Characterization, prediction and evolution of plant peroxisomal targeting signals type 1 (PTS1s)

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Cell Research

Volumn 1863, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 790-803

  Reumann, S ^a,b   Chowdhary, G ^b,c   Lingner, T ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^c KIIT UNIVERSITY   (India)

^d Institute for Microbiology and Genetics   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evolution; Peroxisome; Peroxisome targeting signal type 1; PEX5; Proteome

Indexed keywords

MATRIX PROTEIN; PEROXISOMAL TARGETING SIGNAL TYPE 1 PROTEIN; PEX5 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VEGETABLE PROTEIN; CELL RECEPTOR; PEROXISOMAL TARGETING SIGNAL 2 RECEPTOR; PEROXISOME-TARGETING SIGNAL 1 RECEPTOR; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; EUKARYOTIC CELL; EVOLUTION; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PEROXISOMAL TARGETING SIGNAL; PEROXISOME; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ARABIDOPSIS; CHEMISTRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; ONION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; TOBACCO;

ARABIDOPSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; ONIONS; PEROXISOMES; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEIN SORTING SIGNALS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RECEPTORS, CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TOBACCO;

EID: 84961176265     PISSN: 01674889     EISSN: 18792596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (172)

1. Lazarow P.B., Fujiki Y. Biogenesis of peroxisomes. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 1985, 1:489-530.
2. Wanders R.J. Metabolic functions of peroxisomes in health and disease. Biochimie 2014, 98:36-44.
3. Hu J., Baker A., Bartel B., Linka N., Mullen R.T., Reumann S., Zolman B.K. Plant peroxisomes: biogenesis and function. Plant Cell 2012, 24:2279-2303.
4. Kaur N., Reumann S., Hu J. Peroxisome biogenesis and function. The Arabidopsis Book 2009, 1-41. Place Published, The American Society of Plant Biologists. C.R. Somerville, E.M. Meyerowitz (Eds.).
5. Tanabe Y., Maruyama J., Yamaoka S., Yahagi D., Matsuo I., Tsutsumi N., Kitamoto K. Peroxisomes are involved in biotin biosynthesis in Aspergillus and Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:30455-30461.
6. Magliano P., Flipphi M., Arpat B.A., Delessert S., Poirier Y. Contributions of the peroxisome and beta-oxidation cycle to biotin synthesis in fungi. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:42133-42140.
7. Kim H.U., van Oostende C., Basset G.J., Browse J. The AAE14 gene encodes the Arabidopsis o-succinylbenzoyl-CoA ligase that is essential for phylloquinone synthesis and photosystem-I function. Plant J. 2008, 54:272-283.
8. Widhalm J.R., Ducluzeau A.L., Buller N.E., Elowsky C.G., Olsen L.J., Basset G.J. Phylloquinone (vitamin K(1)) biosynthesis in plants: two peroxisomal thioesterases of lactobacillales origin hydrolyze 1,4-dihydroxy-2-naphthoyl-CoA. Plant J. 2012, 71:205-215.
9. Babujee L., Wurtz V., Ma C., Lueder F., Soni P., van Dorsselaer A., Reumann S. The proteome map of spinach leaf peroxisomes indicates partial compartmentalization of phylloquinone (vitamin K1) biosynthesis in plant peroxisomes. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61:1441-1453.
10. Reumann S. Biosynthesis of vitamin K1 (phylloquinone) by plant peroxisomes and its integration into signaling molecule synthesis pathways. Subcell. Biochem. 2013, 69:213-229.
11. Kliebenstein D.J., D'Auria J.C., Behere A.S., Kim J.H., Gunderson K.L., Breen J.N., Lee G., Gershenzon J., Last R.L., Jander G. Characterization of seed-specific benzoyloxyglucosinolate mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2007, 51:1062-1076.
12. Van Moerkercke A., Schauvinhold I., Pichersky E., Haring M.A., Schuurink R.C. A plant thiolase involved in benzoic acid biosynthesis and volatile benzenoid production. Plant J. 2009, 60:292-302.
13. Klempien A., Kaminaga Y., Qualley A., Nagegowda D.A., Widhalm J.R., Orlova I., Shasany A.K., Taguchi G., Kish C.M., Cooper B.R., D'Auria J.C., Rhodes D., Pichersky E., Dudareva N. Contribution of CoA ligases to benzenoid biosynthesis in petunia flowers. Plant Cell 2012, 24:2015-2030.
14. Qualley A.V., Widhalm J.R., Adebesin F., Kish C.M., Dudareva N. Completion of the core beta-oxidative pathway of benzoic acid biosynthesis in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109:16383-16388.
15. Lee S., Kaminaga Y., Cooper B., Pichersky E., Dudareva N., Chapple C. Benzoylation and sinapoylation of glucosinolate R-groups in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012, 72:411-422.
