Innovating the Singapore English Language curriculum through lesson study

International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 256-280

  Tan Chia, Lydia ^a   Fang, Yanping ^b   Chew Ang, Pow ^a  

^a MINISTRY OF EDUCATION   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Assessment for learning; English language teaching and learning; Lesson study; Process writing; Reciprocal teaching; Retelling; Singapore; Teaching strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958968188     PISSN: 20468253     EISSN: 20468261     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/IJLLS-03-2013-0017     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Ball, D.L., Thames, M.H. and Phelps, G. (2008), “Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special?”, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 59 No. 5, pp. 389-407.
2. Beghetto, R.A. and Kaufman, J.C. (Eds) (2010), Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Brown, H. and Cambourne, B. (1987), Read and Retell, Nelson, South Melbourne.
4. Carlgren, I. (2012), “The learning study as an approach for ‘clinical’ subject matter didactic research”, International Journal of Lesson and Learning Studies, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 126-139.
5. Chandrasegaran, A. (1991), “The composing processes of university student writers”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
6. Cobb, P., McClain, K., Lamberg, T. and Dean, C. (2003), “Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 13-24.
7. Curriculum Planning and Development Division (2006), “Report of the English language curriculum and pedagogy review”, Ministry of Education, Singapore.
8. Curriculum Planning and Development Division (2009), English Language Syllabus 2010: Primary & Secondary (Express/Normal [Academic]), Ministry of Education, Singapore.
9. Eraut, M. (1994), Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence, Palmer Press, Washington, DC.
10. Fang, Y., Lee, C.K. and Yang, Y. (2012), “Developing curriculum and pedagogical resources for teacher learning: a lesson study video case of ‘Division with Remainder’ from Singapore”, International Journal of Lesson and Learning Studies, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 65-84.
11. Fang, Y., Lee, C.K., Haron, S.T., Wang, X. and Arasaratnam, C. (2009a), “The implementation of lesson study as a teacher-directed form of instructional improvement in a primary school in Singapore”, Final Research Report No. CRP 19/05 JW & 11/06 FYP, Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice, Singapore.
12. Fang, Y.P., Lee, K.E.C. and Haron, S.T. (2009b), “Lesson study in mathematics: three cases from Singapore”, in Wong, K.Y., Lee, P.Y., Kaur, B., Foong, P.Y. and Ng, S.F. (Eds), Mathematics Education – The Singapore Journey, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 104-129.
13. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J. and Chokshi, S. (2003), “A US-Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice”, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 171-185.
14. Fitzpatrick, J.L., Sanders, J.R. and Worthen, B.R. (2004), Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 3rd ed., Pearson Education, New York, NY.
15. Flower, L.S. and Hayes, J.R. (1980), “The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints”, in Gregg, L.W. and Steinberg E.R. (Eds), Cognitive Processes in Writing, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
16. Flower, L. and Hayes, J.R. (1981), “A cognitive process theory of writing”, College Composition and Communication, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 365-387.
17. Gambrell, L., Pfeiffer, W. and Wilson, R. (1985), “The effects of retelling upon reading comprehension and recall of text information”, Journal of Education Research, Vol. 78 No. 4, pp. 216-220.
18. Goodrick, D. (2012), “An introduction to programme evaluation”, presentation on programme evaluation to Singapore senior specialists, Ministry of Education, Singapore.
19. Goh, C., Zhang, L.J., Ng, C.H. and Koh, G.H. (2005), Knowledge, Beliefs and Syllabus Implementation: A study of English Language Teachers in Singapore, National Institute of Education, Singapore.
20. Guskey, T.R. (2002), “Professional development and teacher change”, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, Vol. 8 Nos 3/4, pp. 381-391.
21. Hall, G. and Hord, S. (1987), Change in Schools: Facilitating the Process, State University of New York, Albany, NY.
22. Hall, G., Loucks, S., Rutherford, W. and Newlove, B. (1975), “Levels of use of the innovation: a framework for analyzing innovation adoption”, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 52-56.
