The effect of a prior investment on choice: The sunk cost effect

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 22-37

  Magalhães, Paula ^a   White, K Geoffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Choice; Concurrent chains; Delay reduction hypothesis; Matching; Sunk cost; Within trial contrast

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892452146     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xan0000007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abarca, N., & Fantino, E. (1982). Choice and foraging. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 117-123.
2. Arkes, H. R. (1996). The psychology of waste. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 213-224.
3. Arkes, H. R., & Ayton, P. (1999). The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals? Psychological Bulletin, 125, 591-600.
4. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.
5. Avila-Santibáñez, R., González-Montiel, J. C., Miranda-Hernández, P., & Guzmán-González, M. L. (2010). Efectos del estímulo sobre la conducta óptima en una situación de costo de la inversión con palomas [Stimuli effects on optimal behavior in a sunk-cost situation with pigeons]. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 36, 19-31
6. Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231-242.
7. Bloomfield, T. M. (1967). Behavioral contrast and the relative reinforcement frequency in two multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 151-158.
8. Clement, T. S., Feltus, J. R., Kaiser, D. H., & Zentall, T. R. (2000). "Work ethic" in pigeons: Reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 100-106.
9. Cunha, M., Jr., & Caldieraro, F. (2009). Sunk-cost effects on purely behavioral investments. Cognitive Science, 33, 105-113.
10. Davison, M., & Mccarthy, D. (1988). The matching law: A research review. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Dawkins, R., & Carlisle, T. R. (1976). Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature, 262, 131-133.
12. Duncan, B., & Fantino, E. (1970). Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 73-86.
13. Fantino, E. (1969). Choice and rate of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 723-730.
14. Fantino, E. (1977). Conditioned reinforcement: Choice and information. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 313-339). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
15. Fantino, E., & Abarca, N. (1985). Choice, optimal foraging, and the delay-reduction hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 315-330.
16. Fantino, E., Preston, R. A., & Dunn, R. (1993). Delay reduction: Current status. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 159-169.
17. Fleshler, M., & Hoffman, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 529-530.
18. Garland, H. (1990). Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 728-731.
19. Garland, H., & Newport, S. (1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 55-69.
20. Grace, R. C., & Hucks, A. D. (2013). The allocation of operant behavior. In K. A. Lattal, T. D. Hackenberg, & G. J. Madden (Eds.), APA handbook of behavior analysis (pp. 307-337). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267-272.
22. Herrnstein, R. J. (1964). Secondary reinforcement and the rate of primary reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 27-36.
23. Herrnstein, R. J., & Loveland, D. H. (1975). Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 107-116.
24. Lea, S. E. G. (1979). Foraging and reinforcement schedules in the pigeon: Optimal and non-optimal aspects of choice. Animal Behaviour, 27, 875-886.
25. Lionello-DeNolf, K. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2000). Transfer of pigeons' matching to sample to novel sample location. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 141-161.
26. Macaskill, A. C., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2012a). Providing a reinforcement history that reduces the sunk cost effect. Behavioural Processes, 89, 212-218.
27. Macaskill, A. C., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2012b). The sunk cost effect with pigeons: Some determinants of decisions about persistence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 85-100.
28. Macdonall, J. S. (1988). Concurrent variable-ratio schedules: Implications for the generalized matching law. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 55-64.
29. Magalhães, P., & White, K. G. (2013). Sunk cost and work ethic effects reflect suboptimal choice between different work requirements. Behavioural Processes, 94, 55-59.
30. Magalhães, P., White, K. G., Stewart, T., Beeby, E., & van der Vliet, W. (2012). Suboptimal choice in nonhuman animals: Rats commit the sunk cost error. Learning & Behavior, 40, 195-206.
31. Navarro, A. D., & Fantino, E. (2005). The sunk cost effect in pigeons and humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 83, 1-13.
32. Navarro, A. D., & Fantino, E. (2009). The sunk-time effect: An exploration. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 252-270.
33. Osborne, S. R. (1977). The free-food (contrafreeloading) phenomenon: A review and analysis. Animal Learning & Behavior, 5, 221-235.
34. Pattison, K. F., Zentall, T. R., & Watanabe, S. (2012). Sunk cost: Pigeons (Columba livia), too, show bias to complete a task rather than shift to another. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 1-9.
35. Skelton, A., & White, K. G. (1982). Stimulus generalization of signaldirected responding under a negative contingency. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 2, 275-282.
36. Smithson, M. (2003). Confidence intervals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 577-587.
38. Stubbs, D. A., & Pliskoff, S. S. (1969). Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 887-895.
39. Weiss, S. J., & Weissman, R. D. (1992). Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 127-143.
40. Williams, W. A., & Fantino, E. (1994). Delay reduction and optimal foraging: Variable-ratio search in a foraging analogue. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 465-477.
41. Zentall, T. R. (2010). Justification of effort by humans and pigeons: Cognitive dissonance or contrast? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 296-300.