16. Gaid M.M., Sircar D., Muller A., Beuerle T., Liu B., Ernst L., Hansch R., Beerhues L. Cinnamate:CoA ligase initiates the biosynthesis of a benzoate-derived xanthone phytoalexin in Hypericum calycinum cell cultures. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160:1267-1280.
17. Colquhoun T.A., Marciniak D.M., Wedde A.E., Kim J.Y., Schwieterman M.L., Levin L.A., Van Moerkercke A., Schuurink R.C., Clark D.G. A peroxisomally localized acyl-activating enzyme is required for volatile benzenoid formation in a Petunia×hybrida cv. 'Mitchell diploid' flower. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63:4821-4833.
18. Reumann S. Toward a definition of the complete proteome of plant peroxisomes: where experimental proteomics must be complemented by bioinformatics. Proteomics 2011, 11:1764-1779.
19. Bussell J.D., Behrens C., Ecke W., Eubel H. Arabidopsis peroxisome proteomics. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4:101.
20. Reumann S., Babujee L., Ma C., Wienkoop S., Siemsen T., Antonicelli G.E., Rasche N., Luder F., Weckwerth W., Jahn O. Proteome analysis of Arabidopsis leaf peroxisomes reveals novel targeting peptides, metabolic pathways, and defense mechanisms. Plant Cell 2007, 19:3170-3193.
21. Lipka V., Dittgen J., Bednarek P., Bhat R., Wiermer M., Stein M., Landtag J., Brandt W., Rosahl S., Scheel D., Llorente F., Molina A., Parker J., Somerville S., Schulze-Lefert P. Pre- and postinvasion defenses both contribute to nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis. Science 2005, 310:1180-1183.
22. Bednarek P., Pislewska-Bednarek M., Svatos A., Schneider B., Doubsky J., Mansurova M., Humphry M., Consonni C., Panstruga R., Sanchez-Vallet A., Molina A., Schulze-Lefert P. A glucosinolate metabolism pathway in living plant cells mediates broad-spectrum antifungal defense. Science 2009, 323:101-106.
23. Ma C., Haslbeck M., Babujee L., Jahn O., Reumann S. Identification and characterization of a stress-inducible and a constitutive small heat-shock protein targeted to the matrix of plant peroxisomes. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141:47-60.
24. Ma C., Reumann S. Improved prediction of peroxisomal PTS1 proteins from genome sequences based on experimental subcellular targeting analyses as exemplified for protein kinases from Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59:3767-3779.
25. Lingard M.J., Bartel B. Arabidopsis LON2 is necessary for peroxisomal function and sustained matrix protein import. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151:1354-1365.
26. Quan S., Yang P., Cassin-Ross G., Kaur N., Switzenberg R., Aung K., Li J., Hu J. Proteome analysis of peroxisomes from etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings identifies a peroxisomal protease involved in beta-oxidation and development. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163:1518-1538.
27. Park S., Gidda S.K., James C.N., Horn P.J., Khuu N., Seay D.C., Keereetaweep J., Chapman K.D., Mullen R.T., Dyer J.M. The alpha/beta hydrolase CGI-58 and peroxisomal transport protein PXA1 coregulate lipid homeostasis and signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25:1726-1739.
28. Kataya A.R., Heidari B., Hagen L., Kommedal R., Slupphaug G., Lillo C. Protein phosphatase 2A holoenzyme is targeted to peroxisomes by piggybacking and positively affects peroxisomal beta-oxidation. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167:493-506.
29. Kataya A.R., Schei E., Lillo C. MAP kinase phosphatase 1 harbors a novel PTS1 and is targeted to peroxisomes following stress treatments. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 179:12-20.
30. Gould S.G., Keller G.A., Subramani S. Identification of a peroxisomal targeting signal at the carboxy terminus of firefly luciferase. J. Cell Biol. 1987, 105:2923-2931.
31. Gould S.J., Keller G.A., Hosken N., Wilkinson J., Subramani S. A conserved tripeptide sorts proteins to peroxisomes. J. Cell Biol. 1989, 108:1657-1664.
32. Swinkels B.W., Gould S.J., Subramani S. Targeting efficiencies of various permutations of the consensus C-terminal tripeptide peroxisomal targeting signal. FEBS Lett. 1992, 305:133-136.
33. Neuberger G., Maurer-Stroh S., Eisenhaber B., Hartig A., Eisenhaber F. Motif refinement of the peroxisomal targeting signal 1 and evaluation of taxon-specific differences. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 328:567-579.
34. Brocard C., Hartig A. Peroxisome targeting signal 1: is it really a simple tripeptide?. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1763:1565-1573.
