Visual-shift adaptation is composed of separable sensory and task-dependent effects

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 98, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 2827-2841

  Simani, M C ^a   McGuire, L M M ^a   Sabes, P N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EYE HAND COORDINATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HANDEDNESS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SENSORY NERVE CELL; STEREOTYPY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

EID: 36248984294     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00290.2007     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Ariff G, Donchin O, Nanayakkara T, Shadmehr R. A real-time state predictor in motor control: study of saccadic eye movements during unseen reaching movements. J Neurosci 22: 7721-7729, 2002.
2. Baizer JS, Glickstein M. Proceedings: role of cerebellum in prism adaptation. J Physiol 236: 34-35, 1974.
3. Baizer JS, Kralj-Hans I, Glickstein M. Cerebellar lesions and prism adaptation in macaque monkeys. J Neurophysiol 81: 1960-1965, 1999.
4. Bard C, Fleury M, Teasdale N, Paillard J, Nougier V. Contribution of proprioception for calibrating and updating the motor space. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73: 246-254, 1995.
5. Bedford FL. Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15: 232-248, 1989.
6. Bedford FL. Perceptual and cognitive spatial learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19: 517-530, 1993.
7. Bernier PM, Chua R, Bard C, Franks IM. Updating of an internal model without proprioception: a deafferentation study. Neuroreport 17: 1421-1425, 2006.
8. Bizzi E, Polit A, Morasso P. Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position. J Neurophysiol 39: 435-444, 1976.
9. Cheng S, Sabes PN. Calibration of visually guided reaching is driven by error-corrective learning and internal dynamics. J Neurophysiol 97: 3057-3069, 2007.
10. Choe CS, Welch RB. Variables affecting the intermanual transfer and decay of prism adaptation. J Exp Psychol 102: 1076-1084, 1974.
11. Clower DM, Hoffman JM, Votaw JR, Faber TL, Woods RP, Alexander GE. Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching. Nature 383: 618-621, 1996.
12. Cohen MM. Continuous versus terminal visual feedback in prism aftereffects. Percept Mot Skills 24: 1295-1302, 1967.
13. Craske B. Intermodal transfer of adaptation to displacement (Letter). Nature 210: 765, 1966.
14. Craske B, Gregg SJ. Prism after-effects: identical results for visual targets and unexposed limb. Nature 212: 104-105, 1966.
15. Crawshaw M, Craske B. No retinal component in prism adaptation. Acta Psychol (Amst) 38: 421-423, 1974.
16. Diedrichsen J, Hashambhoy Y, Rane T, Shadmehr R. Neural correlates of reach errors. J Neurosci 25: 9919-9931, 2005.
17. Donchin O, Francis JT, Shadmehr R. Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control. J Neurosci 23: 9032-9045, 2003.
18. Ebenholtz SM. The possible role of eye-muscle potentiation in several forms of prism adaptation. Perception 3: 477-485, 1974.
19. Feldman AG. Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (lambda model) for motor control. J Mot Behav 18: 17-54, 1986.
20. Fisher NI. Statistical Analysis of Circular Data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993.
21. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM, Jordan MI. Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation. J Neurosci 16: 7085-7096, 1996.
22. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM, Jordan MI. Computational models of sensorimotor integration. In: Self-Organization, Computational Maps and Motor Control, edited by Morasso PG, Sanguineti V. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997, p. 117-147.
23. Good PI. Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses (2nd ed.). New York: Springer, 2000.
24. Guedon O, Gauthier G, Cole J, Vercher JL, Blouin J. Adaptation in visuomanual tracking depends on intact proprioception. J Motor Behav 30: 234-248, 1998.
25. Guerraz M, Navarro J, Ferrero F, Cremieux J, Blouin J. Perceived versus actual head-on-trunk orientation during arm movement control. Exp Brain Res 172: 221-229, 2006.
