Comparing central location test and home use test results: Application of a new criterion

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 704-713

  Boutrolle, Isabelle ^a,b   Arranz, Delphine ^a   Rogeaux, Michel ^a   Delarue, Julien ^b  

^a Sensovaleur Perceptions et Préférences   (France)

^b UMR SayFood   (France)

Author keywords

Central location test; Hedonic scores; Home use test; Liking; Panel size; Robustness

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544481425     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Association Fraņaise de Normalisation (AFNOR) (2000). XP V09-500: Directives générales pour la réalisation d'épreuves hédoniques en laboratoire d'évaluation sensorielle ou en salle en conditions contrôlées impliquant des consommateurs. In AFNOR, Recueil de normes. Analyse sensorielle (pp. 227-256). Saint Denis la Plaine, France.
2. L.D. Calvin & L.A. Sather A comparison of student preference panels with a household consumer panel Food Technology 13 1959 469-472
3. M.A. Cliff M.C. King & C. Hampson Comparison of mean scores and R-indices for consumer preferences of apple cultivars HortScience 33 1998 1239-1240
4. B. Daillant-Spinnler & S. Issanchou Influence of label and location of testing on acceptability of cream cheese varying in fat content Appetite 24 1995 101-106
5. De Graaf, C., Cardello, A., Kramer, M., Lesher, L., Meiselman, H., & Schutz, H. (2001). A comparison between acceptance ratings obtained under laboratory and field conditions: The role of choice. In Proceedings of the 4th R.M. Pangborn memorial symposium: A sense odyssey, Dijon, France, 22-26 July.
6. N.M. Gordon & J.P. Norback Choosing objective measures when using sensory methods for optimization and product positioning Food Technology 39 1985 96-101
7. R.W. Griffin & L. Stauffer Product optimization in central location testing and subsequent validation and calibration in home-use testing Journal of Sensory Studies 5 1990 231-240
8. M.K. Head F.G. Giesbrecht & G.N. Johnson Food acceptability research: Comparative utility of three types of data from school children Journal of Food Science 42 1977 246-251
9. Hellemann, U., Mela, D. J., Aaron, J. I., & Evans, R. E. (1992). Role of fat in meal acceptance. In: Proceedings of the 3rd R.M. Pangborn memorial symposium on advances in sensory food science, Helsinki, Finland, 2-6 August.
10. M. Hersleth B.H. Mevik T. Naes & J.X. Guinard Effect of contextual factors on liking for wine - use of robust design methodology Food Quality and Preference 14 2003 615-622
11. Hersleth, M., Ueland, O., Allain, H., & Naes, T. Consumer acceptance of cheese, influence of different testing conditions. Food Quality and Preference, in press.
12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1999). ISO/IEC 17 025: General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.
13. S. Issanchou & J. Hossenlopp Les mesures hédoniques: méthodes, portées et limites In I. Giachetti (Ed.) Plaisirs et Préférences alimentaires 1992 Polytechnica Paris 49-75
14. S.A. Kimmel M. Sigman-Grant & J.X. Guinard Sensory testing with young children Food Technology 48 1994 92-99
15. S. King A. Weber H.L. Meiselman & N. Lv The effect of meal situation, social interaction, physical environment and choice on food acceptability Food Quality and Preference 15 2004 645-653
16. E.P. Köster Time and frequency analysis: A new approach to the measurement of some less-well-known aspects of food preferences In J. Solms & R.L. Hall (Eds.), Criteria of food acceptance 1981 Forster Verlaf AG Zurich 240-252
17. E.P. Köster T. Couronne F. Leon C. Levy & A.S. Marcelino Repeatability in hedonic sensory measurement: A conceptual exploration Food Quality and Preference 14 2002 165-176
18. K. Kozlowska M. Jeruszka I. Matuszewska W. Roszkowski N. Barylko-Pikielna & A. Brzozowska Hedonic tests in different locations as predictors of apple juice consumption at home in elderly and young subjects Food Quality and Preference 14 2003 653-661
19. L. Lähteenmäki & H.C.N. Van Trijp Hedonic responses, variety seeking tendency and expressed variety in sandwich choices Appetite 24 1995 139-152
