Deliberative innovation to different effect: Consensus conferences in Denmark, France, and the United States

Public Administration Review

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 864-876

  Dryzek, John S ^a   Tucker, Aviezer ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49349106272     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00928.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andersen, Jørgen Goul. 2004. The Danish Democracy and Power Study: Danish Democratic Audit 1998-2003. Paper presented at the Workshop on Small States, September 17-18, Reykjavik.
2. Anderson, Ida-Elisabeth, and Brigit Jaeger. 1999. Danish Participatory Models Scenario Workshops and Consensus Conferences: Towards More Democratic Decision Making. Science and Public Policy 6 : 331 40.
3. Assouline, Gérald, and Pierre-Benoit Joly, eds. 2001. The French National Report: Assessing Debate and Participative Technology Assessment (ADAPTA). http://www.inra.fr/Internet/Directions/SED/science-gouvernance/pub/ ADAPTA/france-report.pdf accessed May 28, 2008 2004. La Réception de la Conférence de Citoyens par les Média. Chapter 6 of Concertation, Decision, Environment: Les Conferences de Consensus: Un Nouveau Mode de Deliberation Politique? Unpublished report.
4. Bereano, Phil. 1999. Report on Danish Citizen Consensus Conference on Genetically Engineered Foods. http://www.biotech-info.net/danish_conference.html accessed May 29, 2008 Unpublished report.
5. Boy, Daniel, Dominique Donnet-Kamel, and Philippe Roqueplo. 2000. Un Exemple de Démocratie Participative: La Conférence de Citoyens sur les Organismes Génétiques Modifies. Revue Française de Science Politique 50 (4-5 779 809.
6. Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yanrick Barthem. 2001. Agir dans un Monde Incertain: Essai sur la Démocratie Technique. Paris : Éditions du Seuil.
7. Carson, Lyn, and Brian Martin. 1999. Random Selection in Politics. Westport, CT : Praeger.
8. Cohen, Joshua, and Joel Rogers. 1992. Secondary Associations and Democratic Governance. Politics and Society 20 (4 393 472.
9. Doury, Marianne. 2004. L'activité Argumentative. Chapter 10 of Concertation, Decision, Environment: Les Conferences de Consensus: Un Nouveau Mode de Deliberation Politique? Unpublished report.
10. Dryzek, John S. 1996. Political Inclusion and the Dynamics of Democratization. American Political Science Review 90 (1 475 87.
11. Dryzek, John S., David Downes, Christian Hunold, David Schlosberg, and Hans-Kristian Hernes. 2003. Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
12. Dzur, Albert. 2002. Public Journalism and Deliberative Democracy. Polity 34 : 313 36.
13. Fung, Archon. 2003. Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3 338 67.
14. Gastil, John. 2000. By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representation in Democracy through Deliberative Elections. Berkeley : University of California Press.
15. Gastil, John, and Peter Levine, eds. 2005. The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
16. Guston, David H. 1999. Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of the Citizens' Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy. Science, Technology, and Human Values 24 : 451 82.
17. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trans. William Rehg. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
18. Hajer, Maarten A., and Hendrik Wagenaar, eds. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
19. Hamlett, Patrick W. n.d. Enhancing Public Participation in Participatory Public Policy Analysis Concerning Technology: A Report of Two Danish-Style Consensus Conferences. North Carolina State University.
20. Hendriks, Carolyn M. 2004. Public Deliberation and Interest Organisations: A Study of Responses to Lay Citizen Engagement in Public Policy. PhD thesis, Australian National University.
21. Horlick-Jones, Tom, John Walls, Gene Rowe, Nick Pidgeon, Woulter Poortinga, and Tim O'Riordan. 2004. A Deliberative Future? An Independent Evaluation of the GM Nation? Public Debate about the Possible Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops in Britain, 2003. Norwich : University of East Anglia. www.uea.ac.uk/env/pur/gm_future_top_copy_12_feb_04.pdf accessed May 29, 2008 Marris, and M. A. Hermitte. 2003. A la Recherché d'une 'Démocratie Technique.' Enseignements de la Conférence Citoyenne sur les OGM en France. Nature, Science et Société 11 (1 3 15.
22. Joss, Simon. 2000. Participation in Parliamentary Technology Assessment: From Theory to Practice. In Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe, edited by Norman J. Vig and Herbert Paschen, 325 62. Albany : State University of New York Press.
23. Joss, Simon, and John Durant, eds. 1995. Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London : Science Museum.
24. Joss, Simon, and Lars Klüver. 2001. The Denmark National Report: Assessing Debate and Participative Technology Assessment (ADAPTA). http://www.inra.fr/Internet/Directions/SED/science-gouvernance/pub/ADAPTA/ denmark-report.pdf accessed May 29, 2008 Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
25. Kriesi, Hans-Peter, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendek, and Marco G. Giugni. 1992. New Social Movements and Political Opportunities in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 22 (2 219 44.
26. Laurent, Maurice. 2000. France: Office Parlementaire d'Evaluation des Choix Scientifiques at Technologiques. In Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe, edited by Norman J. Vig and Herbert Paschen, 125 46. Albany : State University of New York Press.
27. Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1984. Concertation and the Structure of Corporatist Networks. In Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by John H. Goldthorpe, 60 80. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
28. Leib, Ethan J. 2004. Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government. University Park, PA : Pennsylvania State University Press.
29. Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
30. Mahoney, James, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis: Achievements and Agendas. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 3 40. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
31. Parkinson, John. 2004. Why Deliberate? The Encounter between Deliberation and New Public Managers. Public Administration 82 (2 377 95.
32. Petermann, Thomas. 2000. Technology Assessment Units in the European Parliamentary System. In Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe, edited by Norman J. Vig and Herbert Paschen, 37 61. Albany : State University of New York Press.
33. Safran, William. 2002. The French Polity. 6th ed. New York : Longman.
34. Smith, Graham. 2005. Beyond the Ballot: 57 Democratic Innovations from Around the World. London : POWER Inquiry.
35. Vig, Norman J., and Herbert Paschen, eds. 2000. Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe. Albany : State University of New York Press.