Erratum: Lessons from Domestication: Targeting Cis-Regulatory Elements for Crop Improvement (Trends in Plant Science (2016) 21(6) (506–515), (S1360138516000297), (10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.014));Lessons from Domestication: Targeting Cis-Regulatory Elements for Crop Improvement

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 506-515

  Swinnen, Gwen ^a,b   Goossens, Alain ^a,b   Pauwels, Laurens ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

CRISPR; microRNA; new breeding techniques; non coding; pleiotropy; transcription factor

Indexed keywords

CROP; DOMESTICATION; GENE EDITING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REGULATORY SEQUENCE; TRENDS;

CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; DOMESTICATION; GENE EDITING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; PHENOTYPE; REGULATORY ELEMENTS, TRANSCRIPTIONAL;

EID: 84957669261     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.09.004     Document Type: Erratum

References (98)

1. 1 Doebley, J.F., et al. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127 (2006), 1309–1321.
2. 2 Hufford, M.B., et al. Comparative population genomics of maize domestication and improvement. Nat. Genet. 44 (2012), 808–811.
3. 3 Swanson-Wagner, R., et al. Reshaping of the maize transcriptome by domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 (2012), 11878–11883.
4. 4 Koenig, D., et al. Comparative transcriptomics reveals patterns of selection in domesticated and wild tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 (2013), E2655–E2662.
5. 5 Yoo, M-J., Wendel, J.F., Comparative evolutionary and developmental dynamics of the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fiber transcriptome. PLoS Genet., 10, 2014, e1004073.
6. 6 Rong, J., et al. New insights into domestication of carrot from root transcriptome analyses. BMC Genomics, 15, 2014, 895.
7. 7 Lemmon, Z.H., et al. The role of cis regulatory evolution in maize domestication. PLoS Genet., 10, 2014, e1004745.
8. 8 Morrell, P.L., et al. Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13 (2011), 85–96.
9. 9 Gepts, P., The contribution of genetic and genomic approaches to plant domestication studies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 18 (2014), 51–59.
10. 10 Meyer, R.S., Purugganan, M.D., Evolution of crop species: genetics of domestication and diversification. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14 (2013), 840–852.
11. 11 Doebley, J., Lukens, L., Transcriptional regulators and the evolution of plant form. Plant Cell 10 (1998), 1075–1082.
12. 12 Pickersgill, B., Domestication of plants in the Americas: insights from Mendelian and molecular genetics. Ann. Bot. 100 (2007), 925–940.
13. 13 Lippman, Z., Tanksley, S.D., Dissecting the genetic pathway to extreme fruit size in tomato using a cross between the small-fruited wild species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium and L. esculentum var. Giant Heirloom. Genetics 158 (2001), 413–422.
14. 14 Barrero, L.S., Tanksley, S.D., Evaluating the genetic basis of multiple-locule fruit in a broad cross section of tomato cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109 (2004), 669–679.
15. 15 Barrero, L.S., et al. Developmental characterization of the fasciated locus and mapping of Arabidopsis candidate genes involved in the control of floral meristem size and carpel number in tomato. Genome 49 (2006), 991–1006.
16. 16 Muños, S., et al. Increase in tomato locule number is controlled by two single-nucleotide polymorphisms located near WUSCHEL. Plant Physiol. 156 (2011), 2244–2254.
17. 17 van der Knaap, E., et al. What lies beyond the eye: the molecular mechanisms regulating tomato fruit weight and shape. Front. Plant Sci., 5, 2014, 227.
18. 18 Xu, C., et al. A cascade of arabinosyltransferases controls shoot meristem size in tomato. Nat. Genet. 47 (2015), 784–792.
19. 19 Rodríguez, G.R., et al. Distribution of SUN, OVATE, LC, and FAS in the tomato germplasm and the relationship to fruit shape diversity. Plant Physiol. 156 (2011), 275–285.
