The Errors of Our Ways: Understanding Error Representations in Cerebellar-Dependent Motor Learning

Cerebellum

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 93-103

  Popa, Laurentiu S ^a   Streng, Martha L ^a   Hewitt, Angela L ^a   Ebner, Timothy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebellum; Complex spikes; Internal model; Motor learning; Purkinje cells; Simple spikes

Indexed keywords

BRAIN FUNCTION; CEREBELLUM; COGNITION; FIRING RATE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LOCOMOTION; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR ERROR; MOTOR LEARNING; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURKINJE CELL; REVIEW; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPIKE WAVE; ANIMAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; CEREBELLUM; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84959494988     PISSN: 14734222     EISSN: 14734230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-015-0685-5     Document Type: Review

References (154)

1. Marr D. A theory of cerebellar cortex. J Physiol. 1969;202:437–70.
2. Albus JS. A theory of cerebellar function. Math Biosci. 1971;10:25–61.
3. Ito M, Kano M. Long-lasting depression of parallel fiber-Purkinje cell transmission induced by conjunctive stimulation of parallel fibers and climbing fibers in the cerebellar cortex. Neurosci Lett. 1982;33:253–8.
4. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:1226–35.
5. Berniker M, Kording K. Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11:1454–61.
6. Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:89–108.
7. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3(Suppl):1212–7.
8. Miall RC, Wolpert DM. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 1996;9:1265–79.
9. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9:718–27.
10. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science. 1995;269:1880–2.
11. Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking. J Neurosci. 2006;26:9107–16.
12. Robinson DA. Oculomotor control signals. In: Bachyrita P, Lennerstrand G, editors. Basic mechanisms of ocular motility and their clinical implications. Oxford: Pergamon; 1975. p. 337–74.
13. Xu-Wilson M, Chen-Harris H, Zee DS, Shadmehr R. Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans. J Neurosci. 2009;29:12930–9.
14. Maschke M, Gomez CM, Ebner TJ, Konczak J. Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:230–8.
15. Imamizu H, Miyauchi S, Tamada T, et al. Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature. 2000;403:192–5.
16. Diedrichsen J, Hashambhoy Y, Rane T, Shadmehr R. Neural correlates of reach errors. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9919–31.
17. Flanagan JR, Wing AM. The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. J Neurosci. 1997;17:1519–28.
18. Bell CC, Han V, Sawtell NB. Cerebellum-like structures and their implications for cerebellar function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:1–24.
19. Brooks JX, Cullen KE. The primate cerebellum selectively encodes unexpected self-motion. Curr Biol. 2013;23:947–55.
20. Wong AL, Shelhamer M. Sensorimotor adaptation error signals are derived from realistic predictions of movement outcomes. J Neurophysiol. 2011;105:1130–40.
21. Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci. 2006;26:3642–5.
22. Taylor JA, Ivry RB. The role of strategies in motor learning. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1241:1–12.
23. Izawa J, Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Shadmehr R. Cerebellar contributions to reach adaptation and learning sensory consequences of action. J Neurosci. 2012;32:4230–9.
24. Gaveau V, Prablanc C, Laurent D, Rossetti Y, Priot AE. Visuomotor adaptation needs a validation of prediction error by feedback error. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:880.
25. Henriques DYP, Cressman EK. Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration. J Mot Behav. 2012;44:435–44.
26. Simani MC, McGuire LM, Sabes PN. Visual-shift adaptation is composed of separable sensory and task-dependent effects. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:2827–41.
27. van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol. 2002;12:834–7.
28. Kawato M. Learning internal models of the motor apparatus. In: Bloedel JR, Ebner TJ, Wise SP, editors. The acquisition of motor behavior in vertebrates. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1996. p. 409–30.
29. Miles FA, Lisberger SG. The “error” signals subserving adaptive gain control in the primate vestibulo-ocular reflex. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1981;374:513–25.