35. Lingner T., Kataya A.R., Antonicelli G.E., Benichou A., Nilssen K., Chen X.-Y., Siemsen T., Morgenstern B., Meinicke P., Reumann S. Identification of novel plant peroxisomal targeting signals by a combination of machine learning methods and in vivo subcellular targeting analyses. Plant Cell 2011, 23:1556-1572.
36. Lametschwandtner G., Brocard C., Fransen M., Van Veldhoven P., Berger J., Hartig A. The difference in recognition of terminal tripeptides as peroxisomal targeting signal 1 between yeast and human is due to different affinities of their receptor Pex5p to the cognate signal and to residues adjacent to it. .J Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:33635-33643.
37. Swinkels B.W., Gould S.J., Bodnar A.G., Rachubinski R.A., Subramani S. A novel, cleavable peroxisomal targeting signal at the amino-terminus of the rat 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase. Embo J. 1991, 10:3255-3262.
38. Kato A., Hayashi M., Kondo M., Nishimura M. Targeting and processing of a chimeric protein with the N-terminal presequence of the precursor to glyoxysomal citrate synthase. Plant Cell 1996, 8:1601-1611.
39. Kato A., Takeda-Yoshikawa Y., Hayashi M., Kondo M., Hara-Nishimura I., Nishimura M. Glyoxysomal malate dehydrogenase in pumpkin: cloning of a cDNA and functional analysis of its presequence. Plant Cell Physiol. 1998, 39:186-195.
40. Flynn C.R., Mullen R.T., Trelease R.N. Mutational analyses of a type 2 peroxisomal targeting signal that is capable of directing oligomeric protein import into tobacco BY-2 glyoxysomes. Plant J. 1998, 16:709-720.
41. Kunze M., Neuberger G., Maurer-Stroh S., Ma J., Eck T., Braverman N., Schmid J.A., Eisenhaber F., Berger J. Structural requirements for interaction of peroxisomal targeting signal 2 and its receptor PEX7. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:45048-45062.
42. Distel B., Erdmann R., Gould S.J., Blobel G., Crane D.I., Cregg J.M., Dodt G., Fujiki Y., Goodman J.M., Just W.W., Kiel J.A., Kunau W.H., Lazarow P.B., Mannaerts G.P., Moser H.W., Osumi T., Rachubinski R.A., Roscher A., Subramani S., Tabak H.F., Tsukamoto T., Valle D., van der Klei I., van Veldhoven P.P., Veenhuis M. A unified nomenclature for peroxisome biogenesis factors. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 135:1-3.
43. Reumann S. Specification of the peroxisome targeting signals type 1 and type 2 of plant peroxisomes by bioinformatics analyses. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135:783-800.
44. Reumann S., Ma C., Lemke S., Babujee L. AraPerox. A database of putative Arabidopsis proteins from plant peroxisomes. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136:2587-2608.
45. Theodoulou F.L., Bernhardt K., Linka N., Baker A. Peroxisome membrane proteins: multiple trafficking routes and multiple functions?. Biochem. J. 2013, 451:345-352.
46. Mullen R.T., Trelease R.N. The ER-peroxisome connection in plants: development of the "ER semi-autonomous peroxisome maturation and replication" model for plant peroxisome biogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1763:1655-1668.
47. Kim P.K., Mullen R.T. PEX16: a multifaceted regulator of peroxisome biogenesis. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4:241.
48. Baker A., Paudyal R. The life of the peroxisome: from birth to death. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 22:39-47.
49. Motley A.M., Hettema E.H. Yeast peroxisomes multiply by growth and division. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178:399-410.
50. Fagarasanu A., Fagarasanu M., Rachubinski R.A. Maintaining peroxisome populations: a story of division and inheritance. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 23:321-344.
51. Hoepfner D., Schildknegt D., Braakman I., Philippsen P., Tabak H.F. Contribution of the endoplasmic reticulum to peroxisome formation. Cell 2005, 122:85-95.
52. Kim P.K., Mullen R.T., Schumann U., Lippincott-Schwartz J. The origin and maintenance of mammalian peroxisomes involves a de novo PEX16-dependent pathway from the ER. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 173:521-532.
53. van der Zand A., Braakman I., Tabak H.F. Peroxisomal membrane proteins insert into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:2057-2065.
54. van der Zand A., Gent J., Braakman I., Tabak H.F. Biochemically distinct vesicles from the endoplasmic reticulum fuse to form peroxisomes. Cell 2012, 149:397-409.
55. van der Zand A., Tabak H.F. Peroxisomes: offshoots of the ER. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2013, 25:449-454.
56. Tabak H.F., Braakman I., van der Zand A. Peroxisome formation and maintenance are dependent on the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013, 82:723-744.
57. Hettema E.H., Erdmann R., van der Klei I., Veenhuis M. Evolving models for peroxisome biogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2014, 29:25-30.
