Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1454-1461

  Berniker, Max ^a   Kording, Konrad ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; LIMB MOVEMENT; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVOUS SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BAYES THEOREM; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HAND; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; POSTURAL BALANCE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 56749154254     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nn.2229     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Conditt, M.A., Gandolfo, F. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A. The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the armby rote memorization of past experience. J. Neurophysiol. 78, 554-560 (1997).
2. Conditt, M.A. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A. Central representation of time during motor learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11625-11630 (1999).
3. Ahmed, A.A., Wolpert, D.M. & Flanagan, J.R. Flexible representations of dynamics are used in object manipulation. Curr. Biol. 18, 763-768 (2008).
4. Cothros, N., Wong, J.D. & Gribble, P.L. Are there distinct neural representations of object and limb dynamics? Exp. Brain Res. 173, 689-697 (2006).
5. Shadmehr, R. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14, 3208-3224 (1994).
6. Criscimagna-Hemminger, S.E. et al. Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 168-176 (2003).
7. Sainburg, R.L. & Kalakanis, D. Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 2661-2675 (2000).
8. Sainburg, R.L. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp. Brain Res. 142, 241-258 (2002).
9. Dizio, P. & Lackner, J.R. Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. J. Neurophysiol. 74, 1787-1792 (1995).
10. Lackner, J.R. & Dizio, P. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J. Neurophysiol. 72, 299-313 (1994).
11. Lackner, J.R. & Dizio, P. Gravitoinertial force background level affects adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 546-553 (1998).
12. Wang, J. & Sainburg, R.L. Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations. Exp. Brain Res. 155, 1-8 (2004).
13. Bock, O. Early stages of load compensation in human aimed arm movements. Behav. Brain Res. 55, 61-68 (1993).
14. Krakauer, J.W., Ghilardi, M.F. & Ghez, C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 1026-1031 (1999).
15. Wang, J. & Sainburg, R.L. Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 349-360 (2004).
16. Lackner, J.R. & DiZio, P. Motor control and learning in altered dynamic environments. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 653-659 (2005).
17. Haruno, M., Wolpert, D.M. & Kawato, M. Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput. 13, 2201-2220 (2001).
18. Schaal, S. & Schweighofer, N. Computational motor control in humans and robots. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 675-682 (2005).
19. Wolpert, D.M. & Kawato, M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 11, 1317-1329 (1998).
20. Shadmehr, R. & Moussavi, Z.M. Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements. J. Neurosci. 20, 7807-7815 (2000).
21. Malfait, N., Shiller, D.M. & Ostry, D.J. Transfer of motor learning across arm configurations. J. Neurosci. 22, 9656-9660 (2002).
22. Malfait, N., Gribble, P.L. & Ostry, D.J. Generalization of motor learning based onmultiple field exposures and local adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 3327-3338 (2005).
23. Krakauer, J.W. et al. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J. Neurosci. 20, 8916-8924 (2000).
24. Malfait, N. & Ostry, D.J. Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load? J. Neurosci. 24, 8084-8089 (2004).
25. Burgess, J.K., Bareither, R. & Patton, J.L. Single limb performance following contralateral bimanual limb training. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 15, 347-355 (2007).
26. Laszlo, J.I., Baguley, R.A. & Bairstow, P.J. Bilateral transfer in tapping skill in the absence of peripheral information. J. Mot. Behav. 2, 261-271 (1970).
27. Bagesteiro, L.B. & Sainburg, R.L. Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. J. Neurophysiol. 88, 2408-2421 (2002).
28. Gold, J.I. & Shadlen, M.N. The neural basis of decision making. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 535-574 (2007).
29. Ma, W.J. et al. Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1432-1438 (2006).
30. Wolpert, D.M., Ghahramani, Z. & Jordan, M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269, 1880-1882 (1995).
31. Kording, K.P. & Wolpert, D.M. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427, 244-247 (2004).
32. Ernst, M.O. & Banks, M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415, 429-433 (2002).
33. Ernst, M.O. & Bulthoff, H.H. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 162-169 (2004).
34. Yuille, A. & Kersten, D. Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis? Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 301-308 (2006).
35. Kording, K.P. et al. Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE 2, e943 (2007).
36. Weiss, Y., Simoncelli, E.P. & Adelson, E.H. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 598-604 (2002).
37. Tenenbaum, J.B., Griffiths, T.L. & Kemp, C. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 309-318 (2006).
38. Tong, C., Wolpert, D.M. & Flanagan, J.R. Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study. J. Neurosci. 22, 1108-1113 (2002).
39. Kording, K.P., Tenenbaum, J.B. & Shadmehr, R. The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 779-786 (2007).
40. Hogan, N. An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J. Neurosci. 4, 2745-2754 (1984).
41. Uno, Y., Kawato, M. & Suzuki, R. Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Minimum torque-change model. Biol. Cybern. 61, 89-101 (1989).
42. Chib, V.S. et al. Haptic identification of surfaces as fields of force. J. Neurophysiol. 95, 1068-1077 (2006).
43. Todorov, E. & Jordan, M.I. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 1226-1235 (2002).
44. Izawa, J. et al. Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization. J. Neurosci. 28, 2883-2891 (2008).