Science and Public Reason

Science and Public Reason

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-288

  Jasanoff, Sheila ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911024188     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203113820     Document Type: Book

References (372)

1. Angell, Marcia. 1996. Science on Trial: The Clash ofMedicalEvidence and the Law in the Breast Implant Case. New York: Norton.
2. Barry, Andrew. 1999. “Demonstrations: Sites and Sights of Direct Action.” Economyand Society 28(1): 75-94.
3. Beck, Ulrich. 1988. Gegengifte: Die organisierte Unverantwortlichkeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
4. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towardsa New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
5. Bijker, Wiebe, Thomas Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, eds. 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Brickman, Ronald, Sheila Jasanoff, and Thomas Ilgen. 1985. Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7. Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Camic, Charles, Neil Gross, and Michèle Lamont, eds. 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
9. Daston, Lorraine and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
10. Dear, Peter. 2006. The Intelligibility of Nature: How Science Makes Sense of the World. Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
11. Doubleday, Robert and Brian Wynne. 2011. “Despotism and Democracy in the UK: Experiments in Reframing Citizenship.” In Sheila Jasanoff, ed., Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age, pp. 239-262. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Douglas, Mary. 1986. PurityandDanger:AnAnalysisofConcepts ofPollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13. Edwards, Paul. 1996. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics ofDiscourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Ezrahi, Yaron. 1990. TheDescentofIcarus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In The Interpretation of Cultures, pp. 3-30. New York: Basic Books.
16. Goffman, Erving. 1959. ThePresentation ofSelfinEverydayLife. New York: Doubleday.
17. Gottweis, Herbert. 1998. Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisersas Policymakers. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
19. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1995. Science at the Bar: Law, Science and Technology in America. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
20. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003 . “In a Constitutional Moment: Science and Social Order at the Millennium.” In Bernward Joerges and Helga Nowotny, eds., Social Studies ofScience and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead, pp. 155-180. Yearbook of the Sociology of the Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer .
21. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2004a. “Science and Citizenship: A New Synergy.” Science and Public Policy 31(2): 30-34.
22. Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004b. States ofKnowledge: The Co-Production ofScience and Social Order. London : Routledge .
23. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2010. “A New Climate for Society.” Theory, Culture and Society 27(2-3): 233-253.
24. Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2011. Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
25. Jasanoff, Sheila and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imagi-naries and Nuclear Regulation in the U.S. and South Korea.” Minerva 47(2): 119-146.
26. Kysar, Douglas. 2010. RegulatingFrom Nowhere: EnvironmentalLaw and the Searchfor Objectivity. New Haven : Yale University Press .
27. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
28. Latour, Bruno. 1993. WeHaveNeverBeenModern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
29. Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
30. National Research Council (NRC). 1983. RiskAssessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
31. Picon, Antoine. 2002. Les saint-simoniens: raison, imaginaire et utopie. Paris: Lavoisier.
32. Price, Don K. 1965. The Scientific Estate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Sahlins, Marshall. 1996. How "Natives” Think: About Captain Cook, For Example. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Sunstein, Cass. 2005. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. New York: Cambridge University Press .
37. Wilson, James Q. 1980. The Politics ofRegulation. New York: Basic Books.
38. Winickoff, David, Sheila Jasanoff, Lawrence Busch, Robin Grove-White, and Brian Wynne . 2005 . “Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law.” Yale Journal of International Law 30: 81-123.
39. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Wynne, Brian. 1988. “Unruly Technology.” SocialStudiesofScience 18: 147-167.
41. Wynne, Brian. 1995. “Public Understanding of Science. ” In Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald Markle, James C. Petersen, and Trevor Pinch, eds., HandbookofScience and TechnologyStudies, pp. 380-392. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Wynne, Brian, Ulrike Felt, et al. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
43. ACGM, Advisory Committee on Genetic Manipulation (1990) . The intentional introduction of genetically manipulated organisms into the environment. Guidelines for risk assessment and for the notification of proposals for such work. HSE Guidance Note 3 (revised), January 1990.
44. Brooks, H. (1980). Technology, evolution and purpose. Daedalus 109, 66.
45. Gottweis, H. (1995). German politics of genetic engineering and its deconstruction. Social Studies of Science (in press).
46. ‘Impact’ (1990). The impact of new and impending regulations on UK biotechnology. Report of a meeting sponsored by the Department of the Environment, the Health and Safety Executive and the Bioindustry Association. Cambridge: Cambridge Biomedical Consultants .
47. Jasanoff S. (1985). Technological innovation in a corporatist state: the case of biotechnology in the Federal Republic of Germany. Research Policy 14, 23-38.
48. Jasanoff, S. (1986). Risk management and political culture. New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
49. Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: science advisers aspolicymakers. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
50. Kessler, D. A. et al. (1992). The safety of foods. Science 256, 1747-9 and 1832.
51. Merves, J. (1990). Congress and administration closer to regulating U.S. biotech industry. The Scientist 4(22), 12 November, p. 12.
