OM-FBA: Integrate transcriptomics data with flux balance analysis to decipher the cell metabolism

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2016, Pages

  Guo, Weihua ^a   Feng, Xueyang ^a  

^a State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUGAR; GALACTOSE; GLUCOSE;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CELL METABOLISM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DYNAMICS; FLUX BALANCE ANALYSIS; FUNGAL METABOLISM; GENETIC ALGORITHM; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; OMFBA ALGORITHM; PHENOTYPE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIMULATION; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENERGY METABOLISM; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; METABOLOMICS; PROCEDURES; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; ENERGY METABOLISM; GALACTOSE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOTYPE; GLUCOSE; METABOLOMICS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84964582904     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154188     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Zhang W, Li F, Nie L. Integrating multiple 'omics' analysis for microbial biology: application and methodologies. Microbiology. 2010; 156(2):287-301. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.034793-0
2. Hong K-K, Nielsen J. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a key cell factory platform for future biorefineries. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012; 69(16):2671-90. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-0945-1 PMID: 22388689
3. Nogales J, Palsson BØ, Thiele I. A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Pseudomonas putida KT2440: iJN746 as a cell factory. BMC Systems Biology. 2008; 2:79-84. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-2-79 PMC2569920. PMID: 18793442
4. de Jong B, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Systems biology of yeast: enabling technology for development of cell factories for production of advanced biofuels. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2012; 23(4):624-30. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.021 PMID: 22169890
5. Morozova O, Marra MA. Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics. 2008; 92(5):255-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.07.001 PMID: 18703132
6. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies [mdash] the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11(1):31-46. doi: 10.1038/nrg2626 PMID: 19997069
7. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2009; 10(1):57-63. doi: 10.1038/nrg2484 PMID: 19015660
8. Fiehn O. Metabolomics-the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol Biol. 2002; 48(1-2):155-71. doi: 10.1023/A:1013713905833 PMID: 11860207
9. Scalbert A, Brennan L, Fiehn O, Hankemeier T, Kristal B, van Ommen B, et al. Mass-spectrometrybased metabolomics: limitations and recommendations for future progress with particular focus on nutrition research. Metabolomics. 2009; 5(4):435-58. doi: 10.1007/s11306-009-0168-0 PMID: 20046865
10. Zhang Z, Wu S, Stenoien DL, Paša-Tolić L. High-Throughput Proteomics. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry. 2014; 7(1):427-54. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-071213-020216 PMID: 25014346.
11. Nilsson T, Mann M, Aebersold R, Yates JR, Bairoch A, Bergeron JJM. Mass spectrometry in highthroughput proteomics: ready for the big time. Nat Meth. 2010; 7(9):681-5.
12. Smith RD, Anderson GA, Lipton MS, Pasa-Tolic L, Shen Y, Conrads TP, et al. An accurate mass tag strategy for quantitative and high-throughput proteome measurements. Proteomics. 2002; 2(5):513-23. PMID: 11987125
13. Wiechert W, Schweissgut O, Takanaga H, Frommer WB. Fluxomics: mass spectrometry versus quantitative imaging. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2007; 10(3):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.015 PMID: 17481942
14. Poskar CH, Huege J, Krach C, Shachar-Hill Y, Junker B. High-Throughput Data Pipelines for Metabolic Flux Analysis in Plants. In: Dieuaide-Noubhani M, Alonso AP, editors. Plant Metabolic Flux Analysis. Methods in Molecular Biology. 1090: Humana Press; 2014. p. 223-246.
15. Celton M, Sanchez I, Goelzer A, Fromion V, Camarasa C, Dequin S. A comparative transcriptomic, fluxomic and metabolomic analysis of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increases in NADPH oxidation. BMC genomics. 2012; 13:317-441. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-317 PMC3431268. PMID: 22805527
16. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BO. What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotech. 2010; 28(3):245-8. http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v28/n3/abs/nbt.1614.html#supplementary-information.
17. Gianchandani EP, Chavali AK, Papin JA. The application of flux balance analysis in systems biology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine. 2010; 2(3):372-82. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.60 PMID: 20836035
18. Lakshmanan M, Koh G, Chung BKS, Lee D-Y. Software applications for flux balance analysis. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2012. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbs069
19. Schuetz R, Kuepfer L, Sauer U. Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli2007 2007-01-01 00:00:00.
20. Hyduke DR, Lewis NE, Palsson BO. Analysis of omics data with genome-scale models of metabolism. Molecular bioSystems. 2013; 9(2):167-74. doi: 10.1039/C2MB25453K PMID: 23247105
21. Saha R, Chowdhury A, Maranas CD. Recent advances in the reconstruction of metabolic models and integration of omics data. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2014; 29:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.02.011 PMID: 24632194
22. Becker SA, Palsson BO. Context-Specific Metabolic Networks Are Consistent with Experiments. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008; 4(5):e1000082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000082 PMID: 18483554
23. Zur H, Ruppin E, Shlomi T. iMAT: an integrative metabolic analysis tool. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26 (24):3140-2. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq602 PMID: 21081510
24. Colijn C, Brandes A, Zucker J, Lun DS, Weiner B, Farhat MR, et al. Interpreting Expression Data with Metabolic Flux Models: Predicting Mycobacterium tuberculosis Mycolic Acid Production. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009; 5(8):e1000489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000489 PMID: 19714220
