The influence of sensory and packaging cues on both liking and emotional, abstract and functional conceptualisations

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 146-156

  Ng, M ^a   Chaya, C ^b   Hort, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Conceptualisation; Emotion; Expectation; Hedonic; Packaging; Sensory

Indexed keywords

CUCURBITA; RIBES HUDSONIANUM;

EID: 84877030379     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ares G., Deliza R., Barreiro C., Giménez A., Gámbaro A. Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:417-426.
2. Cardello A.V. Measuring consumer expectations to improve food product development. Consumer-led food product development 2007, 223-261. Woodhead, Cambridge, UK. H.J.H. MacFie (Ed.).
3. Chrea C., Grandjean D., Delplanque S., Cayeux I., Le Calvé B., Aymard L., et al. Mapping the semantic space for the subjective experience of emotional responses to odors. Chemical Senses 2009, 34:49-62.
4. Creusen M.E.H., Schoormans J.P.L. The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2005, 22(1):63-81.
5. Damasio A. Descartes' error 1994, Grosset/Putnam, New York.
6. Davis, C. (2010). A question of science. Drinks International February: 22-23.
7. Delizfa R., MacFie H.J.H. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 1996, 11(2):103-128.
8. Dooley L., Lee Y.S., Meullenet J.F. The application of check-all-thatapply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:394-401.
9. Dransfield E., Zamora F., Bayle M-C. Consumer selection of steaks as influenced by information and price index. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9(5):321-326.
10. Gibson E.L. Emotional influences on food choice. Sensory, physiological and psychological pathways. Physiology & Behavior 2006, 89(1):53-61.
11. Gschwandtner G. The powerful sales strategy behind Red Bull 2004, Selling Power, September.
12. Guinard J.-X., Uotoni B., Schlich P. Acceptability of fat-modified foods to children, adolescents and their parents: Effect of sensory properties, nutritional information and price. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8(3):223-231.
13. Guinard J.-X., Uotani B., et al. Internal and external mapping of preferences for commercial lager beers: Comparison of hedonic ratings by consumers blind versus with knowledge of brand and price. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12(4):243-255.
14. Hinton P.B., Henley T.B. Cognitive and affective components of stimuli presented in three modes. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1993, 31(6):595-598.
15. Kelly G.A. The psychology of personal constructs 1955, Norton, New York.
16. King S.C., Meilselman H.L. Development of a method to measure consumer emotions associated with foods. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(2):168-177.
17. Laros F.J.M., Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. Emotions in consumer behavior: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research 2005, 58:1437-1445.
18. Lê S., Pagês J., Husson F. Methodology for the comparison of sensory profiles provided by several panels: Application to a cross-cultural study. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:179-181.
19. Lee L., Amir O., Ariely D. In search of homo economicus: Cognitive noise and the role of emotion in preference consistency. Journal of Consumer Research 2009, 36:173-187.
20. Lundahl D. Breakthrough food product innovation 2012, Elsevier.
21. Mandler G. The structure of value: Accounting for taste. Affect and cognition: The 17th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition 1982, 3-36. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M.S. Clark, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
22. Meyers-Levy J., Tybout A.M. Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 1989, 16(1):39-54.
23. Morand E., Pagès J. Procrustes multiple factor analysis to analyze the overall perception of food products. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 17:36-42.
24. Murray J.M., Delahunty C.M. Mapping consumer preference for the sensory and packaging attributes of Cheddar cheese. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11(5):419-435.
25. Neisser U. Multiple systems: A new approach to cognitive theory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1994, 6(3):225-241.
26. Nestrud M.A., Lawless H.T. Perceptual mapping of citrus juices using projective mapping and profiling data from culinary professionals and consumers. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:431-438.
27. Ng M., Chaya C., Hort J. Beyond liking: Comparing the measurement of emotional response using essense profile and consumer defined check-all-that-apply methodologies. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28(1):193-205.
28. Ng M., Lawlor J.B., Chandra S., Chaya C., Hewson L., Hort J. Using quantitative descriptive analysis and temporal dominance of sensations analysis as complementary methods for profiling commercial blackcurrant squashes. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.02.004.
29. Olson J.C. The importance of cognitive processes and existing knowledge structures for understanding food acceptance. Criteria of food acceptance 1981, Zurich, Forster. J. Solms, R.L. Hall (Eds.).
30. Perrin L., Symoneaux R., Maitre I., Asselin C., Jourjon F., Pagès J. Comparison of three sensory methods for use with the Napping procedure: Case of ten wines from Loire valley. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:1-11.
31. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Spence C. The weight of the bottle as a possible extrinsic cue with which to estimate the price (and quality) of the wine? Observed correlations. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 25(1):41-45.
32. Porcherot C., Delplanque S., Planchais A., Gaudreau N., Accolla R., Cayeux I. Influence of food odorant names on the verbal measurement of emotions. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 23:125-133.
33. Schifferstein H.N.J., Fenko A., Desmet P.M.A., Labbe D., Martin N. Influence of package design on the dynamics of multisensory and emotional food experience. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 27(1):18-25.
34. Schoormans J.P.L., Robben H.S. The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology 1997, 18(2):271-287.
35. Spence C., Gallace A. Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer. Psychology and Marketing 2011, 28(3):267-308.
36. Storm C., Storm T. A taxonomic study of the vocabulary of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 53(4):805-816.
37. Thomson D.M.H., Crocker C., Marketo C.G. Linking sensory characteristics to emotions: An example using dark chocolate. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(8):1117-1125.
38. Thomson D.M.H., McEwan J.A. An application of the repertory grid method to investigate consumer perceptions of foods. Appetite 1988, 10(3):181-193.
39. Tuorila H., Andersson Å., Martikainen A., Salovaara H. Effect of product formula, information and consumer characteristics on the acceptance of a new snack food. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9(5):313-320.
40. Tuorila H., Cardello A.V. Consumer responses to an off-flavor in juice in the presence of specific health claims. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13(7-8):561-569.
41. Varela P., Ares G., Giménez A., Gámbaro A. Influence of brand information on consumers' expectations and liking of powdered drinks in central location tests. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(7):873-880.
42. Villegas B., Carbonell I., Costell E. Effects of product information and consumer attitudes on responses to milk and soybean vanilla beverages. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2008, 88(14):2426-2434.
43. Watson D., Wiese D., Vaidya J., Tellegen A. The two general activation systems of affect: structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 76(5):820-838.