Optimal and nonoptimal choice in a laboratory-based sunk cost task with humans: A cross-species replication

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 301-315

  Macaskill, Anne C ^a   Hackenberg, Timothy D ^b  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^b REED COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice; Humans; Mouse click; Ratio schedules; Sunk cost error; Video reinforcers

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; REINFORCEMENT; REWARD; TIME;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; REWARD; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84892412419     PISSN: 00225002     EISSN: 19383711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jeab.52     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andrade, L. F., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2012). Saving the best for last? A cross-species analysis of choices between reinforcer sequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 98, 45-64.
2. Arkes, H. R.,&Ayton, P. (1999). The sunk cost and concorde effects: are humans less rational than lower animals?. Psychonomic Bulletin, 5, 591-600.
3. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.
4. Arkes, H. R., & Hutzel, L. (2000). The role of probability of success estimates in the sunk cost effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 295-306.
5. Avila, R., Gonzalez-Montiel, J. C., Miranda-Hernandez, P., & Guzman-Gonzalez, M. D. (2010). Stimuli effects on optimal behavior in a sunk cost situation with pigeons. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 36, 17-29.
6. Avila, R., Yankelevitz, R., Gonzalez, J. C., Hackenberg, T. D. (in press). Varying the costs of sunk costs: optimal and nonoptimal choices in a sunk-cost task with humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.
7. Bornstein, B. H., Embler, A. C., & Chapman, G. (1999). Rationality in medical treatment decisions: is there a sunk cost effect?. Social Science and Medicine, 49, 215- 222.
8. De la Piedad, X., Field, D., & Rachlin, H. (2006). The influence of prior choices on current choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 3-21.
9. Garland, H. (1990). Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 728-731.
10. Goltz, S. M. (1992). A sequential learning analysis of decisions in organizations to escalate resource investments despite continuing costs or losses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 561-574.
11. Hachiga, Y., Silberberg, A., Parker, S.,&Sakagami, T. (2009). Humans (Homo sapiens) fail to show an inequity effect in an "up-linkage" analog of the monkey inequity test. Animal Cognition, 12, 359-367.
12. Hackenberg, T. D., & Joker, V. R. (1994). Instructional versus schedule control of humans' choices in situations of diminishing returns. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 367-383.
13. Hackenberg, T. D., & Pietras, C. (2000). Video access as a reinforcer in a self-control paradigm: A method and some data. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 18, 1-5.
14. Lagorio, C., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2010). Risky choice in pigeons and humans: A cross-species comparison. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 27-44.
15. Locey, M. L., Pietras, C. J., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2009). Human risky choice: Delay sensitivity depends on reinforcer type. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 15-22.
16. Macaskill, A. C., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2012a). Providing a reinforcement history that reduces the sunk cost effect. Behavioural Processes, 89, 212-218.
17. Macaskill, A. C.,& Hackenberg, T. D. (2012b). The sunk cost effect with pigeons: Some determinants of decisions about persistence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 85-100.
18. Magalhães, P., White, K. G., Stewart, T., Beeby, E., & van der Vliet, W. (2012). Suboptimal choice in nonhuman animals: Rats commit the sunk-cost error. Learning and Behavior, 40, 195-206.
19. Navarick, D. (1996). Choice in humans: Techniques for enhancing sensitivity to reinforcement immediacy. The Psychological Record, 46, 539-554.
20. Navarro, A. D., & Fantino, E. (2005). The sunk cost effect in humans and pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 1-13.
21. Navarro, A. D., & Fantino, E. (2007). The role of discriminative stimuli in the sunk cost effect. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 33, 19-29.
22. Pattison, K. F., Zentall, T. R., & Watanabe, S. (2011). Sunk cost: pigeons (Columba livia), too, show bias to complete a task rather than shift to another. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 1-9.
23. Silberberg, A., Roma, P. G., Huntsberry, M. E., Warren- Boulton, F. R., Sakagami, T., Ruggiero, A. M., & Suomi, S. J. (2008). On loss aversion in capuchin monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 145- 155.
24. Smith, P., & Silberberg, A. (2010). Rational maximizing by humans (Homo sapiens) in an ultimatum game. Animal Cognition, 13, 671-677.
25. Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of comitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 577-587.
26. Straw, B. M., & Hoang, H. (1995). Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 474-494.
27. Tan, H. T., & Yates, J. F. (1995). Sunk cost effect: The influence of instruction and future return estimates. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 311-319.