Overview: Language matters

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2000, Issue 86, 2000, Pages 5-16

  Patton, Michael Quinn ^a  

^a Union Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016575201     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1168     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ford, J., “Organizational Change as Shifting Conversations.“Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1999, 12(6), 480-500.
2. Greene, J., “Balancing Philosophy and Practicality in Qualitative Research.“Proceedings of the Stake Symposium on Educational Evaluation. University of Illinois, Champaign, May, 1998.
3. Hilliard III, A. G., “Kemetic (Egyptian) Historical Revision: Implications for Cross-Cultural Evaluation and Research in Education.“Evaluation Practice, 1989, 10(2), 7-23.
4. House, E., Professional Evaluation: Social Impact and Political Consequences.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1993.
5. Hurty, K., Report by Women’s Caucus. Proceedings: Educational Evaluation and Public Policy Conference.San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research, 1976.
6. Janowitz, M., “Where Is the Cutting Edge of Sociology?" Sociological Quarterly, 1979, 20, 591-593.
7. Kretzmann, J., and McKnight, J., Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing Community Assets.Chicago: ACTA, 1997.
8. Leffert, N., and others.“Developmental Assets: Measurement and Prediction of Risk Among Adolescents.“Applied Developmental Science, 1998, 2(4), 209-230.
9. Mattessich, P., and Monsey, B., Community Building: What Makes It Work: A Review of Factors Influencing Successful Community Building.St. Paul, Minn.: Wilder Foundation, 1997.
10. Miller, D., The Book of Jargon.New York: Macmillan, 1981.
11. Oswick, C., and Montgomery, J., “Images of an Organization: The Use of Metaphor in a Multinational Company.“Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1999, 12(6), 501-523.
12. Patton, M. Q., Creative Evaluation.(2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1987.
13. Patton, M. Q., “Developmental Evaluation.“Evaluation Practice, 1994, 15(3), 311-320.
14. Patton, M. Q., “A World Larger Than Formative and Summative.“Evaluation Practice, 1996, 17(2), 131-144.
15. Patton, M. Q., Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text.(3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1997.
16. Patton, M. Q., Grand Canyon Celebration: A Father-Son Journey of Discovery.Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1999.
17. Scriven, M., “Pros and Cons About Goal-Free Evaluation." Evaluation Comment: The Journal of Educational Evaluation.University of California, Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, 1972.
18. Scriven, M., Evaluation Thesaurus.(1st ed.) San Francisco: EdgePress, 1977.
19. Scriven, M., “Beyond Formative and Summative Evaluation.“In M. W.McLaughlinand D. C.Phillips (eds.), Evaluation and Education: At Quarter Century. 90th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991a.
20. Scriven, M., Evaluation Thesaurus.(4th ed.) Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1991b.
21. Sell, H., “Language.“qualrs-l@listserv.uga.edu. December, 1999.
22. Smith, N., Metaphors for Evaluation: Sources of New Methods.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1981.
23. Stanfield, J. H., “Slipping Through the Front Door: Relevant Social Sciences in the People of Color Century.“Keynote speech at the American Evaluation Association national conference, Chicago, Nov. 1998.