Self-deploying shape memory polymer scaffolds for grafting and stabilizing complex bone defects: A mouse femoral segmental defect study

Biomaterials

Volumn 76, Issue , 2016, Pages 388-398

  Baker, Richard M ^a,b   Tseng, Ling Fang ^a,b   Iannolo, Maria T ^c   Oest, Megan E ^c   Henderson, James H ^a,b  

^a Syracuse University   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c State University of New York Upstate Medical University: College of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Internal fracture fixation; Mouse model; Segmental defect; Shape memory polymer; Synthetic bone graft

Indexed keywords

BENDING TESTS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FRACTURE FIXATION; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); INTEGRATION TESTING; POLYMERS; SCAFFOLDS; SHAPE-MEMORY POLYMER; STABILIZATION; X RAY RADIOGRAPHY;

INTERNAL FRACTURE; INTRAMEDULLARY RODS; MICROCOMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MOUSE MODELS; SEGMENTAL DEFECTS; STABILIZATION DEVICE; SYNTHETIC BONE GRAFTS; TORSIONAL STABILITY;

DEFECTS;

POLYMER; SHAPE MEMORY POLYMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLOGRAFT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES; MALE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; OSSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; SYNTHETIC BONE GRAFT; X RAY; X RAY RADIOGRAPHY; ABNORMALITIES; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CHEMISTRY; FEMUR; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; FEMUR; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; POLYMERS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84961226458     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.064     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Reichert J.C., Saifzadeh S., Wullschleger M.E., Epari D.R., Schütz M.A., Duda G.N., et al. The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2149-2163.
2. Owens B.D., Kragh J.F., Wenke J.C., Macaitis J., Wade C.E., Holcomb J.B. Combat wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. J. Trauma 2008, 64:295-299.
3. Owens B.D., Kragh J.F., Macaitis J., Svoboda S.J., Wenke J.C. Characterization of extremity wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. J. Orthop. Trauma 2007, 21:254-257.
4. Dischinger P.C., Read K.M., Kufera J.A., Kerns T.J., Burch C.A., Jawed N., et al. Consequences and costs of lower extremity injuries. Annu. Proc. Assoc. Adv. Automot. Med. 2004, 48:339-353.
5. Masini B.D., Waterman S.M., Wenke J.C., Owens B.D., Hsu J.R., Ficke J.R. Resource utilization and disability outcome assessment of combat casualties from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. J. Orthop. Trauma 2009, 23:261-266.
6. Mills L.A., Simpson A.H. In vivo models of bone repair. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2012, 94:865-874.
7. Reichert J.C., Saifzadeh S., Wullschleger M.E., Epari D.R., Schutz M.A., Duda G.N., et al. The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2149-2163.
8. Burns T.C., Stinner D.J., Mack A.W., Potter B.K., Beer R., Eckel T.T., et al. Microbiology and injury characteristics in severe open tibia fractures from combat. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012, 72:1062-1067.
9. Forsberg J.A., Potter B.K., Cierny G., Webb L. Diagnosis and management of chronic infection. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2011, 19(Suppl 1):S8-S19.
10. Keeling J.J., Gwinn D.E., Tintle S.M., Andersen R.C., McGuigan F.X. Short-term outcomes of severe open wartime tibial fractures treated with ring external fixation. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2008, 90:2643-2651.
11. Mody R.M., Zapor M., Hartzell J.D., Robben P.M., Waterman P., Wood-Morris R., et al. Infectious complications of damage control orthopedics in war trauma. J. Trauma 2009, 67:758-761.
