Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 100, Issue , 2016, Pages 64-80

  Chun, Dorothy ^a   Smith, Bryan ^c   Kern, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affordances; Computer assisted language learning; Electronically mediated communication; Multiliteracies; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84959282454     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/modl.12302     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (1996). Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century (executive summary). Yonkers, NY: ACTFL.
2. Baker, E. A. (2010). The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice. New York: Guilford.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
4. Bauerlein, M. (2009). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future (or, don't trust anyone under 30). New York: Tarcher/Penguin.
5. Baron, N. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Bell, G. (2006). The age of the thumb: A cultural reading of mobile technologies from Asia. Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, 19, 41-57.
7. Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 68-99.
8. Bissell, T. (2010). Extra lives: Why video games matter. New York: Pantheon.
9. Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classrooms: Technology and foreign-language learning (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
10. Blyth, C. S. (2014). Exploring the affordances of digital social reading for L2 literacy: The case of eComma. In J. Guikema & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign language education: Research, perspectives, and best practices (Vol. 12, pp. 201-226). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
11. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12. Byrnes, H. (2005). Literacy as a framework for advanced language acquisition. ADFL Bulletin, 37, 11-15.
13. Carr, N. G. (2010). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton.
14. Chandrasoma, R., Thompson, C., & Pennycook, A. (2004). Beyond plagiarism: Transgressive and nontransgressive intertextuality. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 3, 171-193.
15. Chapelle, C. A. (2009). Computer-assisted language teaching and testing. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 628-644). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
16. Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.
17. Chun, D. M. (2011). Developing intercultural communicative competence through online exchanges. CALICO Journal, 28, 392-419.
18. Chun, D. M. (2013). Contributions of tracking user behavior to SLA research. In P. Hubbard, M. Schulze, & B. Smith (Eds.), Learner-computer interaction in language education (pp. 256-262). San Marcos, TX: The Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium.
19. Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004). What makes students click: Working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32, 481-503.
20. Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 80, 183-198.
21. Chun, D. M., & Wade, E. R. (2004). Collaborative cultural exchanges with CMC. In L. Lomicka & J. Cooke-Plagwitz (Eds.), Teaching with technology (pp. 220-247). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
22. Clark, H. H. (1999). How do real people communicate with virtual partners? Proceedings of 1999 AAAI Fall Symposium, Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems (pp. 43-47). Falmouth, MA: AAAI.
23. Collentine, J. G. (2000). Insights into the construction of grammatical knowledge provided by user-behavior tracking technologies. Language Learning Technology, 3, 44-57.
24. Conseil de l'Europe. (2001). Un cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues: apprendre, enseigner, évaluer [A common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, evaluating]. Paris: Didier.
25. Cornillie, F., Thorne, S. L., & Desmet, P. (2012). Digital games for language learning: From hype to insight? ReCALL, 24, 243-256.
26. East, M., & King, C. (2012). L2 learners' engagement with high stakes listening tests: Does technology have a beneficial role to play? CALICO Journal, 29, 208-223.
27. Firth, J. R. (1964). The tongues of men and speech. London: Oxford University Press.
28. Fischer, R. (2007). How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring students' behavior in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 409-442.
29. Fischer, R. (2012). Diversity in learner usage patterns. In G. Stockwell (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning diversity in research and practice (pp. 14-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Furstenberg, G., Murray, J. H., Malone, S., & Farman-Farmaian, A. (1993). A la rencontre de Philippe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
32. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
33. Gitelman, L., & Pingree, G. B. (Eds.). (2003). New media, 1740-1915. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34. Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Hanna, B. E., & de Nooy, J. (2003). A funny thing happened on the way to the forum: Electronic discussion and foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 71-85.
36. Hanna, B. E., & de Nooy, J. (2009). Learning language and culture via public internet discussion forums. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
37. Harris, R. (1995). Signs of writing. London: Routledge.
38. Harris, R. (2000). Rethinking writing. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
39. Healey, D., Hegelheimer, V., Hubbard, P., Ioannou-Georgiou, S., Kessler, G., & Ware, P. (2008). TESOL Technology Standards Framework. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
40. Heift, T. (2007). Learner personas in CALL. CALICO Journal, 25, 1-10.
41. Herring, S. C. (Ed.). (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. Holmes, M. E. (1995). Naming virtual space in computer-mediated conversation. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 52, 212-221.
43. Hubbard, P. (Ed.). (2009). Computer assisted language learning: Critical concepts in linguistics (Vols. I-IV). New York: Routledge.
44. Hubbard, P. (2011). Evaluation of courseware and websites. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.), Present and future perspectives of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (pp. 407-440). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
45. Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22, 224-261.
46. Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
48. Jones, R. H. (2004). The problem of context in computer-mediated communication. In P. LeVine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 20-33). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
49. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and quality of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
50. Kern, R. (1998). Technology, social interaction, and FL literacy. In J. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of teaching and learning: Focus on technology and foreign language education (pp. 57-92). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
51. Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Kern, R. (2004). Literacy and advanced foreign language learning: Rethinking the curriculum. In H. Byrnes & H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 2-18). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
53. Kern, R. (2014). Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the Internet for foreign language education. Modern Language Journal, 98, 330-347.