30. Magescas F, Prablanc C. Automatic drive of limb motor plasticity. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18:75–83.
31. Cameron BD, Franks IM, Inglis JT, Chua R. Reach adaptation to explicit vs. implicit target error. Exp Brain Res. 2010;203:367–80.
32. Izawa J, Shadmehr R. Learning from sensory and reward prediction errors during motor adaptation. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7, e1002012.
33. Schonberg T, Daw ND, Joel D, O'Doherty JP. Reinforcement learning signals in the human striatum distinguish learners from nonlearners during reward-based decision making. J Neurosci. 2007;27:12860–7.
34. Redding GM, Wallace B. Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996;22:379–94.
35. Cressman EK, Henriques DY. Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following exposure to misaligned sensory input. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103:1888–95.
36. Held R, Freedman SJ. Plasticity in human sensorimotor control. Science. 1963;142:455–62.
37. Pasalar S, Roitman AV, Durfee WK, Ebner TJ. Force field effects on cerebellar Purkinje cell discharge with implications for internal models. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:1404–11.
38. Bastian AJ. Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16:645–9.
39. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998;2:338–47.
40. Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH. Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science. 1997;277:821–5.
41. Kawato M, Kuroda T, Imamizu H, Nakano E, Miyauchi S, Yoshioka T. Internal forward models in the cerebellum: fMRI study on grip force and load force coupling. Prog Brain Res. 2003;142:171–88.
42. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Mentis M, et al. Differential cortical and subcortical activations in learning rotations and gains for reaching: a PET study. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:924–33.
43. Takagi M, Zee DS, Tamargo RJ. Effects of lesions of the oculomotor cerebellar vermis on eye movements in primate: smooth pursuit. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83:2047–62.
44. Golla H, Tziridis K, Haarmeier T, Catz N, Barash S, Thier P. Reduced saccadic resilience and impaired saccadic adaptation due to cerebellar disease. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;27:132–44.
45. Muller F, Dichgans J. Impairments of precision grip in two patients with acute unilateral cerebellar lesions: a simple parametric test for clinical use. Neuropsychologia. 1994;32:265–9.
46. Nowak DA, Hermsdorfer J, Rost K, Timmann D, Topka H. Predictive and reactive finger force control during catching in cerebellar degeneration. Cerebellum. 2004;3:227–35.
47. Smith MA, Shadmehr R. Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington’s disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:2809–21.
48. Ito M. Cerebellar learning in the vestibulo-ocular reflex. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998;2:313–21.
49. Ito M. Cerebellar long-term depression: characterization, signal transduction, and functional roles. Physiol Rev. 2001;81:1143–95.
50. Prsa M, Thier P. The role of the cerebellum in saccadic adaptation as a window into neural mechanisms of motor learning. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33:2114–28.
51. Thompson RF, Steinmetz JE. The role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of discrete behavioral responses. Neuroscience. 2009;162:732–55.
52. Thier P, Ilg U. The neural basis of smooth-pursuit eye movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:645–52.
53. Tseng YW, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:54–62.
54. Schlerf JE, Ivry RB, Diedrichsen J. Encoding of sensory prediction errors in the human cerebellum. J Neurosci. 2012;32:4913–22.
55. Taylor JA, Klemfuss NM, Ivry RB. An explicit strategy prevails when the cerebellum fails to compute movement errors. Cerebellum. 2010;9:580–6.
56. Oscarsson O. Functional organization of olivary projection to the cerebellar anterior lobe. In: Courville J, editor. The inferior olivary nucleus: anatomy and physiology. New York: Raven; 1980. p. 279–90.
57. Gilbert PF, Thach WT. Purkinje cell activity during motor learning. Brain Res. 1977;128:309–28.
58. Ito M. Mechanisms of motor learning in the cerebellum. Brain Res. 2000;886:237–45.
59. Stone LS, Lisberger SG. Detection of tracking errors by visual climbing fiber inputs to monkey cerebellar flocculus during pursuit eye movements. Neurosci Lett. 1986;72:163–8.
