Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 52, Issue , 2016, Pages 27-31

  Schouteten, Joachim J ^a   De Steur, Hans ^a   De Pelsmaeker, Sara ^a   Lagast, Sofie ^a   Juvinal, Joel G ^a   De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse ^a   Verbeke, Wim ^a   Gellynck, Xavier ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Consumer; Emotion; Expectation; Insect; Liking; Meat; Sensory; Vegetarian

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962214993     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ares G., Bruzzone F., Vidal L., Cadena R.S., Giménez A., Pineau B., et al. Evaluation of a rating-based variant of check-all-that-apply questions: Rate-all-that-apply (RATA). Food Quality and Preference 2014, 36:87-95. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.03.006.
2. Caparros Megido R., Sablon L., Geuens M., Brostaux Y., Alabi T., Blecker C., et al. Edible insects acceptance by Belgian consumers: Promising attitude for entomophagy development. Journal of Sensory Studies 2014, 29(1):14-20. 10.1111/joss.12077.
3. Dalenberg J.R., Gutjar S., ter Horst G.J., de Graaf K., Renken R.J., Jager G. Evoked emotions predict food choice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9(12):e115388. 10.1371/journal.pone.0115388.
4. FAO Edible insects. Future prospects for food and feed security 2013, 171. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.
5. Gutjar S., Dalenberg J.R., de Graaf C., de Wijk R.A., Palascha A., Renken R.J., et al. What reported food-evoked emotions may add: A model to predict consumer food choice. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 45:140-148. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.008.
6. Hoek A.C., Luning P.A., Weijzen P., Engels W., Kok F.J., de Graaf C. Replacement of meat by meat substitutes. A survey on person- and product-related factors in consumer acceptance. Appetite 2011, 56(3):662-673. 10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.001.
7. Jiang Y., King J.M., Prinyawiwatkul W. A review of measurement and relationships between food, eating behavior and emotion. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2014, 36(1):15-28. 10.1016/j.tifs.2013.12.005.
8. King S.C., Meiselman H.L., Carr B.T. Measuring emotions associated with foods: Important elements of questionnaire and test design. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28(1):8-16. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.08.007.
9. Meiselman H.L. The future in sensory/consumer research: Evolving to a better science. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 27(2):208-214. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.03.002.
10. Meiselman H.L. A review of the current state of emotion research in product development. Food Research International 2015, 76(2):192-199. 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.015.
11. Moussaoui K.A., Varela P. Exploring consumer product profiling techniques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(8):1088-1099. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.09.005.
12. Ng M., Chaya C., Hort J. The influence of sensory and packaging cues on both liking and emotional, abstract and functional conceptualisations. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 29(2):146-156. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.03.006.
13. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Jaeger S.R. The impact of the means of context evocation on consumers' emotion associations towards eating occasions. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 37:61-70. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.04.017.
14. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Spence C. Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 40:165-179.
15. Schouteten J.J., De Steur H., De Pelsmaeker S., Lagast S., De Bourdeaudhuij I., Gellynck X. An integrated method for the emotional conceptualization and sensory characterization of food products: The EmoSensory® Wheel. Food Research International 2015, 78:96-107. 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.11.001.
16. Spinelli S., Masi C., Zoboli G.P., Prescott J., Monteleone E. Emotional responses to branded and unbranded foods. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 42:1-11. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.12.009.
17. Tan H.S.G., Fischer A.R.H., van Trijp H.C.M., Stieger M. Tasty but nasty? Exploring the role of sensory-liking and food appropriateness in the willingness to eat unusual novel foods like insects. Food Quality and Preference 2016, 48(Part A):293-302. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.11.001.
18. Tan H.S.G., Fischer A.R.H., Tinchan P., Stieger M., Steenbekkers L.P.A., van Trijp H.C.M. Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 42:78-89. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013.
19. van Huis A. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annual Review of Entomology 2013, 58:563-583. 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704.
20. Verbeke W. Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 39:147-155. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008.
21. Verbeke W., Marcu A., Rutsaert P., Gaspar R., Seibt B., Fletcher D., et al. 'Would you eat cultured eat?': Consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat Science 2015, 102:49-58. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013.