58. Knoops K., Manivannan S., Cepinska M.N., Krikken A.M., Kram A.M., Veenhuis M., van der Klei I.J. Preperoxisomal vesicles can form in the absence of Pex3. J. Cell Biol. 2014, 204:659-668.
59. Veenhuis M., van der Klei I.J. A critical reflection on the principles of peroxisome formation in yeast. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5:110.
60. Reumann S., Voitsekhovskaja O., Lillo C. From signal transduction to autophagy of plant cell organelles: lessons from yeast and mammals and plant-specific features. Protoplasma 2010, 244:233-256.
61. Kim J., Lee H., Lee H.N., Kim S.H., Shin K.D., Chung T. Autophagy-related proteins are required for degradation of peroxisomes in Arabidopsis hypocotyls during seedling growth. Plant Cell 2013, 25:4956-4966.
62. Kim J., Lee H.N., Chung T. Plant cell remodeling by autophagy: switching peroxisomes for green life. Autophagy 2014, 10:702-703.
63. Shibata M., Oikawa K., Yoshimoto K., Goto-Yamada S., Mano S., Yamada K., Kondo M., Hayashi M., Sakamoto W., Ohsumi Y., Nishimura M. Plant autophagy is responsible for peroxisomal transition and plays an important role in the maintenance of peroxisomal quality. Autophagy 2014, 10:936-937.
64. Shibata M., Oikawa K., Yoshimoto K., Kondo M., Mano S., Yamada K., Hayashi M., Sakamoto W., Ohsumi Y., Nishimura M. Highly oxidized peroxisomes are selectively degraded via autophagy in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25:4967-4983.
65. Yoshimoto K., Shibata M., Kondo M., Oikawa K., Sato M., Toyooka K., Shirasu K., Nishimura M., Ohsumi Y. Quality control of plant peroxisomes in organ specific manner via autophagy. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127:1161-1168.
66. Yoshimoto K., Shibata M., Kondo M., Oikawa K., Sato M., Toyooka K., Shirasu K., Nishimura M., Ohsumi Y. Organ-specific quality control of plant peroxisomes is mediated by autophagy. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127:1161-1168.
67. Voitsekhovskaja O.V., Schiermeyer A., Reumann S. Plant peroxisomes are degraded by starvation-induced and constitutive autophagy in tobacco BY-2 suspension-cultured cells. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5:629.
68. Lingard M.J., Monroe-Augustus M., Bartel B. Peroxisome-associated matrix protein degradation in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:4561-4566.
69. Gabaldon T., Snel B., van Zimmeren F., Hemrika W., Tabak H., Huynen M.A. Origin and evolution of the peroxisomal proteome. Biol. Direct 2006, 1:8.
70. Schluter A., Fourcade S., Ripp R., Mandel J.L., Poch O., Pujol A. The evolutionary origin of peroxisomes: an ER-peroxisome connection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:838-845.
71. Gabaldon T., Capella-Gutierrez S. Lack of phylogenetic support for a supposed actinobacterial origin of peroxisomes. Gene 2010, 465:61-65.
72. Gabaldon T. Evolutionary considerations on the origin of peroxisomes from the endoplasmic reticulum, and their relationships with mitochondria. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71:2379-2382.
73. Gabaldon T. A metabolic scenario for the evolutionary origin of peroxisomes from the endomembranous system. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71:2373-2376.
74. Gabaldon T., Pittis A.A. Origin and evolution of metabolic sub-cellular compartmentalization in eukaryotes. Biochimie 2015.
75. Hayashi M., Yagi M., Nito K., Kamada T., Nishimura M. Differential contribution of two peroxisomal protein receptors to the maintenance of peroxisomal functions in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:14829-14835.
76. Kragler F., Lametschwandtner G., Christmann J., Hartig A., Harada J.J. Identification and analysis of the plant peroxisomal targeting signal 1 receptor NtPEX5. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95:13336-13341.
77. Wimmer C., Schmid M., Veenhuis M., Gietl C. The plant PTS1 receptor: similarities and differences to its human and yeast counterparts. Plant J. 1998, 16:453-464.
78. Rayapuram N., Subramani S. The importomer-a peroxisomal membrane complex involved in protein translocation into the peroxisome matrix. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1763:1613-1619.
79. Hayashi M., Nito K., Toriyama-Kato K., Kondo M., Yamaya T., Nishimura M. AtPex14p maintains peroxisomal functions by determining protein targeting to three kinds of plant peroxisomes. Embo J. 2000, 19:5701-5710.
80. Neufeld C., Filipp F.V., Simon B., Neuhaus A., Schuller N., David C., Kooshapur H., Madl T., Erdmann R., Schliebs W., Wilmanns M., Sattler M. Structural basis for competitive interactions of Pex14 with the import receptors Pex5 and Pex19. EMBO J. 2009, 28:745-754.
81. Erdmann R., Schliebs W. Peroxisomal matrix protein import: the transient pore model. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6:738-742.