52. Miller, H. I., Burris, R. H., Vidaver, A. K. and Wivel, N. A. (1990). Risk-based oversight of experiments in the environment. Science 250, 490.
53. NRC, National Research Council (1989). Field testing genetically modified organisms -framework for decisions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
54. OSTP, Office of Science and Technology Policy (1992). Exercise of federal oversight within scope of statutory authority: planned introduction of biotechnology products into the environment. Federal Register, 27 February, pp. 6753-62.
55. RCEP, Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1989). The release of genetically engineered organisms to the environment. Thirteenth Report. London: HMSO.
56. RCEP, Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1991). GENHAZ. London: HMSO.
57. Wynne, B. and Mayer, S. (1993). How science fails the environment. NewScientist, 5 June, pp. 33-5.
58. Agamben, G. (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
59. Associated Press (1997) In UK court case, widow wins right to use spouse’s sperm, Herald Tribune, February 7, p. 5.
60. Brickman, R., Jasanoff, S. & Ilgen, T. (1985) Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States (Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press).
61. The BSE Inquiry Report (2000) (http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/) [accessed: May 2005].
62. Coghlan, A. (2004) Britain gives go-ahead for first GM crop, New Scientist, 9 March (http://www.newscientist.com/channel/life/gm-food/dn4754) [accessed: May 2005].
63. Foucault, M. (1990 [1976]) The History ofSexuality, Vol. 1 (New York: Vintage).
64. Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
65. Hartouni, V. (1997) Breached birth: Anna Johnson and the reproduction of raced bodies. In Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life, pp. 85-98 (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
66. Jasanoff, S. (1995) Product, process, or programme: three cultures and the regulation of biotechnology. In Bauer, M. (ed) ResistancetoNewTechnology, pp. 311-31 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
67. Jasanoff, S. (2001) Ordering life: law and the normalization of biotechnology, Politeia, 17(62), pp. 34-50.
68. Jasanoff, S. (ed) (2004) States ofKnowledge: The Co-Production ofScience and Social Order (London: Routledge).
69. Jasanoff, S. (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
70. Johnson v. Calvert (1993) 5 Cal. 4th 84.
71. Marks, K. (1997) Widow wins fight to bear child of dead husband, The Daily Telegraph, February 7, p. 6 .
72. Marris, C., Wynne, B., Simmons, P. & Weldon, S. (2001) PublicPerceptions ofAgricul-tural Biotechnologies in Europe (PABE), Final Report of the PABE Research Project, Contract number: FAIR CT98-3844 (DG12 - SSMI), Lancaster University, December.
73. Medrano, J. D. (2003) Framing Europe: Attitudes toward European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
74. Mulkay, M. (1997) The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press).
75. Office of Science and Technology Policy, Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology (1986) 51 Federal Register 23302, 26 June .
76. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology (2001) Genetically modified crops in the United States, Factsheet (http://pewagbiotech.org/resources/factsheets/display.php37FactsheetID=1) [accessed May 2005].
77. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992) 505 US 833.
78. Roe v. Wade (1973) 410 US 113.
79. Schon, D. A. & Rein, M. (1994) Frame/Reflection: Toward the Resolution oflntractable Policy Controversies (New York: Basic Books).
80. Sperling, S. (forthcoming) Reasons of conscience: Stem cells, bioethics and German citizenship. PhD dissertation, Princeton University.
81. Stolberg, S. G. (2005) In Rare threat, Bush vows veto of stem cell bill, New York Times, 21 May, p. 1 .
82. Vogel, D. (1986) National Styles ofRegulation: Environmental Policy in GreatBritain and the United States (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
83. Welle, D. (2004a) GM crop trials underway throughout Germany, 5 May (http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0119106000.html) [accessed: May 2005].
84. Welle, D. (2004b) Bundestag passes stringent law on genetically modified crops, 6 June (http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0124011200.html) [accessed: May 2005].
85. 9/11 Commission 2004. Final Report of the Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. W.W. Norton.
86. Andrews, N. et al. 2003. “Deaths from variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease in the UK.” Lancet 361: 751-52.
87. Bijker, W., T. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds.). 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. MIT Press.
88. Bourdieu, P. 1980. The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press.
89. Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press .
90. Clarke, L. 1989. Acceptable Risk? MakingDecisions in a Toxic Environment. University of California Press.
91. Ezrahi, Y. 1990. The Descentoflcarus: Science and the Transformation ofContemporary Democracy. Harvard University Press .
92. Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Random House.
93. Jasanoff, S. Forthcoming. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press.
94. Jasanoff, S. 1997. “Civilization and Madness: The Great BSE Scare of 1996.” Public Understanding of Science 6:221-232.
95. Jasanoff, S. 1995. “Product, Process, or Programme: Three Cultures and the Regulation of Biotechnology.” In M. Bauer, ed., Resistance toNew Technology, Cambridge University Press, pp. 311-331.