23. Han, X. and Paine, L. (2010), “Teaching math as deliberate practice through public lessons”, Elementary School Journal, Vol. 110 No. 4, pp. 519-541.
24. Hawley, W.D. (1978), “Horses before carts: developing adaptive schools and the limits of innovation”, in Mann D. (Ed.), Making Change Happen, Teachers College Press, New York, NY, pp. 224-253.
25. Kazemi, E. and Hubbard, A. (2008), “New directions for the design and study of professional development: attending to the coevolution of teachers’ participation across contexts”, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 59 No. 5, pp. 428-444.
26. Lewis, C. (2000), “Lesson study: the core of Japanese professional development”, paper presented at the special interest group on Research in Mathematics Education at the American Educational Research Association meetings, New Orleans, LA.
27. Lewis, C. and Tsuchida, I. (1998), “A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: research lessons and the improvement of Japanese education”, American Educator, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 12-17.
28. Lewis, C., Akita, K. and Sato, M. (2010), “Lesson study as a human science”, NSS Yearbook, Vol. 109 No. 1.
29. Lewis, C., Perry, R. and Hurd, J. (2004), “A deeper look at lesson study”, Educational Leadership, pp. 18-22.
30. Lewis, C., Perry, R. and Murata, A. (2006), “How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 3-14.
31. Lim, C., Lee, K.E.C., Saito, E. and Syed Haron, S. (2011), “Taking stock of lesson study as a platform for teacher development in Singapore”, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 353-365.
32. Lipson, M. and Wilson, K. (1997), Assessment and Instruction of Reading and Writing Disability. An Interactive Approach, Addison-Wesley, New York, NY.
33. Lo, M. and Marton, F. (2012), “Towards a science of the art of teaching: using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design”, International Journal of Lesson and Learning Studies, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 7-22.
34. Lo, M., Pong, W.Y. and Pakey, C.P.M. (2005), For Each and Everyone. Catering for Individual Differences Through Learning Studies, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.
35. Luke, A. and Freebody, P. (1999), “Further notes on the four resources model”, Reading Online 3, available at: http://www.readingonline.org/research/lukefreebody.html (accessed August 1999).
36. Luke, A., Freebody, P., Lau, S. and Gopinathan, S. (2005), “Towards research-based innovation and reform: Singapore schooling in transition”, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 5-28.
37. McLaughlin, M. (1987), “Learning from experience: lessons from policy implementation”, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 171-178.
38. McLaughlin, M. and DeVoogd, G. (2011), “Critical literacy as comprehension: understanding at deeper levels”, in Lapp, D. and Fisher, D. (Eds), Handbook of Research on Teaching the English Language Arts, 3rd ed., Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 278-282.
39. McLaughlin, M.W. and Marsh, D.D. (1978), “Staff development and school change”, Teachers College Record, Vol. 80 No. 1, pp. 70-94.
40. Morris, A.K. and Hiebert, J. (2011), “Creating shared instructional products: an alternative approach to improving teaching”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 5-14.
41. Owocki, G. (1999), Literacy Through Play, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.
42. Paine, L.W., Fang, Y. and Wilson, S. (2003), “Entering a culture of teaching”, in Britton, E., Paine, L., Pimm, D. and Raizen, S. (Eds), Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Systems for Early Career Learning, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 20-82.
43. Palincsar, A.S. and Brown, A.L. (1984), “Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities”, Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 117-175.
44. Palincsar, A.S. and Brown, A.L. (1986), “Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text”, The Reading Teacher, Vol. 39 No. 8, pp. 771-777.
45. Patton, M.Q. (2002), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
46. Perry, R. and Lewis, C. (2008), “What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US?”, Journal of Educational Change, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 365-391.