82. Kerssen D., Hambruch E., Klaas W., Platta H.W., de Kruijff B., Erdmann R., Kunau W.H., Schliebs W. Membrane association of the cycling peroxisome import receptor Pex5p. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:27003-27015.
83. Meinecke M., Cizmowski C., Schliebs W., Kruger V., Beck S., Wagner R., Erdmann R. The peroxisomal importomer constitutes a large and highly dynamic pore. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:273-277.
84. Ma C., Hagstrom D., Polley S.G., Subramani S. Redox-regulated cargo binding and release by the peroxisomal targeting signal receptor, Pex5. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:27220-27231.
85. Apanasets O., Grou C.P., Van Veldhoven P.P., Brees C., Wang B., Nordgren M., Dodt G., Azevedo J.E., Fransen M. PEX5, the shuttling import receptor for peroxisomal matrix proteins, is a redox-sensitive protein. Traffic 2014, 15:94-103.
86. Schumann U., Prestele J., O'Geen H., Brueggeman R., Wanner G., Gietl C. Requirement of the C3HC4 zinc RING finger of the Arabidopsis PEX10 for photorespiration and leaf peroxisome contact with chloroplasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:1069-1074.
87. Schumann U., Wanner G., Veenhuis M., Schmid M., Gietl C. AthPEX10, a nuclear gene essential for peroxisome and storage organelle formation during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:9626-9631.
88. Sparkes I.A., Brandizzi F., Slocombe S.P., El-Shami M., Hawes C., Baker A. An Arabidopsis pex10 null mutant is embryo lethal, implicating peroxisomes in an essential role during plant embryogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133:1809-1819.
89. Sparkes I.A., Hawes C., Baker A. AtPEX2 and AtPEX10 are targeted to peroxisomes independently of known endoplasmic reticulum trafficking routes. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139:690-700.
90. Zolman B.K., Monroe-Augustus M., Silva I.D., Bartel B. Identification and functional characterization of Arabidopsis PEROXIN4 and the interacting protein PEROXIN22. Plant Cell 2005, 17:3422-3435.
91. Zolman B.K., Bartel B. An Arabidopsis indole-3-butyric acid-response mutant defective in PEROXIN6, an apparent ATPase implicated in peroxisomal function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101:1786-1791.
92. Goto S., Mano S., Nakamori C., Nishimura M. Arabidopsis aberrant peroxisome morphology9 is a peroxin that recruits the PEX1-PEX6 complex to peroxisomes. Plant Cell 2011, 23:1573-1587.
93. Ciniawsky S., Grimm I., Saffian D., Girzalsky W., Erdmann R., Wendler P. Molecular snapshots of the Pex1/6 AAA+ complex in action. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6:7331.
94. Blok N.B., Tan D., Wang R.Y., Penczek P.A., Baker D., DiMaio F., Rapoport T.A., Walz T. Unique double-ring structure of the peroxisomal Pex1/Pex6 ATPase complex revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112:E4017-E4025.
95. Dodt G., Warren D., Becker E., Rehling P., Gould S.J. Domain mapping of human PEX5 reveals functional and structural similarities to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pex18p and Pex21p. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:41769-41781.
96. Lee J.R., Jang H.H., Park J.H., Jung J.H., Lee S.S., Park S.K., Chi Y.H., Moon J.C., Lee Y.M., Kim S.Y., Kim J.Y., Yun D.J., Cho M.J., Lee K.O., Lee S.Y. Cloning of two splice variants of the rice PTS1 receptor, OsPex5pL and OsPex5pS, and their functional characterization using pex5-deficient yeast and Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2006, 47:457-466.
97. Gatto G.J., Geisbrecht B.V., Gould S.J., Berg J.M. Peroxisomal targeting signal-1 recognition by the TPR domains of human PEX5. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7:1091-1095.
98. Stanley W.A., Filipp F.V., Kursula P., Schuller N., Erdmann R., Schliebs W., Sattler M., Wilmanns M. Recognition of a functional peroxisome type 1 target by the dynamic import receptor pex5p. Mol. Cell 2006, 24:653-663.
99. Fodor K., Wolf J., Reglinski K., Passon D.M., Lou Y., Schliebs W., Erdmann R., Wilmanns M. Ligand-induced compaction of the PEX5 receptor-binding cavity impacts protein import efficiency into peroxisomes. Traffic 2015, 16:85-98.
100. Scheufler C., Brinker A., Bourenkov G., Pegoraro S., Moroder L., Bartunik H., Hartl F.U., Moarefi I. Structure of TPR domain-peptide complexes: critical elements in the assembly of the Hsp70-Hsp90 multichaperone machine. Cell 2000, 101:199-210.