96. Jasanoff, S. 1994. Learning from Disaster: Risk Management after Bhopal. University of Pennsylvania Press .
97. Jasanoff, S. 1986. Risk Management and Political Culture. Russell Sage Foundation.
98. Kalelkar, A. 1988. “Investigation of Large-Magnitude Incidents: Bhopal as a Case Study.” http://www.bhopal.com/infoarch.htm (visited October 11, 2004).
99. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF). 1989. Report of the Working Party on Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (Southwood Committee Report). HMSO.
100. Nagel, T. 1989. The Viewfrom Nowhere. Oxford University Press.
101. Noble, D. F. 1977. America By Design: Science, Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. Oxford University Press.
102. Perrow, C. 1984. NormalAccidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. Basic Books.
103. Phillips, Lord. 2000. The Inquiry into BSE and variant CJD in the United Kingdom. http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk.
104. Porter, T. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press .
105. Posner, R. 2004. “The 9/11 Report: A Dissent.” New York Times, SundayBookReview. August 29 .
106. Schuck, P. 1986. Agent Orange on Trial: Mass Toxic Disasters in the Courts. Harvard University Press .
107. Scott, J.C. 1998. Seeing Like a State. Yale University Press.
108. Seeger, P. 1955. “Where have all the flowers gone?.”
109. Shapin, S. 1995. “Cordelia’s Love: Credibility and the Social Studies of Science.” Perspectives on Science 3(3):255-275.
110. Short, J. F. and L. Clarke (eds.). 1992. Organizations, Uncertainties, and Risk. Westview Press .
111. Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press.
112. Visvanathan, S. (withR. Kothari). 1985. “Bhopal: The Imagination of a Disaster.” Lokayan Bulletin 3:48-76.
113. Vogel, D. 1986. National Styles ofRegulation. Cornell University Press.
114. Weber, M. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (trans. and ed. H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills). Oxford University Press.
115. Wildavsky, A. 1988. Searching for Safety. Transaction Books.
116. Winner, L. 1986. “On Not Hitting the Tar-Baby.” In The Whale and the Reactor:A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, pp. 138-154.
117. Winner, L. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor:A Search for Limits in an Age of High Tech-nology. University of Chicago Press .
118. Agarwal, Anil and Sunita Narain. 1991. Global Warming in an Unequal World. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.
119. Alpers, Svetlana. 1983. The Art ofDescribing: Dutch Art in the 17th Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
120. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. London: Verso (revised and expanded second edition, Verso, 1991).
121. Ashley, Richard K. 1983. “The Eye of Power: The Politics of World Modeling.” International Organization 37(3): 495-535.
122. Baldwin, Hanson W. 1947. The Price ofPower. New York: Harper and Brothers.
123. Bloomfield, Brian P. 1986. Modelling the World: The Social Constructions ofSystems Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
124. Botkin, Daniel. 1990. Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecologyfor the Twenty-First Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
125. Boulding, Kenneth E. 1966. “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth, ” in Henry Jarrett, ed., Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press .
126. Buruma, Ian. 1995. WagesofGuilt. London: Vintage.
127. Caldwell, Lynton K. 1990. International Environmental Policy: Emergence and Dimensions. Durham, NC : Duke University Press .
128. Caldwell, Lynton K. 1992. “Globalizing Environmentalism: Threshold of a New Phase in International Relations, ” in Riley Dunlap and Angela Mertig, eds., American Environmentalism: The U.S. Environmental Movement, 1970-1990. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
129. Campbell, Joseph. 1972. Myths to Live By. New York: Viking Press.
130. Carson, Rachel. 1962. SilentSpring. New York: Fawcett Crest.
131. Chaikin, Andrew. 1994. “The Last Men on the Moon.” PopularScience 245(3): 70-74, 88.
132. Cotgrove, Stephen. 1982. Catastrophe or Cornucopia: The Environment, Politics and the Future. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
133. Darman, Richard G. 1978. “The Law of the Sea: Rethinking U.S. Interests.” Foreign Affairs 56(2): 381.
134. Folger, Tim, Sarah Richardson and Carl Zimmer. 1994. “Remembering Apollo: Astronauts Recall Their Flights to the Moon.” Discover 15(7): 38.
135. Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End ofHistory or the LastMan. New York: Free Press.
136. Fuller, R. Buckminster. 1969. Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
137. Fussell, Paul. 1975. The Great War and Modern Memory. New York: Oxford University Press .
138. Goodwin, Charles. 1994. “Professional Vision.” AmericanAnthropology 96: 606-633.
139. Haas, Peter M. 1989. “Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control.” International Organization 43: 377-403.
140. Haas, Peter M. 1990a. “Obtaining International Environmental Protection through Epistemic Consensus.” Millennium 19(3): 347-364.
141. Haas, Peter M. 1990b. Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
142. Haggard, Stephan and Beth A. Simmons. 1987. “Theories of International Regimes.” International Organization 41: 491-517.
143. Harwit, Martin. 1996. An ExhibitDenied: Lobbying the History of Enola Gay. New York: Copernicus .
144. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1996. “Science and Norms in International Environmental Regimes, ” in Fen O. Hampson and Judith Reppy, eds., Earthly Goods: Environmental Change and Social Justice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 173-197.
