Mechanical interplay between invadopodia and the nucleus in cultured cancer cells

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Revach, Or Yam ^a   Weiner, Allon ^a,b   Rechav, Katya ^a   Sabanay, Ilana ^a   Livne, Ariel ^a   Geiger, Benjamin ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIN;

CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOPLASM; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; MELANOMA; METABOLISM; MICROTUBULE; PATHOLOGY; PODOSOME; TUMOR CELL LINE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACTINS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOPLASM; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS; MELANOMA; MICROTUBULES; PODOSOMES;

EID: 84926347333     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep09466     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Murphy, D. A. & Courtneidge, S. A. The 'ins' and 'outs' of podosomes and invadopodia: characteristics, formation and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12, 413-426 (2011).
2. Caldieri, G., Ayala, I., Attanasio, F. & Buccione, R. Cell and molecular biology of invadopodia. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 275, 1-34 (2009).
3. Block, M. R. et al. Podosome-type adhesions and focal adhesions, so alike yet so different. Eur J Cell Biol 87, 491-506 (2008).
4. Linder, S. The matrix corroded: podosomes and invadopodia in extracellular matrix degradation. Trends Cell Biol 17, 107-117 (2007).
5. Linder, S., Wiesner, C. & Himmel, M. Degrading devices: invadosomes in proteolytic cell invasion. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27, 185-211 (2011).
6. Gimona, M., Buccione, R., Courtneidge, S. A. & Linder, S. Assembly and biological role of podosomes and invadopodia. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20, 235-241 (2008).
7. Nurnberg, A., Kitzing, T. & Grosse, R. Nucleating actin for invasion. Nat Rev Cancer 11, 177-187 (2011).
8. Tolde, O., Rosel, D., Vesely, P., Folk, P. & Brabek, J. The structure of invadopodia in a complex 3D environment. Eur J Cell Biol 89, 674-680 (2010).
9. Baldassarre, M. et al. Dynamin participates in focal extracellular matrix degradation by invasive cells. Mol Biol Cell 14, 1074-1084 (2003).
10. Buccione, R., Caldieri, G. & Ayala, I. Invadopodia: specialized tumor cell structures for the focal degradation of the extracellular matrix. Cancer Metastasis Rev 28, 137-149 (2009).
11. Clark, E. S., Whigham, A. S., Yarbrough, W. G. & Weaver, A. M. Cortactin is an essential regulator of matrix metalloproteinase secretion and extracellular matrix degradation in invadopodia. Cancer Res 67, 4227-4235 (2007).
12. Albiges-Rizo, C., Destaing, O., Fourcade, B., Planus, E. & Block, M. R. Actin machinery and mechanosensitivity in invadopodia, podosomes and focal adhesions. J Cell Sci 122, 3037-3049 (2009).
13. Sibony-Benyamini, H. & Gil-Henn, H. Invadopodia: the leading force. Eur J Cell Biol 91, 896-901 (2012).
14. Blouw, B., Seals, D. F., Pass, I., Diaz, B. & Courtneidge S. A. A role for the podosome/invadopodia scaffold protein Tks5 in tumor growth in vivo. Eur J Cell Biol 87, 555-567 (2008).
15. Courtneidge, S. A. Cell migration and invasion in human disease: the Tks adaptor proteins. Biochem Soc Trans 40, 129-132 (2012).
16. Stylli, S. S. et al. Nck adaptor proteins link Tks5 to invadopodia actin regulation and ECM degradation. J Cell Sci 122, 2727-2740 (2009).
17. Oikawa, T., Itoh, T. & Takenawa, T. Sequential signals toward podosome formation in NIH-src cells. J Cell Biol 182, 157-169 (2008).
18. Eckert, M. A. & Yang, J. Targeting invadopodia to block breast cancer metastasis. Oncotarget 2, 562-568 (2011).
19. Balzer, E. M. et al. c-Src differentially regulates the functions ofmicrotentacles and invadopodia. Oncogene 29, 6402-6408 (2010).
20. Caldieri, G. et al. Polarised apical-like intracellular sorting and trafficking regulates invadopodia formation and degradation of the extracellular matrix in cancer cells. Eur J Cell Biol 91, 961-968 (2012).
21. Kikuchi, K. & Takahashi, K. WAVE2- and microtubule-dependent formation of long protrusions and invasion of cancer cells cultured on three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Cancer Sci 99, 2252-2259 (2008).
22. Schoumacher, M., Goldman, R. D., Louvard, D. & Vignjevic, D. M. Actin, microtubules, and vimentin intermediate filaments cooperate for elongation of invadopodia. J Cell Biol 189, 541-556 (2010).
23. Branch, K. M., Hoshino, D. & Weaver, A. M. Adhesion rings surround invadopodia and promote maturation. Biol Open 1, 711-722 (2012).
24. Pignatelli, J., Tumbarello, D. A., Schmidt, R. P. & Turner, C. E. Hic-5 promotes invadopodia formation and invasion during TGF-beta-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Cell Biol 197, 421-437 (2012).
25. Oser, M. et al. Cortactin regulates cofilin and N-WASp activities to control the stages of invadopodium assembly and maturation. J Cell Biol 186, 571-587 (2009).
26. DesMarais, V., Ghosh, M., Eddy, R. & Condeelis, J. Cofilin takes the lead. J Cell Sci 118, 19-26 (2005).
27. Revach, O. Y. & Geiger, B. The interplay between the proteolytic, invasive, and adhesive domains of invadopodia and their roles in cancer invasion. Cell AdhMigr 8, 215-225 (2013).
