The Social Dimensions of Energy Transitions

Science as Culture

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 135-148

  Miller, Clark A ^a   Iles, Alastair ^b   Jones, Christopher F ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy; energy epistemics; energy justice; infrastructure; society

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879045085     PISSN: 09505431     EISSN: 14701189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2013.786989     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aanesen, K., Heck, S. and Pinner, D. 2012. Solar Power: Darkest Before Dawn, New York: McKinsey & Co.
2. Abramsky, K. 2010. Sparking a Worldwide Energy Revolution: Social Struggles in the Transition to a Post-Petrol World, Oakland, CA: AK Press.
3. Cowell, R., Bristow, G. and Munday, M. 2011. Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: The role of community benefits in wind energy development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54 (4): 539 - 557. (doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.521047)
4. DiPeso, J. 2012. Trading power. Environmental Quality Management, 21 (4): 87 - 97. (doi:10.1002/tqem.21311)
5. Dryzek, J. 2010. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Edwards, P., Bowker, G., Jackson, S. and Williams, R. 2009. Introduction: An agenda for infrastructure studies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10 (5): 364 - 374.
7. Ezrahi, Y. 1990. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Ferguson, D. and Smith, M. 2012. No Frackin' way: Activism in the Marcellus Shale Region. Business Research Yearbook, 19 (2): 497 - 505.
9. Geels, F. 2005. Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-Evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
10. Graffy, E. and Booth, N. 2008. Linking environmental risk assessment and communication: An experiment in co-evolving scientific and social knowledge. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 8 (1/2): 132 - 146. (doi:10.1504/IJGENVI.2008.017264)
11. Graham, L. 1996. The Ghost of the Executed Engineering: Technology and the Fall of the Soviet Union, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Hecht, G. 1998. The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity After World War II, Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Hecht, G. 2012. Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade, Cambridge: MIT Press.
14. Hughes, T. 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Societies, 1880-1930, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2011) World Energy Outlook (Paris: International Energy Agency).
16. Iles, A. 2013. Greening chemistry: Emerging epistemic political tensions in California and the United States. Public Understanding of Science, 22 (4): 461 - 480. doi: 10.1177/0963662511404306, (doi:10.1177/0963662511404306)
17. Jasanoff, S. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order, Edited by: Jasanoff, S. London: Routledge.
18. Kaijser, A. and van der Vleuten, E. 2006. Networking Europe: Transnational Infrastructures and the Shaping of Europe, 1850-2000, Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications.
19. Kleinman, D. L. 2000. Science, Technology & Environment, New York: SUNY Press.
20. Miller, C. 2012. Energy justice: Ensuring human dignity in the post-carbon future. Cairo Review of Global Affairs, May: 46 - 59.
21. Miller, C. and Moore, S. 2011. Arizona's Energy Future, Phoenix, MD: AZ Town Hall.
22. Nye, D. 1990. Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology, 1880-1940, Cambridge: MIT Press.
23. Nye, D. 1998. Consuming Power: A Social History of American Energies, Cambridge: MIT Press.
24. Nye, D. 2010. When the Lights Went Out: A History of Blackouts in America, Cambridge: MIT Press.
25. O'Rourke, D. and Connolly, S. 2003. Just oil? The distribution of environmental and social impacts of oil production and consumption. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28: 587 - 617. (doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105617)
26. Phadke, R. (2013) Public deliberation and the geographies of wind justice, Science as Culture, 22(2), 000-000.
27. Porter, Theodore. 1996. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Reuters. 2012. Debt-laden Chinese firms need infusion of funds. The New York Times, August 15
29. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, III, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. and Foley, J. A. (2010) A safe operating space for humanity, Nature, 461, pp. 472-475.
30. Sarewitz, D., Thernstrom, S., Alic, J. and Doom, T. 2012. Energy Innovation at the Department of Defense, Washington, DC: Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes.
31. Sclove, R. 1995. Technology and Democracy, New York City: Guilford Press.
32. Scott, J. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33. Southwest Energy Innovation Forum (SWEIF). (2010) Summary Report. Available at http://www.swenergyforum.com/
34. Tillerson, R. (2012) The New North American Energy Paradigm: Reshaping the Future. Speech to the Council on Foreign Relations, June 27.
35. US Department of Energy (DOE). (2012) QTR: Report on the First Quadrennial Technology Review (Washington: Department of Energy).
36. US National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2009) America's Energy Future: Technology and Transformation (Washington: National Academies Press).
37. Winner, L. 1980. Do artifacts have politics?. Daedalus, 109 (1): 121 - 136.
38. Winner, L. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.