60. Kawato M, Gomi H. A computational model of four regions of the cerebellum based on feedback-error learning. Biol Cybern. 1992;68:95–103.
61. Kitazawa S, Kimura T, Yin PB. Cerebellar complex spikes encode both destinations and errors in arm movements. Nature. 1998;392:494–7.
62. Ito M. Error detection and representation in the olivo-cerebellar system. Front Neural Circuits. 2013;7:1–8.
63. Graf W, Simpson JI, Leonard CS. Spatial organization of visual messages of the rabbit’s cerebellar flocculus. II. Complex and simple spike responses of Purkinje cells. J Neurophysiol. 1988;60:2091–121.
64. Kobayashi Y, Kawano K, Takemura A, et al. Temporal firing patterns of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar ventral paraflocculus during ocular following responses in monkeys II. Complex spikes. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:832–48.
65. Barmack NH, Shojaku H. Vestibular and visual climbing fiber signals evoked in the uvula-nodulus of the rabbit cerebellum by natural stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74:2573–89.
66. Stone LS, Lisberger SG. Visual responses of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus during smooth-pursuit eye movements in monkeys. II. Complex spikes. J Neurophysiol. 1990;63:1262–75.
67. Kim JH, Wang JJ, Ebner TJ. Climbing fiber afferent modulation during treadmill locomotion in the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1987;57:787–802.
68. Lou JS, Bloedel JR. The responses of simultaneously recorded Purkinje cells to the perturbations of the step cycle in the walking ferret: a study using a new analytical method—the real-time postsynaptic response (RTPR). Brain Res. 1986;365:340–4.
69. Andersson G, Armstrong DM. Complex spikes in Purkinje cells in the lateral vermis (b zone) of the cat cerebellum during locomotion. J Physiol. 1987;385:107–34.
70. Soetedjo R, Fuchs AF. Complex spike activity of Purkinje cells in the oculomotor vermis during behavioral adaptation of monkey saccades. J Neurosci. 2006;26:7741–55.
71. Soetedjo R, Kojima Y, Fuchs AF. Complex spike activity in the oculomotor vermis of the cerebellum: a vectorial error signal for saccade motor learning? J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:1949–66.
72. Marko MK, Haith AM, Harran MD, Shadmehr R. Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation. J Neurophysiol. 2012;108:1752–63.
73. Robinson FR, Noto CT, Bevans SE. Effect of visual error size on saccade adaptation in monkey. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90:1235–44.
74. Wei K, Kording K. Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? J Neurophysiol. 2009;101:655–64.
75. Miles FA, Lisberger SG. Plasticity in the vestibulo-ocular reflex: a new hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1981;4:273–99.
76. Boyden ES, Raymond JL. Active reversal of motor memories reveals rules governing memory encoding. Neuron. 2003;39:1031–42.
77. Boyden ES, Katoh A, Raymond JL. Cerebellum-dependent learning: the role of multiple plasticity mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:581–609.
78. Medina JF, Lisberger SG. Links from complex spikes to local plasticity and motor learning in the cerebellum of awake-behaving monkeys. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11:1185–92.
79. Yang Y, Lisberger SG. Purkinje-cell plasticity and cerebellar motor learning are graded by complex-spike duration. Nature. 2014;510:529–32.
80. Ojakangas CL, Ebner TJ. Purkinje cell complex and simple spike changes during a voluntary arm movement learning task in the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1992;68:2222–36.
81. Ojakangas CL, Ebner TJ. Purkinje cell complex spike activity during voluntary motor learning: relationship to kinematics. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72:2617–30.
82. Rasmussen A, Jirenhed DA, Zucca R, Johansson F, Svensson P, Hesslow G. Number of spikes in climbing fibers determines the direction of cerebellar learning. J Neurosci. 2013;33:13436–40.
83. De Zeeuw CI, Yeo CH. Time and tide in cerebellar memory formation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:667–74.