54. Kern, R. (2015). Language, literacy, and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Kittler, F. (1990). The mechanized philosopher. In L. A. Rickels (Ed.), Looking after Nietzsche (pp. 195-207). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
56. Kramsch, C. (2006). From communicative competence to symbolic competence. Modern Language Journal, 90, 249-252.
57. Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject: What foreign language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. L. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 83-100). London: Routledge.
59. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
60. Krikorian, D. H., Lee, J., Chock, T. M., & Harms, C. (2000). Isn't that spatial? Distance and communication in a 2-D virtual environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(4).
61. Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 457-482.
62. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
63. Leu, D. J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64. Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2014). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 37-59.
65. Lotherington, H., & Ronda, N. (2014). 2B or not 2B? From pencil to multimodal programming: New frontiers in communicative competencies. In J. Guikema & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign language education: Research, perspectives, and best practices (pp. 9-28). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
66. Lotherington, H., & Xu, Y. (2004). How to chat in English and Chinese: Emerging digital language conventions. ReCALL, 16, 308-329.
67. Lundby, K. (Ed.). (2008). Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media. New York: Peter Lang.
68. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
69. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.
70. McBride, K. (2011). The effect of rate of speech and distributed practice on the development of listening comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 131-154.
71. MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. Profession, 12, 234-245.
72. Murray, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. New York: Free Press.
73. National Council of Teachers of English. (2013). The NCTE definition of 21st century literacies. Accessed 10 October 2014 at http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/21stcentdefinition
74. O'Rourke, B. (2008). The other C in CMC: What alternative data sources can tell us about text-based synchronous computer mediated communication and language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 227-251.
75. O'Rourke, B. (2012). Using eye-tracking to investigate gaze behaviour in synchronous computer-mediated communication for language learning. In M. Dooly & R. O'Dowd (Eds.), Researching online interaction and exchange in foreign language education: Theories, methods and challenges (pp. 305-342). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
76. Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2014). Integrating digital stories in the writing class: Towards a 21st century literacy. In J. P. Guikema & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign language education: Research, perspectives, and best practices (pp. 179-200). San Marcos: TX: CALICO.
77. Paesani, K., Allen, H. W., & Dupuy, B. (2015). A multiliteracies framework for collegiate foreign language teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
78. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin.
79. Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 317-345.
80. Perkel, D. (2007). Everyday creativity: Appropriation before, during, and after dissemination. Paper presented at the Supporting Creative Acts Beyond Dissemination Workshop (Creativity & Cognition 2007), Washington, DC.
81. Perkel, D. (2008). Copy and paste literacy? Literacy practices in the production of a MySpace profile. In K. Drotner, H. S. Jensen, & K. C. Schroeder (Eds.), Informal learning and digital media (pp. 203-224). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
82. Pujola, J. (2002). CALLing for help: Researching language learning strategies using help facilities in a web-based multimedia program. ReCALL, 14, 235-262.
83. Sadler, R. (2012). Virtual worlds for language learning: From theory to practice. Bern: Peter Lang.
84. Sauro, S. (2014). Lessons from the fandom: Task models for technology-enhanced language learning. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 239-262). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
85. Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2010). Investigating L2 performance in text chat. Applied Linguistics, 31, 554-577.
86. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57.
87. Smith, B. (2008). Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. Language Learning & Technology, 12, 85-103.
88. Smith, B. (2009). The relationship between scrolling, negotiation and self-initiated self-repair in an SCMC environment. CALICO Journal, 26, 231-245.
89. Smith, B. (2010). Employing eye-tracking technology in researching the effectiveness of recasts in CMC. In F. M. Hult (Ed.), Directions and prospects for educational linguistics (pp. 79-97). Amsterdam: Springer.
90. Smith, B. (2012). Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC. Language Learning & Technology, 16, 53-81.
91. Smith, B., Alvarez-Torres, M., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Features of CMC technologies and their impact on language learners' online interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 703-729.
92. Smith, B., & Renaud, C. (2013). Eye tracking as a measure of noticing corrective feedback in computer-mediated instructor-student foreign language conferences. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Interaction in diverse educational settings (pp. 147-165). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
93. Smith, B., & Sauro, S. (2009). Interruptions in chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 229-247.
94. Stickler, U., & Shi, L. (2015). Eye movements of online Chinese learners. CALICO Journal, 32, 52-81.
95. Swaffar, J., & Arens, K. (2005). Remapping the foreign language curriculum: An approach through multiple literacies. New York: Modern Language Association.
96. Swaffar, J., & Urlaub, P. (Eds.). (2014). Transforming postsecondary foreign language teaching in the United States. New York: Springer.
97. Theisen, T., Fulton-Archer, L., Smith, M. J., Sauer, T., Small, H., & Abbott, M. (2011). 21st century skills world languages map. Accessed 31 December 2014 at https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/21stCenturySkillsMap/p21_worldlanguagesmap.pdf
98. Thorne, S. L. (2008). Transcultural communication in open Internet environments and massively multiplayer online games. In S. S. Magnan (Ed.), Mediating discourse online (pp. 305-327). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
99. Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11.
100. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
101. Ware, P. (2005). "Missed" communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 64-89.
102. Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89, 190-205.
103. Wasson, C. (2006). Being in two spaces at once: Virtual meetings and their representation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 16, 103-130.
104. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
105. Zarate, G., Lévy, D., & Kramsch, C. (Eds.). (2008). Précis du plurilinguisme et du pluriculturalisme. Paris: Editions des Archives Contemporaines.
106. Zhao, Y. (1998). The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4, 311-345.