47. Pressley, M. (2000), “What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of?”, in Michael, L., Kamil, P.B., Mosenthal, P., David, P. and Rebecca, B. (Eds), Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 3, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 545-562.
48. Punch, K.F. (2003), Introduction to Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
49. Ritchhart, R. and Perkins, D. (2008), “Making thinking visible in”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 65 No. 5, pp. 57-61.
50. Runesson, U. (2006), “What is it possible to learn? On variation as a necessary condition for learning”, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 397-410.
51. Spillane, J. (2012), “Diagnosis and design for instructional improvement: formal structure and school work practice”, paper presented as keynote address at the World Association of Lesson Studies International Conference, November, Singapore.
52. Stigler, J.W. and Hiebert, J. (1999), The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas From the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom, Summit Books, New York, NY.
53. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
54. Wang, J. and Gu, L. (2007), Action Education – Innovative Paradigm for Teacher In-Service Learning (xindong jiaoyu – jiaoshi zaizhi xuexi de fanshi gexin), East China Normal University Press, Shanghai.
55. Wang, J. and Paine, L.W. (2003), “Learning to teach with mandated curriculum and public examination of teaching as contexts”, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 75-94.
56. Wenger, E. and Snyder, W.M. (2000), “Communities of practice: the organizational frontier”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78 Nos 1-3, pp. 139-145.
57. Yang, Y. and Ricks, T.E. (2012), “How crucial incidents analysis support Chinese lesson study”, International Journal of Lesson and Learning Studies, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 41-48.
58. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J. and Wittrock, M.C. (2001), A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, and Assessing – A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Addison-Wesley, New York, NY.
59. Ben-Peretz, M. (2009), Policy Making In Education – A Holistic Approach in Response to Global Changes, Rowman & Littlefield Education.
60. Bennett, C. (1976), Analyzing Impacts of Extension Programs, ESC-575, Extension Service-US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
61. Buckingham, A. and Saunders, P. (2004), The Survey Methods Workbook, Polity Press, Cambridge.
62. Cambourne, B., Labbo, L.D. and Carpenter, M. (2001), “What do I do with the rest of the class: the nature of teaching-learning activities”, Language Arts, Vol. 79 No. 2, pp. 124-135.
63. Carless, D. (1999), “Large-scale curriculum change in Hong Kong”, in Kenndey, C., Doyle, P. and Goh, C. (Eds), Exploring Change in English Language Teaching, Macmillan Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 19-28.
64. Chiarelott, L. (2006), Curriculum in Context: Designing Curriculum and Instruction for Teaching and Learning in Context, Thomson Wadsworth, Southbank, Vic.
65. Fullan, M.G. (1977), “Research on curriculum and instruction implementation”, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 335-397.
66. Fullan, M.G. (1982), The Meaning of Educational Change, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.
67. Fullan, M. (2008), “Curriculum implementation and sustainability”, in Connelly, F.M. (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction, Sage, London, pp. 113-122.
68. Gardner, H. (2004), Changing Minds: The Art and Science of Changing Our Own and Other People's Minds, Harvard Business School Publishing, Harvard, MA.
69. Goh, C.M. and Tay, M.Y. (2008), “Implementing the English language syllabus 2001 in Singapore schools: interpretations and re-interpretations”, in Murray, D.E. (Ed.), Planning Change, Changing Plans: Innovations in Second Language Teaching, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 85-107.
70. Goh, C.C.M. (1999), “Nationwide curriculum innovation: how do we manage?”, in Kennedy, C., Doyle, P. and Goh, C.C.M. (Eds), Exploring Change in English Language Teaching, Macmillan Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 5-18.
71. Gorsuch, G.J. (2002), “EFL educational policies and educational cultures: influences on teachers’ approval of communicative activities”, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 675-710.
72. Gambrell, L., Koskinen, P.S. and Kapinus, B.A. (1991), “Retelling and the reading comprehension of proficient and less-proficient readers”, Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 84 No. 6, pp. 356-362.
