Sharing and developing knowledge products from Learning Study

International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 245-260

  Runesson, Ulla ^a   Gustafsson, Gerd ^b  

^a JÖNKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SKÖVDE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Hong Kong; Instruction; Knowledge creation; Learning; Learning Study; Practitioner research; Sweden; Teacher research; Teachers; Variation theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954552491     PISSN: 20468253     EISSN: 20468261     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/20468251211256447     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adamson, B. and Walker, W. (2011), “Messy collaboration: learning from a learning study”, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 29-36.
2. Arani, M.S.R., Keisuke, F. and Lassegard, J.P. (2010), “Lesson study as professional culture in Japanese schools: an historical perspective”, Japan Review, No. 22, pp. 171-200.
3. Cheung, W.M. (2005), “Describing and enhancing creativity in Chinese writing”, unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
4. Kullberg, A. (2010), What is Taught and What is Learned? Professional Insights Gained and Shared by Teachers of Mathematics, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Göteborg.
5. Lewis, C. (2002), Lesson Study: A Handbook of Teacher-Led Instructional Change, Research for Better Schools Inc, Philadelphia, PA.
6. Lo, M.L. and Marton, F. (2012), “Towards a science of the art of teaching: using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design”, International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 7-22.
7. Lo, M.L., Chik, P.P. and Pang, M.F. (2006), “Patterns of variation in teaching the color of light to primary 3 students”, Instructional Science, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 1-19.
8. Marton, F. and Booth, S. (1997), Learning and Awareness, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
9. Marton, F. and Pang, M.F. (2003), “Beyond lesson study: comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of economic concepts”, Instructional Science, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 175-94.
10. Marton, F., Pang, M.F. and Tsui, B.M.(2006), “On some necessary conditions of learning”, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 193-220.
11. Marton, F. and Tsui, A.B.M. (2004), Classroom Discourse and the Space of Learning, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
12. Marton, F., Runesson, U. and Tsui, B.M. (2004), “The space of learning”, in Marton, F. and Tsui, A.B.M. (Eds), Classroom Discourse and the Space of Learning, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 3-40.
13. Morris, A.K. and Hiebert, J. (2011), “Creating shared instructional products: an alternative approach to improving teaching”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 5-14.
14. Runesson, U. (2008), “Learning to design for learning. The potential of learning study to enhance learning on two levels: teacher's and students’ learning”, in Wood, T. and Sullivan, P. (Eds), International Handbook on Mathematics Teacher Education. Volume 2 Knowledge and Beliefs in Mathematics Teaching and Teaching Development, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, pp. 153-72.
15. Yoshida, M. (1999), “Lesson study: a case of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through a school based teacher development”, unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
16. Yoshida, M. and Fernandez, C. (2004), Lesson Study. A Japanese Approach to Improving Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
17. Stenhouse, L. (1981), “What counts as research?”, British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. XXIX No. 2, pp. 103-14.