26. Hamilton CR, Bossom J. Decay of prism aftereffects. J Exp Psychol 67: 148-150, 1964.
27. Harris CS. Adaptation to displaced vision: visual, motor, or proprioceptive change? Science 140: 812-813, 1963.
28. Harris CS. Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. Psychol Rev 72: 419-444, 1965.
29. Harris CS. Beware of the straight-ahead shift? A nonperceptual change in experiments on adaptation to displaced vision. Perception 3: 461-476, 1974.
30. Hay JC, Pick HL. Gaze-contingent prism adaptation: optical and motor factors. J Exp Psychol 72: 640-648, 1966.
31. Held R, Durlach N. Telepresence, time delay and adaptation. In: Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments, edited by Ellis SR, Kaiser M, Grunwald A. London: Taylor & Francis, 1993, p. 232-246.
32. Held R, Freedman SJ. Plasticity in human sensorimotor control. Science 142: 455-462, 1963.
33. Held R, Gottlieb N. Technique for studying adaptation to disarranged handeye coordination. Percept Mot Skills 8: 83-86, 1958.
34. Hollerbach JM, Atkeson CG. Inferring limb coordination strategies from trajectory kinematics. J Neurosci Methods 21: 181-194, 1987.
35. Ingram HA, van Donkelaar P, Cole J, Vercher JL, Gauthier GM, Miall RC. The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task. Exp Brain Res 132: 114-126, 2000.
36. Kitazawa S, Kimura T, Uka T. Prism adaptation of reaching movements: specificity for the velocity of reaching. J Neurosci 17: 1481-1492, 1997.
37. Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20: 8916-8924, 2000.
38. Kurata K, Hoshi E. Reacquisition deficits in prism adaptation after muscimol microinjection into the ventral premotor cortex of monkeys. J Neurophysiol 81: 1927-1938, 1999.
39. Kwakernaak H, Sivan R. Linear Optimal Control Systems. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1972.
40. Lackner JR. The role of posture in adaptation to visual rearrangement. Neuropsychologia 11: 33-44, 1973.
41. Land MF, Hayhoe M. In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Res 41: 3559-3565, 2001.
42. Lee JH, van Donkelaar P. The human dorsal premotor cortex generates on-line error corrections during sensorimotor adaptation. J Neurosci 26: 3330-3334, 2006.
43. Magescas F, Prablanc C. Automatic drive of limb motor plasticity. J Cogn Neurosci 18: 75-83, 2006.
44. Maravita A, McNeil J, Malhotra P, Greenwood R, Husain M, Driver J. Prism adaptation can improve contralesional tactile perception in neglect. Neurology 60: 1829-1831, 2003.
45. Mars F, Honore J, Richard C, Coquery JM. Effects of all illusory orientation of the head on straight-ahead pointing movements. Cah Psychol Cogn 17: 749-762, 1998.
46. Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT. Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. Brain 119: 1183-1198, 1996.
47. Neggers SF, Bekkering H. Gaze anchoring to a pointing target is present during the entire pointing movement and is driven by a non-visual signal. J Neurophysiol 86: 961-970, 2001.
48. Newport R, Brown L, Husain M, Mort D, Jackson SR. The role of the posterior parietal lobe in prism adaptation: failure to adapt to optical prisms in a patient with bilateral damage to posterior parietal cortex. Cortex 42: 720-729, 2006.
49. Paap KR, Ebenholtz SM. Perceptual consequences of potentiation in extraocular muscles - alternative explanation for adaptation to wedge prisms. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2: 457-468, 1976.
50. Pipereit K, Bock O, Vercher JL. The contribution of proprioceptive feedback to sensorimotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 174: 45-52, 2006.
51. Redding GM, Wallace B. Sources of "overadditivity" in prism adaptation. Percept Psychophys 24: 58-62, 1978.
52. Redding GM, Wallace B. Components of prism adaptation in terminal and concurrent exposure: organization of the eye-hand coordination loop. Percept Psychophys 44: 59-68, 1988.
