Introduction to special section: Intermediaries between science, policy and the market

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 423-429

  Meyer, Morgan ^a   Kearnes, Matthew ^b  

^a CENTRE DE SOCIOLOGIE DE L INNOVATION   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; IDEOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; POLICY APPROACH; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84884932881     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/scipol/sct051     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Akrich, M., Callon, M. and Latour, B. (2002) 'The key to success in innovation part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons', International Journal of Innovation Management, 6: 207-25.
2. Alexandera, A. T. and Martin, D. M. (2013) 'Intermediaries for open innovation: A competence-based comparison of knowledge transfer offices practices', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80: 38-49.
3. Am, H. (2013) ' "Don't make nanotechnology sexy, ensure its benefits, and be neutral": Studying the logics of new intermediary institutions in ambiguous governance contexts', Science and Public Policy, 40: XXX-XXX (this issue).
4. Bessy, C. and Chauvin, P.-M. (2013) 'The power of market intermediaries: From information to valuation processes', Valuation Studies, 1: 83-117.
5. Beunza, D. and Garud, R. (2007) 'Calculators, lemmings or frame-makers? The intermediary role of securities analysts', Sociological Review, 55/S2: 13-39.
6. Bevir, M. (ed.) (2011) Governance as Theory, Practice and Dilemma. The Sage Handbook of Governance. London: Sage.
7. Bijker, W. E., Bal, R. and Hendriks, R. (2009) The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Bimber, B. (1996) The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment. New York: State University of New York Press.
9. Birch, K. (2009) 'The knowledge-space dynamic in the UK bioeconomy', Area, 41: 273-84.
10. Birch, K. (2012) 'Knowledge, place, and power: Geographies of value in the bioeconomy', New Genetics and Society, 31: 183-201.
11. Braun, D. (1993) 'Who governs intermediary agencies? Principal-agent relations in research policy making', Journal of Public Policy, 13: 135-62.
12. Braun, D and Guston, D. (2003) 'Principal-agent theory and research policy: An introduction', Science and Public Policy, 30: 302-8.
13. Bruno, I. (2009) 'The ''indefinite discipline'' of competitiveness benchmarking as a neoliberal technology of government', Minerva, 47: 261-80.
14. Burt, R. (2004) 'Structural holes and good ideas', American Journal of Sociology, 110: 349-99.
15. Busch, L. (2011) Standards: Recipes for Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Callon, M. (1991) 'Techno-economic networks and irreversibility'. In: Law, J. (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, pp. 132-61. London: Routledge.
17. Callon, M.(1992) 'The dynamics of techno-economic networks'. In: Coombs, R., Saviotti, P. and Walsh, V. (eds) Technological Change and Company Strategies: Economic and Sociological Perspectives, pp. 72-102. London: Academic Press.
18. Callon, M. (ed.) (1998) The Laws of the Markets. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19. Callon, M. and Law, J. (1989) 'On the construction of sociotechnical networks: Content and context revisited', Knowledge and Society, 8: 57-83.
20. Calvert, J. and Martin, P. (2009) 'The role of social scientists in synthetic biology', EMBO Reports, 10: 201-4.
21. Cooke, P. (2001) 'Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy', Industrial and Corporate Change, 10: 945-74.
22. Desrosières, A. (2009) 'How to be real and conventional: A discussion of the quality criteria of official statistics', Minerva, 47: 307-22.
23. Doganova, L. (2013) 'Transfer and exploration: Two models of science-industry intermediation', Science and Public Policy, 40: XXX-XXX (this issue).
24. Doganova, L. and Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009) 'What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship', Research Policy, 38: 1559-70.
25. Feller, I. (2009) 'Performance measurement and the governance of American academic science', Minerva, 47: 323-44.
26. Gassmann, O. and Reepmeyer, G. (2005) 'Organizing pharmaceutical innovation: From science-based knowledge creators to drug-oriented knowledge brokers', Creativity and Innovation Management, 14: 233-45.
27. Guston, D. (1999) 'Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization', Social Studies of Science, 29: 87-111.
28. Guston, D. (2000) Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Cambridge, UK: CUP.
29. Hall, P. A. and Taylor, C. R. (1996) 'Political science and the three new institutionalisms', Political Studies, XLIV: 936-57.
30. Hargadon, A. B. (1998) 'Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation', California Management Review, 40: 209-27.
31. Hood, C. (2007) 'Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after two decades', Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 20: 127-44.
32. Howells, J. (2006) 'Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation', Research Policy, 35: 715-28.
33. Howlett, R. (2010) Innovation Through Knowledge Transfer. Berlin: Springer.
34. Irwin, A. (2006) 'The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance', Social Studies of Science, 36: 299-320.
35. Jasanoff, S. (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Kearnes, M. (2013) 'Performing synthetic worlds: Situating the bioeconomy', Science and Public Policy, 40: XXX-XXX (this issue).
37. Kearnes, M. and Wienroth, M. (2011) 'Tools of the trade: UK research intermediaries in science policy practice', Minerva, 49: 153-74.
38. Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Tutton, R. (2007) 'Shifting subject positions: Experts and lay people in public dialogue', Social Studies of Science, 37: 385-411.
39. Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. (2008) 'Balancing multiple interests: Embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure', Technovation, 28: 364-78.
40. Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. (2009) 'Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76: 849-60.
41. Knorr-Cetina, K. (2007) 'Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures', Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32: 361-75.
42. Lascoumes, P. and Le Galès, P. (2007) 'Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments-from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation', Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20: 1-21.
43. Lomas, J. (2001) 'The in-between world of knowledge brokering', BMJ, 223: 129-32.
44. Lyall, C. and Tait, J. (2005) New Modes of Governance: Developing an Integrated Policy Approach to Science. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
45. MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L. (eds) (2007) Do Economists Make Markets: On the Peformativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Macnaghten, P. M., Kearnes, M. B. and Wynne, B. (2005) 'Nanotechnology, governance and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences?', Science Communication, 27: 268-87.
47. Meyer, M. (2010) 'The rise of the knowledge broker', Science Communication, 32: 118-27.
48. Miller, C. (2001) 'Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy and environmental governance in the climate regime', Science, Technology and Human Values, 26: 478-500.
49. Moreira, T. (2011) 'Health care rationing in an age of uncertainty: A conceptual model', Social Science and Medicine, 72: 1333-41.
50. Osborne, T. (2004) 'On mediators: intellectuals and the ideas trade in the knowledge society', Economy and Society, 33: 430-47.
51. Pollock, N. and Williams, R. (2009) 'The sociology of a market analysis tool: How industry analysts sort vendors and organize markets', Information and Organization, 19: 129-51.
52. Pollock, N. and Williams, (2010) 'The business of expectations: How promissory organizations shape technology and innovation', Social Studies of Science, 40: 525-48.
53. Rudy, A. P., Coppin, D., Konefal, J., Shaw, B. T. et al. (2007) Universities in the Age of Corporate Science: The UC Berkeley- Novartis Controversy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
54. Schlierf, K. and Meyer, M. (2013) 'Situating knowledge intermediation: Insights from science shops and knowledge brokers', Science and Public Policy, 40: XXX-XXX (this issue).
55. van der Meulen, B. (2003) 'New roles and strategies of a research council: Intermediation of the principal-agent relationship', Science and Public, 30: 323-36.
56. van Lente, H. (2012) 'Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: Lessons from the sociology of expectations', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12: 769-82.