Consumer acceptability of coffee as affected by situational conditions and involvement

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 52, Issue , 2016, Pages 124-132

  Kim, Soo Eon ^a   Lee, Soh Min ^a   Kim, Kwang Ok ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Coffee; Cognitive evocation; Involvement; Physical environment; Situational test

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967175535     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ares G., Besio M., Giménez A., Deliza R. Relationship between involvement and functional milk desserts intention to purchase. Influence on attitude towards packaging characteristics. Appetite 2010, 55(2):298-304.
2. Bangcuyo R.G., Smith K.J., Zumach J.L., Pierce A.M., Guttman G.A., Simons C.T. The use of immersive technologies to improve consumer testing: The role of ecological validity, context and engagement in evaluating coffee. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 41:84-95.
3. Bell R., Marshall D.W. The construct of food involvement in behavioral research: Scale development and validation. Appetite 2003, 40(3):235-244.
4. Bell R., Meiselman H.L., Pierson B.J., Reeve W.G. Effects of adding an Italian theme to a restaurant on the perceived ethnicity, acceptability, and selection of foods. Appetite 1994, 22(1):11-24.
5. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 1995, 289-300.
6. Berry S.L., Beatty W.W., Klesges R.C. Sensory and social influences on ice cream consumption by males and females in a laboratory setting. Appetite 1985, 6(1):41-45.
7. Bertrand B., Guyot B., Anthony F., Lashermes P. Impact of the Coffea canephora gene introgression on beverage quality of C. arabica. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2003, 107(3):387-394.
8. Bisogni C.A., Falk L.W., Madore E., Blake C.E., Jastran M., Sobal J., et al. Dimensions of everyday eating and drinking episodes. Appetite 2007, 48(2):218-231.
9. Boutrolle I., Arranz D., Rogeaux M., Delarue J. Comparing central location test and home use test results: Application of a new criterion. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16(8):704-713.
10. De Castro J.M., Brewer E.M., Elmore D.K., Orozco S. Social facilitation of the spontaneous meal size of humans occurs regardless of time, place, alcohol or snacks. Appetite 1990, 15(2):89-101.
11. De Castro J.M., de Castro E.S. Spontaneous meal patterns of humans: Influence of the presence of other people. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1989, 50(2):237-247.
12. de Graaf C., Cardello A.V., Matthew Kramer F., Lesher L.L., Meiselman H.L., Schutz H.G. A comparison between liking ratings obtained under laboratory and field conditions: The role of choice. Appetite 2005, 44(1):15-22.
13. Delarue J., Boutrolle I., Jaeger S., MacFie H. The effects of context on liking: implications for hedonic measurements in new product development. Consumer-driven Innovation in Food and Personal Care Products 2010, 175-218.
14. Ferber C., Cabanac M. Influence of noise on gustatory affective ratings and preference for sweet or salt. Appetite 1987, 8(3):229-235.
15. Fernandez P., Bensafi M., Rouby C., Giboreau A. Does olfactory specific satiety take place in a natural setting?. Appetite 2013, 60:1-4.
16. García-Segovia P., Harrington R.J., Seo H.-S. Influences of table setting and eating location on food acceptance and intake. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 39:1-7.
17. Goldsmith R.E., Emmert J. Measuring product category involvement: A multitrait-multimethod study. Journal of Business Research 1991, 23(4):363-371.
18. Hein K.A., Hamid N., Jaeger S.R., Delahunty C.M. Application of a written scenario to evoke a consumption context in a laboratory setting: Effects on hedonic ratings. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(4):410-416.
19. Hein K.A., Hamid N., Jaeger S.R., Delahunty C.M. Effects of evoked consumption contexts on hedonic ratings: A case study with two fruit beverages. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26(1):35-44.
20. Hersleth M., Monteleone E., Segtnan A., Næs T. Effects of evoked meal contexts on consumers' responses to intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes in dry-cured ham. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 40:191-198.
21. Hersleth M., Ueland Ø., Allain H., Næs T. Consumer acceptance of cheese, influence of different testing conditions. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16(2):103-110.
22. Holbrook A.L., Green M.C., Krosnick J.A. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: Comparison of respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly 2003, 67(1):79-125.
23. Howard J.A., Sheth J.N. The theory of buyer behavior 1969, Wiley, New York.
24. Ischer M., Baron N., Mermoud C., Cayeux I., Porcherot C., Sander D., et al. How incorporation of scents could enhance immersive virtual experiences. Frontiers in Psychology 2014, 5.
25. Jaeger S.R., Meiselman H.L. Perceptions of meal convenience: the case of at-home evening meals. Appetite 2004, 42(3):317-325.
26. Kang J.-H., Jeong H.-J. Analyzing the indirect effect of food involvement on vegetable consumption among adults in Jeonnam area. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture 2008, 23(1):97-104.