25. Chandrasekaran S, Price ND. Probabilistic integrative modeling of genome-scale metabolic and regulatory networks in Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010; 107(41):17845-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005139107
26. Hoppe A. What mRNA Abundances Can Tell us about Metabolism. Metabolites. 2012; 2(3):614-31. doi: 10.3390/metabo2030614 PMC3901220. PMID: 24957650
27. O'Brien EJ, Palsson BO. Computing the functional proteome: recent progress and future prospects for genome-scale models. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2015; 34:125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.017 PMID: 25576845
28. Kim J, Reed JL. Refining metabolic models and accounting for regulatory effects. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2014; 29:34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.02.009 PMID: 24632483
29. Kim MK, Lun DS. Methods for integration of transcriptomic data in genome-scale metabolic models. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 2014; 11(18):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2014.08.009 PMC4212280. PMID: 25379144
30. Ronen M, Botstein D. Transcriptional response of steady-state yeast cultures to transient perturbations in carbon source. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006; 103(2):389-94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509978103 PMID: 16381818
31. Moxley JF, Jewett MC, Antoniewicz MR, Villas-Boas SG, Alper H, Wheeler RT, et al. Linking high-resolution metabolic flux phenotypes and transcriptional regulation in yeast modulated by the global regulator Gcn4p. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106(16):6477-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811091106
32. Frick O, Wittmann C. Characterization of the metabolic shift between oxidative and fermentative growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by comparative 13C flux analysis. Microbial Cell Factories. 2005; 4 (1):30. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-4-30
33. Raghevendran V, Gombert AK, Christensen B, Kötter P, Nielsen J. Phenotypic characterization of glucose repression mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using experiments with 13C-labelled glucose. Yeast. 2004; 21(9):769-79. doi: 10.1002/yea.1136 PMID: 15282800
34. Barrett T, Troup DB, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Rudnev D, Evangelista C, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for high-throughput functional genomic data. Nucleic acids research. 2009; 37(suppl 1):D885-D90. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn764
35. Feng X, Xu Y, Chen Y, Tang YJ. Integrating Flux Balance Analysis into Kinetic Models to Decipher the Dynamic Metabolism of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012; 8(2):e1002376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002376 PMID: 22319437
36. Duarte NC, Herrgård MJ, Palsson Bø. Reconstruction and Validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a Fully Compartmentalized Genome-Scale Metabolic Model. Genome Research. 2004; 14 (7):1298-309. doi: 10.1101/gr.2250904 PMID: 15197165
37. King ZA, Lu J, Dräger A, Miller P, Federowicz S, Lerman JA, et al. BiGG Models: A platform for integrating, standardizing and sharing genome-scale models. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1049
38. Raser JM, O'Shea EK. Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control. Science. 2005; 309(5743):2010-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1105891 PMID: 16179466
39. Blake WJ, Kaern M, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature. 2003; 422 (6932):633-7. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v422/n6932/suppinfo/nature01546-S1.html. PMID: 12687005
40. Raser JM, O'Shea EK. Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression. Science. 2004; 304 (5678):1811-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1098641 PMID: 15166317
41. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Giaever G, Kumm J, Eisen MB. Noise Minimization in Eukaryotic Gene Expression. PLoS Biol. 2004; 2(6):e137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020137 PMID: 15124029
42. Fendt S-M, Sauer U. Transcriptional regulation of respiration in yeast metabolizing differently repressive carbon substrates. BMC Systems Biology. 2010; 4(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-4-12
43. Edgar R, Barrett T. NCBI GEO standards and services for microarray data. Nat Biotech. 2006; 24 (12):1471-2.
44. Barrett T, Troup DB, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets-10 years on. Nucleic acids research. 2011; 39(suppl 1):D1005-D10. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1184
45. Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets-update. Nucleic acids research. 2013; 41(D1):D991-D5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1193
46. Leinonen R, Akhtar R, Birney E, Bower L, Cerdeno-Tárraga A, Cheng Y, et al. The European Nucleotide Archive. Nucleic acids research. 2010. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq967
47. Rodriguez-Tomé P, Stoehr PJ, Cameron GN, Flores TP. The European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) databases. Nucleic acids research. 1996; 24(1):6-12. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.1.6 PMID: 8594602
48. Faith JJ, Driscoll ME, Fusaro VA, Cosgrove EJ, Hayete B, Juhn FS, et al. Many Microbe Microarrays Database: uniformly normalized Affymetrix compendia with structured experimental metadata. Nucleic acids research. 2008; 36(suppl 1):D866-D70. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm815
49. Wilhelm M, Schlegl J, Hahne H, Gholami AM, Lieberenz M, Savitski MM, et al. Mass-spectrometrybased draft of the human proteome. Nature. 2014; 509(7502):582-7. doi: 10.1038/nature13319 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v509/n7502/abs/nature13319.html#supplementary-information. PMID: 24870543
50. Sundararaman N, Ash C, Guo W, Button R, Singh J, Feng X. iTAP: integrated transcriptomics and phenotype database for stress response of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Research Notes. 2015; 8(1):1-7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1759-7
51. Mo ML, Palsson BØ, Herrgård MJ. Connecting extracellular metabolomic measurements to intracellular flux states in yeast. BMC Systems Biology. 2009; 3(1):1-17. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-3-37
52. Ott R, Longnecker M. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis: Cengage Learning; 2008.
53. Kenny J, Keeping E. The Standard Deviation and Calculation of the Standard Deviation. 3. chap 6.5-6.6. Princeton NJ. 1962:77-80.