Participation in the making: Rethinking public engagement in co-productionist terms

Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 31-63

  Chilvers, Jason ^a   Kearnes, Matthew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960274839     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203797693     Document Type: Chapter

References (136)

1. Akrich, M. 1994. The de-scription of technical objects. In: W. E. Bijker and J. Law (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp205-224.
2. Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3. Arthur, W. B. 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock—in by historicalevents, Economic Journal 99(394): 116-131.
4. Balough, B. 1991. Chain Reaction -Expert Debate and Public Participation in American Commercial Nuclear Power, 1945-1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Barry, A. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London: Athlone Press.
6. Barry, A. 2006. Technological zones, European Journal of Social Theory 9(2): 239-253.
7. Barry, A. 2012. Political situations: Knowledge controversies in transnational governance, Critical Policy Studies 6(3): 324-336.
8. Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9. Boltanski, L. and Thevenot, L. 2006. On Justification. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Bogner, A. 2012. The paradox of participation experiments, Science Technology & Human Values 37(5): 506-527.
11. Braun, B. and Whatmore, S., eds. 2010. Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy and Public Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Braun, K. and Schultz, S. 2010. ‘… a certain amount of engineering involved’: Constructing the public in participatory governance arrangements, Public Understanding of Science 19(4): 403-419.
13. Brown, M. 2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Callon, M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: J. Law (ed.) Power, Action, Belief. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp196-223.
15. Callon, M., ed. 1998. The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Callon, M. 2007. What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In: D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa and L. Siu (eds) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Peformativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp311-357.
17. Callon, M. and Rabeharisoa, V. 2004. Gino’s lesson on humanity: Genetics, mutual entanglements and the sociologist’s role, Economy and Society 33(1): 1-27.
18. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Chambers, R. 1994. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience, World Development 22(9): 1253-1263.
20. Chilvers, J. 2008a. Deliberating competence: Theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice, Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 155-185.
21. Chilvers, J. 2008b. Environmental risk, uncertainty and participation: Mapping an emergent epistemic community, Environment and Planning A 40(12): 2990-3008.
22. Chilvers, J. 2010. Sustainable Participation? Mapping out and Reflecting on the Field of Public Dialogue on Science and Technology. Harwell: Sciencewise Expert Resource Centre.
23. Chilvers, J. 2012. Expertise, Technologies and Ecologies of Participation. 3S Working Paper 201217. Norwich: Science, Society and Sustainability Research Group, University of East Anglia.
24. Chilvers, J. 2013. Reflexive engagement? Actors, learning and reflexivity in public dialogue on science and technology, Science Communication 35(2): 283-310.
25. Chilvers, J. and Burgess, J. 2008. Power relations: The politics of risk and procedure in nuclear waste governance, Environment and Planning A 40(8): 1881-1900.
26. Chilvers, J. and Evans, J. 2009. Understanding networks at the science-policy interface, Geoforum 40(3): 355-362.
27. Chilvers, J. and Longhurst, N. 2012. Participation, Politics and Actor Dynamics in Low Carbon Energy Transitions. Norwich: Science, Society and Sustainability Research Group, University of East Anglia.
28. Chilvers, J. and Longhurst, N. 2015 (forthcoming). Participation in transition(s): Reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning.
29. Collins, H. 1975. The seven sexes: A study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of experiments in physics, Sociology 9: 205-224.
30. Crosby, N., Kelly, J. M. and Schaefer, P. 1986. Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation, Public Administration Review 46: 170-178.
31. de Vries, G. 2007. What is political in sub-politics? How Aristotle might help STS, Social Studies of Science 37(5): 781-809.
32. Dewey, J. 1927. The Public and its Problems. Athens, OH: Shallow Press.
33. Dryzek, J. S. and Tucker, A. 2008. Deliberative innovation to different effect: Consensus conferences in Denmark, France and the United States, Public Administration Review 68(5): 864-876.
34. Durant, D. 2010. Public participation in the making of science policy, Perspectives on Science 18(2): 180-225.
35. Durant, D. 2011. Models of democracy in social studies of science, Social Studies of Science 41(5): 691-714.
36. Edwards, P. N. 2010. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Elam, M., Reynolds, L., Soneryd, L., Sundqvist, G. and Szerszynski, B. 2007. Mediators of Issues and Mediators of Process: A Theoretical Framework. ARGONA FP6 Project Report. Goteborg: Goteborg University.
38. Eliasoph, N. 1998. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Epstein, S. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40. Ezrahi, Y. 1990. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Ezrahi, Y. 2012. Imagined Democracies: Necessary Political Fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Felt, U. 2015. Keeping technologies out: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the formation of Austria’s technopolitical identity. In: S. Jasanoff and K. Sang-Hyung (eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
43. Felt, U. and Fochler, M. 2010. Machineries for making publics: Inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement, Minerva 48(3): 219-238.
44. Felt, U. and Wynne, B. 2007. Science and Governance: Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research. Brussels: European Commission.
45. Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. 1993. Science for the post-normal age, Futures 25(7): 735-755.
