Corrigendum: CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient and heritable targeted mutagenesis in tomato plants in the first and later generations (Scientific Reports (2016) 6 (24765) DOI: 10.1038/srep24765);CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient and heritable targeted mutagenesis in tomato plants in the first and later generations

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Pan, Changtian ^a,b   Ye, Lei ^a,b   Qin, Li ^b   Liu, Xue ^b   He, Yanjun ^b   Wang, Jie ^b   Chen, Lifei ^b   Lu, Gang ^a,b  

^a BEIJING HOSPITAL   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUIDE RNA;

CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; GENE TARGETING; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; INHERITANCE; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENOME; TOMATO; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; GENE TARGETING; GENES, PLANT; GENOME, PLANT; GENOTYPE; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; RNA, GUIDE;

EID: 84964688883     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep46916     Document Type: Erratum

References (59)

1. Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A. & Barbas, C. R. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 31, 397-405 (2013).
2. Voytas, D. F. Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 327-350 (2013).
3. Wyman, C. & Kanaar, R. DNA double-strand break repair: all's well that ends well. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40, 363-383 (2006).
4. Britt, A. B. & May, G. D. Re-engineering plant gene targeting. Trends Plant Sci. 8, 90-95 (2003).
5. Ray, A. & Langer, M. Homologous recombination: ends as the means. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 435-440 (2002).
6. Mojica, F. J., Diez-Villasenor, C., Soria, E. & Juez, G. Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of archaea, bacteria and mitochondria. Mol. Microbiol. 36, 244-246 (2000).
7. Makarova, K. S., Aravind, L., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biol Direct. 6, 38 (2011).
8. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012).
9. Doudna, J. A. & Charpentier, E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1258096 (2014).
10. Bortesi, L. & Fischer, R. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol. Adv. 33, 41-52 (2015).
11. Mao, Y. et al. Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol. Plant 6, 2008-2011 (2013).
12. Fauser, F., Schiml, S. & Puchta, H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 79, 348-359 (2014).
13. Feng, Z. et al. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res. 23, 1229-1232 (2013).
14. Shan, Q. et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 686-688 (2013).
15. Miao, J. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Res. 23, 1233-1236 (2013).
16. Zhang, H. et al. The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 797-807 (2014).
17. Ma, X. et al. A Robust CRISPR/Cas9 System for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 8, 1274-1284 (2015).
18. Li, J. F. et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 688-691 (2013).
19. Nekrasov, V., Staskawicz, B., Weigel, D., Jones, J. D. & Kamoun, S. Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 691-693 (2013).
20. Gao, J. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Mol. Biol. 87, 99-110 (2015).
21. Brooks, C., Nekrasov, V., Lippman, Z. B. & Van Eck, J. Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats CRISPR-associated system. Plant Physiol. 166, 1292-1297 (2014).
22. Liang, Z., Zhang, K., Chen, K. & Gao, C. Targeted mutagenesis in Zea Mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system. J. Genet. Genomics 41, 63-68 (2014).
23. Jacobs, T. B., LaFayette, P. R., Schmitz, R. J. & Parrott, W. A. Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnol. 15, 16 (2015).
24. Sun, X. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Sci. Rep-UK. 5, 10342 (2015).
25. Jiang, W. et al. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e188 (2013).
26. Jia, H. & Wang, N. Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. PloS One 9, e93806 (2014).
27. Wang, Y. et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 947-951 (2014).
28. Sugano, S. S. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 475-481 (2014).
29. Fan, D. et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Populus in the first generation. Sci. Rep-UK. 5, 12217 (2015).
30. Feng, Z. et al. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4632-4637 (2014).
31. Hyun, Y. et al. Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using dividing tissue-targeted RGEN of the CRISPR/Cas system to generate heritable null alleles. Planta 241, 271-284 (2015).
32. Ron, M. et al. Hairy root transformation using Agrobacterium rhizogenes as a tool for exploring cell type-specific gene expression and function using tomato as a model. Plant Physiol. 166, 455-469 (2014).
33. Liu, Y., Schiff, M. & Dinesh-Kumar, S. P. Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato. Plant J. 31, 777-786 (2002).
34. Leivar, P. & Monte, E. PIFs: systems integrators in plant development. Plant Cell 26, 56-78 (2014).
35. Sun, H., Fan, H. & Ling, H. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the bHLH gene family in tomato. BMC Genomics 16, 9 (2015).
36. Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M. & Lander, E. S. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science 343, 80-84 (2014).
37. Doudna, J. A. & Charpentier, E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1258096 (2014).
38. Xu, R. et al. Generation of inheritable and "transgene clean" targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/Cas9 System. Sci. Rep-UK 5, 11491 (2015).
39. Xie, K. & Yang, Y. RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Mol. Plant 6, 1975-1983 (2013).
40. Lei, Y. et al. CRISPR-P: A web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in plants. Mol. Plant 7, 1494-1496 (2014).
41. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012).
42. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823 (2013).
43. Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F. & Marraffini, L. A. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 233-239 (2013).
44. Sato, S. et al. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485, 635-641 (2012).
45. Xu, R. et al. Gene targeting using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated CRISPR-Cas system in rice. Rice (N Y) 7, 5 (2014).
46. Jiang, W., Yang, B. & Weeks, D. P. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and inheritance of modified genes in the T2 and T3 Generations. PloS One 9, e99225 (2014).
47. Mao, Y. et al. Development of germ-line-specific CRISPR-Cas9 systems to improve the production of heritable gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 519-532 (2015).
48. Ablain, J., Durand, E. M., Yang, S., Zhou, Y. & Zon, L. I. A CRISPR/Cas9 vector system for tissue-specific gene disruption in Zebrafish. Dev. Cell 32, 756-764 (2015).
49. Tsai, S. Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187-197 (2015).
50. Pattanayak, V. et al. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 839-843 (2013).
51. Fu, Y. et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 822-826 (2013).
52. Yang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 154, 1370-1379 (2013).
53. Hruscha, A. et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish. Development 140, 4982-4987 (2013).
54. Lin, Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 7473-7485 (2014).
55. Xie, K., Zhang, J. & Yang, Y. Genome-wide prediction of highly specific guide RNA spacers for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in model plants and major crops. Mol. Plant 7, 923-926 (2014).
56. Ran, F. A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154, 1380-1389 (2013).
57. Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 163, 759-771 (2015).
58. Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281-2308 (2013).
59. Sheila McCormick, J. et al. Leaf disc transformation of cultivated tomato (L. esculentum) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Rep. 5, 81-84 (1986).