101. Das A.K., Cohen P.W., Barford D. The structure of the tetratricopeptide repeats of protein phosphatase 5: implications for TPR-mediated protein-protein interactions. EMBO J 1998, 17:1192-1199.
102. D'Andrea L.D., Regan L. TPR proteins: the versatile helix. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003, 28:655-662.
103. Zeytuni N., Zarivach R. Structural and functional discussion of the tetra-trico-peptide repeat, a protein interaction module. Structure 2012, 20:397-405.
104. Sampathkumar P., Roach C., Michels P.A., Hol W.G. Structural insights into the recognition of peroxisomal targeting signal 1 by Trypanosoma brucei peroxin 5. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 381:867-880.
105. Ghosh D., Berg J.M. A proteome-wide perspective on peroxisome targeting signal 1(PTS1)-Pex5p affinities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132:3973-3979.
106. Fodor K., Wolf J., Erdmann R., Schliebs W., Wilmanns M. Molecular requirements for peroxisomal targeting of alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase as an essential determinant in primary hyperoxaluria type 1. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10.
107. Zeytuni N., Ozyamak E., Ben-Harush K., Davidov G., Levin M., Gat Y., Moyal T., Brik A., Komeili A., Zarivach R. Self-recognition mechanism of MamA, a magnetosome-associated TPR-containing protein, promotes complex assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:E480-E487.
108. Mullen R.T., Lee M.S., Flynn C.R., Trelease R.N. Diverse amino acid residues function within the type 1 peroxisomal targeting signal. Implications for the role of accessory residues upstream of the type 1 peroxisomal targeting signal. Plant Physiol. 1997, 115:881-889.
109. Hayashi M., Aoki M., Kondo M., Nishimura M. Changes in targeting efficiencies of proteins to plant microbodies caused by amino acid substitutions in the carboxy-terminal tripeptide. Plant Cell Physiol. 1997, 38:759-768.
110. Neuberger G., Maurer-Stroh S., Eisenhaber B., Hartig A., Eisenhaber F. Prediction of peroxisomal targeting signal 1 containing proteins from amino acid sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 328:581-592.
111. Maynard E.L., Gatto G.J., Berg J.M. Pex5p binding affinities for canonical and noncanonical PTS1 peptides. Proteins 2004, 55:856-861.
112. Skoulding N.S., Chowdhary G., Deus M.J., Baker A., Reumann S., Warriner S.L. Experimental validation of plant peroxisomal targeting prediction algorithms by systematic comparison of in vivo import efficiency and in vitro PTS1 binding affinity. J. Mol. Biol. 2015, 427:1085-1101.
113. The Arabidopsis genome initiative, Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408:796-815.
114. Fukao Y., Hayashi M., Nishimura M. Proteomic analysis of leaf peroxisomal proteins in greening cotyledons of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43:689-696.
115. Reumann S., Quan S., Aung K., Yang P., Manandhar-Shrestha K., Holbrook D., Linka N., Switzenberg R., Wilkerson C.G., Weber A.P., Olsen L.J., Hu J. In-depth proteome analysis of Arabidopsis leaf peroxisomes combined with in vivo subcellular targeting verification indicates novel metabolic and regulatory functions of peroxisomes. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150:125-143.
116. Reumann S., Singhal R. Isolation of leaf peroxisomes from Arabidopsis for organelle proteome analyses. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1072:541-552.
117. Fukao Y., Hayashi M., Hara-Nishimura I., Nishimura M. Novel glyoxysomal protein kinase, GPK1, identified by proteomic analysis of glyoxysomes in etiolated cotyledons of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44:1002-1012.
118. Eubel H., Meyer E.H., Taylor N.L., Bussell J.D., O'Toole N., Heazlewood J.L., Castleden I., Small I.D., Smith S.M., Millar A.H. Novel proteins, putative membrane transporters, and an integrated metabolic network are revealed by quantitative proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis cell culture peroxisomes. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148:1809-1829.
119. Arai Y., Hayashi M., Nishimura M. Proteomic identification and characterization of a novel peroxisomal adenine nucleotide transporter supplying ATP for fatty acid beta-oxidation in soybean and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2008, 20:3227-3240.
120. Arai Y., Hayashi M., Nishimura M. Proteomic analysis of highly purified peroxisomes from etiolated soybean cotyledons. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49:526-539.
121. Kataya A.R., Reumann S. Arabidopsis glutathione reductase 1 is dually targeted to peroxisomes and the cytosol. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5:171-175.
122. Li J.F., Park E., von Arnim A.G., Nebenfuhr A. The FAST technique: a simplified agrobacterium-based transformation method for transient gene expression analysis in seedlings of Arabidopsis and other plant species. Plant Methods 2009, 5:6.
123. Nelson B.K., Cai X., Nebenfuhr A. A multicolored set of in vivo organelle markers for co-localization studies in Arabidopsis and other plants. Plant J 2007, 51:1126-1136.