145. Jasanoff, Sheila 1998 . “The Eye of Everyman: Witnessing DNA in the Simpson Trial.” Social Studies of Science 28(5-6): 713-740.
146. Jones, Caroline A. and Peter Galison. 1998. PicturingScience, ProducingArt. New York: Routledge .
147. Keohane, Robert O. 1988. “International Institutions: Two Approaches.” International Studies Quarterly 32: 379-397.
148. Latour, Bruno. 1990. “Drawing Things Together, ” in Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar, Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
149. Latour, Bruno. 1995. “The Pédofil of Boa Vista, ” trans. Bart Simon and Katria Verreson. Common Knowledge 4(1): 144-187.
150. Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar. 1979. LaboratoryLife: The Construction ofScientific Facts. London : Sage .
151. Levine, Adeline. 1982. Love Canal: Science, Politics, and People. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books .
152. Litfin, Karen T. 1994. Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
153. Lovelock, James E. 1979. Gaia, A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford : Oxford University Press .
154. Lynch, Michael and Steve Woolgar. 1990. Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
155. Margulis, Lynn and James Lovelock. 1976. “Is Mars a Spaceship, Too?” Natural History June/July, 86-90.
156. McCormick, John . 1989 . Reclaiming Paradise: The Global Environmental Movement. Bloomington : Indiana University Press .
157. Meadows, Donella H., D. L. Meadows, S. Rauderg and W. W. Behrens. 1972. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.
158. Miller, Clark. 2001. “Challenges in the Application of Science to Global Affairs: Contingency, Trust, and Moral Order, ” in C. Miller, and P. Edwards, Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
159. Nora, Pierre, ed. 1987. Les lieux de mémoire. Paris: Gallimard.
160. Ottinodella Chiesa Angela. 1985. The Complete Paintings of Leonardo da Vinci. Introduction by Leopold D. Ettlinger . Harmondsworth, UK : Penguin Books .
161. President’s Air Policy Commission. 1948. Survival in theAir Age. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office .
162. Rheingold, Howard. 1994. “Introduction, ” in H. Rheingold and S. Brand, The Millennium Whole Earth Catalog: Access to Tools and Ideas for the Twenty-First Century, 1st ed. (San Francisco: Harper San Francisco). Available at http://www.rheingold.com/texts/mwecintro.html.
163. Ruggie, John G. 1986 . “ Social Time and International Policy: Conceptualizing Global Population and Resource Issues, ” in M.P. Karns, ed., Persistent Patterns and Emergent Structures in a Waning Century. New York: Praeger.
164. Sachs, Wolfgang . 1994 . “ Satellitenblick. Die Ikone vom blauen Planeten und ihre Folgen für die Wissenschaft, ” in Ingo Braun and Bernward Joerges, eds., Technik ohne Grenzen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 305-346.
165. Sagan, Carl. 1994. The Pale Blue Dot. New York: Random House.
166. Schneider, Stephen, ed. 1991. Scientists on Gaia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
167. Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State. New Haven: Yale University Press.
168. Sebenius, James K. 1984. Negotiating the Law of the Sea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
169. Sebenius, James K. 1991. “Designing Negotiations Toward a New Regime: The Case of Global Warming.” International Security 15(4): 110-148.
170. Stevenson, Adlai E. 1979. “Strengthening the International Development Institutions, ” in Walter Johnson, ed., The Papers ofAdlai E. Stevenson, Volume 8. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
171. Takacs, David. 1996. TheIdeaofBiodiversity:PhilosophiesofParadise. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
172. Tribe, Laurence. 1973. “Technology Assessment and the Fourth Discontinuity: The Limits of Instrumental Rationality.” Southern California Law Review 46: 617-660.
173. U.S. Department of State . 1996. “Fact Sheet: US Oceans Policy and the Law of the Sea Convention, ” Bureau of Public Affairs, March 19. Website produced by Electronic Research Collections. Available at http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/environment/fact_sheets/960319.html.
174. Ward, Barbara. 1966. Spaceship Earth. New York: Columbia University Press.
175. Ward, Barbara and Rene Dubos. 1972. Only One Earth: The Care andMaintenance of a Small Planet. New York: Norton.
176. Weiss, Edith Brown. 1989. In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers and United Nations University.
177. Winner, Langdon. 1986. The Whale and theReactor:ASearchforLimits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
178. Winter, Jay. 1995. Sites of Memory, Sites of Mourning: The Great War in European Cultural History. New York : Cambridge University Press .
179. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
180. Ames, Bruce N., Renae Magaw, and Lois Swirsky Gold. 1987. ‘Ranking Possible Carcinogenic Hazards’. Science 236: 271-280.
181. Ashley, Richard K. 1983. ‘The Eye of Power: The Politics of World Modeling’. International Organization 37: 495-535.
182. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications .
