The sunk cost effect across species: A review of persistence in a course of action due to prior investment

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 339-361

  Magalhães, Paula ^a   Geoffrey White, K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Cross species comparison; Persistence; Sunk cost; Sunk time

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS;

EID: 84966405087     PISSN: 00225002     EISSN: 19383711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jeab.202     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Ackerman, J. T., & Eadie, J. M. (2003). Current versus future reproduction: An experimental test of parental investment decisions using nest desertion by mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 264-273.
2. Ackerman, J. T., Eadie, J. McA, Yarrist, G. S., Loughman, D. L., & McLandress, M. R. (2003). Cues for investment: Nest desertion in response to partial clutch depredation in dabbling ducks. Animal Behaviour, 66, 871-883.
3. Arantes, J., & Grace, R. C. (2008). Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations. Learning & Behavior, 36, 1-11.
4. Arkes, H. R. (1996). The psychology of waste. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 213-224.
5. Arkes, H. R., & Ayton, P. (1999). The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals? Psychological Bulletin, 125, 591 - 600.
6. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.
7. Arkes, H. R., & Hutzel, L. (2000). The role of probability of success estimates in the sunk cost effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 295-306.
8. Avila, R., Yankelevitz, R. L., Gonzalez, J. C., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2013). Varying the costs of sunk costs: Optimal and non-optimal choices in a sunk-cost task with humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 100, 165-173.
9. Avila-Santibañez, R., Gonzalez-Montiel, J. C., Miranda-Hernandez, P., & Guzman-Gonzalez, M. L. (2010). Stimuli effects on optimal behavior in a sunk-cost situation with pigeons. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 36, 17-29.
10. Aw, J. M., Holbrook, R.I., Burt de Perera, T., & Kacelnik, A. (2009). State-dependent valuation learning in fish: Banded tetras prefer stimuli associated with greater past deprivation. Behavioural Processes, 81, 333-336.
11. Aw, J. M., Vasconcelos, M., & Kacelnik, A. (2011). How costs affect preferences: Experiments on state dependence, hedonic state and within-trial contrasts in starlings. Animal Behaviour, 81, 1117-1128.
12. Bornstein, B. H., & Chapman, G. B. (1995). Learning lessons from sunk costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 251-269.
13. Bornstein, B. H., Emler, A. C., & Chapman, G. B. (1999). Rationality in medical treatment decisions: Is there a sunk-cost effect? Social Science and Medicine, 49, 215-222.
14. Boucher, D. H. (1977). On wasting parental investment. The American Naturalist, 111, 786-788.
15. Bragger, J.D., Bragger, D., Hantula, D.A., & Kirnan, J. (1998). Hysteresis and uncertainty: The effect of uncertainty on delays to exit decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 229-253.
16. Braverman, J. A., & Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. (2012). Assessment of the sunk-cost effect in clinical decision-making. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 186-192.
17. Carlisle, T. R. (1985). Parental response to brood size in a cichlid fish. Animal Behaviour, 33, 234-238.
18. Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from Capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517-537.
19. Clement, T. S., Feltus, J. R., Kaiser, D. H., & Zentall, T. R. (2000). "Work Ethic" in pigeons: Reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 100-106.
20. Clement, T. S., & Zentall, T. R. (2002). Second-order contrast based on the expectation of effort and reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 64-74.
21. Coleman, M. D. (2009). Sunk cost and commitment to dates arranged online. Current Psychology, 28, 45-54.
22. Coleman, M. D. (2010). Sunk cost and commitment to medical treatment. Current Psychology, 29, 121-134.
23. Coleman, R. M., & Gross, M. R. (1991). Parental investment theory: The role of past investment. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 6, 404-406.
24. Coleman, R. M., & Gross, M. R. (1992). How to rescue the Concorde Fallacy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 7, 169-169.
25. Coleman, R. M., Gross, M. R., & Sargent, R. C. (1985). Parental investment decision rules: A test in bluegill sunfish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 18, 59-66.
26. Conlon, D. E., & Garland, H. (1993). The role of project completion information in resource allocation decisions. The Academy of Management Journal, 36, 402-4013.
27. Cunha, M., & Caldieraro, F. (2009). Sunk-cost effect on purely behavioural investments. Cognitive Science, 33, 105-113.
28. Dawkins, R. & Brockmann, H. J. (1980). Do digger wasps commit the Concorde fallacy? Animal Behavior, 28, 892-896.
29. Dawkins, R., & Carlisle, T. R. (1976). Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature, 262, 131-133.
30. DiGian, K.A., Friedrich, A.M., & Zentall, T.R. (2004). Discriminative stimuli that follow a delay have added value for pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 889-895.