84. Yeo CH, Hardiman MJ, Glickstein M. Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. II. Lesions of the cerebellar cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1985;60:99–113.
85. Mauk MD, Steinmetz JE, Thompson RF. Classical conditioning using stimulation of the inferior olive as the unconditioned stimulus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:5349–53.
86. Welsh JP. Systemic harmaline blocks associative and motor learning by the actions of the inferior olive. Eur J Neurosci. 1998;10:3307–20.
87. Ghelarducci B, Ito M, Yagi N. Impulse discharges from flocculus Purkinje cells of alert rabbits during visual stimulation combined with horizontal head rotation. Brain Res. 1975;87:66–72.
88. Ohyama T, Nores WL, Murphy M, Mauk MD. What the cerebellum computes. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:222–7.
89. Ebner TJ, Johnson MT, Roitman A, Fu Q. What do complex spikes signal about limb movements? Ann NY Acad Sci. 2002;978:205–18.
90. Fu QG, Mason CR, Flament D, Coltz JD, Ebner TJ. Movement kinematics encoded in complex spike discharge of primate cerebellar Purkinje cells. NeuroReport. 1997;8:523–9.
91. Horn KM, van Kan PL, Gibson AR. Reduction of rostral dorsal accessory olive responses during reaching. J Neurophysiol. 1996;76:4140–51.
92. Catz N, Dicke PW, Thier P. Cerebellar complex spike firing is suitable to induce as well as to stabilize motor learning. Curr Biol. 2005;15:2179–89.
93. Dash S, Catz N, Dicke PW, Thier P. Specific vermal complex spike responses build up during the course of smooth-pursuit adaptation, paralleling the decrease of performance error. Exp Brain Res. 2010;205:41–55.
94. Ebner TJ, Hewitt A, Popa LS. What features of movements are encoded in the discharge of cerebellar neurons during limb movements? Cerebellum. 2011;10:683–93.
95. Najafi F, Giovannucci A, Wang SS, Medina JF. Sensory-driven enhancement of calcium signals in individual Purkinje cell dendrites of awake mice. Cell Rep. 2014;6:792–8.
96. Najafi F, Giovannucci A, Wang SS, Medina JF. Coding of stimulus strength via analog calcium signals in Purkinje cell dendrites of awake mice. Elife. 2014;3, e03663.
97. Welsh JP, Lang EJ, Suglhara I, Llinas R. Dynamic organization of motor control within the olivocerebellar system. Nature. 1995;374:453–7.
98. Lang EJ. Excitatory afferent modulation of complex spike synchrony. Cerebellum. 2003;2:165–70.
99. Ozden I, Dombeck DA, Hoogland TM, Tank DW, Wang SS. Widespread state-dependent shifts in cerebellar activity in locomoting mice. PLoS ONE. 2012;7, e42650.
100. Sasaki K, Bower JM, Llinas R. Multiple Purkinje cell recording in rodent cerebellar cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 1989;1:572–86.
101. Lou JS, Bloedel JR. Responses of sagittally aligned Purkinje cells during perturbed locomotion: synchronous activation of climbing fiber inputs. J Neurophysiol. 1992;68:570–80.
102. Jacobson GA, Lev I, Yarom Y, Cohen D. Invariant phase structure of olivo-cerebellar oscillations and its putative role in temporal pattern generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:3579–84.
103. Schweighofer N, Doya K, Fukai H, Chiron JV, Furukawa T, Kawato M. Chaos may enhance information transmission in the inferior olive. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4655–60.
104. Kimpo RR, Rinaldi JM, Kim CK, Payne HL, Raymond JL. Gating of neural error signals during motor learning. Elife. 2014;3, e02076.
105. Nguyen-Vu TD, Kimpo RR, Rinaldi JM, et al. Cerebellar Purkinje cell activity drives motor learning. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:1734–6.
