Following from the front: theorizing deliberative facilitation

Critical Policy Studies

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 146-162

  Moore, Alfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

deliberation; expertise; facilitator; minipublics; moderator; public engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865057638     PISSN: 19460171     EISSN: 1946018X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2012.689735     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Blaug, R. 2002. Engineering democracy. Political studies, 50(1): 102-116.
2. Bohman, J. 1996. Public deliberation: pluralism, complexity, and democracy, Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Bohman, J. and Richardson, H.S., 2009. Liberalism, deliberative democracy, and 'reasons that all can accept'. Journal of political philosophy, 17 (3), 253-274. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00330.x
4. Bora, A. and Hausendorf, H., 2006. Participatory science governance revisited: normative expectations versus empirical evidence. Science and public policy, 33 (7), 478-488. http://spp.oxfordjournals.org/content/33/7/478.abstract
5. Braun, K. and Schultz, S., 2010. '... a certain amount of engineering involved': constructing the public in participatory governance arrangements. Public understanding of science, 19 (4), 403-419. http://pus.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0963662509347814
6. Braun, K. 2010. Science governance and the politics of proper talk: governmental bioethics as a new technology of reflexive government. Economy and society, 39(4): 510-533.
7. Brown, M. 2009. Science in democracy: expertise, institutions and representation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Burgess, M.M., 2004. Public consultation in ethics an experiment in representative ethics. Journal of bioethical inquiry, 1 (1), 4-13. http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF02448901
9. Burgess, M.M., O'Doherty, K. and Secko, D.M. 2008. Biobanking in BC: enhancing discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement. Personalized medicine, 5(3): 285-296.
10. Chambers, S., 2003. Deliberative democratic theory. Annual review of political science, 6 (1), 307-326. http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146%2Fannurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
11. Chilvers, J. 2008a. Deliberating competence: theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice. Science, technology and human values, 33(2): 155-185.
12. Chilvers, J., 2008b. Environmental risk, uncertainty, and participation: mapping an emergent epistemic community. Environment and planning A, 40 (12), 2990-3009. http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a39279
13. Cohen, J. 1989. "Deliberation and democratic legitimacy". In The good polity: normative analysis of the state, Edited by: Hamlin, A. and Pettit, P. 17-34. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Collins, H. and Evans, R. 2007. Rethinking expertise, Chicago, IL, London: Chicago University Press.
15. Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. 2001. Participation: the new tyranny?, London, New York: Zed Books.
16. Dodds, S. and Thomson, C. 2006. Bioethics and democracy: competing roles of national bioethics organisations. Bioethics, 20(6): 326-338.
17. Dryzek, J. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics and contestations, New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Escobar, O. August 2011. "Science, deliberation and policy-making: the brain imaging dialogue as upstream engagement". In Presented at the ECPR General Conference August, 25-27. Reykjavik
19. Fishkin, J.S. 1995. The voice of the people, New Haven, CT, London: Yale University Press.
20. Forester, J. 1999. The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning processes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Fung, A. 2003a. "Deliberative democracy, Chicago style: grass-roots governance in policing and public education". In Deepening democracy, Edited by: Fung, A. and Wright, E.O. 111-143. London: Verso.
22. Fung, A. 2003b. Survey article: recipes for public spheres: eight institutional design choices and their consequences. The journal of political philosophy, 11(3): 338-367.
23. Gerber, M. 2011. Who are the voices of Europe? Evidence from a pan-European deliberative poll. Presented at the ECPR General Conference. Reykjavik, August: 25-27.
24. Goodin, R.E. and Dryzek, J.S., 2006. Deliberative impacts: the macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics and society, 34 (2), 219-244. http://pas.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0032329206288152
25. Groot, A. and Maarleveld, M. 2000. Demystifying facilitation in participatory development, London: International Institute for Environment and Development. Gatekeeper Series no. 89
26. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. 1996. Democracy and disagreement, Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
27. Habermas, J. 1995. Moral consciousness and communicative action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Habermas, J. 1997. "Popular sovereignty as procedure". In Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics, Edited by: Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. 35-65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Hendriks, C. 2006. Integrated deliberation: reconciling civil society's dual role in deliberative democracy. Political studies, 54(3): 486-508.
31. Hickey, S. and Mohan, G. 2004. Participation: from tyranny to transformation?, London, New York: Zed Books.
32. Irwin, A. 2006. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance. Social studies of science, 36(2): 299-320.
33. Jasanoff, S. 2003. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41(3): 223-244.
34. Kadlec, A. and Friedman, W. 2007. Deliberative democracy and the problem of power. Journal of public deliberation, 3(1): 1-26.