46. Geels, F. W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study, Research Policy 31(8): 1257-1274.
47. Goodin, R. E. and Dryzek, J. S. 2006. Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics, Politics & Society 34(2): 219-244.
48. Goven, J. 2006. Processes of inclusion, cultures of calculation, structures of power: Scientific citizenship and the Royal Commission on genetic modification, Science, Technology & Human Values 31(5): 565-598.
49. Habermas, J. 1984. Theory of Communicative Action - Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
50. Hagendijk, R. P. 2004. The public understanding of science and public participation in regulated worlds, Minerva 42(1): 41-59.
51. Hagendijk, R. P. and Irwin, A. 2006. Public deliberation and governance: Engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe, Minerva 44: 167-184.
52. Haraway, D.J. 1997. Modest itness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan Meets OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. London: Routledge.
53. Harvey, M. 2009. Drama, talk and emotion: Omitted aspects of public participation, Science, Technology & Human Values 34(2): 139-161.
54. Hendriks, C. M. 2006. Integrated deliberation: Reconciling civil society’s dual role in deliberative democracy, Political Studies 54(3): 486-508.
55. Hendriks, C. M. 2008. On inclusion and network governance: The democratic disconnect of Dutch energy transitions, Public Administration 86: 1009-1031.
56. Hendriks, C. M. and Carson, L. 2008. Can the market help the forum? Negotiating the commercialisation of deliberative democracy, Policy Sciences 41(4): 293-313.
57. Hinchliffe, S. 2001. Indeterminacy in-decisions - science, policy and politics in the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) crisis, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26(2): 182-204.
58. Horst, M. and Irwin, A. 2010. Nations at ease with radical knowledge: On consensus, consensusing and false consensusness, Social Studies of Science 40(1): 105-126.
59. Irwin, A. 2001. Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences, Public Understanding of Science 10(1): 1-18.
60. Irwin, A. 2006. The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance, Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299-320.
61. Irwin, A. and Michael, M. 2003. Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
62. Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. 1996. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policy Makers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64. Jasanoff, S. 1998. The mad cow crisis: Health and the public good, Public Understanding of Science 7(4): 354-356.
65. Jasanoff, S. 2004. The idiom of co-production. In: S. Jasanoff (ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge, pp1-12.
66. Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67. Jasanoff, S. 2011. Constitutional moments in governing science and technology, Science and Engineering Ethics 17: 621-638.
68. Jasanoff, S. 2012. Science and Public Reason. London: Routledge.
69. Jasanoff, S. and Kim, S.-H. 2009. Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea, Minerva 47: 119-146.
70. Jasanoff, S. and Kim, S.-H. 2013. Sociotechnical imaginaries and national energy policies, Science as Culture 22(2): 189-196.
71. Joly, P. B. and Kaufmann, A. 2008. Lost in translation? The need for upstream engagement with nanotechnology on trial, Science as Culture 17(3): 225-247.
72. Joss, S. and Durant, J., eds. 1995. Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: The Science Museum.
73. Kothari, U. 2005. Authority and expertise: The professionalisation of international development and the ordering of dissent, Antipode 37(3): 425-446.
74. Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75. Latour, B. 1991. Technology is society made durable. In: Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, pp103-161.
76. Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Harlow: Pearson Education.
77. Latour, B. 1998. To modernize or to ecologize? That’s the question. In: N. Castree and B. Braun (eds) Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium. London: Routledge, pp221-242.
78. Latour, B. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79. Latour, B. 2005a. From realpolitik to dingpolitik or how to make things public. In: B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp4-31.
80. Latour, B. 2005b. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to. Oxford:Clarendon.
81. Latour, B. 2009. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil Cambridge: Polity Press.
82. Latour, B. and Weibel, P. 2005. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
84. Laurent, B. 2009. Replicating Participatory Devices: The Consensus Conference Confronts Nanotechnology. CSI Working Paper No. 18, www.csi.ensmp.fr/working-papers/WP/WP_CSI_018.pdf(accessed 28 August 2015).
85. Laurent, B. 2011. Technologies of democracy: Experiments and demonstrations, Science and Engineering Ethics 17(4): 649-666.
86. Law, J. and Ruppert, E., eds. 2013. The Device: The Social Life of Methods. Special issue of The Journal of Cultural Economy 6(3).
87. Law, J. and Urry, J. 2004. Enacting the social, Economy and Society 33(3): 390-410.
88. Lee, C. W. 2015. Do-It-Yourself Democracy: The Rise of the Public Engagement Industry. New York: Oxford University Press.
89. Lezaun, J. 2007. A market of opinions: The political epistemology of focus groups, The Sociological Review 55(S2): 130-151.
90. Lezaun, J. and Soneryd, L. 2007. Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics, Public Understanding of Science 16(3): 279-297.
91. MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L., eds. 2007. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Peformativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
92. Macnaghten, P. and Chilvers, J. 2014. The future of science governance: Publics, policies, practices, Environment & Planning C 32(3): 530-548.
93. Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F. and Warren, M. E. 2012. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In: J. Parkinson and J. Mansbridge (eds) Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp1-26.
94. Marres, N. 2007. The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy, Social Studies of Science 37(5): 759-780.
