Motif refinement of the peroxisomal targeting signal 1 and evaluation of taxon-specific differences

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 328, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 567-579

  Neuberger, Georg ^a   Maurer Stroh, Sebastian ^a   Eisenhaber, Birgit ^a   Hartig, Andreas ^b   Eisenhaber, Frank ^a  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY   (Austria)

^b Vienna Biocenter   (Austria)

Author keywords

Peroxisome; Protein sequence motif; PTS1; Subcellular localization

Indexed keywords

MATRIX PROTEIN; RECEPTOR PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL ORGANELLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYBRIDIZATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; NONHUMAN; PEROXISOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; PROTEIN VARIANT; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TAXON; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION;

EUKARYOTA; FUNGI; METAZOA;

EID: 0037414447     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00318-8     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Holroyd C., Erdman R. Protein translocation machineries of peroxisomes. FEBS Letters. 501:2001;6-10.
2. Van Den Bosch H., Schutgens R.B.H., Wanders R.J.A., Tager J.M. Biochemistry of peroxisomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61:1992;157-197.
3. Gould S.G., Keller G.A., Subramani S. Identification of a peroxisomal targeting signal at the carboxy terminus of firefly luciferase. J. Cell Biol. 105:1987;2923-2931.
4. Osumi T., Tsukamoto T., Hata S., Yokota S., Miura S., Fujiki Y., et al. Amino-terminal presequence of the precursor of peroxisomal 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase is a cleavable signal peptide for peroxisomal targeting. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 181:1991;947-954.
5. Swinkels B.W., Gould S.J., Bodnar A.G., Rachubinski R.A., Subramani S. A novel, cleavable peroxisomal targeting signal at the amino-terminus of the rat 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase. EMBO J. 10:1991;3255-3262.
6. Kragler F., Langeder A., Raupachova J., Binder M., Hartig A. Two independent targeting signals in catalase A of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 120:1993;665-673.
7. Elgersma Y., Van Roermund C.W., Wanders R.J., Tabak H.F. Peroxisomal and mitochondrial carnitine acetyltransferases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are encoded by a single gene. EMBO J. 14:1995;3472-3479.
8. Klein A.T., Van Den Berg M., Bottger G., Tabak H.F., Distel B. Saccharomyces cerevisiae acyl-CoA oxidase follows a novel, non-PTS1, import pathway into peroxisomes that is dependent on Pex5p. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;25011-25019.
9. Brocard C., Kragler F., Simon M.M., Schuster T., Hartig A. The tetratricopeptide repeat-domain of the PAS10 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is essential for binding the peroxisomal targeting signal-SKL. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 204:1994;1016-1022.
10. Fransen M., Brees C., Baumgart E., Vanhooren C.T., Myriam B., Mannaerts G.P., Van Valdhoven P.P. Identification and characterization of the putative human peroxisomal C-terminal targeting signal import receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 270:1995;7731-7736.
11. Rehling P., Marzioch M., Niesen F., Wittke E., Veenhuis M., Kunau W.H. The import receptor for the peroxisomal targeting signal 2 (PTS2) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is encoded by the PAS7 gene. EMBO J. 15:1996;2901-2913.
12. Purdue P., Zhang J.W., Skoneczny M., Lazarow P.B. Rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata is caused by deficiency of human PEX7, a homologue of the yeast PTS2 receptor. Nature Genet. 15:1997;381-384.
13. Braverman N., Steel G., Obie C., Moser A., Moser H., Gould S.J., Valle D. Human PEX7 encodes the peroxisomal PTS2 receptor and is responsible for rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata. Nature Genet. 15:1997;369-376.
14. Tsukamoto T., Hata S., Yokota S., Miura S., Fujiki Y., Hijikata M., et al. Characterization of the signal peptide at the amino terminus of the rat peroxisomal 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase precursor. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994;6001-6010.
15. Glover J.R., Andrews D.W., Subramani S., Rachubinski R.A. Mutagenesis of the amino targeting signal of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase reveals conserved amino acids required for import into peroxisomes in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994;7558-7563.
16. Gould S.J., Keller G.A., Hosken N., Wilkinson J., Subramani S. A conserved tripeptide sorts proteins to peroxisomes. J. Cell Biol. 108:1989;1657-1664.
17. Gatto G.J., Geisbrecht B.V., Gould S.J., Berg J. Peroxisomal targeting signal-l recognition by the TPR domains of human PEX5. Nature Struct. Biol. 7:2000;1091-1095.
18. Lametschwandtner G., Brocard C., Fransen M., Van Veldhoven P., Berger J., Hartig A. The difference in recognition of terminal tripeptides as peroxisomal targeting signal 1 between yeast and human is due to different affinities of their receptor Pex5p to the cognate signal and to residues adjacent to it. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1998;33635-33643.
19. Boeckmann B., Bairoch A., Apweiler R., Blatter M., Estreicher A., Gasteiger E., et al. The Swiss-prot protein knowledgebase and its supplement trembl in 2003. Nucl. Acids Res. 31:2003;365-370.
20. Sunyaev S.R., Eisenhaber F., Rodchenkov I.V., Eisenhaber B., Tumanyan V.G., Kuznetsov E.N. PSIC: profile extraction from sequence alignments with position-specific counts of independent observations. Protein Eng. 12:1999;387-394.
21. Hobohm U., Scharf M., Schneider R., Sander C. Selection of representative protein data sets. Protein Sci. 1:1992;409-417.
22. Heringa J., Sommerfeldt H., Higgins D., Argos P. OBSTRUCT: a program to obtain largest cliques from a protein sequence set according to structural resolution and sequence similarity. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:1992;599-600.
