Interruptions in chat

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 229-247

  Smith, Bryan ^a   Sauro, Shannon ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

CALL; Deleted text; Interaction; Interruptions; Synchronous computer mediated communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449578716     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588220902920219     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abrams, Z. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 157-167.
2. Bachman, L. (1990). Constructing measures and measuring constructs. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, & M. Swain (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 26-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Beauvois, M.H. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 198-217.
4. Bennett, A. (1981). Interruptions and the interpretation of conversation. Discourse Processes, 4,171-188.
5. Blake, R., & Zyzik, E. (2003). Who's helping whom? Learner/heritage-speaker networked discussions in Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 24, 519-544.
6. Daller, H., Van Hout, R., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2003). Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics, 24, 197-222.
7. DeKeyser, R. (2005). What makes second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55(SUPPL. 1), 1-25.
8. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
9. Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 59-84.
10. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-323.
11. Hertel, T.J. (2003). Lexical and discourse factors in the second language acquisition of Spanish word order. Second Language Research, 19, 273-304.
12. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production{thorn}. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
13. Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 143-166.
14. Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24, 168-196.
15. Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning & Technology, 10,102-120.
16. O'Rourke, B. (2008). The other C in CMC: What alternative data sources can tell us about text-based synchronous computer mediated communication and language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 227-251.
17. Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492-518.
18. Payne, J.S., & Whitney, P.J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20(1),7-32.
19. Pellettieri, J. (1999). Why-talk? Investigating the role of task-based interaction through synchronous network-based communication among classroom learners of Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis.
20. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In G. Crookes & S.M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and second language learning (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
21. Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning and Technology, 13(1), 96-120.
22. Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2008). Investigating the occurrence, linguistic complexity and lexical richness of deleted turns in chat. Presentation at CALCIO & IALLT 2008 conference, San Francisco, CA.
23. Schegloff, E. (1973). Recycled turn beginnings. Public lecture. Summer Linguistics Institute, LSA, Ann Arbor, MI, 1973.
24. Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147-163.
25. Shang, H.-F. (2007). An exploratory study of e-mail application on FL writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 79-96.
26. Shehadeh, A. (2002). Comprehensible output, from occurrence to acquisition: An agenda for acquisitional research. Language Learning, 52, 597-647.
27. Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 365-398.
28. Smith, B. (2008). Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. Language Learning & Technology, 12, 85-103.
29. Smith, B., & Gorsuch, G.J. (2004). Synchronous computer mediated communication captured by usability lab technologies: New interpretations. System, 32, 553-575.
30. Swain, M.K. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S.M. Gass & C.G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
31. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
32. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
35. Valdes, G. (2000). Spanish for native speakers, Volume 1. AATSP Professional Development Series Handbook for Teachers K-16. New York, NY: Harcourt College Publishers.
36. VanPatten, B. (1994). Evaluating the role of consciousness in second language acquisition: Terms, linguistic features, & research methodology. AILA Review, 11, 27-36.
37. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.
38. Way, D., Joiner, E., & Seaman, M. (2000). Writing in the secondary foreign language classroom: The effects of prompts and tasks on novice learners of French. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 171-184.
39. Weigel, S.C. (2002). Assessing writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Wolf-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Technical Report No. 17. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
41. Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1-27.