Sunk cost and work ethic effects reflect suboptimal choice between different work requirements

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 94, Issue , 2013, Pages 55-59

  Magalhães, Paula ^a   White, K Geoffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Decision making; Pigeon; Suboptimal choice; Sunk cost; Work ethic

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BIRD; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; OPTIMIZATION;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; COLUMBA LIVIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD; NONHUMAN; PIGEON; RESEARCH ETHICS; SUNK COST EFFECT; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

ANIMALS; AREA UNDER CURVE; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLUMBIDAE; DECISION MAKING; MODELS, ANIMAL; REWARD; WORK;

COLUMBA; COLUMBA LIVIA;

EID: 84875369938     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: 18728308     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alessandri J., Darcheville J., Delevoye-Turrel Y., Zentall T.R. Preference for rewards that follow greater effort and greater delay. Learn. Behav. 2008, 36:352-358.
2. Arantes J., Grace R.C. Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations. Learn. Behav. 2008, 36:1-11.
3. Arkes H.R., Ayton P. The sunk cost and concorde effects: are humans less rational than lower animals?. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125:591-600.
4. Arkes H.R., Blumer C. The psychology of sunk cost. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1985, 35:124-140.
5. Aw J.M., Holbrook R.I., Burt de Perera T., Kacelnik A. State-dependent valuation learning in fish: banded tetras prefer stimuli associated with greater past deprivation. Behav. Process. 2009, 81:333-336.
6. Aw J.M., Vasconcelos M., Kacelnik A. How costs affect preferences: experiments on state dependence, hedonic state and within-trial contrasts in starlings. Anim. Behav. 2011, 81:1117-1128.
7. Bhatt R.S., Wasserman E.A. Choice behavior of pigeons on progressive and multiple schedules: a test of optimal foraging theory. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 1987, 13:40-51.
8. Clement T.S., Feltus J.R., Kaiser D.H., Zentall T.R. " Work ethic" in pigeons: reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2000, 7:100-106.
9. DiGian K.A., Friedrich A.M., Zentall T.R. Discriminative stimuli that follow a delay have added value for pigeons. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2004, 11:889-895.
10. Dunn R.M. Choice, relative reinforce duration, and the changeover ratio. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1982, 38:313-319.
11. Eisenberger R. Learned industriousness. Psychol. Rev. 1992, 99:248-267.
12. Friedrich A.M., Zentall T.R. Pigeons shift their preference toward locations of food that take more effort to obtain. Behav. Process. 2004, 67:405-415.
13. Kacelnik A., Marsh B. Cost can increase preference in starlings. Anim. Behav. 2002, 63:245-250.
14. Macaskill A.C., Hackenberg T.D. The sunk cost effect with pigeons: some determinants of decisions about persistence. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2012, 97:85-100.
15. Macaskill A.C., Hackenberg T.D. Providing a reinforcement history that reduces the sunk cost effect. Behav. Process. 2012, 89:212-218.
16. Magalhães P., White K.G., Stewart T., Beeby E., van der Vliet W. Suboptimal choice in nonhuman animals: rats commit the sunk cost error. Learn. Behav. 2012, 40:195-206.
17. Navarro A.D., Fantino E. The sunk cost effect in pigeons and humans. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2005, 83:1-13.
18. Osborne S.R. The free-food (contrafreeloading) phenomenon: a review and analysis. Anim. Learn. Behav. 1977, 5:221-235.
19. Patisson K.F., Zentall T.R., Watanabe S. Sunk cost: pigeons (Columba livia), too, show a bias to complete a task rather than shift to another. J. Comp. Psychol. 2012, 126:1-9.
20. Pliskoff S.S., Fetterman J.G. Undermatching and overmatching: the fixed-ratio changeover requirement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1981, 36:21-27.
21. Rachlin H. Judgment, Decision and Choice: A Cognitive/Behavioral Synthesis 1989, W.H. Freeman, New York, NY.
22. Staw B.M. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1981, 6:577-5887.
23. Stephens D.W., Krebs J.R. Foraging Theory 1986, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
24. Vasconcelos M., Urcuioli P.J., Lionello-DeNolf K.M. Failure to replicate the " work ethic" effect in pigeons. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2007, 87:383-399.
25. Vasconcelos M., Urcuioli P.J. Extensive training is insufficient to produce the work-ethic effect in pigeons. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2009, 91:143-152.
26. Zentall T.R. Justification of effort by humans and pigeons: cognitive dissonance or contrast?. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 19:296-300.