73. Hall, G.E., George, A.A. and Rutherford, W.L. (1979), Measuring Stages of Concern About the Innovation: A Manual For Use of the SoC Questionnaire, 2nd ed., Research and Development Centre for Teacher Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
74. Heck, S., Stiegelbauer, S.M., Hall, G.E. and Loucks, S.F. (1999), Measuring Innovation Configurations: Procedures and Applications, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL), Austin, TX.
75. Jason, M.H. (2003), Evaluating Programs to Increase Student Achievement, Skylight Professional Development, Glenview, IL.
76. Kennedy, C. and Kennedy, J. (1996), “Teacher attitudes and change implementation”, System, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 351-360.
77. Krathwohl, D.R. (2002), “A revision of bloom's taxonomy: an overview”, Theory Into Practice, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 212-218.
78. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
79. Lewis, C. (2002), Lesson Study: A Handbook of Teacher-Led Instructional Change, Research for Better Schools, Philadelphia, PA.
80. Li, C. (2003), “A study of in-service teachers’ beliefs, difficulties and problems in current teacher development programmes”, HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies, No. 7, pp. 64-85.
81. Little, J.W. (2003), “Professional community and the problem of high school reform”, International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 37 No. 8, pp. 683-714.
82. Marsh, C.J. (2009), Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum, 4th ed., Routledge, New York, NY.
83. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
84. Ng, S.M. (2010), Proposed Project to Enhance English Language Teaching and Learning at Lower Secondary Levels, Ministry of Education, Singapore.
85. Oczkus, L.D. (2010), Reciprocal Teaching at Work: Powerful Strategies and Lessons for Improving Reading Comprehension, International Reading Association, Newark, NJ.
86. O'Donoghue, T.A. and Clarke, S. (2010), Leading Learning: Process, Themes and Issues in International Contexts, Routledge, New York, NY.
87. Patton, M.Q. (2000), “Overview: language matters”, in Hopson, R.K. (Ed.), How and Why Language Matters in Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation No. 86, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 5-16.
88. Polanyi, M. (1967), The Tacit Dimension, Rouledge & Kegan Paul, London.
89. Runesson, U. and Gustafsson, G. (2012), “Sharing and developing knowledge products from learning study”, International Journal of Lesson and Learning Studies, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 245-260.
90. Stufflebeam, D.L. (1977), “Working paper on needs assessment in evaluation”, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Evaluation Conference, April, San Francisco, CA.
91. Stufflebeam, D.L. (2001), “Evaluation models”, New Directions for Evaluation, Vol. 2001 No. 89, pp. 7-98.
92. Swartz, R.J. and Parks, S. (1994), Infusing the Teaching of Critical and Creative Thinking into Content Instruction, Critical Thinking Press and Software, Pacific Grove, CA.
93. Taylor-Powell, E. and Henert, E. (2008), Developing a Logic Model: Teaching and Training Guide, University of Wisconsin-Extension, Madison, WI, available at: http://www.ecu.edu/cs-acad/ipar/customcf/DL/Planing/LogicModelGuide.pdf
94. Taylor-Powell, E. and Renner, M. (2003), Analysing Qualitative Data, University of Wisconsin-Extension, Madison, WI.
95. Vogler, K.E. (2005), “Improve your verbal questioning”, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, Vol. 79 No. 2, pp. 98-103.
96. W.K. Kellogg Foundation (2004), Logic Model Development Guide, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI, available at: http://www.wkkf.org/default.aspx?tabid=101&CID=281&CatID=281&ItemID=2813669&NID=20&LanguageID=0.
97. Weiss, C.H. (1998), “Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation?”, American Journal of Education, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 21-33.
98. Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
99. Wholey, J. (1979), Evaluation: Promise and Performance, Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC.
100. Zamel, V. (1982), “Writing: the process of discovering meaning”, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 195-209.