124. Gatto G.J., Maynard E.L., Guerrerio A.L., Geisbrecht B.V., Gould S.J., Berg J.M. Correlating structure and affinity for PEX5:PTS1 complexes. Biochemistry 2003, 42:1660-1666.
125. Maynard E.L., Berg J.M. Quantitative analysis of peroxisomal targeting signal type-1 binding to wild-type and pathogenic mutants of Pex5p supports an affinity threshold for peroxisomal protein targeting. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 368:1259-1266.
126. Leon S., Goodman J.M., Subramani S. Uniqueness of the mechanism of protein import into the peroxisome matrix: transport of folded, co-factor-bound and oligomeric proteins by shuttling receptors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1763:1552-1564.
127. Smith J.J., Aitchison J.D. Peroxisomes take shape. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14:803-817.
128. Walton P.A., Gould S.J., Rachubinski R.A., Subramani S., Feramisco J.R. Transport of microinjected alcohol oxidase from Pichia pastoris into vesicles in mammalian cells: involvement of the peroxisomal targeting signal. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 118:499-508.
129. Glover J.R., Andrews D.W., Rachubinski R.A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae peroxisomal thiolase is imported as a dimer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91:10541-10545.
130. McNew J.A., Goodman J.M. An oligomeric protein is imported into peroxisomes in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 127:1245-1257.
131. Kato A., Hayashi M., Nishimura M. Oligomeric proteins containing N-terminal targeting signals are imported into peroxisomes in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 1999, 40:586-591.
132. Crookes W.J., Olsen L.J. The effects of chaperones and the influence of protein assembly on peroxisomal protein import. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:17236-17242.
133. Faber K.N., van Dijk R., Keizer-Gunnink I., Koek A., van der Klei I.J., Veenhuis M. Import of assembled PTS1 proteins into peroxisomes of the yeast Hansenula polymorpha: yes and no!. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1591:157-162.
134. Tanaka N., Aoki K., Ishikura S., Nagano M., Imamura Y., Hara A., Nakamura K.T. Molecular basis for peroxisomal localization of tetrameric carbonyl reductase. Structure 2008, 16:388-397.
135. Luo B., Norris C., Bolstad E.S., Knecht D.A., Grant D.F. Protein quaternary structure and expression levels contribute to peroxisomal-targeting-sequence-1-mediated peroxisomal import of human soluble epoxide hydrolase. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 380:31-41.
136. Freitas M.O., Francisco T., Rodrigues T.A., Alencastre I.S., Pinto M.P., Grou C.P., Carvalho A.F., Fransen M., Sa-Miranda C., Azevedo J.E. PEX5 protein binds monomeric catalase blocking its tetramerization and releases it upon binding the N-terminal domain of PEX14. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:40509-40519.
137. Freitas M.O., Francisco T., Rodrigues T.A., Lismont C., Domingues P., Pinto M.P., Grou C.P., Fransen M., Azevedo J.E. The peroxisomal protein import machinery displays a preference for monomeric substrates. Open Biol. 2015, 5:140236.
138. Purdue P.E., Lazarow P.B. Targeting of human catalase to peroxisomes is dependent upon a novel COOH-terminal peroxisomal targeting sequence. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 134:849-862.
139. Kamigaki A., Mano S., Terauchi K., Nishi Y., Tachibe-Kinoshita Y., Nito K., Kondo M., Hayashi M., Nishimura M., Esaka M. Identification of peroxisomal targeting signal of pumpkin catalase and the binding analysis with PTS1 receptor. Plant J. 2003, 33:161-175.
140. Oshima Y., Kamigaki A., Nakamori C., Mano S., Hayashi M., Nishimura M., Esaka M. Plant catalase is imported into peroxisomes by Pex5p but is distinct from typical PTS1 import. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49:671-677.
141. Williams C., Bener Aksam E., Gunkel K., Veenhuis M., van der Klei I.J. The relevance of the non-canonical PTS1 of peroxisomal catalase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1823:1133-1141.
142. Otera H., Fujiki Y. Pex5p imports folded tetrameric catalase by interaction with Pex13p. Traffic 2012, 13:1364-1377.
143. Yang X., Purdue P.E., Lazarow P.B. Eci1p uses a PTS1 to enter peroxisomes: either its own or that of a partner, Dci1p. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 80:126-138.
144. Islinger M., Li K.W., Seitz J., Volkl A., Luers G.H. Hitchhiking of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase to peroxisomes-evidence for a natural piggyback import mechanism in mammals. Traffic 2009, 10:1711-1721.
145. Nakai K., Kanehisa M. A knowledge base for predicting protein localization sites in eukaryotic cells. Genomics 1992, 14:897-911.
146. Horton P., Park K.J., Obayashi T., Fujita N., Harada H., Adams-Collier C.J., Nakai K. WoLF PSORT: protein localization predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35:W585-W587.