53. Redding GM, Wallace B. Effects on prism adaptation of duration and timing of visual feedback during pointing. J Mot Behav 22: 209-224, 1990.
54. Redding GM, Wallace B. Effects of pointing rate and availability of visual feedback on visual and proprioceptive components of prism adaptation. J Mot Behav 24: 226-237, 1992.
55. Redding GM, Wallace B. Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22: 379-394, 1996.
56. Redding GM, Wallace B. Adaptive Spatial Alignment (Scientific Psychology Series). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997.
57. Redding GM, Wallace B. Generalization of prism adaptation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32: 1006-1022, 2006.
58. Rossetti Y, Desmurget M, Prablanc C. Vectorial coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both? J Neurophysiol 74: 457-463, 1995.
59. Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farne A, Li L, Boisson D, Perenin MT. Prismatic displacement of vision induces transient changes in the timing of eye-hand coordination. Naure 395: 166-169, 1998.
60. Sailer U, Eggert T, Ditterich J, Straube A. Spatial and temporal aspects of eye-hand coordination across different tasks. Exp Brain Res 134: 163-173, 2000.
61. Sainburg RL, Poizner H, Ghez C. Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. J Neurophysiol 70: 2136-2147, 1993.
62. Saunders JA, Knill DC. Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 152: 341-352, 2003.
63. Sober SJ, Sabes PN. Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci 23: 6982-6992, 2003.
64. Sober SJ, Sabes PN. Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Nat Neurosci 8: 490-497, 2005.
65. Stevens J. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996.
66. Taub E, Goldberg LA. Prism adaptation: control of intermanual transfer by distribution of practice. Science 180: 755-757, 1973.
67. Templeton WB, Howard IP, Wilkinson DA. Additivity components of prismatic adaptation. Percept Psychophys 15: 249-257, 1974.
68. Todorov E, Li W. A generalized iterative LQG method for locally-optimal feedback control of constrained nonlinear stochastic systems. Proc IEEE Am Control Conf 1: 300-306, 2005.
69. Uhlarik JJ, Canon LK. Influence of concurrent and terminal exposure conditions on the nature of perceptual adaptation. J Exp Psychol 91: 233-239, 1971.
70. van Beers RJ, Haggard P, Wolpert DM. The role of execution noise in movement variability. J Neurophysiol 91: 1050-1063, 2004.
71. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ. How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Exp Brain Res 111: 253-261, 1996.
72. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ. The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp Brain Res 122: 367-377, 1998.
73. van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol 12: 834-837, 2002.
74. Vetter P, Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM. Evidence for an eye-centered spherical representation of the visuomotor map. J Neurophysiol 81: 935-939, 1999.
75. von Helmholtz H. Treatise on Physiological Optics. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1925.
76. Wallace B, Redding GM. Additivity in prism adaptation as manifested in intermanual and interocular transfer. Percept Psychophys 25: 133-136, 1979.
77. Weiner MJ, Hallett M, Funkenstein HH. Adaptation to lateral displacement of vision in patients with lesions of the central nervous system. Neurology 33: 766-772, 1983.
78. Welch RB. Adaptation to prism-displaced vision: the importance of target-pointing. Percept Psychophys 5: 305-309, 1969.
79. Welch RB. Adaptation of space perception. In: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Sensory Processes and Perception, edited by Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP. New York: Wiley, 1986, p. 1-45.
80. Welch RB, Choe CS, Heinrich DR. Evidence for a three-component model of prism adaptation. J Exp Psychol 103: 700-705, 1974.
81. Welch RB, Rhoades RW. The manipulation of informational feedback and its effects upon prism adaptation. Can J Psychol 23: 415-428, 1969.
82. Wilkinson DA. Visual-motor control loop: a linear system? J Exp Psychol 89: 250-257, 1971.