Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 30, Issue 1-2, 2017, Pages 1-21

  Chen Hsieh, Jun Scott ^a   Wu, Wen Chi Vivian ^b   Marek, Michael W ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b PROVIDENCE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c WAYNE STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

flipped classroom; idiomatic acquisition; LINE; MALL; oral training

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958037316     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1111910     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Amer, M., (2014). A study of learners' usage of a mobile learning application for learning idioms and collocations. CALICO Journal, 31(3), 285–302. doi:10.11139/cj.31.3.285–302
2. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., & Pintrich, P.R., (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing:A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. White Plains, NY:Addison Wesley Longman.
3. Asl, F.M., (2013). The impact of context on learning idioms in EFL classes. TESOL Journal, 37(1), 1–12.
4. Baepler, P., Walker, J.D., & Driessen, M., (2014). It's not about seat time:Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236.
5. Bishop, J.L., & Verleger, M.A., (2013). The flipped classroom:A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA:American Society for Engineering Education.
6. Butler, K., & Lumpe, A., (2008). Student use of scaffolding software:Relationships with motivation and conceptual understanding. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 17(5), 427–436. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9111-9
7. Celce-Murcia, M., (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, MA:Heinle & Heinle.
8. Chen, N.S., Hsieh, S.W., & Kinshuk. (2008). Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 93–113.
9. Chen, C.M., & Li, Y.L., (2010). Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(4), 341–364.
10. Clark, D., (2007). Games, motivation & learning. Sunderland:Caspian Learning.
11. Davis, F.D., (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–339.
12. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R., (1989). User acceptance of computer technology:A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1002.
13. Day, J.A., & Foley, J.D., (2006). Evaluating a web lecture intervention in a human-computer interaction course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(4), 420–431.
14. Deslauriers, L., & Wieman, C., (2011). Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods. Physical Review Special Topics, Physics Education Research, 7, 1–6.
15. Dill, E.M., (2012). The impact of flip teaching on student homework completion, behavior, engagement, and proficiency. Armidale:University of New England.
16. Dörnyei, Z., (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems:‘Retrodictive qualitative modeling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching 47(1), 80–91.
17. Eun-ji, B., (2015). Number of LINE users to top 700 mil. this year. Retrieved from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2015/02/419_173201.html
18. Flipped Learning Network. (2014). The four pillars of F-L-I-P. Retrieved from http://flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/Centricity/Domain/46/FLIP_handout_FNL_Web.pdf
19. Fotovatnia, Z., & Khaki, G., (2012). The effect of three techniques for teaching English idioms to Iranian TEFL undergraduates. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(2), 272–281.
20. Fresen, J., (2007). A taxonomy of factors to promote quality web-supported learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(1), 81–94.
21. Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K.M., (2013). A review of flipped learning. Retrieved from http://www.flippedlearning.org/review
22. Hayes, A.F., & Krippendorff, K., (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.
23. Herrald, C.F., & Schiller, N.A., (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
24. Herried, C.F., & Freeman, N.A., (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
25. Horowitz, E.K., Horowitz, M.B., & Cope, J., (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
26. Huang, Y.M., Huang, Y.M., Huang, S.H., & Lin, Y.T., (2011). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system:Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58(1), 273–282.
27. Hung, H.T., (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.967701
28. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A., (2014). NMC horizon report:2014 K-12 edition. Austin, TX:The New Media Consortium.
29. Kahari, L., (2013). The effects of cell phone use on the study habits of University of Zimbabwe first year Faculty of Arts students. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(10), 1–12.
30. Khan, Ö., & Daşkin, N.C., (2014). “You reap what you sow” idioms in materials designed by EFL teacher-trainees. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 8(2), 97–118.
31. Kiernan, P.J., & Aizawa, K., (2004). Cell phones in task based learning–are cell phones useful language learning tools? ReCALL, 16(1), 71–84.
32. Kukulska-Hulme, A., (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165.
33. Kwoen, S.O., & Kim, H.R., (2008). Beyond raw frequency:Incidental vocabulary acquisition in extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 191–215.
34. Liu, D., (2008). Idioms. Description comprehension, acquisition and pedagogy. New York/London:Routledge.
