Are Birds Smarter Than Mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) Perform Optimally on a Version of the Monty Hall Dilemma

Journal of Comparative Psychology

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-13

  Herbranson, Walter T ^a   Schroeder, Julia ^a  

^a WHITMAN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

matching; Monty Hall Dilemma; pigeon; probability

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LEARNING; PIGEONS AND DOVES; PROBLEM SOLVING; REWARD;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLUMBIDAE; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DECISION MAKING; PROBABILITY LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; REWARD;

EID: 77649107692     PISSN: 07357036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0017703     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arkes H.R., and Ayton P. The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals?. Psychological Bulletin 125 (1999) 591-600
2. Ashby F.G., and Maddox W.T. Complex decision rules in categorization: Contrasting novice and experienced performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 1 (1992) 50-71
3. Brown P.L., and Jenkins H.J. Autoshaping of the pigeon's keypeck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 11 (1968) 1-8
4. Bullock D.H., and Bitterman M.E. Probability-matching in the pigeon. American Journal of Psychology 75 (1962) 634-639
5. Burns B.D., and Wieth M. The collider principle in causal reasoning: Why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 3 (2004) 434-449
6. DeNeys W. Developmental trends in decision making: The case of the Monty Hall dilemma. In: Ellsworth J.A. (Ed). Psychology of decision making in education (2006), Nova Science Publishers, Haupauge, NY
7. Estes W.K. A descriptive approach to the dynamics of choice behavior. Behavioral Science 6 (1961) 177-184
8. Fantino E., and Asafandiari A. Probability matching: Encouraging optimal responding in humans. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 1 (2002) 58-63
9. Franco-Watkins A.M., Derks P.L., and Dougherty M.R.P. Reasoning in the Monty Hall problem: Examining choice behaviour and probability judgements. Thinking and Reasoning 9 1 (2003) 67-90
10. Gilovich T., Medvec V.H., and Chen S. Commission, omission, and dissonance reduction: Coping with regret in the "Monty Hall" problem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 2 (1995) 182-190
11. Goodie A.S., and Fantino E. Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error. Nature 380 (1996) 247-249
12. Granberg D. A new version of the Monty Hall dilemma with unequal probabilities. Behavioural Processes 48 (1999) 25-34
13. Granberg D. Cross-cultural comparison of responses to the Monty Hall dilemma. Social Behavior and Personality 27 4 (1999) 431-438
14. Granberg D., and Brown T.A. The Monty Hall dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 7 (1995) 711-723
15. Hartl J.A., and Fantino E. Choice as a function of reinforcement ratios in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 66 (1996) 11-27
16. Herbranson W.T., Fremouw T., and Shimp C.P. The randomization procedure in the study of categorization of multidimensional stimuli by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 25 1 (1999) 113-135
17. Herbranson W.T., Fremouw T., and Shimp C.P. Categorizing a moving target in terms of its speed, direction, or both. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 78 3 (2002) 249-270
18. Herrnstein R.J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 4 (1961) 267-272
19. Herrnstein R.J. On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 13 (1970) 243-266
20. Herrnstein R.J. The Matching Law (1997), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
21. Hoffman P. The man who loved only numbers: The story of Paul Erdos and the search for mathematical truth (1998), Hyperion, New York, NY
22. Houston A. The matching law applies to wagtails foraging in the wild. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 45 1 (1986) 15-18
23. Langer E.J. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 33 2 (1975) 311-328
24. Langer E.J., and Imber L.G. When practice makes imperfect: Debilitating effects of overlearning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 11 (1979) 2014-2024
25. Maddox W.T., and Bohil C.J. Probability matching, accuracy maximizing and a test of the optimal classifier's independence assumption in perceptual categorization. Perception & Psychophysics 66 1 (2004) 104-118
26. Mazur J.E. Optimization theory fails to predict performance of pigeons in a two-response situation. Science 214 (1981) 823-825
27. Posner G. Nations mathematicians guilty of "innumeracy.". Skeptical Inquirer 15 (1991) 342-345
28. Reber A.S. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6 (1967) 855-863
29. Shimp C.P. Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 9 4 (1966) 443-455
30. Shimp C.P. Probabilistic discrimination learning in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 3 (1973) 292-304
31. Skinner B.F. "Superstition" in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (1948) 168-172
32. Stephens D.W., and Krebs J.J. Foraging theory (1986), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
33. Tierney J. Behind Monty Hall's doors: Puzzle, debate and answer?. New York Times (1991, July 21) 1-20
34. Tubau E., and Alonso D. Overcoming illusory differences in a probabilistic counterintuitive problem: The role of explicit representations. Memory & Cognition 31 4 (2003) 596-607
35. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 (1981) 453-458
36. Vos Savant M. Ask Marilyn. Parade (1990, September 9) 15