28. Lizarraga, F. et al. Diaphanous-related formins are required for invadopodia formation and invasion of breast tumor cells. Cancer Res 69, 2792-2800 (2009).
29. Kojima, H., Ishijima, A. & Yanagida, T. direct measurement of stiffness of single actin-filaments with and without tropomyosin by in-vitro nanomanipulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 12962-12966 (1994).
30. Caille, N., Thoumine, O., Tardy, Y. & Meister, J. J. Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. J Biomech 35, 177-187 (2002).
31. Azeloglu, E. U., Bhattacharya, J. & Costa, K. D. Atomic force microscope elastography reveals phenotypic differences in alveolar cell stiffness. J Appl Physiol 105, 652-661 (2008).
32. Krause, M., te Riet, J. & Wolf, K. Probing the compressibility of tumor cell nuclei by combined atomic force-confocal microscopy. Phys Biol 10 (2013).
33. Liu, H. J. et al. In Situ mechanical characterization of the cell nucleus by Atomic Force Microscopy. ACS Nano 8, 3821-3828 (2014).
34. Hamilton, G. M. Explicit equations for the stresses beneath a sliding spherical contact. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C-J Eng Mech Eng Sci 197, 53-59 (1983).
35. Guilak, F., Tedrow, J. R. & Burgkart, R. Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 269, 781-786 (2000).
36. Rowat, A. C., Foster, L. J., Nielsen, M. M., Weiss, M. & Ipsen, J. H. Characterization of the elastic properties of the nuclear envelope. J R Soc Interface 2, 63-69 (2005).
37. Swift, J. et al. Nuclear Lamin-a scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrixdirected differentiation. Science 341, 1-33 (2013).
38. Condeelis, J. & Segall, J. E. Intravital imaging of cell movement in tumours. Nat Rev Cancer 3, 921-930 (2003).
39. Gligorijevic, B. et al. N-WASP-mediated invadopodium formation is involved in intravasation and lung metastasis of mammary tumors. J Cell Sci 125, 724-734 (2012).
40. Beerling, E., Ritsma, L., Vrisekoop, N., Derksen, P. W. & van Rheenen, J. Intravital microscopy: new insights into metastasis of tumors. J Cell Sci 124, 299-310 (2011).
41. Magalhaes, M. A. et al. Cortactin phosphorylation regulates cell invasion through a pH-dependent pathway. J Cell Biol 195, 903-920 (2011).
42. Hoshino, D., Branch, K. M. & Weaver, A. M. Signaling inputs to invadopodia and podosomes. J Cell Sci 126, 2979-2989 (2013).
43. Baldassarre, M. et al. Actin dynamics at sites of extracellular matrix degradation. Eur J Cell Biol 85, 1217-1231 (2006).
44. Yamaguchi, H. et al. Molecular mechanisms of invadopodium formation: the role of the N-WASP-Arp2/3 complex pathway and cofilin. J Cell Biol 168, 441-452 (2005).
45. Chen, L., Zhang, J. J. & Huang, X. Y. cAMP inhibits cell migration by interfering with Rac-induced lamellipodium formation. J Biol Chem 283, 13799-13805 (2008).
46. Small, J. V., Stradal, T., Vignal, E. & Rottner, K. The lamellipodium: where motility begins. Trends Cell Biol 12, 112-120 (2002).
47. Machesky, L. M. Lamellipodia and filopodia in metastasis and invasion. FEBS Lett 582, 2102-2111 (2008).
48. Ridley, A. J. Life at the Leading Edge. Cell 145, 1012-1022 (2011).
49. Friedl, P. & Alexander, S. Cancer invasion and the microenvironment: plasticity and reciprocity. Cell 147, 992-1009 (2011).
50. Jerrell, R. J. & Parekh, A. Cellular traction stresses mediate extracellular matrix degradation by invadopodia. Acta Biomater 10, 1886-1896 (2014).
51. Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677-689 (2006).
52. Buxboim, A., Ivanovska, I. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells 'feel' outside and in? J Cell Sci 123, 297-308 (2010).
53. Janmey, P. A. The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: component localization and mechanical coupling. Physiol Rev 78, 763-781 (1998).
54. Li, Q., Kumar, A., Makhija, E. & Shivashankar, G. V. The regulation of dynamic mechanical coupling between actin cytoskeleton and nucleus by matrix geometry. Biomaterials 35, 961-969 (2014).
55. Wang, N., Tytell, J. D. & Ingber, D. E. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10, 75-82 (2009).
56. Lombardi, M. L. & Lammerding, J. Altered mechanical properties of the nucleus in disease. Methods Cell Biol 98, 121-141 (2010).
57. Petrie, R. J., Koo, H. & Yamada, K. M. Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix. Science 345, 1062-1065 (2014).
58. Zhao, T., Graham, O. S., Raposo, A. & St Johnston, D. Growing microtubules push the oocyte nucleus to polarize the Drosophila dorsal-ventral axis. Science 336, 999-1003 (2012).
59. Artym, V. V., Yamada, K. M. & Mueller, S. C. ECM degradation assays for analyzing local cell invasion. Methods Mol Biol 522, 211-219 (2009).
60. Bowden, E. T., Coopman, P. J. & Mueller, S. C. Invadopodia: unique methods for measurement of extracellular matrix degradation in vitro. Methods Cell Biol 63, 613-627 (2001).
61. Hanson, H. H., Reilly, J. E., Lee, R., Janssen, W. G. & Phillips, G. R. Streamlined embedding of cell monolayers on gridded glass-bottom imaging dishes for correlative light and electron microscopy. Microsc Microanal 16, 747-754 (2010).