23. Eisenhaber B., Bork P., Eisenhaber F. Sequence properties of GPI-anchored proteins near the omega-site: constraints for the polypeptide binding site of the putative transamidase. Protein Eng. 11:1998;1155-1161.
24. Tomii K., Kanehisa M. Analysis of amino acid indices and mutation matrices for sequence comparison and structure prediction of proteins. Protein Eng. 9:1996;27-36.
25. Nakashima H., Nishikawa K. The amino acid composition is different between the cytoplasmic and extracellular sides in membrane proteins. FEBS Letters. 303:1992;141-146.
26. Isogai Y., Nemethy G., Rackovsky S., Leach S.J., Scheraga H.A. Characterization of multiple bends in proteins. Biopolymers. 19:1980;1183-1210.
27. Maurer-Stroh S., Eisenhaber B., Eisenhaber F. N-terminal N-myristoylation of proteins: refinement of the sequence motif and its taxon-specific differences. J. Mol. Biol. 317:2002;523-540.
28. Peitsch M.C. Protein modeling by e-mail. Biotechnology. 13:1995;658-660.
29. Guex N., Peitsch M.C. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modelling. Electrophoresis. 18:1997;2714-2723.
30. Guex N., Diemand A., Peitsch M.C. Protein modelling for all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:1999;364-367.
31. Sweet R.M., Eisenberg D. Correlation of sequence hydrophobicities measures similarity in three-dimensional protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 171:1983;479-488.
32. Eisenberg D., McLachlan A. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 319:1986;199-203.
33. Levitt M. Conformational preferences of amino acids in globular proteins. Biochemistry. 17:1978;4277-4285.
34. Palau J., Argos P., Puigdomenech P. Protein secondary structure. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 19:1982;394-401.
35. Burgess A.W., Ponnuswamy P.K., Scheraga H.A. Analysis of conformations of amino acid residues and prediction of backbone topography in proteins. Isr. J. Chem. 12:1974;239-286.
36. Frishman D., Argos P. Incorporation of non-local interactions in protein secondary structure prediction from the amino acid sequence. Protein Eng. 9:1996;133-142.
37. Frishman D., Argos P. Seventy-five percent accuracy in protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins. 27:1997;329-335.
38. Wootton J.C., Federhen S. Statistics of local complexity in amino acid sequences and sequence databases. Comput. Chem. 17:1993;149-163.
39. Nielsen H., Brunak S., Von Heijne G. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. Protein Eng. 12:1999;3-9.
40. Ashmarina L.I., Rusnak N., Miziorko H.M., Mitchell G.A. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA lyase is present in mouse and human liver peroxisomes. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994;31929-31932.
41. +-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1999;30527-30533.
42. Yoshihara T., Hamamoto T., Munakata R., Tajiri R., Ohsumi M., Yokota S. Localization of cytosolic NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase in the peroxisomes of rat liver cells: biochemical and immunocytochemical studies. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 49:2001;1123-1131.
43. Yang M., Wu Z., Fields S. Protein-peptide interactions analyzed with the yeast two-hybrid system. Nucl. Acids Res. 23:1995;1152-1156.
44. Eisenhaber B., Bork P., Eisenhaber F. Prediction of potential GPI-modification sites in proprotein sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 292:1999;741-758.
45. Maurer-Stroh S., Eisenhaber B., Eisenhaber F. N-terminal N-myristoylation of proteins: prediction of substrate proteins from amino acid sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 317:2002;541-557.
46. Kendall M., Stuart A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. 1977;Griffen, London.
47. Schneider T.D., Stephens R.M. Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucl. Acids Res. 18:1990;6097-6100.
48. Rackovsky S., Scheraga H.A. Hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, and the radial and orientational distributions of residues in native proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 74:1977;5248-5251.
49. Nakashima H., Nishikawa K., Ooi T. Distinct character in hydrophobicity of amino acid composition in mitochondrial proteins. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 8:1990;173-178.
50. Zvelebil M., Barton G., Taylor W., Sternberg M. Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 195:1987;957-961.
51. Karplus P., Schulz G. Prediction of chain flexibility in proteins. Naturwiss. 72:1985;212-213.
52. Levitt M. A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 104:1976;59-107.
53. Argos P., Rao J.K., Hargrave P.A. Structural prediction of membrane-bound proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 128:1982;565-575.
54. Zimmerman J.M., Eliezer N., Simha R. The characterization of amino acid sequences in proteins by statistical methods. J. Theoret. Biol. 21:1968;170-201.
55. Fauchere J.L., Charton M., Kier L.B., Verloop A., Pliska V. Amino acid side chain parameters for correlation studies in biology and pharmacology. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 32:1988;269-278.
56. Eisenberg D. Three-dimensional structure of membrane and surface proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 53:1984;595-623.
57. Grantham R. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science. 185:1974;862-864.
58. Vihinen M., Torkkila E., Riikonen P. Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 19:1994;141-149.
59. Cid H., Bunster M., Canales M., Gazitua F. Hydrophobicity and structural classes in proteins. Protein Eng. 5:1992;373-375.
60. Ponnuswamy P.K., Prabhakaran M., Manavalan P. Hydrophobic packing and spatial arrangement of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 623:1980;301-316.
61. Biou V., Gibrat J.F., Levin J.M., Robson B., Garnier J. Secondary structure prediction: combination of three different methods. Protein Eng. 2:1988;185-191.
62. Tanaka S., Scherenga H.A. Statistical mechanical treatment of protein conformation 5. A multistate model for specific-sequence copolymers of amino acids. Macromolecules. 10:1977;9-20.
63. Bhaskaran R., Ponnuswamy P.K. Positional flexibilities of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 32:1988;241-255.
64. Cohn E.J., Edsall J.T. Proteins, Amino Acids and Peptides as Ions and Dipolar Ions. 1943;Reinhold, New York.