12. Khalsa A.S., Toossi N., Tabb L.P., Amin N.H., Donohue K.W., Cerynik D.L. Distal tibia fractures: locked or non-locked plating? A systematic review of outcomes. Acta Orthop. 2014, 85:299-304.
13. Johnson E.N., Burns T.C., Hayda R.A., Hospenthal D.R., Murray C.K. Infectious complications of open type III tibial fractures among combat casualties. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45:409-415.
14. Sirbu P.D., Petreus T., Asaftei R., Berea G., Botez P. Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) in Long Bone Fractures - Biomechanics - Design - Clinical Results 2011.
15. Pollak A.N., Ficke J.R. Extremity war injuries: challenges in definitive reconstruction. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2008, 16:628-634.
16. O'Keefe R.J., Mao J. Bone tissue engineering and regeneration: from discovery to the clinic-an overview. Tissue Eng. B Rev. 2011, 17:389-392.
17. Xie C., Reynolds D., Awad H., Rubery P.T., Pelled G., Gazit D., et al. Structural bone allograft combined with genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells as a novel platform for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2007, 13:435-445.
18. Davy D.T. Biomechanical issues in bone transplantation. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 1999, 30:553-563.
19. Zhang X., Awad H.A., O'Keefe R.J., Guldberg R.E., Schwarz E.M. A perspective: engineering periosteum for structural bone graft healing. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2008, 466:1777-1787.
20. Bostman O., Hirvensalo E., Makinen J., Rokkanen P. Foreign-body reactions to fracture fixation implants of biodegradable synthetic polymers. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 1990, 72:592-596.
21. Felfel R.M., Ahmed I., Parsons A.J., Haque P., Walker G.S., Rudd C.D. Investigation of crystallinity, molecular weight change, and mechanical properties of PLA/PBG bioresorbable composites as bone fracture fixation plates. J Biomater. Appl. 2012, 26:765-789.
22. van der Elst M., Klein C.P.A.T., de Blieck-Hogervorst J.M., Patka P., Haarman H.J.T.M. Bone tissue response to biodegradable polymers used for intra medullary fracture fixation: a long-term in vivo study in sheep femora. Biomaterials 1999, 20:121-128.
23. Shah S.R., Kasper F.K., Mikos A.G. Perspectives on the prevention and treatment of infection for orthopedic tissue engineering applications. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2013, 58:4342-4348.
24. Knothe Tate M.L., Chang H., Moore S.R., Knothe U.R. Surgical membranes as directional delivery devices to generate tissue: testing in an ovine critical sized defect model. PLoS One 2011, 6:e28702.
25. Diab T., Pritchard E.M., Uhrig B.A., Boerckel J.D., Kaplan D.L., Guldberg R.E. A silk hydrogel-based delivery system of bone morphogenetic protein for the treatment of large bone defects. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 11:123-131.
26. Liu C., Qin H., Mather P.T. Review of progress in shape-memory polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17:1543-1558.
27. Metcalfe A., Desfaits A.-C., Salazkin I., Yahia L.H., Sokolowski W.M., Raymond J. Cold hibernated elastic memory foams for endovascular interventions. Biomaterials 2003, 24:491-497.
28. Maitland D.J., Small W., Ortega J.M., Buckley P.R., Rodriguez J., Hartman J., et al. Prototype laser-activated shape memory polymer foam device for embolic treatment of aneurysms. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007, 12. 030504-3.
29. Small I.V.W., Wilson T., Benett W., Loge J., Maitland D. Laser-activated shape memory polymer intravascular thrombectomy device. Opt. Express 2005, 13:8204-8213.
30. Yakacki C.M., Shandas R., Lanning C., Rech B., Eckstein A., Gall K. Unconstrained recovery characterization of shape-memory polymer networks for cardiovascular applications. Biomaterials 2007, 28:2255-2263.
31. Lendlein A., Langer R. Biodegradable, elastic shape-memory polymers for potential biomedical applications. Science 2002, 296:1673-1676.