31. Fantino, E., Navarro, A., & Stolarz-Fantino, S. (2008). Multiple causes of the sunk-cost effect. In G. Burthold (Ed.), Psychology of decision making: Legal and healthcare settings (pp. 141-157). NewYork: Nova Science Publishers.
32. Fantino, E., & Stolarz-Fantino, S. (2013). Behavioral approaches to decision making. In P. H. Crowley & T. R. Zentall (Eds.), Comparative decision making (pp. 211-234). New York: Oxford.
33. Friedrich, A. M., Clement, T. S., & Zentall, T. R. (2005). Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement. Learning & Behavior, 33, 337-342.
34. Friedrich, A. M., & Zentall, T. R. (2004). Pigeons shift their preference toward locations of food that take more effort to obtain. Behavioural Processes, 67, 405-415.
35. Garland, H. (1990). Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 728-731.
36. Garland, H., & Conlon, D. E. (1998). Too close to quit: The role of project completion in maintaining commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 2025-2048.
37. Garland, H., & Newport, S. (1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 55-69.
38. Goltz, S.M. (1992). A sequential learning analysis of decisions in organizations to escalate investments despite continuing costs or losses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 561-574.
39. Goltz, S.M. (1993). Examining the joint roles of responsibility and reinforcement history in recommitment. Decision Sciences, 24, 977-994.
40. Goltz, S.M. (1999). Can't stop on a dime: The roles of matching and momentum in persistence of commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 19, 37-63.
41. Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (1998). Payment depreciation: The behavioral effects of temporally separating payment from consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 160-174.
42. Grace, R. C., & Hucks, A. D. (2013). The allocation of operant behavior. In K. A. Lattal, T. D. Hackenberg, & G. J. Madden (Eds.), Handbook of behavior analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43. Gross, M. R. (2005). The evolution of parental care. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80, 37-45.
44. Hamm, S. L., & Shettleworth, S. J. (1987). Risk aversion in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 376-383.
45. Hartl, J. A., & Fantino, E. (1996). Choice as a function of reinforcement ratios in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 11-27.
46. Herbranson, W. T., & Schroeder, J. (2010). Are birds smarter than mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) perform optimally on a version of the Monty Hall Dilemma. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124, 1-13.
47. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534-539.
48. Kacelnik, A. & Marsh, B. (2002). Cost can increase preference in starlings. Animal Behaviour, 63, 245-250.
49. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
50. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
51. Lavery, R. J., & Keenleyside, M. H. A. (1990). Parental investment of a biparental cichlid fish, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum, in relation to brood size and past investment. Animal Behaviour, 40, 1128-1137.
52. Macaskill, A. C., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2012a). Providing a reinforcement history that reduces the sunk cost effect. Behavioural Processes, 89, 212-218.
53. Macaskill, A. C., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2012b). The sunk cost effect with pigeons: Some determinants of decisions about persistence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 85-100.
54. Macaskill, A. C., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2013). Optimal and nonoptimal choice in a laboratory-based sunk cost task with humans: A cross-species replication. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 100, 301-315.
55. Maestripieri, D., & Alleva, E. (1991). Litter defense and parental investment allocation in house mice. Behavioural Processes, 23, 223-230.
56. Magalhães, P., & White, K. G. (2013). Sunk cost and work ethic effects reflect suboptimal choice between different work requirements. Behavioural Processes, 94, 55-59.
57. Magalhães, P., & White, K. G. (2014a). The effect of a prior investment on choice: The sunk cost effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 22-37.
58. Magalhães, P., & White, K. G. (2014b). Persistence in extinction: The sunk time effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 38-54.
59. Magalhães, P., & White, K. G. (2014c). A good time to leave?: The sunk time effect in pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 105, 1-5.
60. Magalhães, P., White, K. G., Stewart, T., Beeby, E., & van der Vliet, W. (2012). Suboptimal choice in nonhuman animals: Rats commit the sunk cost error. Learning & Behavior, 40, 195 - 206.
61. Marsh, B. (2002). Do animals use heuristics? Journal of Bioeconomics, 4, 49-56.
62. Marsh, B., Schuck-Paim, C., & Kacelnik, A. (2004). Energetic state during learning affects foraging choices in starlings. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 396-399.
63. McCarthy, A. M., Schoorman, F. D., & Cooper, A. C. (1993). Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: Rational decision-making or escalation of commitment. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 9-24.