106. Guo CC, Ke MC, Raymond JL. Cerebellar encoding of multiple candidate error cues in the service of motor learning. J Neurosci. 2014;34:9880–90.
107. Ke MC, Guo CC, Raymond JL. Elimination of climbing fiber instructive signals during motor learning. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:1171–9.
108. Shin SL, Zhao GQ, Raymond JL. Signals and learning rules guiding oculomotor plasticity. J Neurosci. 2014;34:10635–44.
109. Greger B, Norris S. Simple spike firing in the posterior lateral cerebellar cortex of Macaque Mulatta was correlated with success-failure during a visually guided reaching task. Exp Brain Res. 2005;167:660–5.
110. Roitman AV, Pasalar S, Ebner TJ. Single trial coupling of Purkinje cell activity to speed and error signals during circular manual tracking. Exp Brain Res. 2009;192:241–51.
111. Kahlon M, Lisberger SG. Changes in the responses of Purkinje cells in the floccular complex of monkeys after motor learning in smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84:2945–60.
112. Hewitt A, Popa LS, Pasalar S, Hendrix CM, Ebner TJ. Representation of limb kinematics in Purkinje cell simple spike discharge is conserved across multiple tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:2232–47.
113. Popa LS, Hewitt AL, Ebner TJ. Predictive and feedback performance errors are signaled in the simple spike discharge of individual Purkinje cells. J Neurosci. 2012;32:15345–58.
114. Paninski L, Fellows MR, Hatsopoulos NG, Donoghue JP. Spatiotemporal tuning of motor cortical neurons for hand position and velocity. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:515–32.
115. Popa LS, Hewitt AL, Ebner TJ. The cerebellum for jocks and nerds alike. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:1–13.
116. Crowe DA, Goodwin SJ, Blackman RK, et al. Prefrontal neurons transmit signals to parietal neurons that reflect executive control of cognition. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:1484–91.
117. Wallman J, Fuchs AF. Saccadic gain modification: visual error drives motor adaptation. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:2405–16.
118. Noto CT, Robinson FR. Visual error is the stimulus for saccade gain adaptation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001;12:301–5.
119. Nezafat R, Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH. Long-term adaptation to dynamics of reaching movements: a PET study. Exp Brain Res. 2001;140:66–76.
120. Balsters JH, Ramnani N. Cerebellar plasticity and the automation of first-order rules. J Neurosci. 2011;31:2305–12.
121. Ploghaus A, Tracey I, Clare S, Gati JS, Rawlins JN, Matthews PM. Learning about pain: the neural substrate of the prediction error for aversive events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:9281–6.
122. Meyer-Lohmann J, Hore J, Brooks VB. Cerebellar participation in generation of prompt arm movements. J Neurophysiol. 1977;40:1038–50.
123. Lisberger SG, Fuchs AF. Role of primate flocculus during rapid behavioral modification of vestibuloocular reflex. I. Purkinje cell activity during visually guided horizontal smooth-pursuit eye movements and passive head rotation. J Neurophysiol. 1978;41:733–63.
124. Jirenhed DA, Bengtsson F, Hesslow G. Acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition of a cerebellar cortical memory trace. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2493–502.
125. Catz N, Dicke PW, Thier P. Cerebellar-dependent motor learning is based on pruning a Purkinje cell population response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:7309–14.
126. Medina JF, Lisberger SG. Encoding and decoding of learned smooth pursuit eye movements in the floccular complex of the monkey cerebellum. J Neurophysiol. 2009;102:2039–54.
127. Dash S, Dicke PW, Thier P. A vermal Purkinje cell simple spike population response encodes the changes in eye movement kinematics due to smooth pursuit adaptation. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013;7:3.
128. Hewitt AL, Popa LS, Ebner TJ. Changes in Purkinje cell simple spike encoding of reach kinematics during adaptation to a mechanical perturbation. J Neurosci. 2015;35:1106–24.
129. Dugas C, Smith AM. Responses of cerebellar Purkinje cells to slip of a hand-held object. J Neurophysiol. 1992;67:483–95.