32. Davis K.A., Burke K.A., Mather P.T., Henderson J.H. Dynamic cell behavior on shape memory polymer substrates. Biomaterials 2011, 32:2285-2293.
33. Le D.M., Kulangara K., Adler A.F., Leong K.W., Ashby V.S. Dynamic topographical control of mesenchymal stem cells by culture on responsive poly (ε-caprolactone). Surf. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23:3278-3283.
34. Yakacki C.M., Shandas R., Safranski D., Ortega A.M., Sassaman K., Gall K. Strong, tailored, biocompatible shape-memory polymer networks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18:2428-2435.
35. Smith K.E., Garcia M., McAnuffK., Lamell R., Yakacki C.M., Griffis J., et al. Anterior cruciate ligament fixation: is radial force a predictor of the pullout strength of soft-tissue interference devices?. Knee 2012, 19:786-792.
36. Baker R.M., Henderson J.H., Mather P.T. Shape memory poly(ε-caprolactone)-co-poly(ethylene glycol) foams with body temperature triggering and two-way actuation. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1:4916-4920.
37. Zhang D., George O.J., Petersen K.M., Jimenez-Vergara A.C., Hahn M.S., Grunlan M.A. A bioactive "self-fitting" shape memory polymer scaffold with potential to treat cranio-maxillo facial bone defects. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10:4597-4605.
38. Liu X., Zhao K., Gong T., Song J., Bao C., Luo E., et al. Delivery of growth factors using a smart porous nanocomposite scaffold to repair a mandibular bone defect. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15:1019-1030.
39. Rychter P., Pamula E., Orchel A., Posadowska U., Krok-Borkowicz M., Kaps A., et al. Scaffolds with shape memory behavior for the treatment of large bone defects. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2015, 103:3503-3515.
40. Bao M., Lou X., Zhou Q., Dong W., Yuan H., Zhang Y. Electrospun biomimetic fibrous scaffold from shape memory polymer of PDLLA-co-TMC for bone tissue engineering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6:2611-2621.
41. Huang M., Wang Y., Luo Y., Pan F. Design, preparation and characterization of novel shape memory porous poly (urethane-urea) scaffold for non-union. Asian J Chem. 2013, 25:7773.
42. Yang P., Baker R.M., Henderson J.H., Mather P.T. In vitro wrinkle formation via shape memory dynamically aligns adherent cells. Soft Matter 2013, 9:4705-4714.
43. Lee H., Dellatore S.M., Miller W.M., Messersmith P.B. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 2007, 318:426-430.
44. Tseng L.F., Mather P.T., Henderson J.H. Shape-memory-actuated change in scaffold fiber alignment directs stem cell morphology. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9:8790-8801.
45. Arnold E.V., Doletski B.G., Dunn T.M., Raulli R.E., Mueller E.P., Benedek K.R., et al. Sterilization system and device. Office USPaT 2011, Noxilizer, Inc., US.
46. Arrington S.A., Schoonmaker J.E., Damron T.A., Mann K.A., Allen M.J. Temporal changes in bone mass and mechanical properties in a murine model of tumor osteolysis. Bone 2006, 38:359-367.
47. Yazici C., Takahata M., Reynolds D.G., Xie C., Samulski R.J., Samulski J., et al. Self-complementary AAV2.5-BMP2-coated femoral allografts mediated superior bone healing versus live autografts in mice with equivalent biomechanics to unfractured femur. Mol. Ther. 2011, 19:1416-1425.
48. Reilly D.T., Burstein A.H. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J. Biomech. 1975, 8:393-405.
49. Turner C.H., Cowin S.C., Rho J.Y., Ashman R.B., Rice J.C. The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. J. Biomech. 1990, 23:549-561.
50. Oest M.E., Dupont K.M., Kong H.J., Mooney D.J., Guldberg R.E. Quantitative assessment of scaffold and growth factor-mediated repair of critically sized bone defects. J. Orthop. Res. 2007, 25:941-950.
51. Campoccia D., Montanaro L., Arciola C.R. The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance. Biomaterials 2006, 27:2331-2339.