183. Botkin, Daniel. 1990. DiscordantHarmonies:A New Ecologyfor the Twenty-First Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
184. Breyer, Stephen. 1993. Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective RiskRegulation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
185. Bullard, Robert D., ed. 1993. ConfrontingEnvironmentalRacism: Voicesfrom the Grassroots. Boston: South End Press.
186. Caldwell, Lynton Keith. 1990. International Environmental Policy: Emergence and Dimensions. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
187. Callon, Michel. 1986. ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay’. In John Law, ed., Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pp. 196-233. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
188. Chatwin, Bruce. 1988. The Songlines. London: Penguin Books.
189. Clark, William C. 1990. ‘Managing Planet Earth’. In ManagingPlanetEarth, Readings from Scientific American, pp. 1-11. New York: W.H. Freeman.
190. Clarke, Lee. 1989. Acceptable Risk?MakingDecisions in a ToxicEnvironment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
191. Ezrahi, Yaron. 1990. TheDescentofIcarus: Science and the TransformationofContempo-rary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
192. Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York : Pantheon .
193. Fussell, Paul. 1975. The Great War andModern Memory. New York: Oxford University Press .
194. Gieryn, Thomas F. and Anne E. Figert. 1990. ‘Ingredients for a Theory of Science in Society: O-Rings, Ice Water, C-Clamp, Richard Feynman, And the Press’. In Susan E. Cozzens and Thomas F. Gieryn, eds., Theories ofScience in Society, pp. 67-97. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
195. Greenberg, M. 1993. ‘Proving Environmental Inequity in Siting Locally Unwanted Land Uses’. Issues in Science and Technology 4: 235-252.
196. Haas, Peter M., Robert O. Keohane, and Marc A. Levy, eds. 1994. Institutionsfor the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
197. Haas, Peter M. 1990. Saving theMediterranean. New York: Columbia University Press.
198. Irwin, Alan and Brian Wynne, eds. 1996 . Misunderstanding Science?. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
199. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1998. ‘The Political Science of Risk Perception’. ReliabilityEngineering and System Safety 59: 91-99.
200. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1992. ‘Science, Politics, and the Renegotiation of Expertise at EPA’. Osiris 2: 195-217.
201. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1987. ‘Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science’. Social Studies of Science 17: 195-230.
202. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1986. Risk Management and Political Culture. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
203. Jasanoff, Sheila and Brian Wynne. 1998. ‘Science and Decision Making’. In Steve Rayner and Elizabeth L. Malone, eds., Human Choice and Climate Change, pp. 1-87. Columbus, OH : Battelle Press .
204. Johnson, Branden B. and Vincent T. Covello. 1987. The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk. Dordrecht: Reidel.
205. Latour, Bruno. 1992. ‘Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts’. In Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law, eds., Shaping Technology/Building Society, pp. 225-258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
206. Levin, Simon. 1992. ‘Sustaining Ecological Research’. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 73: 213-218.
207. National Research Council (cited as NRC). 1996. Understanding Risk. Washington, DC: National Academy Press .
208. National Research Council. 1994. Science and Judgment in RiskAssessment. Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
209. National Research Council. 1989. Field Testing GeneticallyModified Organisms: Framework for Decisions. Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
210. National Research Council. 1987. RegulatingPesticides in Food: The DelaneyParadox. Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
211. National Research Council. 1983. Risk Assessment in theFederal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
212. Perrow, Charles. 1984. NormalAccidents. New York: Basic Books.
213. Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
214. Power, Michael and Lynn S. McCarty. 1998. ‘A Comparative Analysis of Environmental Risk Assessment/Risk Management Frameworks’. Environmental Science and Technology 32: 224A-231A.
215. Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident (cited as Challenger Commission). 1986. Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident. Washington, DC: US GPO .
216. Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management (cited as Risk Commission). 1997. Framework for Environmental Health Risk Management. Washington, DC : Presidential/Congressional Commission .
217. Skolnikoff, Eugene. 1993. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
218. Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischhoff, and Sarah Lichtenstein. 1985. ‘Characterizing Perceived Risk’. In R.W. Kates, C. Hohenemser, and J.X. Kasperson, eds., Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology, pp. 91 - 125 . Boulder, CO : Westview Press .
219. Stone, Irving, ed. 1969. Dear Theo: TheAutobiography ofVincent Van Gogh. New York: Signet .
220. Tal, Alon. 1997. ‘Assessing the Environmental Movement’s Attitudes Toward Risk Assessment’. Environmental Science and Technology 31: 470A-476A.
221. Tennyson, Alfred, Lord. 1930. Idylls ofthe King. New York: Macmillan.
222. Tribe, Laurence. 1973. ‘Technology Assessment and the Fourth Discontinuity: The Limits of Instrumental Rationality ’. Southern California Law Review 46: 617-660.
223. Turner, Barry A. 1978. Man-Made Disasters. London: Wykeham.
224. Vaughan, Diane. 1996. TheChallengerLaunchDecision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
225. Weiss, Edith Brown. 1989. In Fairness toFuture Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Press.
226. Winner, Langdon. 1986. The Whale and theReactor:A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
227. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford : Oxford University Press .
