The learning study as an approach for “clinical” subject matter didactic research

International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 126-139

  Carlgren, Ingrid ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Clinical research; Development and design based research; Educational research; Learning study; Science of particulars; Teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894524258     PISSN: 20468253     EISSN: 20468261     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/20468251211224172     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Brown, A. (1992), “Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings”, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 141-78.
2. Bulterman-Bos, J. (2008), “Will a clinical approach make education research more relevant for practice?”, Educational Researcher October 2008, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 412-20.
3. Carlgren, I. and Marton, F. (2000), Lärare av imorgon (Teachers of tomorrow). Pedagogiska magasinets skriftserie, nr1. Lärarförbundets förlag, Stockholm.
4. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R. and Schauble, L. (2003), “Design experiments in educational research”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 9-13.
5. Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, S. (1990), “Research on teaching and teacher research: the issues that divide”, ER, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 2-11.
6. Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, S. (1999), “The teacher research movement: a decade later”, ER, Vol. 28 No. 7, pp. 15-25.
7. Dewey, J. (1958), Experience and Nature, Dover Publications Inc, Mineola, NY.
8. Dewey, J. and Bentley, A.F. (1949), Knowing and the Known, Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
9. Elliot, J. (1991), Action Research for Educational Change, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, p. 176.
10. Erickson, F. (1992), “Why the clinical trial doesn’t work as a metaphor for educational research: a response to Schrag”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 9-11.
11. Fjelland, R. and Gjengedahl, E. (1994), “A theoretical foundation for nursing as science”, in Benner, P. (Ed.), Interpretative Phenomenology: Embodiment, Caring and Ethics in Health and Illness, SAGE Publications, London, pp. 3-26.
12. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001), Making Social Science Matter. Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Foray, D. (2007), “Innovation systems and policies in VET”, OECD/CERI, Paris, 4-5 February.
14. Gorovitz, S. and MacIntyre, A. (1975), “Toward a theory of medical fallibility”, Hastings CenterReport, Vol. 5 No. 6, pp. 13-23.
15. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R. and Stigler, J. (2002), “A knowledge base for the teaching profession: what would it look like and how can we get one?”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 2-15.
16. Kelly, A. (2003), “Research as design”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 3-4.
17. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999), Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Chicago, IL.
18. Kullberg, A. (2010), What is taught and what is Learned? Professional Insights Gained and Shared by Teachers of Mathematics, Vol. 293, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Göteborg.
19. Labaree, D. (2008), “Comments on Bulterman-Bos: the dysfunctional pursuit of relevance in education research”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 37 No. 7, pp. 421-3.
20. Larsson, S. (2009), “A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research”, International Journal of Research and Method in Education, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 25-38.
21. Levin, J. and O'Donnell, A. (1999), “What to do about educational research's credibility gap”, Issues in Education, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 177-229.
22. Lewis, C. (2000), “Lesson study: the core of Japanese professional development”, invited address to the Special Interest Group on Research in Mathematics Education American Educational Research Association Meetings, New Orleans, April.
23. Lewis, C., Perry, R. and Murata, A. (2006), “How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 3-14.
24. Marton, F. and Pang, M.F. (2003), “Beyond lesson studies. Comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of economic concepts”, Instructional Science, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 175-94.
25. Marton, F. and Pang, M.F. (2005), “Learning theory as teaching resource: enhancing students’ understanding of economic concept”, Instructional Science, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 159-91.
26. Marton, F. and Pang, M.F. (2006), “On some necessary conditions of learning”, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 193-220.
27. Plomp, T. (2007), “Educational design research – an introduction”, in Plomp, T. and Nieven, N. (Eds), Proceedings of the Seminar Conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), 23-26 November, SLO, Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development, Enschede, Netherlands, pp. 9-36.
28. Runesson, U. (2008), “Learning to design for learning”, in Woods, T. and Sullivan P. (Eds), Knowledge and Beliefs in Mathematics Teaching and Teaching Development, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands, pp. 153-72.
29. Runesson, U. and Gustafsson, G. (2010), “Learning study–knowledge production for teachers?”, paper presented at The World Association of Lesson Studies International Conference, Brunei, Darusalam, 9-10 December.
30. Schön, D. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Avebury, Aldershot.
31. Shulman, L. (2004), The Wisdom of Practice: Essays on Teaching, Learning, and Learning to Teach, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
32. Stiles, W.B. (2009), “Logical operations in theory-building case studies”, Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 9-27.
33. Strenhouse, L. (1981), “What counts as research?”, British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 103-14.
34. Toulmin, S. (2001), Return to reason, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Van den Akker, J. (1999), “Principles and methods of development research”, in van den Akker, I.J. (Ed.), Tools in Education and Training, Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, pp. 1-14.
36. Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S. and Nieveen, N. (Eds) (2006), Educational Design Research, Routledge, London.
37. Wang, F. and Hannafin, M. (2005), “Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments”, ETR&D, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 5-23.
38. Yin, R.K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed., Vol. 5, Applied Social Research Methods Series Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
39. Zaritsky, R., Kelly, A., Flowers, W.W., Rogers, E. and O'Neill, P. (2003), “Clinical design sciences: a view from sister design efforts”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 32-4.
40. Zeichner, K. and Noffke, S. (2001), “Practitioner research”, in Richardson, V. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 4th ed., AERA, Washington, DC.
41. Barab, S. and Squire, K. (2004), “Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground”, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 1-14.
42. Carlgren, I., Josefson, I. and Liberg, C.Forskning av denna världen II.
43. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J. and Chokshi, S. (2003), “A US–Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice”, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 19 No. 2003, pp. 171-85.
44. Collins, A., Joseph, D. and Bielaczyc, K. (2004), “Design research: theoretical and methodological issues”, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 15-42.
45. Feuer, M., Towne, L. and Shavelson, R. (2002), “Scientific culture and educational research”, Educational Researcher November, Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 4-14.
46. Knorr Cetina, K. (2001), “Objectual practice”, in Schatzki, T.R., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (Eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Routledge, London, pp. 175-88.
47. Shavelson, R.J., Phillips, D.C., Towne, L. and Feuer, M.J. (2003), “On the science of education design studies”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 25-8.
48. The Design-Based Research Collective Design-Based Research (2003), “An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 5-8.
49. Toulmin, S. (1992), Cosmopolis. The hidden agenda of modernity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
50. Weiner, G. (2005), “Educational action research: theory, practice and action”, in Carlgren, I., Josefson, I. and Liberg, C. (Eds), Forskning av denna världen II. Om teorins roll i praxisnära forskningVetenskapsrådets rapportserie, Vol. 4, Vetenskapsradet, Stockholm, pp. 138-54.