Typical vine or international taste: Wine consumers' dilemma between beliefs and preferences

Recent Patents on Food, Nutrition and Agriculture

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 31-38

  Scozzafava, Gabriele ^a   Boncinelli, Fabio ^a   Contini, Caterina ^a   Romano, Caterina ^a   Gerini, Francesca ^a   Casini, Leonardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Experimental auctions; Taste; Typicality; Vine; Wine

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; TASTE; VITIS; WINE;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMMERCE; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; TASTE; VITIS; WINE;

EID: 84962291576     PISSN: 22127984     EISSN: 18761429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/2212798408666151230114115     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Scozzafava G, Casini L, Contini C. Analysis of Italian consumer preferences for beef. New Medit 2014; 13(1): 66-72.
2. Cadot Y, Caillé S, Samson A, Barbeau G, Cheynier V. Sensory dimension of wine typicality related to a terroir by quantitative descriptive analysis, just about right analysis and typicality assessment. Anal Chim Acta 2010; 660(1-2): 53-62.
3. Gade DW. Tradition, territory and terroir in french viniculture: Cassis, France and appellation controlee. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2004; 94(4): 848-76.
4. Skuras D, Vakrou A. Consumer's willingness to pay for origin labeled wine: A greek case study. Brit Food J 2002; 104(11): 898-12.
5. Bernabéu R, Tendero A, Olmeda M, Castillo S. Consumer attitudes of wine with appellation of origin in the province of Albacete. IV Congress National Agricultural Economics. Pamplona, Spain, September 19-21, 2001.
6. Lai MB, Del Giudice T, Pomarici E. Unobserved heterogeneity in the wine market: An analysis of Sardinian wine using Mixed Logit. American association of wine economists, Wp No. 28, November, 2008.
7. Martínez-Carrasco L, Brugarolas M, Del Campo FJ, Martínez A. Influence of purchase place and consumption frequency over quality wine preferences. Food Qual Prefer 2006; 17: 315-27.
8. Mtimet N, Albisu LM. Spanish wine consumer behavior: A choice experiment approach. Agribusiness 2006; 22(3): 343-62.
9. Corduas M, Cinquanta M, Ievoli C. The importance of wine attrib-utes for purchase decisions: A study of Italian consumers' perception. Food Qual Prefer 2013; 28: 407-18.
10. Lange C, Martin C, Chabanet C, Combris P, Issanchou S. Impact of the information provided to consumers on their willingness to pay for champagne: Comparison with hedonic scores. Food Qual Prefer 2002; 13: 597-608.
11. Mueller S, Osidacz I, Francis IL, Lockshin L. Combining discrete choice and informed sensory testing in a two-stage process: Can it predict wine market share? Food Qual Prefer 2010; 21: 741-54.
12. Thompson G, Keith E, Vourvachis A. Social and attitudinal influences on the intention to drink wine. Int J Wine Market 1995; 7: 35-45.
13. Lecocq S, Magnac T, Pichery M-C, Visser M. The impact of information on wine auction prices: Results of an experiment. Ann Econ Stat 2005; 77: 37-57.
14. Casini L, Contini C, Romano C, Scozzafava G. Changes in dietary preferences: New challenges for sustainability and innovation. J Chain Net Sci 2015; 15(1): 17-26.
15. Casini L, Contini C, Romano C, Scozzafava G. Trends in food consumptions: What is happening to generation x? Brit Food J 2015; 117(2): 705-18.
16. Casini L, Marone E, Scozzafava G. Management accounting in the winegrowing sector: Proposal and development of an "Ad Hoc" control system. Qual-Acc Succ 2014; 15(138): 70-3.
17. Alfnes F, Rickertsen K. European consumers' willingness to pay for U.S. beef in experimental auction. Am J Agr Econ 2003; 85(2): 396-405.
18. th International Conference of the Academy of Wine Business Research. Siena, Italy, July 17-19, 2008.
19. Lockshin L, Jarvis W, d'Hauteville F, Perrouty J-P. Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sen-sivity to brand, region, price, and awards in wine choice. Food Qual Prefer 2006; 17: 166-78.