20. N. Lavenka & N. Kamen Magnitude estimation of food acceptance Journal of Food Science 59 1994 1322-1324
21. Leon, F. (1998). Elaboration et comparaison de méthodes d'évaluation des préférences alimentaires adaptées aux enfants de quatre à dix ans. Thése de Doctorat. Paris: Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI. 164 p.
22. F. Leon T. Couronne M.C. Marcuz & E.P. Köster Measuring food liking in children: A comparison of non verbal methods Food Quality and Preference 10 1999 93-100
23. C.M. Levy & E.P. Köster The relevance of initial hedonic judgments in the prediction of subtle food choices Food Quality and Preference 10 1999 185-200
24. Martens, H., & Martens, M. (1999). Validation of PLS regression models in sensory science by extended cross validation. In: Les méthodes PLS. Symposium international PLS'99, Jouy-en-Josas, France, 5-6 October.
25. M.R. McDaniel & F.M. Sawyer Preference testing of whiskey sour formulations: Magnitude estimation versus the 9-point hedonic Journal of Food Science 46 1981 182-185
26. J.A. McEwan A comparative study of three product acceptability trials Food Quality and Preference 8 1997 183-190
27. H.L. Meiselman Methodology and theory in human eating research Appetite 19 1992 49-55
28. H.L. Meiselman E.S. Hirsch & R.D. Popper Sensory, hedonic and situational factors in food acceptance consumption D.M.H. Thomson Food acceptability 1988 Elsevier London 77-87
29. H.L. Meiselman J.L. Johnson W. Reeve & J.E. Crouch Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance Appetite 35 2000 231-237
30. P.G. Miller J.H. Nair & A.J. Harriman A household and a laboratory type of panel for testing consumer preference Food Technology 9 1955 445-449
31. Monrozier, R. (2001). Le profil sensoriel, de la mesure á l'analyse discriminante multiple. Thèse de Doctorat. Massy: Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Industries Agro-alimentaires. 217 p.
32. H.R. Moskowitz Base size in product testing: A psychophysical viewpoint and analysis Food Quality and Preference 8 1997 247-255
33. E.F. Murphy B.S. Clark & R.M. Berglund A consumer survey versus panel testing for acceptance evaluation of Maine sardines Food Technology 12 1958 222-226
34. J. Perrien E.J. Cheron & M. Zins Méthodes d'échantillonnage Recherche en marketing. Méthodes et décisions 1984 Gaëtan Morin Montreal 203-241
35. P. Pliner The effect of mere exposure on liking for edible substances Appetite 3 1982 283-290
36. C. Porcherot & S. Issanchou Dynamics liking for flavored crackers: Test of predictive value of a boredom test Food Quality and Preference 9 1997 21-29
37. Posri, W., MacFie, H., & Henson, S. (2001). Improving the predictability of consumer liking from central location test in tea. In Proceedings of the 4th R.M. Pangborn memorial symposium: A sense odyssey, Dijon, France, 22-26 July.
38. C. Pound C. Duizer & K. McDowell Improved consumer product development. Part one. Is a laboratory necessary to assess consumer opinion? British Food Journal 102 2000 810-820
39. H.G. Schutz Consumer data - sense and nonsense Food Quality and Preference 10 1999 245-251
40. W.F. Sharp J.P. Norback & D.A. Stuiber Using a new measure to define shelf-life of fresh whitefish Journal of Food Science 51 1986 936-939
41. R. Shepherd & N.M. Griffiths Preferences for eggs produced under different systems assessed by consumer and laboratory panels Lebensmittelwissenshaft und Technologie 20 1987 128-132
42. Z. Vickers & E. Holton A comparison of taste ratings, repeated consumption, and post consumption ratings of different strengths of iced tea Journal of Sensory Studies 13 1998 199-212
43. B. Wansink Response to "Measuring consumer response to food products". Sensory tests that predict consumer acceptance Food Quality and Preference 14 2003 23-26
44. R.B. Zajonc Attitudinal effect of mere exposure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 1968 65-74
45. E.H. Zandstra C. De Graaf H.C.M. Van Trijp " W.A. Van Staveren Laboratory hedonic ratings as predictors of consumption Food Quality and Preference 10 1999 411-418