An explicit strategy prevails when the cerebellum fails to compute movement errors

Cerebellum

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 580-586

  Taylor, Jordan A ^a   Klemfuss, Nola M ^a   Ivry, Richard B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Cerebellum; Cognitive; Motor control; Motor learning; Reaching

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL TRAINING; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; MALE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPINOCEREBELLAR DEGENERATION; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; CEREBELLAR ATAXIA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79952735179     PISSN: 14734222     EISSN: 14734230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-010-0201-x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Krakauer JW. Motor learning and consolidation: the case of visuomotor rotation. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Progress in Motor Control. 2008;629:405-21.
2. Cunningham H. Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989;15(3):493-506.
3. Curran T, Keele SW. Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993;19:189-202.
4. Hwang EJ, Smith MA, Shadmehr R. Dissociable effects of the implicit and explicit memory systems on learning control of reaching. Exp Brain Res. 2006;173(3):425-37. (Pubitemid 44222338)
5. Werner S, Bock O. Effects of variable practice and declarative knowledge on sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual feedback. Exp Brain Res. 2007;178(4):554-9. (Pubitemid 46569896)
6. Mazzoni P, Krakauer J. An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci. 2006;26(14):3642.
7. Sülzenbrück S, Heuer H. Functional independence of explicit and implicit motor adjustments. Conscious Cogn. 2009;18(1):145-59.
8. Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT. Throwing while looking through prisms: I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. Brain. 1996;119(4):1183.
9. Tseng Y, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98(1):54-62. (Pubitemid 47084798)
10. Rabe K, Livne O, Gizewski ER, Aurich V, Beck A, Timmann D, et al. Adaptation to visuomotor rotation and force field perturbation is correlated to different brain areas in patients with cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol. 2009;101(4):1961-71.
11. Werner S, Bock O, Gizewski ER, Schoch B, Timmann D. Visuomotor adaptive improvement and aftereffects are impaired differentially following cerebellar lesions in SCA and PICA territory. Exp Brain Res. 2009;201(3):429-39.
12. Trouillas P. International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome. The Ataxia Neuropharmacology Committee of the World Federation of Neurology. J Neurol Sci. 1997;145:205-11. (Pubitemid 27121687)
13. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-98.
14. Reitan R. The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage. J Consult Psychol. 1955;19(5):393-4.
15. Bright P, Jaldow E, Kopelman MD. The National Adult Reading Test as a measure of premorbid intelligence: a comparison with estimates derived from demographic variables. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002;8(6):847-54.
16. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(6):e179.
17. Taylor JA, Thoroughman KA. Divided attention impairs human motor adaptation but not feedback control. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98(1):317-26. (Pubitemid 47084822)
18. Taylor JA, Thoroughman KA. Motor adaptation scaled by the difficulty of a secondary cognitive task. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(6):e2485.
19. Galea JM, Sami SA, Albert NB, Miall RC. Secondary tasks impair adaptation to step- and gradual-visual displacements [Internet]. Exp Brain Res. 2010;202:473-84. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/ s00221-010-2158-x.
20. Anguera JA, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Willingham DT, Seidler RD. Contributions of spatial working memory to visuomotor learning [Internet]. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;22(9):1917-30. [cited 2009 Dec 17]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/19803691.
21. Smith MA. Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93(5):2809-21. (Pubitemid 40570859)
22. Willingham DB. A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychol Rev. 1998;105:558-84. (Pubitemid 128459553)
23. Heuer H, Hegele M. Adaptation to visuomotor rotations in younger and older adults. Psychol Aging. 2008;23(1):190.
24. Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT. Throwing while looking through prisms: II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze - throw calibrations. Brain. 1996;119(4):1199.
25. Spencer RM, Ivry RB. Sequence learning is preserved in individuals with cerebellar degeneration when the movements are directly cued. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21(7):1302-10.
26. Criscimagna-Hemminger S, Bastian AJ, Shadmehr R. Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103:2275-84.
27. Ito M. Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(4):304-13. (Pubitemid 351430830)