG, Grimm CM. 1987. Environmental variation, strategic change and firm performance: a study of railroad deregulation. Strategic Management Journal 8(4): 363-376.
17. Tolbert PS. 1985. Resource dependence and institutional environments: sources of administrative structure in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly 30: 1-13.
18. Vickers J, Yarrow G. 1988. Privatization: An Economic Analysis. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
19. Vining A, Boardman A. 1992. Ownership versus competition: efficiency in public enterprise. Public Choice 73: 205-239.
20. Wright M, Hoskisson RE, Filatotchev I, Buck T. 1998. Revitalizing privatized Russian enterprises. Academy of Management Executive 12: 75-85.