228. Wynne, Brian and Sue Mayer. 1993. ‘How Science Fails the Environment’. New Scientist, 5 June: 33-35.
229. Anderson, F.R. (2003), ‘Peer review of data’, The National Law Journal, September 29, 2003.
230. Beck, U. (1992), RiskSociety: TowardsaNewModernity, London: Sage.
231. Boffey, P.M. (1975), The Brain BankofAmerica: An Inquiry into the Politics ofScience, New York: McGraw-Hill.
232. Brickman, R., S. Jasanoff, and T. Ilgen (1985), Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the U.S., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
233. Bush, V. (1945), Science - The Endless Frontier, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
234. Carson, J. (2004), ‘The merit of science and the science of merit’, in S. Jasanoff (ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London: Routledge, pp. 181-205.
235. Dahl, R.A. (1961), Who Governs?, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
236. Dennis, M.A. (1994), ‘ “Our first line of defense” ’: Two university laboratories in the postwar American State’, Isis 85(3): 427-55.
237. Dennis, M.A. (2004), ‘ Reconstructing sociotechnical order: Vanncvar Bush and US Science Policy’, in S. Jasanoff (ed.), States ofKnowledge: The CoProduction of Science and Social Order, London : Routledge .
238. Ezrahi, Y. (1990), The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
239. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge, London: Sage Publications.
240. Gieryn, T. (1999), Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
241. Golinski, J. (1992), Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760-1820, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
242. Greenberg, D.S. (2001), Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
243. Guston, D.H. (2000), Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research, New York: Cambridge University Press.
244. Jardine, L. (1999), Ingenious Pursuits: Building the Scientific Revolution, London: Little, Brown.
245. Jasanoff, S. (1986), Risk Management and Political Culture, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
246. lasanoff, S. (1987), “Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science, ” Social Studies ofScience 17: 195-230.
247. Jasanoff, S. (1990), The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
248. Jasanoff, S. (1990), The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
249. Jasanoff, S. (1996), “Beyond epistemology: Relativism and engagement in the politics of science, ” Social Studies ofScience 26(2): 393-418.
250. lasanoff, S. (2003), “(No) Accounting for expertise?”, Science and Public Policy 30 (3): 157-62.
251. Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London: Routledge.
252. Jasanoff, S. (2005), Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
253. Kevles, D. (1987), The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
254. Kevles, D.J. (1998), The Baltimore Case: A Trial of Politics, Science, and Character, New York: W.W. Norton.
255. Krimsky, S. (2003), Science in the Private Interest: How the Lure of Profits Has Corrupted the Virtue of Biomedical Research, Lanham, MD: Rowman-Littlefield, 2003.
256. Krimsky, S. and D. Golding (eds.) (1992), Social Theories of Risk, London: Praeger.
257. Merton, R.K. (1973), “The normative structure of science, ” in R.K. Merton (ed.), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 267-78.
258. Mukerji, C. (1989), A Fragile Power: Scientists and the State, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
259. National Research Council (1983), Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
260. Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons (2001), Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge, MA: Polity.
261. Philadelphia Inquirer (January 25, 2004), Editorial, “The White House vs. Science.”
262. Press, E. and J. Washburn (2000), “The kept university”, Atlantic Monthly, March 2000: 39-54.
263. Price, D.K. (1965), The Scientific Estate, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
264. Shapin, S. and S. Schaffer (1985), Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
265. Solingen, E. (1993), “Between markets and the state: Scientists in comparative perspective, ” Comparative Politics 26: 31-51, at p. 43.
266. Steinbrook, R. (2004), “Peer review and federal regulations”, New England Journal of Medicine 350(2): 103-4 (January 8, 2004).
267. Stokes, D.E. (1997), Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
268. Winickoff, D., S. Jasanoff, L. Busch, R. Grove-White, and B. Wynne (in press), “Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, risk, and democracy in world trade law, ” Yale Journal of International Law.
269. Ackerman, Bruce A. (1983), Reconstructing American Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
270. Ackerman, Bruce A. (1991), We The People: Foundations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
271. Ackerman, Bruce A. (1998), We The People: Transformations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
272. Anderson, Benedict (1991 [1983]), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised and expanded edition, London: Verso.
273. Anderson, Benedict (1994), ‘Exodus’, Critical Inquiry 20: 314-27.
274. Bartlett, Katherine T. (1990), ‘Feminist legal methods’, Harvard Law Review 103: 829 - 88 .
275. Bauman, Zygmunt (1991), Modernity andAmbivalence, Cambridge: Polity.
276. Beck, Ulrich (1992 [1986]), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage Publications .
277. Bijker, Wiebe, Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor Pinch 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
278. Bimber, Bruce (1996), The Politics ofExpertise in Congress, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
279. Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Susan Leigh Star (1999), Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
280. Boyle, James (1996), Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
281. Breyer, Stephen (1993), Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective RiskRegulation, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
282. Callon, Michel (1986), ‘Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay’, in J. Law (ed.), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 196-233.