130. Nowak DA, Topka H, Timmann D, Boecker H, Hermsdorfer J. The role of the cerebellum for predictive control of grasping. Cerebellum. 2007;6:7–17.
131. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci. 1994;14:3208–24.
132. Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci. 2000;20:8916–24.
133. Scheidt RA, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Conditt MA, Rymer WZ, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84:853–62.
134. Richter S, Maschke M, Timmann D, et al. Adaptive motor behavior of cerebellar patients during exposure to unfamiliar external forces. J Mot Behav. 2004;36:28–38.
135. Kojima Y, Soetedjo R, Fuchs AF. Changes in simple spike activity of some Purkinje cells in the oculomotor vermis during saccade adaptation are appropriate to participate in motor learning. J Neurosci. 2010;30:3715–27.
136. Miles FA, Braitman DJ, Dow BM. Long-term adaptive changes in primate vestibuloocular reflex. IV. Electrophysiological observations in flocculus of adapted monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1980;43:1477–93.
137. Raymond JL, Lisberger SG. Multiple subclasses of Purkinje cells in the primate floccular complex provide similar signals to guide learning in the vestibulo-ocular reflex. Learn Mem. 1997;3:503–18.
138. Koekkoek SK, Hulscher HC, Dortland BR, et al. Cerebellar LTD and learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses. Science. 2003;301:1736–9.
139. Gao Z, van Beugen BJ, De Zeeuw CI. Distributed synergistic plasticity and cerebellar learning. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:619–35.
140. Hansel C, Linden DJ, D'Angelo E. Beyond parallel fiber LTD: the diversity of synaptic and non-synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:467–75.
141. Jorntell H, Hansel C. Synaptic memories upside down: bidirectional plasticity at cerebellar parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses. Neuron. 2006;52:227–38.
142. Sing GC, Joiner WM, Nanayakkara T, Brayanov JB, Smith MA. Primitives for motor adaptation reflect correlated neural tuning to position and velocity. Neuron. 2009;64:575–89.
143. Bauswein E, Kolb FP, Leimbeck B, Rubia FJ. Simple and complex spike activity of cerebellar Purkinje cells during active and passive movements in the awake monkey. J Physiol. 1983;339:379–94.
144. Mano N, Kanazawa I, Yamamoto K. Complex-spike activity of cerebellar Purkinje cells related to wrist tracking movement in monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1986;56:137–58.
145. Roitman AV, Pasalar S, Johnson MT, Ebner TJ. Position, direction of movement, and speed tuning of cerebellar Purkinje cells during circular manual tracking in monkey. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9244–57.
146. Ramnani N. Automatic and controlled processing in the corticocerebellar system. Prog Brain Res. 2014;210:255–85.
147. Wolpert DM, Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 1998;11:1317–29.
148. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:1026–31.
149. Ebner TJ, Pasalar S. Cerebellum predicts the future motor state. Cerebellum. 2008;7:583–8.
150. Cerminara NL, Apps R, Marple-Horvat DE. An internal model of a moving visual target in the lateral cerebellum. J Physiol. 2009;587:429–42.
151. Witter L, Canto CB, Hoogland TM, de Gruijl JR, De Zeeuw CI. Strength and timing of motor responses mediated by rebound firing in the cerebellar nuclei after Purkinje cell activation. Front Neural Circuits. 2013;7:133.
152. Chaumont J, Guyon N, Valera AM, et al. Clusters of cerebellar Purkinje cells control their afferent climbing fiber discharge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:16223–8.
153. Marshall SP, Lang EJ. Local changes in the excitability of the cerebellar cortex produce spatially restricted changes in complex spike synchrony. J Neurosci. 2009;29:14352–62.
154. Yang Y, Lisberger SG. Interaction of plasticity and circuit organization during the acquisition of cerebellum-dependent motor learning. Elife. 2013;2, e01574.