Differential nuclear shape dynamics of invasive andnon-invasive breast cancer cells are associated with actin cytoskeleton organization and stability

Biochemistry and Cell Biology

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 287-295

  Chiotaki, Rena ^a   Polioudaki, Hara ^a   Theodoropoulos, Panayiotis A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Actin cytoskeleton organization; Cell attachment; Cytoskeleton; Invasive and non invasive breast cancer cells; Nuclear shape and deformability

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; CELLS; DEFORMATION; DRUG THERAPY; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; ACTIN REORGANIZATION; BREAST CANCER CELLS; CELL ATTACHMENTS; CYTOSKELETONS; HYPER-OSMOTIC SHOCK; NUCLEAR ARCHITECTURE; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

PROTEINS;

ACTIN;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CANCER CELL LINE; CANCER CELL; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CELL ADHESION; CELL NUCLEUS MATRIX; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL SPREADING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPOLYMERIZATION; ELASTICITY; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYPEROSMOTIC STRESS; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; INTERMEDIATE FILAMENT; NUCLEAR SHAPE; TUMOR INVASION; WESTERN BLOTTING; BREAST TUMOR; CELL MOTION; CELL NUCLEUS; FEMALE; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR SIZE; PATHOLOGY; PROTEIN STABILITY; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS SHAPE; CELL NUCLEUS SIZE; FEMALE; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMANS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PROTEIN STABILITY;

