Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1752-1763

  Marko, Mollie K ^a   Haith, Adrian M ^a   Harran, Michelle D ^a   Shadmehr, Reza ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebellum; Motor learning; Proprioception; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBELLUM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTIVE FEEDBACK; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

ADULT; CEREBELLUM; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84866377868     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00177.2012     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Albus JS. A theory of cerebellar function. Math Biosci 10: 25-61, 1971.
2. Bock O, Thomas M. Proprioception plays a different role for sensorimotor adaptation to different distortions. Hum Mov Sci 30: 415-423, 2011.
3. Burge J, Ernst MO, Banks MS. The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. J Vis 8: 20.1.19415-19420, 2008.
4. Catz N, Dicke PW, Thier P. Cerebellar complex spike firing is suitable to induce as well as to stabilize motor learning. Curr Biol 15: 2179-2189, 2005.
5. Cheng S, Sabes PN. Modeling sensorimotor learning with linear dynamical systems. Neural Comput 18: 760-793, 2006.
6. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Bastian AJ, Shadmehr R. Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning. J Neurophysiol 103: 2275-2284, 2010.
7. Donchin O, Francis JT, Shadmehr R. Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control. J Neurosci 23: 9032-9045, 2003.
8. Donchin O, Rabe K, Diedrichsen J, Lally N, Schoch B, Gizewski ER, Timmann D. Cerebellar regions involved in adaptation to force field and visuomotor perturbation. J Neurophysiol 107: 134-147, 2012.
9. Fine MS, Thoroughman KA. Motor adaptation to single force pulses: sensitive to direction but insensitive to within-movement pulse placement and magnitude. J Neurophysiol 96: 710-720, 2006.
10. Gilbert PFC, Thach WT. Purkinje cell activity during motor learning. Brain Res 128: 309-328, 1977.
11. Gonzalez Castro LN, Monsen CB, Smith MA. The binding of learning to action in motor adaptation. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1002052, 2011.
12. Haswell CC, Izawa J, Dowell LR, Mostofsky SH, Shadmehr R. Representation of internal models of action in the autistic brain. Nat Neurosci 12: 970-972, 2009.
13. Hinkley DV. On the ratio of two correlated normal random variables. Biometrika 56: 635-639, 1969.
14. Izawa J, Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Shadmehr R. Cerebellar contributions to reach adaptation and learning sensory consequences of action. J Neurosci 32: 4230-4239, 2012a.
15. Izawa J, Pekny SE, Marko MK, Haswell CC, Shadmehr R, Mostofsky SH. Motor learning relies on integrated sensory inputs in ADHD, but overselectively on proprioception in autism spectrum conditions. Autism Res 5: 124-136, 2012b.
16. Izawa J, Shadmehr R. On-line processing of uncertain information in visuomotor control. J Neurosci 28: 11360-11368, 2008.
17. Izawa J, Shadmehr R. Learning from sensory and reward prediction errors during motor adaptation. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1002012, 2011.
18. Joiner WM, Smith MA. Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching. J Neurophysiol 100: 2948-2955, 2008.
19. Kawato M. Cerebellum and motor control. In: The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, edited by Arbib MA. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003, p. 190-195.
20. Kitazawa S, Kimura T, Yin PB. Cerebellar complex spikes encode both destinations and errors in arm movements. Nature 392: 494-497, 1998.
21. Kording KP, Wolpert DM. The loss function of sensorimotor learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 9839-9842, 2004.
22. Korenberg A, Ghahramani Z. A Bayesian view of motor adaptation. Curr Psychol Cogn 21: 537-564, 2002.
23. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2: 1026-1031, 1999.
24. Marr D. A theory of cerebellar cortex. J Physiol 202: 437-470, 1969.
25. Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT. Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. Brain 119: 1183-1198, 1996.
26. Maschke M, Gomez CM, Ebner TJ, Konczak J. Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements. J Neurophysiol 91: 230-238, 2004.
27. Medina JF, Lisberger SG. Links from complex spikes to local plasticity and motor learning in the cerebellum of awake-behaving monkeys. Nat Neurosci 11: 1185-1192, 2008.
28. Ojakangas CL, Ebner TJ. Purkinje cell complex and simple spike changes during a voluntary arm movement learning task in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 68: 2222-2236, 1992.
29. Pekny SE, Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Shadmehr R. Protection and expression of human motor memories. J Neurosci 31: 13829-13839, 2011.
30. Pipereit K, Bock O, Vercher JL. The contribution of proprioceptive feedback to sensorimotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 174: 45-52, 2006.
31. Rabe K, Livne O, Gizewski ER, Aurich V, Beck A, Timmann D, Donchin O. Adaptation to visuomotor rotation and force field perturbation is correlated to different brain areas in patients with cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol 101: 1961-1971, 2009.
32. Robinson FR, Noto CT, Bevans SE. Effect of visual error size on saccade adaptation in monkey. J Neurophysiol 90: 1235-1244, 2003.
33. Scheidt RA, Conditt MA, Secco EL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. J Neurophysiol 93: 3200-3213, 2005.
34. Scheidt RA, Dingwell JB, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Learning to move amid uncertainty. J Neurophysiol 86: 971-985, 2001.
35. Scheidt RA, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Conditt MA, Rymer WZ, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. J Neurophysiol 84: 853-862, 2000.
36. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
37. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4: e179, 2006.
38. Smith MA, Shadmehr R. Modulation of the rate of error-dependent learning by the statistical properties of the task. Proc Adv Computational Motor Control 3, 2004.
39. Smith MA, Shadmehr R. Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol 93: 2809-2821, 2005.
40. Soetedjo R, Fuchs AF. Complex spike activity of purkinje cells in the oculomotor vermis during behavioral adaptation of monkey saccades. J Neurosci 26: 7741-7755, 2006.
41. Soetedjo R, Kojima Y, Fuchs AF. Complex spike activity in the oculomotor vermis of the cerebellum: a vectorial error signal for saccade motor learning? J Neurophysiol 100: 1949-1966, 2008.
42. Synofzik M, Thier P, Leube DT, Schlotterbeck P, Lindner A. Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one's actions. Brain 133: 262-271, 2010.
43. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407: 742-747, 2000.
44. Tseng YW, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol 98: 54-62, 2007.
45. van Beers RJ. Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise. Neuron 63: 406-417, 2009.
46. Veerman MM, Brenner E, Smeets JB. The latency for correcting a movement depends on the visual attribute that defines the target. Exp Brain Res 187: 219-228, 2008.
47. Wei K, Kording K. Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? J Neurophysiol 101: 655-664, 2009.
48. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269: 1880-1882, 1995.