20. 20 Schoof, H., et al. The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems in maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell 100 (2000), 635–644.
21. 21 Huang, Z., van der Knaap, E., Tomato fruit weight 11.3 maps close to fasciated on the bottom of chromosome 11. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123 (2011), 465–474.
22. 22 Sakamoto, T., Matsuoka, M., Identifying and exploiting grain yield genes in rice. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11 (2008), 209–214.
23. 23 Wang, S., et al. The OsSPL16-GW7 regulatory module determines grain shape and simultaneously improves rice yield and grain quality. Nat. Genet. 47 (2015), 949–954.
24. 24 Houston, K., et al. Variation in the interaction between alleles of HvAPETALA2 and microRNA172 determines the density of grains on the barley inflorescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 (2013), 16675–16680.
25. 25 Mejia-Guerra, M.K., et al. From plant gene regulatory grids to network dynamics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1819 (2012), 454–465.
26. 26 Carroll, S.B., Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134 (2008), 25–36.
27. 27 Streisfeld, M.A., Rausher, M.D., Population genetics, pleiotropy, and the preferential fixation of mutations during adaptive evolution. Evolution 65 (2011), 629–642.
28. 28 Lenser, T., Theißen, G., Molecular mechanisms involved in convergent crop domestication. Trends Plant Sci. 18 (2013), 704–714.
29. 29 Wessinger, C.A., Rausher, M.D., Lessons from flower colour evolution on targets of selection. J. Exp. Bot. 63 (2012), 5741–5749.
30. 30 Wittkopp, P.J., Kalay, G., Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13 (2011), 59–69.
31. 31 Pan, I.L., et al. Functional diversification of AGAMOUS lineage genes in regulating tomato flower and fruit development. J. Exp. Bot. 61 (2010), 1795–1806.
32. 32 Zuo, J., et al. The WUSCHEL gene promotes vegetative-to-embryonic transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 30 (2002), 349–359.
33. 33 Wang, S., et al. Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice. Nat. Genet. 44 (2012), 950–954.
34. 34 Hoekstra, H.E., Coyne, J.A., The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61 (2007), 995–1016.
35. 35 Wray, G.A., The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8 (2007), 206–216.
36. 36 Kaufmann, K., et al. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) of plant transcription factors followed by sequencing (ChIP-SEQ) or hybridization to whole genome arrays (ChIP-CHIP). Nat. Protoc. 5 (2010), 457–472.
37. 37 Thomas-Chollier, M., et al. RSAT peak-motifs: motif analysis in full-size ChIP-seq datasets. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, 2012, e31.
38. 38 Franco-Zorrilla, J.M., et al. DNA-binding specificities of plant transcription factors and their potential to define target genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 (2014), 2367–2372.
39. 39 Lindemose, S., et al. A DNA-binding-site landscape and regulatory network analysis for NAC transcription factors in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 42 (2014), 7681–7693.
40. 40 Weirauch, M.T., et al. Determination and inference of eukaryotic transcription factor sequence specificity. Cell 158 (2014), 1431–1443.
41. 41 Goossens, A., It is easy to get huge candidate gene lists for plant metabolism now, but how to get beyond?. Mol. Plant 8 (2015), 2–5.
42. 42 Li, B., et al. Promoter-based integration in plant defense regulation. Plant Physiol. 166 (2014), 1803–1820.
43. 43 Taylor-Teeples, M., et al. An Arabidopsis gene regulatory network for secondary cell wall synthesis. Nature 517 (2014), 571–575.
44. 44 Shaikhali, J., et al. The CRYPTOCHROME1-dependent response to excess light is mediated through the transcriptional activators ZINC FINGER PROTEIN EXPRESSED IN INFLORESCENCE MERISTEM LIKE1 and ZML2 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24 (2012), 3009–3025.