35. Kleinman, D.L., Delborne, J.A. and Anderson, A.A., 2011. Engaging citizens: the high cost of citizen participation in high technology. Public understanding of science, 20 (2), 221-240. http://pus.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0963662509347137
36. Krantz, R.S. 2003. "Cycles of reform in Porto Alegre and Madison". In Deepening democracy: institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance, Edited by: Fung, A. and Wright, E.O. 225-236. London, New York: Verso.
37. Lang, A. 2008. "Agenda-setting in deliberative forums: expert influence and citizen autonomy in the British Columbia Citizens' Assembly". In Designing deliberative democracy: the British Columbia Citizen's Assembly, Edited by: Warren, M.E. and Pearse, H. 85-105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Laurent, B., 2009. Replicating participatory devices. The example of the consensus conference and nanotechnology. http://www.csi.mines-paristech.fr/Items/WorkingPapers/Download/DLWP.php?wp=WP_CSI_018.pdf
39. Levine, P., Gastil, J. and Fung, A., 2005. Future directions for public deliberation. Journal of public deliberation, 1 (1), 1-13. http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol1/iss1/art3
40. Lezaun, J. and Soneryd, S. 2007. Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public understanding of science, 16(3): 279-297.
41. Loeber, A. 2004. Practical wisdom in risk society. Methods and practice of interpretive analysis on questions of sustainable development, Thesis (PhD). University of Amsterdam.
42. Loeber, A. and Vermeulen, T. June 2010. "The art of 'doing' sustainable agricultural innovation: approaches and attitudes to facilitating transitional projects". In Paper presented at the International workshop on System Innovations, Knowledge Regimes, and Design Practices towards Sustainable Agriculture, June, 16-18. The Netherlands: Lelystad.
43. Luskin, R.C., Fishkin, J. and Jowell, R., 2002. Considered opinions: deliberative polling in Britain. British journal of political science, 32 (3), 455-487. http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0007123402000194
44. MacLean, S. and Burgess, M.M., 2009. In the public interest: assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks. Public understanding of science, 19 (4), 486-496. http://pus.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0963662509335410
45. Manin, B. 1987. On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political theory, 15(3): 338-368.
46. Mansbridge, J. 2006. Norms of deliberation: an inductive study. Journal of public deliberation, 2(1): 1-47.
47. Mansbridge, J. 2010. The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy. Journal of political philosophy, 18(1): 64-100.
48. Marres, N. 2007. The issues deserve more credit: pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social studies of science, 37(5): 759-780.
49. Moore, A. 2010. Public bioethics and public engagement: the politics of 'proper talk'. Public understanding of science, 19(2): 197-211.
50. O'Doherty, K.C. and Davidson, H.J., 2010. Subject positioning and deliberative democracy: understanding social processes underlying deliberation. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 40 (2), 224-245. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00429.x
51. Parkinson, J. 2006. Deliberating in the real world, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Rose, N. 1999. Powers of freedom: reframing political thought, 1st, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J., 2005. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, technology and human values, 30 (2), 251-290. http://sth.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0162243904271724
54. Ryfe, D.M., 2005. Does deliberative democracy work? Annual review of political science, 8 (1), 49-71. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633
55. Salter, B. and Jones, M. 2006. Change in the policy community of human genetics: a pragmatic approach to open governance. Policy and politics, 34(2): 347-66.
56. Sanders, L. 1997. Against deliberation. Political theory, 25(3): 347-376.
57. Smith, G. 2009. Democratic innovations: designing institutions for citizen participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Steenbergen, M.R. et al., 2003. Measuring political deliberation: a discourse quality index. Comparative European politics, 1 (1), 21-48. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/doifinder/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002
59. Stirling, A. 2008. 'Opening up' and 'closing down': power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, technology and human values, 2(33): 262-294.
60. Stromer-Galley, J. 2007. Measuring deliberation's content: a coding scheme. Journal of public deliberation, 3(1): 1-35.
61. Sunstein, C.R. 1999. "Agreement without theory". In Deliberative politics: essays on democracy and disagreement, Edited by: Macedo, S. 123-150. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Sunstein, C.R. 2003. Why societies need dissent, Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
63. Tucker, A. 2008. Pre-emptive democracy: oligarchic tendencies in deliberative democracy. Political studies, 56(1): 127-147.
64. Unger, R. 1987. False necessity: anti-necessitarian social theory in the service of radical democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Urfalino, P., 2006. Apparent consensus and voting: two modes of collective decision-making. http://cespra.ehess.fr/docannexe.php?id=551
66. Walmsley, H., 2009. Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation: five lessons from British Columbia. Public understanding of science, 19 (4), 452-468. http://pus.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0963662509335523
67. Warren, M.E., 2009. Governance-driven democratization. Critical policy studies, 3 (1), 3-13. http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/19460170903158040&magic=crossref{pipe}{pipe}D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3
68. Young, I.M. 2002. Inclusion and democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.