20. Gil JM, Sanchez M. Consumer preferences for wine attributes: A conjoint approach. Brit Food J 1997; 99(1): 3-11.
21. Rasmussen M, Lockshin L. Wine choice behavior: The effect of regional branding. Int J Wine Market 1999; 11(1): 36-46.
22. Bredahl L. Cue utilisation and quality perception with regard to branded beef. Food Qual Prefer 2004; 15(1): 65-75.
23. Jover AJV, Montes FJL, Fuentes MDF. Measuring perceptions of quality in food products: The case of red wine. Food Qual Prefer 2004; 15(5): 453-69.
24. Hawkes C. Dietary implications of supermarket development: A global perspective. Dev Policy Rev 2008; 26(6): 657-92.
25. Angulo AM, Gil JM, Gracia A, Sanchez M. Hedonic prices for Spanish red quality wine. Brit Food J 2000; 2(7): 481-93.
26. Jarvis W, Rungie C, Lockshin L. Analysing wine behavioural loyalty. International Wine Marketing Colloquium, Adelaide, Australia, July, 2003.
27. Tustin M, Lockshin L. Region of origin: Does it really count? Austr NZ Wine Ind J 2001; 16(5): 139-43.
28. Dean R. The changing world of the international fine wine market. Austr NZ Wine Ind J 2002; 17(3): 84-8.
29. Johnson R, Bruwer J. Regional brand image and perceived wine quality: The consumer perspective. Int J Wine Bus Res 2007; 19(4): 276-97.
30. Schamel G, Anderson K. Wine quality and varietal, regional and winery reputations: Hedonic prices for Australia and New Zealand. Econ Rec 2003; 79(246): 357-69.
31. Mueller S, Szolnoki G. The relative influence of packaging, labelling, branding and sensory attributes on liking and purchase intent: Consumers differ in their responsiveness. Food Qual Prefer 2010; 21: 774-83.
32. Mueller S, Francis IL, Lockshin L. Comparison of best-worst and hedonic scaling for the measurement of consumer wine preferences. Aust J Grape Wine R 2009; 15: 205-15.
33. Lusk J, Shogren J. Experimental auctions-Methods and Applications in Economic and Marketing Research. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2007.
34. Combris P, Bazoche P, Giraud-Héraud E, Issanchou S. Food choices: What do we learn from combining sensory and economic experiments? Food Qual Prefer 2009; 20: 550-57.
35. Schmit TM, Rickard BJ, Taber J. Consumer valuation of environmentally friendly production practices in wines, considering asymmetric information and sensory effects. J Agr Eco 2013; 62(2): 483-504.
36. Sáenz-Navajas M-P, Campo E, Sutan A, Ballester J, Valentin D. Perception of wine quality according to extrinsic cues: The case of Burgundy wine consumers. Food Qual Prefer 2013; 27: 44-53.
37. Lusk J, Schroeder T. Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks. Am J Agr Econ 2004; 86: 467-82.
38. Ding M, Grewal R, Liechty J. Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. J Marketing Res 2005; 42: 67-83.
39. Chambers S, Lobb A, Butler L, Harvey K, Traill B. Local, national and imported foods: A qualitative study. Appetite 2007; 49: 208-13.
40. Boyle D. Authenticity: Brands, fakes, spin and the lust for real life. Flamingo: London 2003.
41. Fandos C, Flavian C. Intrinsic and extrinsic quality attributes, loyalty and buying intention: An analysis for a PDO product. Brit Food J 2006; 108: 646-62.
42. Seyfang G. Consuming values and contested cultures: A critical analysis of the UK strategy for sustainable consumption and production. Rev Soc Econ 2004; 62(2): 323-33.
43. Simon H. Models of man, social and rational. Wiley: Oxford 1957.
44. Bernetti I., Alampi Sottini V., Marinelli A., Marinelli N., Marone E., Menghini S., et al. Evaluation of economic, social and sector impacts of agricultural land loss. Ita J Agr 2013; 8(24): 197-205.
45. Ortega, A. Wine tasting kit. US20110287133 (2011).
46. Hall, R. Method for aerating wine. US6332706 (2001).
47. Zeng, J. Packing box for wine industry. CN203832963 (2014).
48. Casini L, Contini C, Marinelli N, Romano C, Scozzafava G. Nu-traceutical olive oil: Does it make the difference? J Nutr Food Sci 2014; 44(6): 586-600.