27. Kasof J. Indoor lighting preferences and bulimic behavior: An individual differences approach. Personality and Individual Differences 2002, 32(3):383-400.
28. King S.C., Meiselman H.L., Hottenstein A.W., Work T.M., Cronk V. The effects of contextual variables on food acceptability: A confirmatory study. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18(1):58-65.
29. King S.C., Weber A.J., Meiselman H.L., Lv N. The effect of meal situation, social interaction, physical environment and choice on food acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15(7):645-653.
30. Köster E.P. The psychology of food choice: Some often encountered fallacies. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14(5):359-373.
31. Köster E.P. Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20(2):70-82.
32. Labbe D., Ferrage A., Rytz A., Pace J., Martin N. Pleasantness, emotions and perceptions induced by coffee beverage experience depend on the consumption motivation (hedonic or utilitarian). Food Quality and Preference 2015, 44:56-61.
33. Leino M., Lapveteläinen A., Menchero P., Malm H., Kaitaranta J., Kallio H. Characterisation of stored Arabica and Robusta coffees by headspace-GC and sensory analyses. Food Quality and Preference 1992, 3(2):115-125.
34. Lockshin L.S., Spawton A.L., Macintosh G. Using product, brand and purchasing involvement for retail segmentation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 1997, 4(3):171-183.
35. Lusk K.A., Hamid N., Delahunty C.M., Jaeger S.R. Effects of an evoked refreshing consumption context on hedonic responses to apple juice measured using best-worst scaling and the 9-pt hedonic category scale. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 43:21-25.
36. Maeztu L., Sanz C., Andueza S., Paz de Pena M., Bello J., Cid C. Characterization of espresso coffee aroma by static headspace GC-MS and sensory flavor profile. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2001, 49(11):5437-5444.
37. Marshall D., Bell R. Relating the food involvement scale to demographic variables, food choice and other constructs. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15(7-8):871-879.
38. Meiselman H.L. Methodology and theory in human eating research. Appetite 1992, 19(1):49-55.
39. Meiselman H.L., Johnson J., Reeve W., Crouch J. Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance. Appetite 2000, 35(3):231-237.
40. Mendes L.C., de Menezes H.C., Aparecida M., Da Silva A. Optimization of the roasting of robusta coffee (C. canephora conillon) using acceptability tests and RSM. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12(2):153-162.
41. O'Brien H.L., Toms E.G. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59(6):938-955.
42. Ohly H., Pealing J., Hayter A.K., Pettinger C., Pikhart H., Watt R.G., et al. Parental food involvement predicts parent and child intakes of fruits and vegetables. Appetite 2013, 69:8-14.
43. Petit C., Sieffermann J. Testing consumer preferences for iced-coffee: Does the drinking environment have any influence?. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18(1):161-172.
44. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Jaeger S.R. The impact of the means of context evocation on consumers' emotion associations towards eating occasions. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 37:61-70.
45. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Spence C. Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 40:165-179.
46. Recchia A., Monteleone E., Tuorila H. Responses to extra virgin olive oils in consumers with varying commitment to oils. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24(1):153-161.
47. Robertson T.S. Low-commitment consumer behavior. Journal of Advertising Research 1976.
48. Rogers W.J., Michaux S., Bastin M., Bucheli P. Changes to the content of sugars, sugar alcohols, myo-inositol, carboxylic acids and inorganic anions in developing grains from different varieties of Robusta (Coffea canephora) and Arabica (C. arabica) coffees. Plant Science 1999, 149(2):115-123.
49. Rubayiza A.B., Meurens M. Chemical discrimination of arabica and robusta coffees by Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2005, 53(12):4654-4659.
50. Russell B. Situational variables and consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Research 1975, 145-155.
51. Sommer R., Steele J. Social effects on duration in restaurants. Appetite 1997, 29(1):25-30.
52. Stroebele N., De Castro J.M. Effect of ambience on food intake and food choice. Nutrition 2004, 20(9):821-838.
53. Verbeke W., Vackier I. Individual determinants of fish consumption: Application of the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 2005, 44(1):67-82.
54. Verlegh P.W., Candel M.J. The consumption of convenience foods: Reference groups and eating situations. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10(6):457-464.
55. Westerterp-Plantenga M.S. Effects of extreme environments on food intake in human subjects. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1999, 58(04):791-798.
56. Zaichkowsky J.L. Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research 1985, 341-352.