35. Lucke, T., (2014). Using learning analytics to evaluate the effectiveness of the flipped classroom approach. Paper presented at the Australasian Association for Engineering Education 2014 conference, Wellington. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Terry_Lucke/publication/270162113_Using_Learning_Analytics_to_Evaluate_the_Effectiveness_of_the_Flipped_Classroom_Approach/links/54a1e9760cf256bf8baf7b15.pdf
36. Mäntylä, K., (2004). Idioms and language users:The effect of the characteristics of idioms on their recognition and interpretation by native and non-native speakers of English. Jyväskylä:University of Jyväskylä.
37. Marek, M.W., & Wu, P.-H.N., (2012). Selecting CMC systems for EFL Instruction:Can standard social media platforms succeed? In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2012 (pp. 967–972). Chesapeake, VA:AACE.
38. McLaughlin, J.E., Roth, M.T., Glatt, D.M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C.A., Griffin, L.M., … Mumper, R.J., (2014). The flipped classroom:A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236–243.
39. Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T., (2010). Learning outcomes and students' perceptions of online writing:Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38(2), 185–199.
40. Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O'Dowd, D.K., (2010). Learn before lecture:A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 473–481.
41. Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M., Kalman, H., & Kemp, J.E., (2011). Designing effective instruction (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
42. Mortensen, C.J., & Nicholson, A., (2014). Improved student achievement through gamification and the flipped classroom. Paper presented at the ADSA-ASAS Joint Annual Meeting, Kansas City, Mo.
43. Murdock, J.L., & Williams, A.M., (2011). Creating an online learning community:Is it possible? Innovative Higher Education, 36(5), 305–315.
44. Norbrook, H., & Scott, P., (2003). Motivation in mobile modern foreign language learning. In J., Attewell, G.D., Bormida, M., Sharples & C., Savill-Smith (Eds.), MLEARN:Learning with mobile devices (pp. 50–51). London:Learning and Skills Development Agency.
45. November, A., & Mull, B. (2012). Flipped learning:A response to five common criticisms. Retrieved from http://www.eschoolnews.com/2012/03/26/flipped-learning-a-response-to-five-common-criticisms/
46. Phillips, N., & Lindsay, G., (2006). Motivation in gifted students. High Ability Studies, 17(1), 57–73.
47. Prensky, M., (2005). In digital games for education, complexity matters. Educational Technology, 45(4), 22–28.
48. Rahman, A.A., & Mohamed, H., (2014). The influences of flipped classroom:Ameta analysisapproach every student capability in every class. Paper presented at the IEEE 6th International Conference on Engineering Education, Kuala Lumpur.
49. Saran, M., & Seferoğlu, G., (2010). Supporting foreign language vocabulary learning through multimedia messages via mobile phones. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, 252–266.
50. Sarawagi, N., (2014). A flipped CS0 classroom:Applying Bloom's taxonomy to algorithmic thinking. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 29(6), 21–28.
51. Shirazi, M., & Talebinezhad, M., (2013). Developing intermediate EFL learners' metaphorical competence through exposure. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 135–141.
52. Stockwell, G., (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities:Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95–110. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol14num2/stockwell.pdf
53. Stockwell, G., (2013). Tracking learner usage of mobile phones for language learning outside of the classroom. In P., Hubbard, M., Schulze, & B., Smith (Eds.), Learner-computer interaction in language education:A Festschrift in honor of Robert Fischer. CALICO Monograph Series (pp. 118–136). San Marcos, TX:CALICO.
54. Strayer, J.F., (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193.
55. Sweeny, S.M., (2010). Writing for the instant messaging and text messaging generation:Using new literacies to support writing instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54, 121–130.
56. Tărcăoanu, M.C., (2012). Teaching and learning idioms in English (theoretical and practical considerations). Scientific Journal of Humanistic Studies, 4(7), 220–228.
57. Thorne, S.L., Black, R., & Sykes, J., (2009). Second language use, socialization, and learning in internet interest communities and online games. Modern Language Journal, 93, 802–821.
58. Traxler, J., & Riordan, B., (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of retention strategies using SMS, WAP and WWW student support. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences. National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, LTSN.
59. Wen, Q., (2008). On the output-driven hypothesis and reform of English-skill courses for English majors. Foreign Language World, 2, 2–9.
60. Wen, Q., (2013). Application of the output-driven hypothesis in college English teaching; Reflections and suggestions. Foreign Language World, 6, 14–22.
61. Wood, D., (2009). Effects of focused instruction of formulaic sequences on fluent expression in second language narratives:A case study. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 39–57.
62. Wray, A., (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
63. Wu, W.-C.V., Yen, L.L., Marek, M.W., (2011). Using online EFL interaction to increase confidence, motivation, and ability. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 118–129.
64. Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., & Lee, H.W., (2009). Flipping the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/4545