45. 45 Fujita, T., et al. Identification of telomere-associated molecules by engineered DNA-binding molecule-mediated chromatin immunoprecipitation (enChIP). Sci. Rep., 3, 2013, 3171.
46. 46 John, S., et al. Genome-scale mapping of DNase I hypersensitivity. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol., 27, 2013, 21.27.
47. 47 Sung, M-H., et al. DNase footprint signatures are dictated by factor dynamics and DNA sequence. Mol. Cell 56 (2014), 275–285.
48. 48 Zhang, W., et al. Genome-wide identification of regulatory DNA elements and protein-binding footprints using signatures of open chromatin in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24 (2012), 2719–2731.
49. 49 Sullivan, A.M., et al. Mapping and dynamics of regulatory DNA and transcription factor networks in A. thaliana. Cell Rep. 8 (2014), 2015–2030.
50. 50 Sullivan, A.M., et al. DNase I hypersensitivity mapping, genomic footprinting, and transcription factor networks in plants. Curr. Plant Biol. 3-4 (2015), 40–47.
51. 51 Pajoro, A., et al. Dynamics of chromatin accessibility and gene regulation by MADS-domain transcription factors in flower development. Genome Biol., 15, 2014, R41.
52. 52 Buenrostro, J.D., et al. ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol., 109, 2015, 21.29.
53. 53 Van de Velde, J., et al. Inference of transcriptional networks in Arabidopsis through conserved noncoding sequence analysis. Plant Cell 26 (2014), 2729–2745.
54. 54 De Witte, D., et al. BLSSpeller: exhaustive comparative discovery of conserved cis-regulatory elements. Bioinformatics 31 (2015), 3758–3766.
55. 55 Varshney, R.K., et al. Harvesting the promising fruits of genomics: applying genome sequencing technologies to crop breeding. PLoS Biol., 12, 2014, e1001883.
56. 56 Canver, M.C., et al. BCL11A enhancer dissection by Cas9-mediated in situ saturating mutagenesis. Nature 527 (2015), 192–197.
57. 57 Kuscu, C., et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals characteristics of off-target sites bound by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 677–683.
58. 58 Wu, X., et al. Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 670–676.
59. 59 Ran, F.A., et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520 (2015), 186–191.
60. 60 Steinert, J., et al. Highly efficient heritable plant genome engineering using Cas9 orthologues from Streptococcus thermophilus and Staphylococcus aureus. Plant J. 84 (2015), 1295–1305.
61. 61 Kleinstiver, B.P., et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523 (2015), 481–485.
62. 62 Schiml, S., et al. The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny. Plant J. 80 (2014), 1139–1150.
63. 63 Wang, Y., et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 947–951.
64. 64 Li, T., et al. High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 30 (2012), 390–392.
65. 65 Antony, G., et al. Rice xa13 recessive resistance to bacterial blight is defeated by induction of the disease susceptibility gene Os-11N3. Plant Cell 22 (2010), 3864–3876.
66. 66 Vierstra, J., et al. Functional footprinting of regulatory DNA. Nat. Methods 12 (2015), 927–930.
67. 67 Hou, J., et al. A Tourist-like MITE insertion in the upstream region of the BnFLC.A10 gene is associated with vernalization requirement in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). BMC Plant Biol., 12, 2012, 238.
68. 68 Butelli, E., et al. Retrotransposons control fruit-specific, cold-dependent accumulation of anthocyanins in blood oranges. Plant Cell 24 (2012), 1242–1255.
69. 69 Liu, B., et al. The soybean stem growth habit gene Dt1 is an ortholog of Arabidopsis TERMINAL FLOWER1. Plant Physiol. 153 (2010), 198–210.
70. 70 Espley, R.V., et al. Multiple repeats of a promoter segment causes transcription factor autoregulation in red apples. Plant Cell 21 (2009), 168–183.
71. 71 Zhu, Z., et al. Genetic control of inflorescence architecture during rice domestication. Nat. Commun., 4, 2013, 2200.
72. 72 Li, Y., et al. Natural variation in GS5 plays an important role in regulating grain size and yield in rice. Nat. Genet. 43 (2011), 1266–1269.