64. Moon, H. (2001). Looking forward and looking back: Integrating completion and sunk-cost effects within an escalation-of-commitment progress decision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 104-113.
65. Navarro, A. D., & Fantino, E. (2005). The sunk cost effect in pigeons and humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 83, 1-13.
66. Navarro, A. D., & Fantino, E. (2007). The role of discriminative stimuli in the sunk cost effect. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 33, 19-29.
67. Navarro, A. D., & Fantino, E. (2009). The sunk-time effect: An exploration. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 252-270.
68. Otto, A. R. (2010). Three attempts to replicate the behavioral sunk-cost effect: A note on Cunha and Caldieraro (2009). Cognitive Science, 24, 1379-1383.
69. Pattison, K. F., Zentall, T. R., & Watanabe, S. (2012). Sunk cost: Pigeons (Columba livia), too, show a bias to complete a task rather than shift to another. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 1-9.
70. Piedad, X., Field, D., & Rachlin, H. (2006). The influence of prior choices on current choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 3-21.
71. Pompilio, L., & Kacelnik, A. (2005). State-dependent learning and suboptimal choice: When starlings prefer long over short delays to food. Animal Behaviour, 70, 571-578.
72. Pompilio, L., Kacelnik, A., & Behmer, S. T. (2006). State-dependent learned valuation drives choice in an invertebrate. Science, 311, 1613-1614.
73. Rakow, T., & Newell, B. R. (2010). Degrees of uncertainty: An overview and framework for future research on experience-based choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 1-14.
74. Ross, J., & Staw, B. M. (1986). Expo 86: An escalation prototype. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 274-297.
75. Rytkonen, S., Orell, M., & Koivula, K. (1995). Pseudo Concorde fallacy in the willow tit. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1017-1028.
76. Sargent, R. C., & Gross, M. R. (1985). Parental investment decision rules and the Concorde fallacy. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 17, 43-45.
77. Simonson, I., & Staw, B. M. (1992). De-escalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 419-426.
78. Singer, R. A., Berry, L.M., & Zentall, T. R. (2007). Preference for a stimulus that follows a relatively aversive event: Contrast or delay reduction? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 275-285.
79. Soman, D. (2001). The mental accounting of sunk time costs: Why time is not like money. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 169-185.
80. Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in big muddy: Study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27-44.
81. Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 577-587.
82. Staw, B. M., & Fox, F. V. (1977). Escalation: The determinants of commitment to a chosen course of action. Human Relations, 30, 431-450.
83. Staw, B. M., & Hoang, H. (1995). Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 474-494.
84. Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1989). Understanding behavior in escalation situations. Science, New Series, 246, 216-220.
85. Tan, H., & Yates, J. F. (1995). Sunk cost effects: The influences of instruction and future return estimates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 311-319.
86. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1, 39-60.
87. Thames, E. A. (1996). The sunk-cost effect: The importance of context. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 817-826.
88. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
89. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
90. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, S251-S278.
91. Vasconcelos, M., Urcuioli, P. J., & Lionello-DeNolf, K. M. (2007). Failure to replicate the work-ethic effect in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 383-399.
92. Verboven, N., & Tinbergen, J. M. (2002). Nest desertion: A trade-off between current and future reproduction. Animal Behaviour, 63, 951-958.
93. Weatherhead, P. J. (1979). Do savannah sparrows commit the Concorde fallacy? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 5, 373-381.
94. White, K. G. (2013). Can choice be suboptimal? In P. H. Crowley & T. R. Zentall, (Eds.), Comparative decision making (pp. 235-238). New York: Oxford.
95. White, K. G., & Magalhães, P. (2015). The sunk cost effect in pigeons and people: A case of within-trials contrast? Behavioural Processes, 112, 22-28.
96. Winkler, D. W. (1991). Parental investment decision rules in tree swallows: Parental defense, abandonment, and the so-called Concorde fallacy. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 133-142.
97. Zeng, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, C., Yu, R., & Gong, Q. (2013). An fMRI study on sunk cost effect. Brain Research, 1519, 63-70.
98. Zentall, T. R. (2010). Justification of effort by humans and pigeons: Cognitive dissonance or contrast? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 296-300.
99. Zentall, T. R. (2013). Animals prefer reinforcement that follows greater effort: Justification of effort or within-trial contrast? Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 8, 60-77.
100. Zentall, T. R. (2015). When animals misbehave: Analogs of human biases and suboptimal choice. Behavioural Processes, 112, 3-12.