147. Emanuelsson O., Elofsson A., von Heijne G., Cristobal S. In silico prediction of the peroxisomal proteome in fungi, plants and animals. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 330:443-456.
148. Hawkins J., Mahony D., Maetschke S., Wakabayashi M., Teasdale R.D., Boden M. Identifying novel peroxisomal proteins. Proteins 2007, 69:606-616.
149. Boden M., Hawkins J. Prediction of subcellular localization using sequence-biased recurrent networks. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:2279-2286.
150. Reumann S., Buchwald D., Lingner T. PredPlantPTS1: a web server for the prediction of plant peroxisomal proteins. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3:194.
151. Freitag J., Ast J., Bolker M. Cryptic peroxisomal targeting via alternative splicing and stop codon read-through in fungi. Nature 2012, 485:522-525.
152. Ast J., Stiebler A.C., Freitag J., Bolker M. Dual targeting of peroxisomal proteins. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4:297.
153. Schueren F., Lingner T., George R., Hofhuis J., Dickel C., Gartner J., Thoms S. Peroxisomal lactate dehydrogenase is generated by translational readthrough in mammals. eLife 2014, 3.
154. Sorhagen K., Laxa M., Peterhansel C., Reumann S. The emerging role of photorespiration and non-photorespiratory peroxisomal metabolism in pathogen defence. Plant Biol. (Stuttg.) 2013, 15:723-736.
155. Xu L., Law S.R., Murcha M.W., Whelan J., Carrie C. The dual targeting ability of type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenases arose early in land plant evolution. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13:100.
156. Motley A.M., Hettema E.H., Ketting R., Plasterk R., Tabak H.F. Caenorhabditis elegans has a single pathway to target matrix proteins to peroxisomes. EMBO Rep. 2000, 1:40-46.
157. Gonzalez N.H., Felsner G., Schramm F.D., Klingl A., Maier U.G., Bolte K. A single peroxisomal targeting signal mediates matrix protein import in diatoms. PLoS One 2011, 6.
158. Faust J.E., Verma A., Peng C., McNew J.A. An inventory of peroxisomal proteins and pathways in Drosophila melanogaster. Traffic 2012, 13:1378-1392.
159. Shinozaki A., Sato N., Hayashi Y. Peroxisomal targeting signals in green algae. Protoplasma 2009, 235:57-66.
160. Adoutte A., Balavoine G., Lartillot N., Lespinet O., Prud'homme B., de Rosa R. The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97:4453-4456.
161. Sommer M.S., Daum B., Gross L.E., Weis B.L., Mirus O., Abram L., Maier U.G., Kuhlbrandt W., Schleiff E. Chloroplast Omp85 proteins change orientation during evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:13841-13846.
162. Schleiff E., Becker T. Common ground for protein translocation: access control for mitochondria and chloroplasts. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:48-59.
163. Shi L.X., Theg S.M. The chloroplast protein import system: from algae to trees. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1833:314-331.
164. Ulrich T., Rapaport D. Biogenesis of beta-barrel proteins in evolutionary context. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 305:259-264.
165. Kunze M., Berger J. The similarity between N-terminal targeting signals for protein import into different organelles and its evolutionary relevance. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6:259.
166. Mani J., Meisinger C., Schneider A. Peeping at TOMs-diverse entry gates to mitochondria provide insights into the evolution of eukaryotes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015.
167. Kunze M., Malkani N., Maurer-Stroh S., Wiesinger C., Schmid J.A., Berger J. Mechanistic insights into PTS2-mediated peroxisomal protein import: the co-receptor PEX5L drastically increases the interaction strength between the cargo protein and the receptor PEX7. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290:4928-4940.
168. Bolte K., Rensing S.A., Maier U.G. The evolution of eukaryotic cells from the perspective of peroxisomes: phylogenetic analyses of peroxisomal beta-oxidation enzymes support mitochondria-first models of eukaryotic cell evolution. BioEssays 2015, 37:195-203.
169. Schliebs W., Kunau W.H. PTS2 co-receptors: diverse proteins with common features. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1763:1605-1612.
170. Lanyon-Hogg T., Warriner S.L., Baker A. Getting a camel through the eye of a needle: the import of folded proteins by peroxisomes. Biol. Cell. 2010, 102:245-263.
171. Quan S., Switzenberg R., Reumann S., Hu J. In vivo subcellular targeting analysis validates a novel peroxisome targeting signal type 2 and the peroxisomal localization of two proteins with putative functions in defense in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5:151-153.
172. Goyer A., Johnson T.L., Olsen L.J., Collakova E., Shachar-Hill Y., Rhodes D., Hanson A.D. Characterization and metabolic function of a peroxisomal sarcosine and pipecolate oxidase from Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:16947-16953.