283. Callon, Michel (1987), ‘Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis’, in W. Bijker, T. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 83-103.
284. Callon, Michel (1999), ‘The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge’, Science, Technology and Society 4(1): 81-94.
285. Cambrosio, Alberto, Peter Keating and Michael Mackenzie (1990), ‘Scientific practice in the courtroom: The construction of sociotechnical identities in a biotechnology patent dispute’, Social Problems 37: 275-93.
286. Carson, John (1993), ‘Army alpha, army brass, and the search for army intelligence’, Isis 84 : 278 - 309 .
287. Cohn, Bernard S. (1996), Colonialism and Its forms of Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
288. Daemmrich, Arthur (1998), ‘The evidence does not speak for itself: Expert witnesses and the organization of DNA-typing companies’, Social Studies of Science 28: 741-72.
289. Darman, Richard G. (1978), ‘The law of the sea: Rethinking U.S. interests’, Foreign Affairs 56 (2): 381.
290. Dickson, David (1984), The NewPolitics ofScience, New York: Pantheon Books.
291. Eder, Klaus and Catherine Kantner (2000), ‘Nationale Resonanzstrukturen in Europa: Eine Kritik der Rede vom Öffentlichkeitsdefizit’, in M. Bach (ed.), Die Europäisierung nationaler Gesellschaften, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 306-31.
292. Ezrahi, Yaron (1990), The DescentofIcarus: Science and the Transformation ofContem-porary Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
293. Fisher, William W. III, Morton J. Horwitz and Thomas A. Reed (eds.) (1993), American Legal Realism, New York : Oxford University Press .
294. Foster, Kenneth R. and Peter W. Huber (1997), Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
295. Foucault, Michel (1971 [1966]), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, New York : Pantheon Books .
296. Foucault, Michel (1979), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Random House .
297. Fried, Barbara (1998), The ProgressiveAssault on Laissez Faire: Robert Hale and the First Law and Economics Movement, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
298. Friedman, Thomas L. (1999), The Lexus and the Olive Tree, New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
299. Fukuyama, Francis (1992), The End ofHistory and the LastMan, New York: Free Press.
300. Fyfe, Gordon and John Law (eds.) (1988), PicturingPower: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, London : Routledge .
301. Gaskell, George, Martin W. Bauer, John Durant and N.C. Allum (1999), ‘Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. ’, Science 285: 384-7.
302. Gavaghan, Helen (1999), ‘Britain struggles to turn anti-GM tide’, Science 284: 1442-4.
303. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge, London: Sage Publications .
304. Giddens, Anthony (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Selfand Society in the LateModern Age, Cambridge : Polity .
305. Goldberg, Carey (1996), ‘Shunning “he” and “she, ” they fight for respect’, New York Times, September 8, Section 1:24.
306. Goldberg, Steven (1994), Culture Clash, New York: New York University Press.
307. Goldmann, Kjell (2001), Transforming the European Nation-State, London: Sage Publications .
308. Grimm, Dieter (1995), ‘Does Europe need a constitution?’, European Law Journal 1 (3): 282-302.
309. Guha, Ranajit and Gayatri Spivak (ed.) (1988), Selected Subaltern Studies, New York: Oxford University Press.
310. Haas, Peter M. (1990), Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation, New York: Columbia University Press.
311. Habermas, Juergen (1975 [1973]), Legitimation Crisis, Boston: Beacon Press.
312. Hacking, Ian (1983), Representing and Intervening, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
313. Haraway, Donna (1991), Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention ofNature, New York, NY: Routledge, Chapman, and Hall.
314. Haraway, Donna (1997), Modest-Witness@Second-Millennium.FemaleMan-Meets-Onco-mouse: Feminism and Technoscience, New York: Routledge.
315. Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri (2000), Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
316. Huber, Peter W. (1991), Galileo’s Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom, New York: Basic Books.
317. Hughes, Thomas P. (1983), Networks ofPower: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
318. Huxley, Aldous (1946), Brave New World, London: Harper & Brothers.
319. Ignatieff, Michael (1997), The Warrior’sHonor, Toronto: Viking.
320. Jasanoff, Sheila (1995a), Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology inAmerica. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
321. Jasanoff, Sheila (1995b), ‘Product, process, or programme: Three cultures and the regulation of biotechnology’, in M. Bauer (ed.), Resistance to New Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 311-31.
322. Jasanoff, Sheila (1998a), ‘The eye of everyman: Witnessing DNA in the Simpson trial’, Social Studies ofScience 28 (5-6): 713-40.
323. Jasanoff, Sheila (1998b), ‘Expert games in silicone gel breast implant litigation’, in M. Freeman and H. Reece (eds.), Science in Court, London: Dartmouth, pp. 83-107.
324. Jasanoff, Sheila (2001), ‘Election 2000: Mechanical error or system failure?’, Social Studies of Science 31 (3): 461-7.