EID: 84905568364     PISSN: 08298211     EISSN: 12086002     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/bcb-2013-0120     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Blick T. Widodo E. Hugo H. Waltham M. Lenburg M.E. Neve R.M. Thompson E.W. 2008. Epithelial mesenchymal transition traits in human breast cancer cell lines. Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 25 (6): 629-642. 10.1007/s10585-008-9170-6. 18461285.
2. Burke B. Roux K.J. 2009. Nuclei take a position: managing nuclear location. Dev. Cell, 17 (5): 587-597. 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.10.018. 19922864.
3. Capo-chichi C.D. Cai K.Q. Smedberg J. Ganjei-Azar P. Godwin A.K. Xu X.X. 2011. Loss of A-type lamin expression compromises nuclear envelope integrity in breast cancer. Chin. J. Cancer, 30 (6): 415-425. 10.5732/cjc.30.0415. 21627864.
4. Chow K.H. Factor R.E. Ullman K.S. 2012. The nuclear envelope environment and its cancer connections. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 12 (3): 196-209. 10.1038/nrc3219. 22337151.
5. Dahl K.N. Engler A.J. Pajerowski J.D. Discher D.E. 2005. Power-law rheology of isolated nuclei with deformation mapping of nuclear substructures. Biophys. J. 89 (4): 2855-2864. 10.1529/biophysj.105.062554. 16055543.
6. de Las Heras J.I. Batrakou D.G. Schirmer E.C. 2013. Cancer biology and the nuclear envelope: a convoluted relationship. Semin. Cancer Biol. 23 (2): 125-137. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.01.008. 22311402.
7. De Vos W.H. Houben F. Hoebe R.A. Hennekam R. van Engelen B. Manders E.M. et al 2010. Increased plasticity of the nuclear envelope and hypermobility of telomeres due to the loss of A-type lamins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1800 (4): 448-458. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.01.002. 20079404.
8. Friedl P. Wolf K. Lammerding J. 2011. Nuclear mechanics during cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23 (1): 55-64. 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.10.015. 21109415.
9. Fu Y. Chin L.K. Bourouina T. Liu A.Q. VanDongen A.M. 2012. Nuclear deformation during breast cancer cell transmigration. Lab Chip, 12 (19): 3774-3778. 10.1039/c2lc40477j. 22864314.
10. Gerlitz G. Reiner O. Bustin M. 2013. Microtubule dynamics alter the interphase nucleus. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 70 (7): 1255-1268. 10.1007/s00018-012- 1200-5. 23117601.
11. He D.C. Nickerson J.A. Penman S. 1990. Core filaments of the nuclear matrix. J. Cell Biol. 110 (3): 569-580. 10.1083/jcb.110.3.569. 2307700.
12. Imbalzano K.M. Cohet N. Wu Q. Underwood J.M. Imbalzano A.N. Nickerson J.A. 2013. Nuclear shape changes are induced by knockdown of the SWI/SNF ATPase BRG1 and are independent of cytoskeletal connections. PloS One, 8 (2): e55628. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055628. 23405182.
13. Ketema M. Sonnenberg A. 2011. Nesprin-3: a versatile connector between the nucleus and the cytoskeleton. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 39 (6): 1719-1724. 10.1042/BST20110669. 22103514.
14. Khatau S.B. Hale C.M. Stewart-Hutchinson P.J. Patel M.S. Stewart C.L. Searson P.C. et al 2009. A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (45): 19017-19022. 10.1073/pnas.0908686106. 19850871.
15. Khatau S.B. Kim D.H. Hale C.M. Bloom R.J. Wirtz D. 2010. The perinuclear actin cap in health and disease. Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 1 (4): 337-342. 10.4161/nucl.1.4.12331. 21327082.
16. Khatau S.B. Bloom R.J. Bajpai S. Razafsky D. Zang S. Giri A. et al 2012. The distinct roles of the nucleus and nucleus-cytoskeleton connections in three-dimensional cell migration. Sci. Rep. 2: 488. 10.1038/srep00488. 22761994.
17. Lu W. Schneider M. Neumann S. Jaeger V.M. Taranum S. Munck M. et al 2012. Nesprin interchain associations control nuclear size. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69 (20): 3493-3509. 10.1007/s00018-012-1034-1. 22653047.
18. Ma H. Siegel A.J. Berezney R. 1999. Association of chromosome territories with the nuclear matrix. Disruption of human chromosome territories correlates with the release of a subset of nuclear matrix proteins. J. Cell Biol. 146 (3): 531-542. 10.1083/jcb.146.3.531. 10444063.
19. Nagayama K. Yahiro Y. Matsumoto T. 2011. Stress fibers stabilize the position of intranuclear DNA through mechanical connection with the nucleus in vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 585 (24): 3992-3997. 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.11.006. 22094165.
20. Nandakumar V. Kelbauskas L. Hernandez K.F. Lintecum K.M. Senechal P. Bussey K.J. et al 2012. Isotropic 3D nuclear morphometry of normal, fibrocystic and malignant breast epithelial cells reveals new structural alterations. PloS One, 7 (1): e29230. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029230. 22242161.
21. Olins A.L. Olins D.E. 2004. Cytoskeletal influences on nuclear shape in granulocytic HL-60 cells. BMC Cell Biol. 5: 30. 10.1186/1471-2121-5-30. 15317658.
22. Olins A.L. Hoang T.V. Zwerger M. Herrmann H. Zentgraf H. Noegel A.A. et al 2009. The LINC-less granulocyte nucleus. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 88 (4): 203-214. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.10.001. 19019491.
23. Ostlund C. Folker E.S. Choi J.C. Gomes E.R. Gundersen G.G. Worman H.J. 2009. Dynamics and molecular interactions of linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex proteins. J. Cell Sci. 122 (22): 4099-4108. 10.1242/jcs.057075. 19843581.
24. Pajerowski J.D. Dahl K.N. Zhong F.L. Sammak P.J. Discher D.E. 2007. Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (40): 15619-15624. 10.1073/pnas.0702576104. 17893336.
25. Richter K. Nessling M. Lichter P. 2007. Experimental evidence for the influence of molecular crowding on nuclear architecture. J. Cell Sci. 120 (9): 1673-1680. 10.1242/jcs.03440. 17430977.
26. Theodoropoulos P.A. Polioudaki H. Kostaki O. Derdas S.P. Georgoulias V. Dargemont C. Georgatos S.D. 1999. Taxol affects nuclear lamina and pore complex organization and inhibits import of karyophilic proteins into the cell nucleus. Cancer Res. 59 (18): 4625-4633. 10493517.
27. Versaevel M. Grevesse T. Gabriele S. 2012. Spatial coordination between cell and nuclear shape within micropatterned endothelial cells. Nat. Commun. 3: 671. 10.1038/ncomms1668. 22334074.
28. Wang N. Tytell J.D. Ingber D.E. 2009. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10 (1): 75-82. 10.1038/nrm2594. 19197334.
29. Whipple R.A. Balzer E.M. Cho E.H. Matrone M.A. Yoon J.R. Martin S.S. 2008. Vimentin filaments support extension of tubulin-based microtentacles in detached breast tumor cells. Cancer Res. 68 (14): 5678-5688. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6589. 18632620.
30. Whipple R.A. Matrone M.A. Cho E.H. Balzer E.M. Vitolo M.I. Yoon J.R. et al 2010. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition promotes tubulin detyrosination and microtentacles that enhance endothelial engagement. Cancer Res. 70 (20): 8127-8137. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4613. 20924103.