95. Marres, N. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
96. Marres, N. and Lezaun, J. 2011. Materials and devices of the public: An introduction, Economy and Society 40(4): 489-509.
97. McGee, K. 2014. Bruno Latour: The Normativity of Networks. London: Routledge.
98. Meyer, M. 2010. The rise of the knowledge broker, Science Communication 32(1): 118-127.
99. Meyer, M. 2013. Debating synthetic biology: A necessity or a masquerade? www.csi.mines- paristech.fr/blog/en/?p=36 (accessed 16 December 2014).
100. Meyer, M. and Kearnes, M. 2013. Intermediaries between science, policy and the market, Science and Public Policy 40: 423-429.
101. Michael, M. 2009. Publics performing publics: Of PiGs, PiPs and politics, Public Understanding of Science 18: 617-631.
102. Miller, C., Iles, A. and Jones, C. 2013. The social dimensions of energy transitions, Science as Culture 22(2): 135-148.
103. Moore, A. 2012. Following from the front: Theorizing deliberative facilitation, Critical Policy Studies 6(2): 146-162.
104. Muniesa, F. 2014. The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. London: Routledge.
105. Murdoch, J. 1998. The spaces of actor-network theory, Geoforum 29: 357-374.
106. Osborne, T. 2004. On mediators: Intellectuals and the ideas trade in the knowledge society, Economy and Society 33(4): 430-447.
107. Osborne, T. and Rose, N. 1999. Do the social sciences create phenomena? The example of public opinion research, British Journal of Sociology 50(3): 367-396.
108. Parkinson, J. and Mansbridge, J., eds. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
109. Polley, D. E., Garud, R. and Venkataraman, S. 1999. The Innovation Journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
110. Proctor, J. D. 1998. The meaning of global environmental change: Retheorising culture in human dimensions research, Global Environmental Change 8(3): 227-248.
111. Rayner, S. 2003. Democracy in the age of assessment: Reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making, Science and Public Policy 30(3): 163-170.
112. Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
113. Rose, N. and Miller, P. 1992. Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government, British Journal of Sociology 43(2): 173-205.
114. Routledge, P., Cumbers, A. and Nativel, C. 2007. Grassrooting network imaginaries: Relationality, power and mutual solidarity in global justice networks, Environment & Planning A 39(11): 2575-2592.
115. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. 2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation, Science, Technology & Human Values 25(1): 3-29.
116. Ruppert, E., Law, J. and Savage, M. 2013. Reassembling social science methods: The challenge of digital devices, Theory, Culture & Society 30(4): 22-46.
117. Saretzki, T. 2008. Policy-analyse, demokratie und deliberation: Theorieentwicklung und forschungsperspektiven der ‘policy sciences of democracy’. In: F. Janning and K. Toens (eds) Die Zukunft der Policy-Forschung: Theorien, Methoden, Anwendungen. Wiesbaden: Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, pp23-54.
118. Seifert, F. 2006. Local steps in an international career: A Danish-style consensus conference in Austria, Public Understanding of Science 15(1): 73-88.
119. Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
120. Singh, K. 2001. Handing over the stick: The global spread of participatory approaches to development. In: M. Edwards and J. Gaventa (eds) Global Citizen Action. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp175-187.
121. Smith, A. 2011. The Transition Town network: A review of current evolutions and renaissance, Social Movement Studies 10(1): 99-105.
122. Smith, A. 2012. Civil society in sustainable energy transitions. In: G. Verbong and D. Loorbach (eds) Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or Necessity? London: Routledge, pp180-202.
123. Smith, G. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
124. Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. J. and Wilsdon, J. 2014. Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science 23(1): 4-15.
125. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. and Macnaghten, P. 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation, Research Policy 42(9): 1568-1580.
126. Stirling, A. 2008. ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: Power, participation and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology, Science, Technology & Human Values 33(2): 262-294.
127. Stirling, A. 2011. Pluralising progress: From integrative transitions to transformative diversity, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1(1): 82-88.
128. Thevenot, L. 1984. Rules and implements: Investment in forms, Social Science Information 23(1): 1-45.
129. Van Oudheusden, M. and Laurent, B. 2013. Shifting and deepening engagements: Experimental normativity in public participation in science and technology, Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 9(1): 3-22.
130. Webler, T. 1995. Right discourse in citizen participation: An evaluative yardstick. In: O. Renn, T. Webler and P. Wiedemann (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp35-86.
131. Welsh, I. and Wynne, B. 2013. Science, scientism and imaginaries of publics in the UK: Passive objects, incipient threats, Science as Culture 22(4): 540-566.
132. Wickson, F., Delgado, A. and Kjolberg, K. 2010. Who or what is ‘the public’? Nature Nanotechnology 5: 757-758.
133. Worthington, R., Rask, M. and Minna, L., eds. 2013. Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.
134. Wynne, B. 2006. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science - Hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics 9(3): 211-220.
135. Wynne, B. 2007. Dazzled by the mirage of influence? STS-SSK in multivalent registers of relevance, Science, Technology & Human Values 32: 491-503.
136. Young, I. M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.