325. Jasanoff, Sheila, Gerald Markle, James Petersen and Trevor Pinch (eds.) (1995), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
326. Joss, Simon and John Durant (1995), Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, London : Science Museum .
327. Kairys, David (ed.) (1990), The Politics ofLaw, New York: Pantheon.
328. Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink (1998), Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Network in International Politics, Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press .
329. Kelman, Mark (1987), A Guide to Critical Legal Studies, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
330. Keyssar, Alexander (2000), The Right to Vote: The Contested History ofDemocracy in the United States, New York: Basic Books.
331. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962), The Structure ofScientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
332. Latour, Bruno (1983), ‘Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world’, in K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds.), Science Observed, London: Sage, pp. 141-70.
333. Latour, Bruno (1987), Science in Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
334. Latour, Bruno (1988), ThePasteurization ofFrance, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
335. Latour, Bruno (1990), ‘Drawing things together’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 19-68.
336. Latour, Bruno (1993), We Have Neve rBeen Modern, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
337. Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar (1979), LaboratoryLife: The Construction ofScientific Facts, Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
338. Lessig, Lawrence (1997), ‘Constitution of code: Limitations on choice-based critiques of cyberspace regulation’, CommLaw Conspectus 5: 181-204.
339. Lewin, Tamar (2001), ‘In genetic testing for paternity, law often lags behind science’, New York Times, March 11, Section 1, 1.
340. MacKenzie, Donald (1990), Inventing Accuracy:A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
341. Marris, Claire and Pierre-Benoit Joly (1999), ‘Between consensus and citizens: public participation in technology assessment in France’, Science Studies 12 (2): 3-32.
342. Masood, Ehsan (1999), ‘Gag on food scientist is lifted as gene modification row hots up. . . .’, Nature 397: 547.
343. Miller, Clark and Paul Edwards (eds.) (2001), Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
344. Mol, Annemarie and John Law (1994), ‘Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology’, Social Studies ofScience 24: 641-71.
345. Nowotny, Helga (2001), Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge : Polity .
346. Nye, Joseph S., Philip D. Zelikow and David C. King (eds.) (1997), WhyPeopleDon’t Trust Government, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
347. Ogburn, William Fielding (1922), Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature, New York : B.W. Huebsch .
348. Porter, Theodore M. (1995), Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
349. Ratner, Sidney, James H. Soltow and Richard Sylla (1979), The Evolution of the American Economy, New York : Basic Books .
350. Reardon, Jennifer (2001), ‘The human genome diversity project: A failure to coproduce natural and social order’, Social Studies of Science 31: 357-88.
351. Sandel, Michael J. (1996) Democracy’s Discontent:America in Search ofa Public Philosophy, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
352. Sassen, Saskia (1991), The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
353. Schauer, Frederick (1998). ‘Internet privacy and the public-private distinction’, Jurimetrics 38: 555-64.
354. Schuck, Peter (1993), ‘Multi-culturalism redux: Science, law, and politics’, Yale Law and Policy Review 2: 1-46.
355. Scott, James C. (1998), SeeingLike a State, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
356. Service, Robert F. (1998), ‘Seed-sterilizing “terminator technology” sows discord’, Science 282 : 850-1 .
357. Shapin, Steven (1994), A Social History of Truth, Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
358. Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer (1985), Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
359. Shiva, Vandana (1993), Monocultures of the Mind: Perspectives on Biodiversity and Biotechnology, London : Third World Network .
360. Shiva, Vandana (1997), Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge, Toronto : Between The Lines .
361. Smaglik, Paul (2000), ‘Tissue donors use their influence in deal over gene patent terms’, Nature 408: 894-6.
362. Smith, Merritt Roe and Leo Marx (eds.) (1994), Does Technology Drive History?, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
363. Smith, Roger and Brian Wynne (eds.) (1989), ExpertEvidence: Interpreting Science in the Law, London : Routledge .
364. Stone, Christopher D. (1974), Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects, Los Altos, CA : William Kaufmann .
365. Storey, William (1997), Science and Power in Colonial Mauritius, Rochester, NY : University of Rochester Press.
366. Sunstein, Cass (1993), The Partial Constitution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
367. Tribe, Laurence H. (1978), American Constitutional Law, Mineola, NY: Foundation Press.
368. Visvanathan, Shiv (1997), Carnival for Science: Essays on Science, Technology and Development, Delhi : Oxford University Press .
369. Walker, Neil (1996), ‘European constitutionalism and European integration’, Public Law Summer 1996: 266-90.
370. Wynne, Brian (1982), Rationality and Ritual: The Windscale Inquiry and Nuclear Decisions in Britain, Chalfont St. Giles, UK: British Society for the History of Science.
371. Wynne, Brian (1988), ‘Unruly technology’, Social Studies ofScience 18: 147-167.
372. Wynne, Brian (1989), ‘Frameworks of rationality in risk management: Towards the testing of naive sociology’, in J. Brown (ed.), Environmental Threats: Social Sciences Approaches to Public Risk Perceptions, London: Belhaven, pp. 33-45