52. Wu J., Hou S., Ren D., Mather P.T. Antimicrobial properties of nanostructured hydrogel webs containing silver. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:2686-2693.
53. Gugala Z., Gogolewski S. Healing of critical-size segmental bone defects in the sheep tibiae using bioresorbable polylactide membranes. Injury 2002, 33(Suppl. 2):71-76.
54. Oryan A., Alidadi S., Moshiri A., Bigham-Sadegh A. Bone morphogenetic proteins: a powerful osteoinductive compound with non-negligible side effects and limitations. BioFactors 2014, 40:459-481.
55. Rahman C.V., Ben-David D., Dhillon A., Kuhn G., Gould T.W., Müller R., et al. Controlled release of BMP-2 from a sintered polymer scaffold enhances bone repair in a mouse calvarial defect model. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2014, 8:59-66.
56. Mercado-Pagán Á.E., Stahl A.M., Shanjani Y., Yang Y. Vascularization in bone tissue engineering constructs. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 1-12.
57. Peng H., Wright V., Usas A., Gearhart B., Shen H.-C., Cummins J., et al. Synergistic enhancement of bone formation and healing by stem cell-expressed VEGF and bone morphogenetic protein-4. J. Clin. Investig. 2002, 110:751-759.
58. Bruder S.P., Kraus K.H., Goldberg V.M., Kadiyala S. The effect of implants loaded with autologous mesenchymal stem cells on the healing of canine segmental bone defects. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1998, 80:985-996.
59. Zhang D., Burkes W.L., Schoener C.A., Grunlan M.A. Porous inorganic-organic shape memory polymers. Polymer 2012, 53:2935-2941.
60. Knight P.T., Lee K.M., Chung T., Mather P.T. PLGA-POSS end-linked networks with tailored degradation and shape memory behavior. Macromolecules 2009, 42:6596-6605.
61. Rüedi T.P., Buckley R.E., Moran C.G. AO Principles of Fracture Management 2007, Thieme. second ed.
62. Peltoniemi H., Ashammakhi N., Kontio R., Waris T., Salo A., Lindqvist C., et al. The use of bioabsorbable osteofixation devices in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2002, 94:5-14.
63. Vaccaro A.R., Singh K., Haid R., Kitchel S., Wuisman P., Taylor W., et al. The use of bioabsorbable implants in the spine. Spine J. 2003, 3:227-237.
64. Hasegawa S., Ishii S., Tamura J., Furukawa T., Neo M., Matsusue Y., et al. A 5-7 year in vivo study of high-strength hydroxyapatite/poly(L-lactide) composite rods for the internal fixation of bone fractures. Biomaterials 2006, 27:1327-1332.
65. Felfel R.M., Ahmed I., Parsons A.J., Walker G.S., Rudd C.D. In vitro degradation, flexural, compressive and shear properties of fully bioresorbable composite rods. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2011, 4:1462-1472.
66. Knight P.T., Kirk J.T., Anderson J.M., Mather P.T. In vivo kinetic degradation analysis and biocompatibility of aliphatic polyester polyurethanes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2010, 94:333-343.
67. Kolambkar Y.M., Dupont K.M., Boerckel J.D., Huebsch N., Mooney D.J., Hutmacher D.W., et al. An alginate-based hybrid system for growth factor delivery in the functional repair of large bone defects. Biomaterials 2011, 32:65-74.
68. Henderson J.H., Chang L.Y., Song H.M., Longaker M.T., Carter D.R. Age-dependent properties and quasi-static strain in the rat sagittal suture. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:2294-2301.
69. Henderson J.H., de la Fuente L., Romero D., Colnot C.I., Huang S., Carter D.R., et al. Rapid growth of cartilage rudiments may generate perichondrial structures by mechanical induction. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2007, 6:127-137.
70. Henderson J.H., Nacamuli R.P., Zhao B., Longaker M.T., Carter D.R. Age-dependent residual tensile strains are present in the dura mater of rats. J. R. Soc. Interface 2005, 2:159-167.
71. Perren S.M. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2002, 84:1093-1110.