73. 73 Xu, C., et al. Differential expression of GS5 regulates grain size in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 66 (2015), 2611–2623.
74. 74 Konishi, S., et al. An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice domestication. Science 312 (2006), 1392–1396.
75. 75 Lu, L., et al. Evolution and association analysis of Ghd7 in rice. PLoS ONE, 7, 2012, e34021.
76. 76 Wang, E., et al. Control of rice grain-filling and yield by a gene with a potential signature of domestication. Nat. Genet. 40 (2008), 1370–1374.
77. 77 Oikawa, T., et al. The birth of a black rice gene and its local spread by introgression. Plant Cell 27 (2015), 2401–2414.
78. 78 Wang, L., et al. Regulatory change at Physalis Organ Size 1 correlates to natural variation in tomatillo reproductive organ size. Nat. Commun., 5, 2014, 4271.
79. 79 Frary, A., et al. fw2. 2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289 (2000), 85–88.
80. 80 Cong, B., et al. Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (2002), 13606–13611.
81. 81 Chakrabarti, M., et al. A cytochrome P450 regulates a domestication trait in cultivated tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 (2013), 17125–17130.
82. 82 Nakamura, S., et al. A wheat homolog of MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 acts in the regulation of germination. Plant Cell 23 (2011), 3215–3229.
83. 83 Zhang, J., et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism at the Vrn-D1 promoter region in common wheat is associated with vernalization response. Theor. Appl. Genet. 125 (2012), 1697–1704.
84. 84 This, P., et al. Wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) color associates with allelic variation in the domestication gene VvmybA1. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114 (2007), 723–730.
85. 85 Studer, A., et al. Identification of a functional transposon insertion in the maize domestication gene tb1. Nat. Genet. 43 (2011), 1160–1163.
86. 86 Yang, Q., et al. CACTA-like transposable element in ZmCCT attenuated photoperiod sensitivity and accelerated the postdomestication spread of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 (2013), 16969–16974.
87. 87 Han, J-J., et al. Pod corn is caused by rearrangement at the Tunicate1 locus. Plant Cell 24 (2012), 2733–2744.
88. 88 Wingen, L.U., et al. Molecular genetic basis of pod corn (Tunicate maize). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 (2012), 7115–7120.
89. 89 Salvi, S., et al. Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (2007), 11376–11381.
90. 90 Wills, D.M., et al. From many, one: genetic control of prolificacy during maize domestication. PLoS Genet., 9, 2013, e1003604.
91. 91 Miwa, H., et al. Plant meristems: CLAVATA3/ESR-related signaling in the shoot apical meristem and the root apical meristem. J. Plant Res. 122 (2009), 31–39.
92. 92 Sun, B., Ito, T., Regulation of floral stem cell termination in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci., 6, 2015, 17.
93. 93 Lenhard, M., et al. Termination of stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis floral meristems by interactions between WUSCHEL and AGAMOUS. Cell 105 (2001), 805–814.
94. 94 Lohmann, J.U., et al. A molecular link between stem cell regulation and floral patterning in Arabidopsis. Cell 105 (2001), 793–803.
95. 95 Liu, X., et al. AGAMOUS terminates floral stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis by directly repressing WUSCHEL through recruitment of Polycomb Group proteins. Plant Cell 23 (2011), 3654–3670.
96. 96 Fernandez-Pozo, N., et al. The Sol Genomics Network (SGN) – from genotype to phenotype to breeding. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 (2015), D1036–D1041.
97. 97 Klein, J., et al. A new family of DNA binding proteins includes putative transcriptional regulators of the Antirrhinum majus floral meristem identity gene SQUAMOSA. Mol. Gen. Genet. 250 (1996), 7–16.
98. 98 Liang, X., et al. Identification of a consensus DNA-binding site for the Arabidopsis thaliana SBP domain transcription factor, AtSPL14, and binding kinetics by surface plasmon resonance. Biochemistry 47 (2008), 3645–3653.